FOCUS: Step 3 – Breaking Through Brick Walls Using Y-DNA and Mitochondrial DNA

In the first three articles of this series, we:

  1. Selected a brick-walled ancestor we’d like to find
  2. Learned how to overcome the hurdle of DNA matches without trees
  3. Discussed methods to locate our ancestors’ mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and Y-DNA

I suggest reading these articles in order.

In this article, we’re going to learn how to use mitochondrial DNA or Y-DNA to help identify the ancestor you’re seeking.

Multiple Levels of Information

Mitochondrial DNA and Y-DNA testers receive important information that includes matching with other testers, several interpretive tools and reports, and a haplogroup which is the key to unlocking the past.

Since people have tested at varying levels, or maybe they’ve simply obtained a partial haplogroup from autosomal testing, you may encounter varying levels of information about the same ancestor.

As we noted in Finding the Y-DNA and Mitochondrial DNA of Your Ancestors, you could be working with:

  • The most refined haplogroup possible if you or the tester has tested at either the mtFull or the Big Y-700 test level at FamilyTreeDNA.
  • A full haplogroup, whether you have access through the tester’s account, which provides additional tools, such as matches, or access to the haplogroup only, meaning not directly through the tester’s account.
  • A partial haplogroup if the tester has tested at a lower level, or the haplogroup was determined through an autosomal DNA test. Autosomal tests only provide partial haplogroups.
  • Minimum information, meaning an unknown haplogroup level without access to the tester’s account information.

All of these can be useful, but for our example, we’re assuming account-level access along with the highest testing level, which provides the most refined haplogroup possible.

Also note that both Y-DNA at the Big Y-700 level and mitochondrial DNA haplogroups at the mtFull level are evergreen. This means that when more people’s test results produce additional mutations that you share, and that qualify for a new haplogroup, you’ll automatically receive that new haplogroup.

New Y-DNA haplogroups are typically added within a few days or a couple of weeks after the new tester’s results are complete. For mitochondrial DNA, an updated Mitotree is calculated every few weeks, and your haplogroup may be refined from time to time.

Matches are the Backbone of DNA Testing

As with all types of DNA testing, matches are critically important.

With Y-DNA matching, the tester typically has the benefit of a recognizable, or at least similar, surname on their match list. However, that’s not always the case.

I’m starting with the results of one of my Estes cousins who has taken the Big Y-700 test as an example because it affords me the opportunity to review all of the genealogical benefits of the highest testing level.

My cousin’s Big Y-700 haplogroup is R-ZS3700, which was formed about 1750 CE. Note that all haplogroup origin dates are actually a range.

Using the results of Big Y-700 testers combined with genealogy, we know exactly which of the Estes males developed that mutation.

Prior to taking the Big Y-700 test, my cousin’s predicted haplogroup based on STR testing was R-M269, a difference of about 6,200 years.

If you’re a new tester, a haplogroup from 6,450 years ago versus one that places you directly as a descendant of Moses Estes, born in 1711 in King and Queen County, Virginia, is night and day.

Y-DNA Testing and Matching Levels

All Y-DNA testers receive the regular STR (Short Tandem Repeat) panel matches at the level they’ve purchased – ranging from 12-111 markers, including all markers beneath that level.

Testers at the now obsolete Big Y-500 and current Big Y-700 level also receive 500 and 700 STR markers, but the SNPs (Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms) revealed at this level of testing greatly overshadow the usefulness of those additional STR markers.

Men who take the Big Y-700 test receive Big Y-700 SNP matching separately from STR panel matching on their dashboard.

12-111 STR Panel Matches

Clicking on “Y-DNA Matches” under “Y-DNA Results and Tools” shows the tester’s STR panel matches at various levels. Big Y testers should not ignore these because not all people have tested at the Big Y-700 level.

Click any image to enlarge

At the top of the matching display, note that the STR match levels are shown. Matching defaults to the testing level of the tester. In this case, my cousin took the Big Y-700 test, so the matches he’ll see first are his 40 111-marker matches.

Not everyone has tested at that level.

The very first Y-DNA test offered in this industry 26 years ago was at FamilyTreeDNA and was only 12 markers. It was revolutionary at the time, affording genealogists the ability to determine if two men with the same surname were descended from the same paternal line. This also means that FamilyTreeDNA has men in their database that testers can match today who tested a generation ago, many of whom have since passed away.

Over the years, the tests have expanded and improved. Today, men can purchase the introductory 37-marker test, which includes the 12- and 25-marker levels, or the 111-marker test, which includes all the lower levels. Big Y-700 testers receive everything, plus a substantial amount of additional information not available with the STR tests.

Notice that our Estes tester has 40 111-marker matches, but 238 12-marker matches. This is due, in part, to the fact that many men have not upgraded to the higher-level tests. Some men will match on the 12-marker test but will have too many mismatches at higher-level testing. Generally, when both men are being compared at the same level, the higher-level tests ferret out matches that occur simply because they share a very old and distant haplogroup.

The “Genetic Distance” step number is NOT the number of generations difference, but the number of mutational steps separating the results at the level being viewed.

H Estes, the first match, tested at the 111-marker level, so 1-111 markers are being compared. My cousin and H Estes have a “1-step” difference at 111 markers. That means H Estes matches my cousin on 110 of the 111 markers in that panel.

The values of those markers can be viewed under the “Y-STR Results” under the “See More” tab, but the values themselves are not generally informative. You cannot see your matches’ values unless they have joined a group project. Some group projects are displayed publicly, and some are not.

If a tester has joined a DNA Group Project, such as the Estes Project, the values for consenting participants can be seen there, along with additional information such as the Earliest Known Ancestor (EKA).

In general, the fewer the mismatches, the closer the relationship. That said, STR (Short Tandem Repeat) markers are inherently unstable. Mutations and back-mutations can happen at any time, which sometimes makes the results misleading. Haplogroup-defining SNP mutations don’t suffer from that issue.

You can also see project members listed in Group Time Tree format as we discussed in the third FOCUS article, here.

More Hints on the Matches Page

Additional important genealogy hints on the Matches page include the “Paternal Country of Origin” and, of course, the “Earliest Known Ancestor.”

Always check the trees of your matches, even if the match has a different surname. Adoptions, both formal and informal, have been going on as long as there have been humans, and family trees can also hold location proximity information. Think, “right time, right place.”

In the second article, FOCUS: Step 1 – Seven Solutions for DNA Matches with Absent or Shrunken Trees, we discussed how to work around small or absent trees.

Be sure to inspect every match level. Some people view their 111-marker matches but ignore their 12-marker or other match levels.

In this case, there are 198 more 12-marker matches than 111-marker matches, so don’t neglect to review each one. Think of it this way – there are 198 hints you’re missing if you don’t.

Depending on where mutations randomly happened to occur, you may NOT match someone at the 12-marker level that you DO match at higher levels, so you can’t always assume that all of your 25-marker matches are shown at the 12-marker level or vice versa.

In the Estes lineage, we’ve been recruiting males and solving mysteries for 25 years now, but not every lineage has this many testers with surname matches. Then, of course, there’s mitochondrial DNA, where surnames won’t meaningfully match testers.

Mitochondrial DNA Matching

People working with mitochondrial DNA consider Y-DNA testers fortunate because their surname tends to remain the same across generations, at least in some parts of the world.

For the most part, mitochondrial DNA matching is the same as Y-DNA matches, except:

  • You seldom recognize a surname
  • If you do recognize a surname, it won’t be the tester’s surname that matches yours, but perhaps you’ll recognize the surname of their Earliest Known Ancestor
  • You have a Mitotree Haplogroup in addition to the mtDNA Haplogroup
  • You have an F number, which is your haplotype cluster number, in addition to your Mitotree Haplogroup

All people who take or upgrade to the mtFull level test will receive a new Mitotree haplogroup in addition to the older legacy haplogroup. Mitotree was released in 2025 and restructured the entire mitochondrial DNA tree of humankind.

People who only took the HVR1 (Hypervariable Region 1) or HVR1+HVR2 Plus level tests can’t receive the new haplogroup because not enough locations have been tested, so you’ll only see their legacy haplogroup when you’re viewing your lower-level matches. Don’t neglect your HVR1 and HVR2 matches, because the very hint you need may be waiting there.

Your Coding Region matches include the entire mitochondrial sequence – in other words – the mtFull test.

About Haplotype Clusters

As part of your Mitotree haplogroup, you also have a haplotype cluster number which begins with F. The number itself doesn’t matter. The message does.

The mitochondrial DNA matching system excludes several unstable markers because they may provide essentially false matches. However, they can sometimes be useful genealogically, so we have multiple matching criteria.

  • Rose’s example: The genetic distance matching excludes unstable markers such as 315.1, so it’s possible to have an “Exact Match” under Genetic Distance, but a different F number because not every location matches.
  • Anastasia’s example: It’s NOT possible to have a “1 step” Genetic Distance, but the same haplotype cluster F number. It is possible to have the same haplogroup.
  • Per’s example: An identical F number, or haplotype cluster, means you match exactly, INCLUDING any excluded or unstable markers, such as 315.1.

In other words, proceed with caution, and your mileage may vary.

Check marks in the blue boxes mean you have the same haplogroup and/or the same haplotype cluster as your match.

I wrote about haplotype clusters here and here.

Identifying Sophia

In this example, Ms. Traxler and Mr. Lyman are exact matches in the regular “Genetic Distance” matching, their haplogroup, and the new Mitotree haplotype clusters.

In the third example, Ms. Crosbie has a 1-step difference, which means, in this case, she is missing a haplogroup-defining mutation. We know this because her haplogroup is V216a instead of V216a2. And of course, she doesn’t match our tester exactly, so they don’t share an F number either.

The tester, a family member, was brick-walled at his great-grandmother, Sophia Smith, born in 1877, someplace, and died in 1950 in Richland County, Ohio. It seemed like she was dropped off by the stork in the middle of a field, because records about her didn’t seem to exist.

Even though the surnames are different, and Traxler doesn’t have a tree, the name Schmidt in the EKA field caught my eye. Smith is Schmidt in German, and I knew the tester had German heritage in other lines, but Sophia Smith was supposed to be English.

Sophia Smith was married to John Rittinger. That, plus their children’s names, was all I had, but it was eventually enough.

I clicked on the match’s EKA link, and it showed that Elizabeth Schmidt Hornung was born in 1888 and died in 1930.

At this point, I’m wondering whether Schmidt was a middle name or a birth surname.

Two days and a sleepless night later, I had discovered that Hornung was her married name, and Elizabeth Schmidt had married Karl Hornung. As these things tend to do, one thing led to another, and eventually, sorting through newspaper articles, death certificates, and a bunch of misinformation, misspelled names, dead ends, and wrong turns, I found information linking Elizabeth to her brother, Joseph, who connected to their sister, Sophia Schmidt. But was Sophia Schmidt the same person as Sophia Smith?

Finally, running on pure caffeine and determination, I found Elizabeth Hornung’s death announcement in the newspaper, where it gave the names of her siblings, including Mrs. John Rittinger. Now I needed to connect a few final dots to verify that her sister was, in fact, that same Mrs. John Rittinger (by several spellings).

I eventually connected even more dots and discovered the family was from Timisoara, Romania, even though the area where they lived changed borders more than once and fell within the multiple countries of the Austro-Hungarian Empire.

Then, I discovered their parents’ names, but the parents never immigrated, and we don’t know any more about them. Unfortunately, that area was terribly ravaged by WWII, which is what spurred immigration.

The point being that it’s incredibly important to follow every available clue, even if it seems rather pointless. You never know which tidbit is the right one, and if you skip them, you’ll never make that breakthrough.

Follow your exact haplotype cluster matches first, then your exact and one-step regular matches, then your haplogroup-only matches, and then your near-haplogroup matches.

What if the Y-DNA Match Surnames Aren’t the Same as Yours?

Let’s say you take a Y-DNA test and your surname is Estes. Furthermore, your father and grandfather carry the same surname.

So, you didn’t expect to see this on your match page.

First, breathe.

Second, you’re looking at 12-marker matches. It’s not at all uncommon for men within a core haplogroup, like R, to match at the 12-marker level even though they may not have shared a common paternal ancestor in thousands of years.

Panning for Gold

But wait, you’re saying, you just told me not to ignore 12-marker matches.

At 12 markers, you’ll need to focus on your own or similar surnames. It’s like panning for gold.

At 12 markers, my Estes cousin has a total of:

  • 35 Estes matches
  • 2 Easter matches
  • 1 Eastes match
  • 3 Eastridge matches

This means that he also has 197 non-similar surname matches.

The information you need may well be buried in the information provided by those 12-marker Estes or similar surname matches.

For example, if your surname is Eastridge or Easter, you might want to look at historical documents to compare your ancestors’ surnames. We now know that Easter happened sometime near the Civil War in North Carolina, probably because the final S in Estes was interpreted as an R. The circumstances surrounding Eastridge are less clear, but we know roughly when and where it occurred in North Carolina.

A group of researchers spent years trying to unravel the Eastridge mystery and have narrowed the event to a specific North Carolina county.

On the other hand, if an Easter or Eastridge male takes the Big Y-700 test, he will know immediately if he falls into this Estes grouping, and where, or if he belongs to a different genetic lineage.

A Genetic Detour

However, if your surname is Jones and you match a large number of Estes males at the highest testing levels, and you don’t match any or many other men by your surname, that might be a significant hint about your brick-walled ancestor.

The telltale sign may be that you can track your surname and DNA matching back a couple of generations, then nothing. I recommend working progressively upstream, testing male-line descendants of different sons in each generation, if possible.

In this example, John Jones is the progenitor of the Jones family. According to the genealogy, he had three sons, Elijah, Sidney and William.

In this hypothetical situation, Rodney Jones’ descendant tested and discovered that he matched a whole group of Estes men, many with his own haplogroup – R-ZS3700. A descendant of Nathaniel Jones, a second son of William Jones, tested and confirmed that he matches the descendant of Rodney.

So far, so good.

Next, a direct male-line descendant of Sidney Jones tested and sure enough, he’s a member of haplogroup J. Hmmm. We need another Jones male that descends from another son of John as a tiebreaker. Lucky for our tester, further investigation revealed that Sidney’s descendant matches a descendant of Elijah Jones, another son of John.

This tells us exactly where the genetic break in the Jones line occurred. Between John and William Jones. You may have heard this situation referred to as a “misattributed paternity,” or an NPE, “not parent expected,” but we really know what happened, or why, without additional research.

Caution – Don’t Jump!

A word of caution here. Never, ever jump to conclusions about “cheating wives.” While that’s one possibility, there are several other circumstances we need to consider and rule out first.

In many cases, a young widow remarried, and her baby took the stepfather’s surname. The “adoption” wasn’t remarkable. Adoptions in 1600s, 1700s, 1800s and into the 1900s were informal, not legal affairs. Everyone at the time knew about it, but over the generations it was forgotten until DNA testing shocked everyone.

In another case, a widow had two children more than 9 months after her husband died and both children took the deceased husband’s surname, which was then their mother’s surname.

When making these discoveries, we also need to keep in mind that not all sexual encounters were consensual.

Sometimes, the situation is complicated. I know of a case during the Civil War where a woman traded favors with a soldier of the opposing army for food for her children. Her husband returned home to a pregnant wife, but his wife and children had all lived, and he simply raised that child as his own. That family’s oral history was confirmed by DNA testing.

Now, in our example, given that our Jones tester carries haplogroup R-ZS3700, we know that he descends from Moses Estes, born in 1711, the progenitor of that haplogroup. We need to begin by working down the genealogical tree with Moses and look for an Estes male in the same location as William Jones’ mother about 10 months before his birth. Also consider factors like warfare and trader movement. Check the census for missing children, or a child that suddenly appears in a later census that should have been recorded with the family in an earlier census. Notice anomalies.

Look for the surname you match the most closely in that location and at that time. Right time, right place, and opportunity.

And of course, to complicate things further, don’t assume that the mother was the mother either. Sometimes both parents died and someone took the child to raise as their own. Review all of the evidence at hand with fresh eyes.

Matches Map

Another matching feature for both Y-DNA and mtDNA includes the Matches Map.

For Y-DNA, the Matches Map can be found under the “See More” tab.

For mitochondrial DNA, it’s found under “mtDNA Results and Tools.”

While the Matches page and Discover reports both provide the Country of Origin, the Matches Map provides a specific location where your match’s earliest known ancestor is found. Be sure to select the match level using the drop-down in the upper left-hand corner, or no results will display, and you’ll receive the message that there are no results available.

The Matches Map is extremely useful for quickly identifying common locations, especially when surnames don’t match.

The Matches Map utilizes the location entered for your EKA.

Add Your Earliest Known Ancestor and Locations

Please be sure to add your Earliest Known Ancestor and their location under the drop-down beside your name at the upper right-hand corner of your dashboard page. Click on the gear for “Account Settings,” then “Genealogy.”

You don’t need to know the longitude and latitude. Just click on “Update Location,” which takes you to the map where you can simply search for and select the location, which updates these fields.

An identical field for your matrilineal line is found below the paternal section. For purposes of clarification, this is NOT any woman on your “maternal” line, and NOT the “earliest known person” on your maternal side. The ancestor must be a female, and it is ONLY ever your mother’s mother’s mother’s direct matrilineal line – through all women – to the end of that line.

If you see a male EKA in your mitochondrial DNA match list, you know the tester was confused about what to enter here. Hopefully they have a tree that you can view to find the correct EKA.

In addition to your EKA, please add the list of your family surnames, your Family Tree, and a link to your profile at WikiTree while you’re there. You’ll see in just a minute why that information is so important and how it benefits your genealogy.

The Difficult Moore Line

Let’s look at a much more difficult scenario.

My James Moore line (c1720-c1798) is my decades-long brick wall. He first appears in Amelia County, VA, and then moved to Halifax County. His wife was Mary Rice. His life before that is a blank slate, despite my earlier efforts and those of several cousins. I wrote about him here and here.

My Moore cousin, who is deceased, so cannot upgrade his Y-DNA test from its original 12 markers, has only three matches at the 12-marker level. This is all I have to work with except for his autosomal Family Finder results.

Note that one of his matches tested at the 12-marker level, one at 37 markers, and one at 111 markers. Each man would have received a predicted haplogroup based on his STR marker test. Recently, if they had taken a Family Finder test, their predicted haplogroup would have been updated and overwritten by a confirmed haplogroup derived from Family Finder.

Not only are Family Finder haplogroups more specific and closer in time than predicted haplogroups from STR tests, but they are also SNP-confirmed, not predicted.

Keep in mind that not all autosomal DNA chips were programmed to read the same Y-DNA and mtDNA locations. At that time, they were never intended to be used for this purpose, which probably explains the two different haplogroups for the Moore men.

My Moore cousin’s original predicted haplogroup based on his STR test was J-M102. His Family Finder results updated his haplogroup to J-M241, while his matches are J-Z631.

Using Discover’s Compare feature, we find that:

  • J-M102 developed about 16,000 years ago
  • J-M241 developed about 9,500 years ago
  • J-Z631 developed about 2,950 years ago

While their haplogroups don’t match because they come from different sources, they are still in the same genetic lineage on the Y-DNA phylogenetic tree. In other words, they don’t preclude a common ancestor. Since they also match on their STR markers and share the same surname, we don’t need to be terribly concerned about false Y-DNA matches.

I’ve tried to break through this brick wall many times, but let’s try again using new information.

To begin with, there are many more genealogy resources available now than when my cousin and these other men tested. I had originally communicated with all three of his matches when they initially matched, and they provided me with what little they knew.

I still have that information entered into a tiny tree on my computer. I have not been able to get ahold of these men now in several years, so I’m VERY glad that I reached out when I did. Reach out and collaborate now. You never know when it’s too late.

Y-DNA Plus Family Finder Yields More Hints

Let’s move to my Moore cousin’s autosomal Family Finder matches and see if there’s any additional help buried there.

Searching his Family Finder match list for “Moore” produces 39 people with the Moore surname, and 256 people with the Moore surname either in their own name or their surname list. This is why entering your list of ancestral surnames is important.

I selected the 39 Moore surname matches, then focused on the males’ Y-DNA haplogroups. Our Moore cousin’s haplogroup is J-M241, and his Y-DNA matches’ haplogroups are all J-Z631.

Haplogroups derived from autosomal testing are very useful when viewing autosomal matches with Moore men. As you can see, these Moore men aren’t in the same major haplogroup as our line, so even though they share the same surname, it’s happenstance. Their haplogroup results preclude matches due to their Moore direct paternal line.

Autosomal transfer haplogroups do not update Y-DNA haplogroups and are not displayed to autosomal matches due to quality and consistency challenges.

Working with the rest of my Moore cousin’s autosomal matches, I did not find others who match with haplogroup J and the Moore surname.

If I had found another Moore male that fell someplace in the same branch of haplogroup J, I could use autosomal tools to view shared “in common” matches and triangulate segments to identify others who share that specific lineage. Autosomal matches’ trees plus the genealogy work I’m doing on the trees of the Y-DNA testers might lead to a breakthrough on the Moore line that is severely brick-walled in colonial Virginia.

This approach didn’t work this time, but new matches appear all the time, and autosomal matches may help.

However, we’re not done.

Advanced Matching

FamilyTreeDNA provides an Advanced Matches feature that allows you to select matching criteria across different tests to see whether anyone matches you on those combined criteria.

You’ll find “Advanced Matches” in the “Additional Tests and Tools” section.

You can select the tests to compare to see if people match you on ALL of the criteria you choose.

Yes, ALL is bold red because if you select any of the “Select All” features – that means everything. So, if you select “All Y-DNA” you must match at the 12, 25, 37, 67 and 111 marker levels – not just one of them. If someone doesn’t meet the matching criteria at any individual selected level, that person won’t show on the combined match list.

So, select one Y-DNA choice that both people have, plus Family Finder.

Then, CHECK “YES” under “Show only people I match in all selected tests.” Otherwise, you’ll see everyone you match on both tests, combined.

In this example, one of my cousins matches a Morrow male on both the 12-marker test and the Family Finder test. If I had NOT checked “yes,” I would have seen all of my cousin’s Y-DNA AND all of his Family Finder matches on this list.

Is Morrow the same paternal lineage as Moore? We don’t know. Matching on both tests DOES NOT mean your match is from the same line.

However, this possibility absolutely warrants additional investigation.

Big Y Matching

Big Y matches and tools are displayed separately from STR matches.

The only reason I look at the matches page is to see who has a tree, because the most useful information is provided on the Block Tree and in Discover.

Big Y Block Tree

The Block Tree is an alternate way to view tree relationships over time.

The block tree shows a top-down genetic view of the original Estes line out of Kent. The primary named haplogroup is R-BY482, shown at the top of the blue block labeled “Estes in Kent.” The haplogroup names, like BY483 shown in that same block, mean that all of the men within and beneath that block also have those SNP mutations. Someday, a man may come along and test who does NOT have all of those mutations, or has additional mutations, and may be a candidate to form a new haplogroup.

For genealogy, the point is to see who you’re genetically the closest to.

In this case, our Estes tester falls into the Moses descendant group with haplogroup R-ZS3700. Because other men have already tested and we’ve done that associated genealogy work, we know that this mutation occurred with the birth of Moses Estes, who was born in Virginia in 1711.

Another branch, the James Carroll Estes line, has been defined beneath Moses’ line. If you were to take a DNA test and find yourself in haplogroup R-BY154784, you would know that your ancestor was born to a son of James Carroll Estes who was born in 1860 – so not many generations back in time. You’ll notice a man with the surname of Wilbur in this branch. Sometime, and in some set of circumstances between about 1880 and the present generation, the surname became Wilbur, but the genetic line is absolutely Estes. I view this as the Wilburs having established a new genetic branch in their family line while also being Estes cousins.

Discover

For both Y-DNA and mitochondrial DNA, Discover holds a plethora of wonderful information. Lower-level haplogroups can use the free versions of Discover, but we’re going to focus on information available from the mtFull and Big Y tests when the tester clicks through to Discover from within their own account.

I wrote about Discover broadly here. All Discover reports are educational and help you understand your ancestors and their journey to you, but we are focusing only on the tools you would use to break through brick walls.

Click through on the Discover link in your account on your dashboard for either mitochondrial or Y-DNA.

You’ll arrive on the Haplogroup Story page, which provides a summary of the information available in other Discover Reports.

  1. First, read, don’t skim.
  2. Second, don’t skip the other reports because you read the summary.
  3. Third, check each report for various tabs, displays, and settings.
  4. Fourth, read all the reports.

I wrote a very detailed article about using mitochondrial DNA, Mitotree, and Discover, here.

The Match Time Tree

The Match Time Tree is one of my favorite reports.

Please note the various display options at the top of reports. Checking the “Share Mode” box obfuscates the names of your matches, which allows you to share with others without unintentionally compromising privacy.

I particularly like the Match Time Tree report because it lets you view several things in one place.

  • Your Big Y (or full sequence mitochondrial DNA) matches
  • Genetic lineages and the time when haplogroups were born
  • Globes representing the country where your match indicates that their EKA was born
  • Your matches’ EKAs and family trees, if they have provided them

Additional Bonuses:

  • Ancient Connections
  • WikiTree Connections and lineages

If you add both Ancient Connections and WikiTree Connections to your display criteria, you’ll see them on the Match Time Tree too. In this case, no Ancient Connections are found in this portion of the tree, but four matches have connected themselves to WikiTree as indicated by the rows of pearls.

This is particularly useful because EKAs only display the Earliest Known Ancestors, but you’re probably interested in the entire lineage of your match. Their entire WikiTree patrilineal lineage is displayed on the line, including their common ancestors and their linkage to each other.

In this case, the little blue circle “pearl” on the WikiTree line where I clicked is John R. Estes.

I can click on any pearl and see which ancestor that represents in that match’s tree. I think this is the best thing since sliced bread because, generally, I am looking for the missing ancestor between the tester and their common EKA with their matches. I certainly care about the EKA, but to break down brick walls, I need to know how I can connect from here to there.

Ancient Connections

Ancient Connections shows archaeological excavations from published academic papers and is an evergreen feature. This means that as new Ancient Connections are added, in order of how closely they are genetically related to the tester’s haplogroup, older Connections roll off the end.

You can select the option to view Ancient Connections on your Globetrekker™ video too.

Ancient Connections are anchored in the location where they were excavated by little trowels.

While you may think that Ancient Connections are simply interesting, they hold more information. On a different line, I found another clue about the “rumored” birth city of my ancestor, based on an Ancient Connection buried on the Roman Road just outside the city who could potentially have been his ancestor.

Some Ancient Connections are our haplo-cousins, because they belong to descendant haplogroups from our common ancestor, but sometimes their locations, cultures and artifacts can speak to the lives of our ancestors too.

I wrote in detail how to use Ancient Connections here and here. Don’t shortchange yourself by glossing over these.

Notable Connections

Notable Connections may or may not be useful genealogically. It all depends on who is included, and what the evidence reveals. Some Notable Connections are actually bonus Ancient Connections.

The Estes haplogroup R-ZS3700 connects to the Celtic Mystery Ancestor, but based on the Time Tree, the Celtic Mystery Ancestor cannot be the Ancestor of the Estes line. They do, however, share R-DF49 as their common ancestor.

Who doesn’t love a good mystery? Regardless of how we are related, I enjoyed studying the Mystery Ancestor’s cultural information and assembling it in context with the other Ancient Connections. I stood at Tara, Knowth and Newgrange long before Discover existed, but now I know it might have been where our haplo-cousin lived, and maybe where our common ancestor R-DF49 once stood too.

Notable Connections are intended to be fun facts, but sometimes there’s more.

Globetrekker™

Screenshot of Globetrekker™ video

Globetrekker™ is a video that maps the path your ancestors took across the globe. Note the several display options at the top, along with the legend. Globetrekker™ is really an amazing tool.

Haplogroup locations and connecting lines or paths are based on:

  • Locations of ancient burials which serve as anchors
  • Locations of the EKAs of various testers who carry that specific haplogroup
  • Least-cost travel, meaning given the choice between climbing over the Himalayas or taking the route through a valley beside a river – the valley was almost always the choice of people who survived to create the next generation.
  • Only extending into the Americas for the migration routes of indigenous peoples

You may notice what appears to be confusion or inconsistency in the most recent haplogroups. For example, we know that R-ZS3700 occurred in Moses Estes, born in 1711 in Virginia, son of Abraham Estes, the immigrant, who was born in Kent, England. However, that’s not what the map depicts.

The men who carry R-ZS3700 accurately show their EKA as Nicolas Ewstas born in 1495 in England.

Globetrekker™ can only work with the information it has at its disposal. Moses is not the testers’ EKA, but he is the progenitor of R-ZS3700. The way we know that R-ZS3700 occurred in Virginia in 1711 is because the tested male-line descendants of Moses all carry that SNP mutation, while tested male-line descendants of Moses’s siblings, Abraham’s other sons, do not.

Another potential reason that haplogroup placement might appear faulty is because multiple testers with that haplogroup show different locations.

Let’s say the EKA location provided by one man is Dover, Kent, England, across the Strait of Dover from France. A second man shows his EKA on the far western coast of Ireland in Galway, and a third man places his EKA in the Orkney Islands, off the Northern coast of Scotland.

The “average” of those three locations might be someplace around Dumfries in Scotland, even though none of the three men entered that location – and all three testers are equally unhappy.

Keep in mind that EKA information and locations are user-entered, and, as we know, genealogy can be incorrect and people are sometimes confused.

Another factor affecting placement is that when someone enters only a country name, maps default to the center of the country, which can pull the Globetrekker™ migration paths in one direction or another.

Globetrekker™, in combination with other tools, provides valuable evidence about your ancestor.

Globetrekker™ for mitochondrial DNA has not been released but is planned for the future.

Suggested Projects

Suggested Projects can also provide clues.

Projects are suggested for one of three reasons:

  • Other people with that surname have joined that project
  • The surname administrators have identified your surname as “of interest” to their project
  • Your haplogroup, haplogroup branches, or specific keywords

If you’re searching for your ancestor, hints about their origins or family associations may be found in the projects suggested.

Mitochondrial DNA Match Time Tree Haplotype Clusters

One important difference between the Y-DNA Match Time Tree and the mitochondrial DNA Match Time Tree is that the mitochondrial DNA version displays results within haplotype clusters.

On the Match Time Tree, your results are displayed with other members of your haplotype cluster. These are your closest matches.

That isn’t to say that some of your identifiable ancestors won’t be found in other haplotype clusters, or even neighboring haplogroups, but the place where you should start your analysis is with other people in your haplotype cluster.

I’ve written about haplotype clusters here and here.

Your Summary Checklist

Mitochondrial DNA and Y-DNA have the unique ability to look in a laser-straight line back in time. Unlike autosomal DNA, mtDNA and Y-DNA aren’t recombined, so parts of your ancestor’s DNA aren’t lost during recombination with the other parent’s DNA.

The tools on your personal page, plus Discover Reports, provide at least 25 different ways to analyze your results, several of which are critically important for genealogy and, specifically, breaking through brick walls.

  1. Y-DNA STR matching and Big Y DNA matching are different, so take advantage of both and review every level.
  2. Big Y-700 results include several features that neither STR matching nor mitochondrial DNA can offer.
  3. Mitochondrial DNA provides features not available for Y-DNA.
  4. Matching includes how close or distant the match is, their haplogroup, EKA, EKA’s country of origin, and family tree.
  5. The Matches Map provides the exact location provided for your matches’ EKAs, not just the country.
  6. Enter your patrilineal and matrilineal Earliest Known Ancestor (EKA), their ancestral location, and all of your family surnames.
  7. Be sure you’ve uploaded a tree. Also, connected yourself to your WikiTree profile.
  8. Be sure to check your matches’ trees and their WikiTree connection, if they have one, and build out as necessary to connect with your EKA and your other matches’ EKAs.
  9. Use Group Project Results to check groupings made by the volunteer administrators, EKAs, and possibly marker values.
  10. The Y-DNA Block Tree displays matches along with their mutations in a vertical phylogenetic tree format.
  11. Mitochondrial DNA matching also provides your legacy (pre-Mitotree) haplogroup, plus your Mitotree haplogroup, haplotype cluster and features like trees. Be sure to view all match levels.
  12. Haplotype clusters group mitochondrial DNA testers who match exactly, and include less-reliable markers that are excluded from general matching and haplogroup formation. Research to identify a common ancestor should begin with your haplotype cluster, but should not ignore people in different haplotype clusters.
  13. Investigate unfamiliar surnames through family histories, testing male-line descendants of different sons, and researching descendants of the identified genetic ancestor. Look for intersections and remember: right time, right place, opportunity.
  14. Advanced Matching allows you to combine two (or more) forms of DNA test to determine if someone matches you on both tests, such as either a Y-DNA or mtDNA test and the Family Finder autosomal test. Remember that they may match on both tests due to different ancestors.
  15. Y-DNA haplogroups found in Family Finder matches may identify additional family members in your lineage who have not taken a Y-DNA test (but might be willing to).
  16. Discover provides more than a dozen additional reports.
  17. The Match Time Tree plots your matches with their EKAs along a genetic timeline.
  18. The Match Time Tree also displays WikiTree Connections, which include each generation, not just the EKA.
  19. The Match Time Tree displays Ancient Connections and Notable Connections, which may prove useful.
  20. Ancient Connections provide insight into the movements of your ancestor, their culture and location at a specific point in time.
  21. Globetrekker™, an animated Y-DNA video, tracks your ancestor’s journey across the world to the locations where recent haplogroups are found, based on a variety of criteria and data points.
  22. Suggested Projects provides a list of projects that you may be interested in joining based on common interests. The suggestions alone may be especially important when surnames aren’t particularly helpful, and when you’re searching for your ancestor’s origins.
  23. Use Discover’s Compare feature to determine how different haplogroups relate to each other and whether they are in the same genetic lineage. This is particularly useful for autosomal matches with the same surname.
  24. Use shared matches, segment triangulation, and your matches’ trees to investigate possible connections identified through Family Finder surname and haplogroup searches.
  25. Contact matches, collaborate, and preserve the genealogy they provide.

Your ancestors are waiting for you to find them!

_____________________________________________________________

Share the Love!

You’re always welcome to forward articles or links to friends and share on social media.

Subscribe!

If you haven’t already subscribed, it’s free. You’ll receive an e-mail whenever I publish by clicking the “follow” button at the top of the main blog page, here.

Help Keep This Blog Free

I receive a small commission when you click a vendor link in my articles and purchase that item. This does NOT increase your price but helps me keep the lights on and this informational blog free for everyone. Please click on the affiliate links in the articles or to the vendors below if you are purchasing products or DNA testing.

Thank you so much.

DNA Purchases and Free Uploads

Genealogy Products and Services

My Books

Genealogy Books

Genealogy Research

FOCUS: Step 1 – Seven Solutions for DNA Matches with Absent or Shrunken Trees

This is the second article in the FOCUS series.

You can read the first article, FOCUS – A New Series Focused on Breaking Down Brick Walls, here.

DNA matches without trees, or bare-bones shrunken trees, can be a significant roadblock whether you’re looking at autosomal, Y-DNA, or mitochondrial DNA matches. To help resolve that issue, I’ve listed seven ways you can create or expand those trees. Not every methodology works every time, but none will work if you don’t invest the effort to try them.

I’ll probably say this in every article because it bears repeating. Everything we are working with is a hint. Breadcrumbs along the way. Sometimes they lead to the next wonderful breadcrumb. Sometimes to a dead end. Sometimes they look like useful breadcrumbs, but they are red herrings and not relevant. And sometimes they are simply wrong. Do not throw the baby out with the bathwater. Also, do not think every hint is accurate, because they aren’t, and many rely upon other people.

Our goal in the FOCUS series is to accrue evidence from multiple sources, tools and methodologies that leads us to our ancestor. So let’s start with trees.

Trees, Trees, But Not Everywhere

DNA testing relies on trees to identify our common ancestors, at least with matches beyond the closest generation or two.

This is true at all vendors, which is why all of the main vendors, except 23andMe, integrate with or provide trees as part of their platform.

Because we need to work with trees for all types of DNA testing and matching, I’m going to share various ways to overcome partial trees or even no tree at all. I’m intentionally using examples from multiple vendors throughout this series.

23andMe is omitted in this article because they don’t support trees, although testers can include a link to a tree elsewhere.

GEDmatch is omitted in this article because they are not a testing company. They are a DNA upload and matching site, so everyone at GEDmatch has tested elsewhere and probably has a tree there. You can upload a GEDCOM file to GEDmatch, though, so it never hurts to check and see if your match is there too.

Some of these techniques are vendor specific, and others can be applied broadly.

What Is a Shrunken Tree?

A shrunken tree is a small tree in which your DNA match has included only a few people. Small or missing trees tend to frustrate genealogists – a lot. I remind myself that these folks maybe seeking their family or new genealogists, trying to piece their tree together themselves.

This is a tree provided by one of my matches. Their mother is deceased, but it’s recent enough that I’ve chosen to obfuscate her name as well, and it’s not relevant to the next steps.

There’s not a lot to work with here, but as it turns out, there’s enough.

Based on this tree, we have no idea where in their tree our Most Recent Common Ancestor (MRCA) is found, so let’s look at a few ways to indirectly expand their tree in order to find our common ancestor.

Step 1 – Check Your Own Tree

I know this sounds like a “duh” moment, but always remember to check your own tree to see if you’ve expanded that branch to include your match’a ancestors and completely forgotten about it. I maintain my primary tree on my computer with lots of notes and information that I’m not comfortable uploading to a public space. I maintain smaller public trees with a couple thousand people at both Ancestry and MyHeritage, along with a link to my ancestors at WikiTree.

If your match is a female, they may be using a married surname, so always keep that in mind. I try their complete name first. Then I search for their surname to see if it’s a “married-in” name – and cross my fingers that it’s not Smith. If they have any ancestors in their tree, I try their oldest generation next.

Step 2 – Reach Out to Your Match

Every vendor provides some way of communicating with your matches. You can either message or email, depending on the vendor, and your match may be very willing to share more about their genealogy. They may have a better tree elsewhere that they will share with you, or may know more than is in their tree.

An Ancestry survey showed that about 53% of Americans can’t name all four grandparents, and only 47% can correctly name all four. Only 4% can name all eight great-grandparents. In the Rolland tree, the tester knew more about their mother’s side, and only knew the first name of their paternal grandmother.

So while shrunken trees are exasperating, they are probably more normal that we think, and we all have to start someplace. Your match might well appreciate some help.

Step 3 – Check Other DNA Testing Sites

If your match has a real name (meaning not just initials or something indecipherable), such as Heather Jacobs (made-up name), who is predicted to be your third cousin and shares 100 cM of (unweighted) DNA at one vendor, sign on to your accounts at the other vendors and see if Heather is a match there.

You’re looking for a Heather, or maybe HJacobs or something similar, who’s approximately a 3C with roughly the same amount of shared DNA. The exact relationship prediction may not match, but it should be close, and the amount of shared DNA may not be identical either. If it varies substantially, it may not be the same person, so exercise care.

Every vendor provides the ability to search for matches by name, and if you can’t find them by name, begin paging until you reach matches at the approximate predicted relationship level. In Heather’s case, that’s third cousins. Beyond third cousins, this paging technique quickly becomes too laborious.

At Ancestry

Only one vendor, Ancestry, “downweights” your DNA with your matches, meaning that they may remove some amount of DNA that they consider “too matchy.” In my case, this is often DNA from my Acadian lines, which collectively forms pileup regions. This does NOT mean those aren’t useful, but that’s not relevant for this discussion other than to alert you that you need to check both the assigned amount of DNA and your unweighted shared DNA with a match when you’re trying to verify that the match is the same person at two vendors.

Assuming you find “HeatherJ” at Ancestry, you’ll want to verify that it’s the same person as Heather Jacobs at the other vendor.

Is your amount of shared DNA roughly the same?

Click on the relationship link to view the amount of unweighted DNA. In this case, weighted and unweighted is the same, and Heather Jacobs matches you with 100 cM at the other vendor.

Heather has a public tree here, and it’s the same size. It’s probably the same person, but check anyway.

Heather’s tree at Ancestry is exactly the same as it was at the other vendor, so this confirms it’s the same person.

There’s an important hint here, and let me emphasize the word HINT.

While Heather’s actual 15-person tree does NOT extend to our common ancestor, Ancestry has pieced together other trees that include and extend beyond her ancestors to show my (purported) common ancestor with Heather. Click on Common Ancestor, which takes you to ThruLines.

This new version of ThruLines has now replaced the older version. Unfortunately it does not show Heather’s path back to our common ancestor, Hiram Bauke Ferverda.

Click on “View all ancestors” in the upper left-hand corner.

Click on any image to enlarge

After clicking on “View all ancestors,” click on Hiram Bauke Ferverda to see the DNA matches who descend from him. Despite what Ancestry provided under my “Common ancestor” with Heather, she isn’t shown anyplace here. This could be a bug, given that I later confirmed this common ancestor using other techniques.

Regardless of the problem, this IS a hint, so don’t disregard it entirely. Just keep your “skeptic” hat handy and wear it liberally. You’ll need to use Ancestry searches and hints, including possibly Quick and Dirty Trees, to piece together the possibilities.

Make a note on Heather’s match at Ancestry so that you know what you found this time through. We’re not done with Heather. Move on to another vendor to see if Heather has tested and has a better tree elsewhere. We’re gathering evidence.

At MyHeritage

Heather is not at MyHeritage, so I’ll use a different example.

Let’s look for Cathy, a 3C match who has no tree at another vendor. I found her at MyHeritage with the same first and last name and approximately the same amount of shared DNA, so I’m confident it’s the same person.

Fortunately, at MyHeritage, Cathy has a tree, which is the first step, of course, but no common ancestor is shown in her tree.

MyHeritage has a wonderful feature called Theory of Family Relativity which are often based on “Smart Matches.” Click on “View theory.”

Click to enlarge

MyHeritage has found five possible paths to a common ancestor based on multiple documents and trees. In this case, Surrilda Claxton in my tree is the same person as Surelda Clarkson in Cathy’s tree, and MyHeritage made that connection correctly.

I confirmed this Theory at MyHeritage as accurate, and now I know how Cathy at the other vendor with no tree is related to me. I made a note about Cathy at MyHeritage on my match with Cathy at the other vendor too about our common ancestor AND where Cathy’s tree can be found. Add Cathy to her proper place in your trees.

Step 4 – Sleuth at the Same Vendor

At FamilyTreeDNA, when I find a match with no tree, I do two things.

Looking at Patricia’s profile, I immediately see that she has been assigned to the maternal side of my tree. I’ve linked other known matches which allows FamilyTreeDNA to use triangulation to assign Patricia to the proper side.

Then, I notice that even though Patricia doesn’t have a tree, she has provided her ancestral surnames.

Clicking on “View Details,” I can see if any of them match my surnames, or I can view all of her surnames.

Given that this is my mother’s side, these shared surnames give me an idea of a shared lineage.

Next, look for your closest shared match WITH a tree. Clicking on the two little people at far right displays your shared matches which are labeled “in common with.”

I share 122 matches in common with with Patricia, and our closest shared match, other than my mother who is not shown here, is Dennis. Dennis happens to be a known relative, which is why he already has a note.

But for purposes of this exercise, let’s say that I haven’t already figured out how Dennis and I are related. Viewing Dennis’s tree, I see that our common ancestors are Anthony (Antoine) Lore and Rachel Levina Hill. Hmmm, Hill is on Patricia’s list of surnames.

Sleuthing at the same vendor is MUCH EASIER when your matches have at least a couple of generations in a small tree. Having no tree is the most difficult situation at every vendor, but there are multiple ways to begin building a tree for your DNA match, or to expand a shrunken tree.

Step 5 – Google Is Your Friend

Google is your friend. Google cannot reach behind paywalled sites, so you won’t find records other than records from free indexes at Ancestry or MyHeritage in Google searches, but you will find information about people from other genealogy sites.

Let’s go back to Rolland Robison who died in 1963 and his wife, Chloe. And let’s also consider that his surname is often spelled RobiNson. We know from our match’s tree that Rolland’s wife’s first name is Chloe.

Look closely at the search box in the image below. By structuring the query as “rolland robison died 1963 wife chloe”, we combine a full name, a specific vital event year, and a spouse’s first name. This gives Google just enough precise detail to hopefully filter out (most) noise.

That’s interesting. It looks like Rolland can be spelled two ways too.

Not only is there an article (yes, I wrote about this previously), BUT there’s also an obituary and estate distribution in a local newspaper that I have never seen before.

Rolland’s wife’s birth surname is given in his obituary, even though her first name is misspelled. This is the link I need to establish our common ancestor, because Chloe is my grandfather’s sister.

Google can provide you with important links to information and articles that are not yet in genealogical databases, such as:

  • Facebook accounts for individuals: Useful for finding the tester, relatives or family connections.
  • Facebook groups and pages: Forums that contain local historical information and shared community memories.
  • LinkedIn & Instagram accounts: Social footprints that often reveal professional histories, geographic locations, and birth surnames.
  • Mentions elsewhere: Local newspaper archives, digital press releases, and published legal notices regarding estate partitions or land records.
  • Obituaries: Printed family notices that explicitly list surviving family names and relationships along with the Legacy.com tribute archives.
  • Public websites & genealogy blogs: Independent sites where genealogists sometimes publish deep-dive ancestral lineages. Always verify.

Google also provides an easy way to find free resources in public databases without having to search each one individually, including:

  • Collaborative family trees: WikiTree, FamilySearch, and Geni trees.
  • Cemetery registries: FindAGrave and BillionGraves.
  • Digital libraries: Internet Archive and Google Books, which hold a vast assortment of historical information like out-of-print town and county histories.
  • Open-Access portals: The Library of Congress (LOC) and the Digital Public Library of America (DPLA), which pulls photos, maps, and civic documents from libraries across the US.
  • Volunteer projects: Regional repositories like GenWeb.
  • Directories: Local alumni directories and digitized historical yearbooks.

Pro Tip: Resurrecting Old RootsWeb and Genealogy.com Breadcrumbs

RootsWeb was a wonderful resource for genealogists until Ancestry began systematically dismantling it in 2023.

While Google is fantastic at finding obscure text, it will occasionally point you to an old, broken RootsWeb link. Because Ancestry has frozen or removed much of the old platform, don’t let that 404 error stop you in your tracks. Copy the dead URL from Google and paste it into the Internet Archive Wayback Machine where you can sometimes resurrect the exact information you need!

The same methodology applies to the old message board, Genealogy.com.

Step 6 – Search Old Emails and Files On Your Own Computer

I know this probably sounds either ridiculous or incredibly obvious, but if you’re a typical genealogist, you probably have a quarter century of emails on your computer, not to mention reams of photos that you saved because someone gave them to you and you “might need them someday.”

I’ve never thought of myself as the family archivist, but I clearly must be, which is another name for the family packrat. Long live the packrats.

I’ve learned that I need to search all of my email folders for the names in someone’s shrunken tree. I’ve been shocked at what I’ve found there.

Don’t just search for full names. For example, Rolland Robison or Chloe Ferverda. Search for the names individually too. So, Rolland, Roland, Robison, Robinson, and Chloe. I didn’t know Chloe was a Ferverda yet when I was initially searching for her identity.

A middle-of-the-night insomnia-induced epiphany struck – “search your emails.” Who needs sleep? It’s overrated! I hopped right up, searched my emails and my computer and found even more.

As it turns out, I attended a Ferverda family reunion in 2010 where I only knew two people. Thankfully, cousin Cheryl thought to invite me, because someone brought an old photo album AND an old Ferverda family Bible. I took photos of everything in the album even though I had no idea who most of those people were and neither did the album’s owner.

Many photos had no surnames at all, or they were recorded as Mr. and Mrs. SoAndSo.

Here are “Chloe and Rolland” as they were named in the photo, with no last name or additional information.

Here are Mr and Mrs. Rolland Vincent Robison. I carelessly saved this one as Rolland RobiNson. My bad.

A search for just “Rolland” found both, which is exactly why you need to search creatively.

Finding those initially still wouldn’t have told me who they were, but I would have at least had some family context, given that a Ferverda descendant brought the album to the Ferverda reunion.

However, this article about Rolland and Chloe’s 50th wedding anniversary from that same album would have provided that missing context.

My emails revealed now-deceased cousin Cheryl referring to Aunt Chloey, but with nothing else to identify her. A search for simply “Chloe” found Cheryl’s emails.

More tidbits of evidence.

I did a very poor job of saving these images with useful names because they weren’t relevant at the time, although I did store them in a “Ferverda Reunion” folder. Now, I’m going to attach them to Chloe and Rolland’s profiles in my tree at both Ancestry and MyHeritage to make sure they don’t disappear forever.

I’m also going to send them to my match with the abbreviated tree. As Rolland and Chloe’s grandchild, if they don’t have these pictures, I’m positive they will want them.

I’m sure you’ve noticed that I got VERY squirreled during this process, but utilizing all of our resources is exactly how we make discoveries – and sometimes that includes chasing squirrels.

This is also why our research journals are important – so we don’t chase the same squirrel over and over.

Step 7 – Quick and Dirty Trees

I used the Robison example in an earlier article discussing how to build a “quick and dirty” tree. I use quick and dirty trees often because it’s the easiest way to keep track of informational tidbits from different places, including multiple vendors, during the research process.

I’ll say it again here. Quick and dirty trees aren’t meant to be public. They aren’t gospel. They are a structure for you to work through the various hints provided and to evaluate them to see if they are of sufficient quality for you to identify a common ancestor with a DNA tester who provided a minimal tree.

You can read about these investigative workbenches in the article, What is a Quick and Dirty Tree, and When Might I Need One?

What’s Next?

Have you decided which of your brick walls you’re going to focus on? Last week’s article discussed some of the criteria you might want to consider and how to prepare.

Select your ancestor, because next week, we’re going to begin using a variety of tools and techniques to track that ancestor. Bit by bit, we’re going to gather evidence that will hopefully lead to a breakthrough.

FOCUS – A New Series Focused on Breaking Down Brick Walls

When I teach about genetic genealogy, people often ask, “What’s next? How can I break down my brick wall?” Sometimes I can reply that a Y-DNA test or mitochondrial DNA will help them under specific circumstances. But more often than not, what they really need is a precise, step-by-step methodology that includes autosomal DNA and utilizes multiple tools and techniques across vendors.

Even after people have taken Y-DNA and/or mitochondrial DNA tests PLUS autosomal tests at the major vendors, we still need a methodology to work with combinations of those results. Often, the answers we need aren’t just sitting there like a pretty rock, waiting to be picked up and admired, but depend on us using the results and matches as tools to help focus our search in the right direction.

It’s more like a scavenger hunt than a single discovery.

Focus

Sometimes I feel like a fish out of water – flip-flopping from ancestor to ancestor, match to match and hint to hint, hoping that the magic bullet will fall into my lap, but that almost never happens.

By this point in my research, I’ve perused all the easy records and many of the not-so-easy ones. If you don’t have a surname, or you don’t have a first name, or worse yet, you don’t have either, how is one supposed to search for records?

The good news is that you still carry at least one record in your own body and/or the bodies of your relatives. The DNA of your ancestors.

This is where we’re going to focus our efforts – hence FOCUS, the name of this new series.

Everyone is going to select their closest, or one of their closest, brick-walled ancestors, and we’re going to use several methods and tools to focus on identifying that ancestor.

Prepare

Before I publish the next article in the series, there are a few things that I’d like you to think about and do in preparation.

  • First, there’s no guarantee that you’ll break through your brick wall during this series. You might, and you also might not. You stand a much better chance of breaking through that brick wall if you focus and follow these steps than if you don’t.

Keep in mind that even negative evidence is evidence, and just because you don’t break through right away doesn’t mean you won’t. New people test everyday and new records become available too. If nothing else, your ancestor will have more meat on their bones, and you’ll have a process to build upon.

  • Second, if your brick wall is very close in time, meaning parents or grandparents, you’ll want the already-written “In Search Of Unknown Family” series, which you can find, here.
  • Third, you’ll need to keep a research journal or log by ancestor, family or location, which will also include your other related ancestors. For example, if you’re looking for Lucy whose surname you don’t know, but you know that she married William Moore, then your research journal will apply to William Moore too, and other people including their children and either spouse’s parents and siblings, whether that was your intention or not. The neighbors are probably relevant as well.

That “it takes a village” saying is particularly relevant here. People didn’t tend to move to the next location alone, and often their community consisted of their cousins and relatives – who are also your relatives, and hold clues to the identity of your ancestor. When I’m extracting records for the Moore surname in Halifax County, VA, for example, I extract everything for that and similarly spelled surnames, not just one particular person, so I don’t have to replow that field.

Tracking and Recording Your Research

If you don’t already have a research journal methodology, I would suggest a spreadsheet.

Here’s a screenshot of two rows in my “Halifax County” spreadsheet where I’ve recorded separate rows for each person in every record. Note that I started this spreadsheet years ago and omitted some columns that I later wished I had included, like the access date.

You’ll want to record:

  • Item number beginning with 1. In the example above, the item number is 6, and it’s 6 for every person in that record. Each person in this transaction gets their own separate row, with the same item number. The next record I extracted would be item 7.
  • Access date (date you found and retrieved the record)
  • Last name
  • First name
  • State (add a column for country if multiple countries are relevant for this family)
  • County
  • Town, township or city
  • Geographic places like road or creek names (these can be VERY important)
  • Year, month and day that the record occurred
  • Record repository or source (including a link if applicable – you may want to add a separate column for the link)
  • Record type (deed, will, tax list, etc.)
  • Role of individual (buyer, seller, witness, etc.)
  • Names of additional people in the record (I retain the same item number and other information, changing the name of the person, their role and sometimes an associated comment)
  • Transcribed text of the record itself
  • Comment, which can include things like the name of an image, something about what you were searching for when you found the record, links, or anything else relevant

You will want to be able to sort and filter this spreadsheet when you are finished. Hint – be sure your date fields and formats are sortable in the way you wish. I normally use filters instead of the sort feature.

The goal isn’t just to record your findings, but to make this spreadsheet as useful as possible to make discoveries that are only available by comparing and incorporating multiple records.

For example, let’s say that you’re extracting all of the Moore records in a Halifax County, VA deed book, and you want to know how many times the surname Henderson is found in the Moore deeds or in conjunction with the Moore family. Is there a pattern? You won’t recognize a pattern from any ONE record, but you may eventually wonder if the Henderson’s are related to the Moore family, and if so, how.

You’ll also want to record nonproductive or negative evidence. For example, let’s say you searched the Halifax County Plea Book for William Moore (including More and Mohr) and found no occurrences. That’s important, because otherwise you‘ll eventually search again, so enter that as a record item.

Note that with the full text search feature introduced by FamilySearch a couple of years ago, if you extracted records from a book that did NOT include every-name indexing including property lines, creek names and witnesses – you’ll want to redo that search using the full text feature at FamilySearch. There’s often LOTS of valuable information buried in records that won’t be found if you’re only viewing records indexed by buyer and seller, for example.

Your To-Do List Before the Series Begins

The In Search Of Unknown Family Series introduces important concepts, so reading that series is your first assignment in preparation for the upcoming FOCUS articles.

Test Your DNA With the Major Vendors

It’s important to test with the major vendors. Each vendor has matches and tools that the others don’t, and we need to identify and work with as many relevant matches as possible.

If you have NOT taken an autosomal DNA test at the first three following vendors, order these tests now so you have results to work with.

  1. AncestryDNA
  2. FamilyTreeDNA – Purchase a Family Finder test or upgrade an earlier Family Finder test to the new Family Finder NGS test. You should upgrade if you uploaded your autosomal DNA file from another vendor at any time, or tested at FamilyTreeDNA directly before March of 2026. The upgrade is only $29.
  3. MyHeritage DNA
  4. A fourth vendor, 23andMe, is optional, but testing there certainly won’t hurt.

23andMe Sidebar

I have an issue with 23andMe’s policy of forcing customers to repurchase a DNA test at $199 PLUS a subscription at $149 for the first year, renewable at $69 per year, in order to obtain any of their latest tools. This happened around the time of their data breach and subsequent bankruptcy.

I would feel much better about the situation as a whole if a new owner had taken the wheel, but the original owner resigned from the 23andMe board, formed another corporation, and was allowed to buy 23andMe out of the bankruptcy that occurred on her watch.

Furthermore, 23andMe does not support genealogy trees, nor do they have Y-DNA or mitochondrial DNA testing and matching, or research records.

I have (begrudgingly) ordered an upgrade for my own 23andMe test in order to include accurate information in these articles, but I won’t be focusing on 23andMe specifically aside from any unique feature. You can apply the same concepts and techniques to results at 23andMe where possible.

Test Your Relatives

If you have close upstream relatives, such as parents, grandparents, aunts, uncles, and cousins who also descend from your brick-walled ancestor, please ask them to test too.

I explain what I’m trying to achieve, why their test is important, and offer scholarships to sweeten the pie. I view purchasing their DNA tests in the same way I view purchasing a rare research book that I KNOW includes my ancestors but it not available anyplace else.

Your shared matches are extremely important and may provide that brick-wall-breaker. Perhaps even more importantly, they will have relevant matches that you don’t.

So how do you know who to test? You certainly want to test everyone relevant, without wasting money.

Let’s look at this example where Lucy is the brick-walled ancestor I’m seeking to identify. Her children (labeled siblings) and grandchildren (1C) are all deceased, but second cousins (2C), Rhonda, Charles and Sally are all available to test. Test each of them because they will all have some different segments of DNA from Lucy that the others don’t have.

Lazarus is also a second cousin, but he’s deceased. However, William, my father (in this example, not my real pedigree), and his sister, Jane are both available to test.

You ALWAYS want to test both of your parents and every available grandparent or direct ancestor. In this example, I’ll only inherit some portion of Lucy’s DNA that my father has, but Jane, my aunt, will carry segments of Lucy’s DNA that my father didn’t inherit from Lazarus. Jane’s matches on those segments that neither my father nor I have may be just what we need to identify Lucy.

If Lazarus has other children not shown in this example, we certainly want to test them too.

If the relevant parent has tested, you don’t need to test any of their children. However, if the parent hasn’t tested, absolutely test as many of their children or descendants as possible.

In this case, Rhonda, Jane, Charles and Sally have all tested, so I don’t need to test their children. Their children can only have as much of Lucy’s DNA as their parents had.

However, if any of them had been deceased, then I should test as many of their children as I can to “gather up” as much of Lucy’s DNA as possible.

If any of the people upstream of the bold red people have other children, those children or their descendants would be testing candidates too. Ideally, you want as many descendant testers as possible to increase your chances of identifying that ancestor.

Selecting Your Brick-Wall Ancestor

I want you to be successful, so you’re going to select your closest brick-walled ancestor within certain parameters. If you have multiple brick-walled ancestors at the at the same genealogical distance, you’ll choose one to focus on.

Why your closest brick-walled ancestor? If your brick wall is 5 generations back from you, and they are 5 generations back from your DNA match as well, that means you’re dealing with a 4th cousin match.

This also means that ancestor’s DNA has been divided a total of 10 times – five times on the path of descent to you, and five times on the path of descent to your match.

A 4th cousin match is likely to be in the 35 cM range. You can view the matching ranges for various relationships at DNAPainter, here.

The entire 4th cousin (4C) matching range is 0-139 cM. You won’t match all of your 4th cousins and are likely to match only 50-70% of your 4th cousins.

That said, the average person has between 1,500 and 4,000 4th cousins. At the 4th cousin level, you have 32 ancestors, so only between 46 and125 4th cousins will descend from any given ancestor, and of those, only a few will have taken a DNA test. The more children that ancestor had that lived to marry and have children of their own, the better your chances of more matches.

The Selection Process

I’m going to be stepping through the ancestor selection process with you, discussing who is and isn’t a good candidate, and why. I’m also going to be using this same methodology to (hopefully) identify one of my own mystery ancestors too.

I have no brick walls closer than 4th cousins. If I did, I’d choose the closest brick wall. You should too in order to have the best chance of solving this puzzle. The further back in time, the more difficult the solve will be.

In my tree, I have four mystery ancestors at the 5X great-grandparent level on my father’s side, and one on my mother’s side.

Those will be the four ancestors I consider selecting. And no, before you do it, I don’t recommend working on all four of them at the same time. Remember, the purpose is to FOCUS.

  • Select an ancestor as close generationally as possible, because it’s more likely that both you and other people will carry at least some of their DNA, and the same segment(s) of DNA. Matches closer in time generally carry more total DNA in common, which means better matching and more shared matches.
  • Given that the majority of testers are from the US, and assuming you are from the US too, I don’t recommend selecting an ancestor from another country unless you are very comfortable with that language and working with those records. Generally, there will be fewer people who have tested from other countries. If you are going to work with an ancestor from another country, be sure you are in both the MyHeritage and FamilyTreeDNA databases.

My mother’s entire paternal line is either Dutch or German Brethren, and her Dutch ancestors only immigrated in the mid 1800s, so have few descendants in the databases.

My closest brick wall on her paternal line is Traut Enterlein, a German man who was named in an out-of-wedlock baptism for his daughter in Germany in 1823. He is not found in any other records in that part of Germany, so actually identifying “who he is”, even with a name, would be extremely difficult, and I have nothing to “anchor to” here.  He is eliminated as a candidate because he’s found in a country where I don’t speak the language, where fewer people have taken DNA tests, and we’ve already spent a substantial amount of time trying to identify him in the records.

Brick-walled ancestors on Mom’s maternal side are two generations further back in time. Half are German and the other half are a combination of English and Acadian.

  • Avoid both endogamy and pedigree collapse, if possible. I don’t recommend a line with baked-in challenges that will make DNA more difficult.

Acadians are heavily endogamous and often suffer from pedigree collapse since there were so few founding families in the mid-1600s. The same goes for Brethren families who immigrated in the early 1700s. Those lines are too far back generationally anyway, so they have already been eliminated, but if they weren’t, I’d eliminate them because of heavy endogamy and pedigree collapse, both, not to mention record loss.

My father’s side has much better candidates.

  • Try to select an ancestor where you have some familiarity with the location, the culture, and the records. If you have printed resources at the ready, possibly ones that are not online, that’s a plus.
  • When you’re trying to decide between ancestors, select one whose spouse you are sure of, and who has children you can document. Do you know important things about them like their religion, where they lived during specific times, and who their neighbors were? If not, take some time now to brush up on what you do know about their spouse and children.
  • Check back at all of the records vendors and resources, including Ancestry, MyHeritage, WikiTree, and FamilySearch, to see if anything new is easily available for either your brick-wall candidate or their spouse.
  • I do NOT recommend selecting an ancestral couple, neither of whom you can identify, unless you’re “lucky” enough to have no other brick-walled ancestors to choose from. It’s possible to solve this “double-blind” couple, but it’s substantially more difficult because you have no same-generation anchor.

My Candidates

I’m selecting one of my brick walls and hope to solve it during this process. Let’s run through the decision-making process so you’ll understand some of the considerations and why they weigh as factors. I wish I didn’t have so many choices, and I’d like to solve them all, but my best chance is to work on one at a time.

Most candidates are women because their birth surnames tend to easily become lost after they marry, and with their surname, their parents are lost too. Given how little we know, we have to presume (dangerous word), at least for now, that your missing female ancestor was the mother of all of their husband’s children, unless we know or subsequently prove otherwise.

Let’s review my candidates.

  1. Lucy was born about 1754, probably in Virginia, and died in 1832 in Halifax County, VA. She married William Moore between 1772 and 1774, who may or may not have been a circuit-riding minister at that time. She is found under her own name on the 1830 census, there’s an 1826 chancery suit, and I know who her children and neighbors are, so she might be a good candidate. One vote against selecting Lucy is that I don’t know where she was born, nor do I know where they were married, although there’s a very strong possibility that it took place in Halifax County. The fact that he was a circuit-rider means he could have met her anyplace. If they were married in Halifax County, their families could have been allied before arriving there. William Moore’s family came from Prince Edward County about 1770, and we know who his parents were. One good thing is that Lucy is a fairly uncommon name, but there are multiple William Moores in Halifax County, and there are two other Lucy Moores. One is her daughter, and one is her daughter-in-law. The fact that Lucy and William Moore had 12 known children, with at least 8 who married, means there is a good chance of matching at least some descendants. Unfortunately, I don’t have her mitochondrial DNA, which removes one possible tool unless I can find a tester.
  2. Jane, born about 1760 in an unknown location, but probably Virginia, was the wife of Lazarus Dodson. They moved across multiple frontiers into what would become early Tennessee, an area that sustained substantial record loss. Jane died between 1830 and 1840. There’s a lot of uncertainty about Jane’s life. She probably had at least 8 children, and we know something about six of them. Given that we already have a better candidate with Lucy, I’ll eliminate Jane for now.
  3. William Crumley’s wife, whose name I don’t know, was born around 1765 or 1770, possibly in Virginia. She was married to William Crumley around 1786 or 1787, probably in Frederick County, VA, or nearby. I do have her mitochondrial DNA and we know the family was Quaker which are both benefits. I’ve been working with a cousin who has delved deeply into Quaker records, and I have some records from a trip to the FamilySearch Library in Salt Lake City that I have not yet processed. She and William had at least 10 children who married, and I know quite a bit about them. She would probably be an excellent choice. For lack of another name, I’ve been calling her H2a1, her legacy mitochondrial haplogroup before Mitotree, but she has a much more complete haplogroup now. She would be a good candidate, and I REALLY want to identify her.
  4. Mary, wife of John Harrold (by various spellings), was born about 1750, possibly in Ireland, although it would be unusual for a first-generation Irish immigrant to end up deep in the Appalachian frontier. Mary died in 1826 in Wilkes County, NC. We know nothing about John’s background, other than he served in the Revolutionary War, in Virginia. He may have been living in Botetourt County, although we don’t know for sure, and there are multiple men by that name. Mary had at least 7 children, six of whom were married. We do not have her mitochondrial DNA. Given that we know so little about John, and we have better candidates with both Lucy, William Moore’s wife, and William Crumley’s wife, I’m eliminating Mary for now.
  5. Isabel, the wife of Michael McDowell – another couple from Wilkes County, NC. Their daughter married the son of Mary and John Harrold. Isabel was probably born about 1750, someplace in Virginia. We don’t know where they were married, but it could have been in Franklin County, VA. They lived in Wilkes County for several decades before moving on to Claiborne County, TN. We know very little about Michael’s early life, other than his Revolutionary War service, although I’ve written about him four times as additional information dribbles out. They had at least 8 children, and a deposition after Michael’s death tells us where they moved and settled, which is a very big plus. We know her first name thanks to a 1793 deed. Isabel is a reasonable candidate, but I eliminated her after comparison to the other candidates, in part because of multiple frontier moves with few records and no known point of origin.
  6. Elizabeth, wife of Andrew McKee, was born about 1767, possibly someplace in Virginia. They were in Washington Co., VA by 1789, although we don’t know where either originated. They may have married before they moved to Washington County, where we find several records. They had 14 children. Twelve are known to have married, and the other two probably did as well. We know who their neighbors were. We also have Elizabeth’s mitochondrial DNA. Unfortunately, we know nothing about Andrew McKee’s family or where he was from. However, Elizabeth is a strong candidate because so many records exist in Washington County, they had a large number of children, and many continued to live in Washington County or nearby, making them easier to track.
  7. If I didn’t already have good candidates, there’s one more ancestor I’d consider, even though James Lee Claxton/Clarkson is a generation further back in my tree, born about 1775, and his unknown parents are the brick walls. I know I just told you NOT to do this, so I won’t either, but the reason I might have considered his parents, or more specifically his father, as a strong candidate is because we have several Y-DNA matches, including Big-Y testers, and we know the ancestors of his matches came from NC. We also have many autosomal testers and matches, which would help immensely, and there’s a Clarkson/Claxton DNA Surname Project. A contiguous surname is a HUGE benefit not available with female ancestors, and I just feel that I’m SO CLOSE to solving this mystery. For now, James’s parents are eliminated because they are two generations further back in time than our other candidates, we know nothing about either of them, except Y-DNA results, and we have better candidates for this exercise.

After evaluation, I still have two candidates in the running – Lucy, wife of William Moore, and H2a1, William Crumley’s wife. I haven’t decided for sure yet, but right now, William Crumley’s wife is leading because I have an amazing collaborator along with some unprocessed records that may hold important information. I know there probably aren’t any smoking guns there, but when combined with DNA, we may well ignite that gunpowder.

FOCUS

Are you ready to focus?

Let’s get our ducks in a row.

  • Order any DNA tests you need to order for yourself and relatives now.
  • Select your ancestor.
  • Prepare your research journal by reviewing which records you’ve already researched and record what you have.
  • Refamiliarize yourself. Take a look at those results again with fresh eyes. It helps when reviewing match results to be able to view surnames in your matches trees and recall that you’ve seen that name before, and where.
  • Check to see if any new records or resources are now available.

Who do you want to find?

_____________________________________________________________

Share the Love!

You’re always welcome to forward articles or links to friends and share on social media.

Subscribe!

If you haven’t already subscribed, it’s free. You’ll receive an e-mail whenever I publish by clicking the “follow” button at the top of the main blog page, here.

Help Keep This Blog Free

I receive a small commission when you click a vendor link in my articles and purchase that item. This does NOT increase your price but helps me keep the lights on and this informational blog free for everyone. Please click on the affiliate links in the articles or to the vendors below if you are purchasing products or DNA testing.

Thank you so much.

DNA Purchases and Free Uploads

Genealogy Products and Services

My Books

Genealogy Books

Genealogy Research