2024 Retrospective – Plus New Color Version of Complete Guide to FamilyTreeDNA

I hope 2024 was a great year for you.

2024 was an amazing year that included the release of my new book, Complete Guide to FamilyTreeDNA, and two genealogy-focused trips. I was also able to use Y-DNA to extend multiple paternal lines and break down a mitochondrial brick wall. It hardly gets better than this, but I have a focus list for 2025 already – and I hope you do, too.

But before we move on to 2025, let’s take a look at what was popular in 2024. Did you miss anything? Now is a great time to review, and I’ve assembled a list of this year’s top ten articles for you.

2024 in Review

Each year, I look back at my blog’s end-of-year statistics to see which articles were the most popular. I published 75 articles in 2024, which is an article about every four and a half days.

The Top 10 List isn’t just compiled from this year’s new articles, but the top 10 articles read this year from all 1738 articles that I’ve published over the past 12.5 years. I’ve noted the publication year by the article name.

Four of this year’s top 10 also fall in the all-time top 10. Of course, articles that have been published longer have more time to accrue views.

Article 2024 All Time
Concepts – Calculating Ethnicity Percentages (2017) 1 2
442 Ancient Viking Skeletons Hold DNA Surprised – Does Your Y or Mitochondrial DNA Match? (2020) 2
Ancestral DNA Percentages – How Much of Them is in You? (2017) 3 5
Proving Native American Ancestry Using DNA (2012) 4 1
23andMe Trouble – Step-by-Step Instructions to Preserve Your Data and Matches (2024) 5
DNA Inherited from Grandparents and Great-Grandparents (2020) 6
Ancestry’s ThruLines and Shared Matches Now Require a Subscription (2024) 7
Native American Mitochondrial Haplogroups (2013) 8 10
FamilyTreeDNA Tree Integration with MyHeritage – Step-by-Step Instructions (2024) 9
Y-DNA: Step-by-Step Analysis (2020) 10

Consistently, Native American DNA, ethnicity, and inheritance prove to be overwhelmingly popular topics. This probably explains the success of my book, DNA for Native American Genealogy. It’s timeless, and there are always new people searching! Thank you to everyone who has purchased it.

Of course, articles about this year’s announcements in the genetic genealogy world are always popular. The articles that didn’t make the Top 10 List but are in the 11-20 category include articles from RootsTech, two more Native American articles,  determining full or half-siblingspedigree collapse, the Washington family burial article, plus one about my Acadian ancestors and their DNA.

Thank you to everyone who subscribes, reads, and comments. Please share this article or site link with another genealogist who you think might benefit. As you know, it’s easy to subscribe and completely free.

You can also search for keywords in articles throughout the year to answer questions when you see them on social media or elsewhere. It’s easy and educational to post or send an article link.

Complete Guide to FamilyTreeDNA – Now Available in Color

Are you ready for a good laugh?

As I was reviewing these articles, I thought to myself, “where’s the announcement of the new color version of my book, “The Complete Guide to FamilyTreeDNA”?

I literally forgot to publish that article. How could I?? I mean…seriously. (My excuse is that I was traveling, plus conferences and back-to-back hurricanes.)

So, here’s the (slightly late) mini-announcement.

Initially, in May, The Complete Guide to FamilyTreeDNA was released in a full-color e-pub version, which is available from the publisher here. You can take a look at the table of contents here.

That was followed shortly by the release of the black and white print version, available in the US from the publisher, here, and worldwide from your country’s Amazon. Selling outside the US through Amazon removes the issues of expensive international shipping, VAT tax, and customs, which significantly increases the cost of the book and delays its delivery.

The decision was made to publish initially in black and white due to printing costs, but lots of people requested a color book.

For those who have already purchased the black-and-white version, the publisher has provided a free downloadable PDF with 26 of the most critical pages in color. We really had no idea that people would be eager to purchase a color version, but that has proven to be the case, and we didn’t want earlier purchasers to be disappointed.

Drum Roll

You spoke, and we listened.

In the fall, we released a full-color print-on-demand version of The Complete Guide to FamilyTreeDNA. Again, in the US, the book is available from the publisher, here, and at Amazon elsewhere.

This book truly is comprehensive and includes both DNA education, along with how to use the FamilyTreeDNA tools, many of which are unique in the industry. For example, no other vendor offers either Y-DNA or mitochondrial DNA testing and matching.

You don’t know what you don’t know, and I encourage you to find out!

Thank You!

Thank you so much for your ongoing support. Twelve years strong, going on 13.

Be thinking about what you’d like to see in 2025, because I’m going to be asking you tomorrow!

_____________________________________________________________

Sign Up Now – It’s Free!

If you appreciate this article, subscribe to DNAeXplain for free, to automatically receive new articles by e-mail each week.

Here’s the link. Just look for the black “follow” button on the right-hand side on your computer screen below the black title bar, enter your e-mail address, and you’re good to go!

In case you were wondering, I never have nor ever will share or use your e-mail outside of the intended purpose.

_____________________________________________________________

Follow DNAexplain on Facebook, here.

Share the Love!

You’re always welcome to forward articles or links to friends and share on social media.

If you haven’t already subscribed (it’s free,) you can receive an e-mail whenever I publish by clicking the “follow” button on the main blog page, here.

You Can Help Keep This Blog Free

I receive a small contribution when you click on some of the links to vendors in my articles. This does NOT increase your price but helps me keep the lights on and this informational blog free for everyone. Please click on the links in the articles or to the vendors below if you are purchasing products or DNA testing.

Thank you so much.

DNA Purchases and Free Uploads

Genealogy Products and Services

My Books

Genealogy Books

Genealogy Research

Daniel Garceau (1707-1772), Cooper, Exile, Founder of a New Acadian Homeland – 52 Ancestors #436

Daniel Garceau was baptized on Friday, April 8, 1707 in Port Royal, Acadia, which means he was probably born that same day or perhaps the day before. Babies were baptized as soon as possible, just in case something went wrong.

His parents were Jean Garceau dit Tranchemontagne and Marie Levron or Leveron.

Daniel’s godmother was Dame Marie Mius, the daughter of Jacques Mius. She married a French military man, subordinate to Acadian Governor Subercase.

Daniel Subercase, beloved leader and Governor of Acadia, was Daniel Garceau’s Godfather. According to the marriage record of Jean Garsseaux dit Tranchemontagne to Marie Levron, he was a “soldier of the garrison,” which meant that Daniel’s father, Jean, was a soldier under Subercase’s command.

Just days later, from June 6-17th, the English laid Port Royal under siege, or tried, but Subercase successfully ousted the English, breaking the siege.

Of course, infant Daniel knew nothing of this.

Two months later, on August 22nd, the English tried again, meeting with no more success than the first time. On September 1st, Subercase, with the assistance of the French soldiers and Acadian men, successfully thwarted that attempt as well.

The firing of guns and cannons might well have awakened Daniel. His mother was probably frightened, and his father was assuredly at the fort.

The warfare in Acadia in 1707 and 1708 was nearly incessant. The English landed, burned the homesteads, farms and villages, departed, and then returned to do it all over again.

In 1710, the Acadians lost the battle.

On September 4th, 1710, the English once again arrived, but this time, in full force. They outnumbered the Acadians 3400 soldiers to a total of 1250 people, many of whom lived in Beaubassin, not Port Royal. About 450 residents lived in or near Port Royal, of which only about 100 were men.

A month later, by October 5th, the ships had blockaded the harbour near Goat Island.

A week later, Subercase knew the Acadians were doomed, but tried to arrange the best surrender terms possible.

The terms included a provision that the, “”inhabitants of the cannon firing range of the fort” may remain on their properties for up to two years if they wish, provided they are prepared to take the oath to the British Crown.” If nothing else, he bought them time.

On October 16th, the keys to the fort were surrendered to the British, along with the rest of Acadia. The French soldiers and Acadian men were allowed to march out with dignity, drummers drumming and flags flying.

Cannon-firing range was about 3 English miles. That meant the Acadians had two years to relocate their “moveable items” to a French territory which at that time was any of the rest of French-held Canada. 481 Acadians pledged allegiance to the Queen of England, and the French troops left Port Royal, renamed by the English to Annapolis Royal in 1713.

We don’t know where Daniel Garceau’s parents were living, but if the family was living at the Levron homeplace, across the river from the fort, they were within sight and clearly within two miles. If that was the case, Daniel’s father would have been extremely concerned, because the family was clearly in danger. While the upriver residents were in a “tolerable” position, anyone that lived closer was not.

The parish priest, Justinien Durand, tried to gather and rally Acadians upstream at Pre Ronde, or Round Hill, where they might not be required to take the dreaded oath of allegiance to the English crown. Due to his efforts, he was kidnapped by the English in January 1711 and taken to Boston, as were 35 Acadians whose names we don’t know.

Does this signal that Daniel’s father, Jean Garceau, and the other Acadians were rabble-rousers, complicit in defying the required oath? Most likely. If there were 100 adult Acadian men, about one-third were kidnapped along with the priest.

Father Durand and the unfortunate Acadians were transported to Boston in January 1711 as captives, fully expecting to be exchanged for English hostages.

There were no parish records recorded between January 17h and December 20th when Justinien Durand returned and resumed his duties by “catching up” on baptisms he had missed and had taken place provisionally while he was absent.

In December 1711, the exchange was made, and Father Durand returned.

Indeed, the good Father noted in the book of burials Acadians that had died in his absence. Some people interpret this to mean that these four people died with Father Durand in Boston:

Died in 1711: Angélique Comeau, wife of Jacques Laure, Germain Bourgeois, Joseph Garcot, Pierre Teriot died in 1711 during their captivity in Boston; Justinien Durand, Rec. Miss.

The translations on the Nova Scotia Archives site omits Joseph Garcot altogether, but for the rest, interprets this as “died during Durand’s captivity at Boston.” It does not say whether or not these people were in Boston with Durand, or died in Acadia, but we know for sure that Germain Bourgeois was not in Boston. In fact, he was involved with the June 1711 Bloody Creek Massacre and is believed to have died in the Black Hole in Fort Anne.

The archives also translates some of the names differently. Joseph Teriot instead of Pierre Teriot, and adds Marie La Perrier, wife of Pierre Le Blanc dit Jasmin.

My French is not good enough to decipher this passage definitively.

The bottom line is that we don’t know for sure whether Daniel’s father, Jean Garceau, died in Boston, on the way to or the way back from Boston, or in Port Royal during this time. What we do know is that his death occurred while the priest was in Boston, sometime between January 27th and December 20th.

Frankly, I’d bet that Jean was not in Boston, or his widow would not have remarried just six days after the priest returned, carrying news of Jean’s death.

However, given the fact that his widow had three young children, one never knows.

There was no Joseph Garceau, so this death had to be Jean Garceau. You would think if Jean Garceau was with Father Durand, the good Father would have unquestionably known his name.

Adding to this evidence, Daniel’s mother, Marie, remarried to Alexander Richard on December 26, 1711, right after the priest returned, where she is listed as the widow of Jean Garceau.

Daniel probably had no memory of his father. He would only have been about three-and-a-half when his father engaged in battle with the English. He might have had a few hazy memories, or he may have had none at all.

Regardless, Daniel’s stepfather, Alexander Richard dit Boutin raised him as his own.

Daniel’s younger brother, Joseph Garceau, born in March of 1710, was buried under the Richard surname, even though he was the child of Jean Garceau. During his lifetime, Joseph used both surnames interchangeably.

Daniel was raised with his own two full brothers and six half-siblings, 3 brothers and 3 sisters.

Life Along the River

We don’t know exactly where Daniel grew up, but we do have some clues.

Daniel was born just three and a half years after his parents were married.

His mother, Marie Levron’s parents, Francois Joseph Levron, who probably arrived as a soldier, and Catherine Savoie, lived directly across the river from Port Royal. Literally in sight of the fort, which would have been a very dangerous location during the 1707, 1708, and 1710 battles with the English. Not protected by the fort and entirely exposed to the English.

Catherine Savoie’s parents lived a few miles further east, just below the BelleIsle Hall Acadian Cultural Centre.

Daniel Garceau would one day marry Anne Doucet, daughter of Rene Doucet and Marie Broussard.

Rene Doucet lived further west of the Levron family on the north side of the river, and the Broussard family lived further east of the Savoies for a total distance of about 9 miles between the homesteads. Of course, the Catholic church played in important role in the lives of all Acadians and is likely where the young people socialized.

Daniel Garceau’s mother remarried to Alexandre Richard the day after Christmas in 1711. Alexander’s father, Michel Richard married Madeleine Blanchard and lived at BelleIsle, possibly on or near the Savoie land. After her death, he married Jean Babin whose parents probably lived in the same area.

Alexander (Alexandre) Richard is quite confusing, because his father, Michel Richard had a son by that exact same name with both wives. Yes, seriously – and they both lived. Welcome to my rathole!

The elder Alexandre Richard, born in 1668 to Michel Richard and Anne Blanchard, married Isabelle Petitpas, and died in 1709. The younger Alexandre Richard (dit Boutin), born in 1686 to Michel Richard and Jeanne Babin, married Marie Levron in 1711 after Jean Garceau died.

So, there’s absolutely no question that there were two Alexander Richards, and no question that Marie Levron married the younger one because the older one was dead by that time.

This younger Alexandre Richard dit Boutin (born 1686) was probably raised at BelleIsle, because his mother, Jeanne Babin, a young widow with two children, married Laurent Doucet.

On this 1710 map, you can see the homestead of Laurent Doucet at BelleIsle. In other words, Alexander Richard born in 1686 dit Boutin grew up here, and likely met his future wife, Marie Levron, near here, too.

Daniel Garceau very likely spent his early years, before his father died and his mother remarried to Alexandre Richard someplace between Port Royal and BelleIsle. Then of course, after Daniel’s father died and his mother remarried, Daniel would have been living with his mother and stepfather at BelleIsle where Alexander Richard dit Boutin was raised in the home of Laurent Doucet.

Are you getting all this?

This is where it got even more confusing. Hang with me.

I found the homestead of Alexander Richard on the 1710 map, second from left, at the top. My lucky day. So I thought that Alexander Richard (born 1686) left the BelleIsle community after his marriage to widow Marie Levron to obtain land upstream.

That was before I knew there were two Alexander Richards, both sons of the same immigrant male. I mean, what the heck?? Who would ever have suspected that?

Another head-scratcher, before I realized there were two half-brothers, both named Alexandre Richard was that single, meaning unmarried, men simply didn’t have homesteads. So how did Alexander Richard have a homestead in 1710 when he didn’t marry until 1711?

I didn’t think too much about it at first, because, after all, there was an entry for Alexander Richard on the 1710 map.

The next second monkey-wrench was that the earlier Acadian censuses showed Alexander Richard living in that location, between the same neighbors, with his wife and children.

Wife and children? What wife and children?

Our Alexander Richard (born 1686) would still have been living with his mother and Laurent Doucet at BelleIsle where the 1701 and 1707 census shows them living. Except that census doesn’t show her children’s surnames by Jean Garceau – just the one name, Doucet, for the entire household.

Those censuses also confirm that the older Alexander Richard, born in 1668, is living on the land near present-day Bridgewater, not our Alexander Richard, born in 1686, dit Boutin, who was living with Laurent Doucet and his mother, Jean Babin.

I was very confused at this point, and connected enough puzzle pieces together to discover the same-name brothers, Alexander Richard (1668) and his brother, Alexander Richard (1686). There has to be a joke in there someplace! My brother Alexander and my other brother Alexander…but I digress.

After the 1710 surrender of Acadia to the British, there was only one more census, taken in 1714.

Click to enlarge image

That census shows us that our Alexander Richard (born 1686) is living with his wife and 4 sons beside Mathieu Doucet, with his wife (Anne Lord) and one son, and beside the LaMontagne family. Julien Lore dit LaMontagne lives next door along with his sons, Alexandre and Jacques. This location is very clearly between BelleIsle and the Lore land not far east of Granville Ferry.

The bottom line to all of this is that Daniel Garceau very likely grew up very close to the Lore land. This photo shows where some of those homesteads used to be on the raised knolls in the field.

A Funeral

In 1727, when Daniel was just 20, his mother, Marie Levron, died. She had given birth to her youngest of nine children just four and a half months earlier.

The family was most probably associated with the St. Laurent Church at BelleIsle, because one of Daniel’s aunts was married there in 1722 and it was much closer than Port Royal.

Daniel would have said goodbye to his mother in the little church and buried her in the churchyard outside, now lost to time. He wasn’t quite grown, wasn’t a young child, but he was an orphan just the same.

The Oath

For decades, there was a constant push and pull surrounding the issue of an oath of allegiance. The English insisted that the Acadians sign the dreaded oath, and the Acadians did everything possible to resist. Altogether, the Acadians signed three oaths, and all three times, the English wanted more. This was a hill the Acadians would, and did, die on. They felt the British would require them to fight against their countrymen, the Mi’qmaq people, with whom many had intermarried, and renounce their Catholic faith. They might even insist that they speak English! In 1710, the Acadians had initially been told that they had to vacate the Annapolis River basin and relocate to Beaubassin or another area, then by 1720, told they couldn’t leave.

Conflict, upheaval, and confusion were constant companions.

By 1720, Daniel would have been 13 – not yet a man, but an impressionable teen who was certainly paying attention to what the men discussed.

In 1725, yet another governor, Governor Armstrong, arrived. He realized he needed the Acadians to remain near Annapolis Royal to feed the English troops and convinced the Port Royal Acadians, representing about one-fourth of the Acadian population, to take the oath. He reminded them that England would not allow Catholics to serve in the military which should alleviate their concern about having to fight against their countrymen and family members. It worked! Encouraged by his success, the Governor tried the same thing in the Minas villages, but it didn’t work there.

Then Armstrong offered to allow them to take the following oath:

“I do sincerely promise and swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to His Majesty King George the Second, so help me God.”

Signing this oath meant that they wouldn’t have to “take up arms” against the French or Indians, they could leave whenever they wanted, and they had the freedom to have priests and to practice the Catholic religion.

Beginning then, they were known as the “neutral French” or “French neutrals.”

However, in 1729, that oath was considered too lenient and declared null and void. Everyone was unhappy, but the Acadians were unwavering in their insistence on a conditional oath, which they took in 1730.

This is where it gets interesting.

Phillips, the wizened old commander that was sent to replace Armstrong, reported that the Acadians took this oath:

“I sincerely promise and swear, as a Christian, that I will be utterly faithful and will truly obey His Majesty King George the Second, whom I acknowledge as the sovereign Lord of Nova Scotia and Acadia. So help me God.”

That’s what Phillips reported, but the actual oath continued, as follows:

“… that the inhabitants, when they have sworn hereto, will not be obliged to take up arms against France or against the Savages, and the said Inhabitants have further promised that they will not take up arms against the King of England or against its government.”

The priest and a notary signed as witnesses, but Phillips only sent the first part back to England. The second page was “somehow omitted,” but neither party knew.

In December 1729, Daniel Garceau, then 22, along with his brother, Joseph, signed that oath of allegiance to King George II. He had little choice, but after that, at least for awhile, everyone was happy.

Anne Doucet

Sometime around 1730, when he was about 23, Daniel Garceau married Anne Doucet, daughter of Rene Doucet and Marie Broussard.

Rene Doucet lived not even a mile west of Daniel Garceau’s Levron grandparents had settled, directly across from Port Royal.

Marie Broussard’s parents lived on east of Laurent Doucet and BelleIsle. These people clearly moved fluidly along the river, probably seeing each other regularly at church.

Daniel and Anne settled in this same general area, probably near or on the Lore land. Their oldest child, Marguerite, born in September of 1731, married Charles Lord in January of 1755, the son of Jacques (Montagne) Lore, their neighbor back in 1714.

The Lore/Lord family farmed land on the north side of the river, between BelleIsle on the east and the Doucet and Levron homes further west.

Two more Garceau children would marry sons of Jacques Lore after the 1755 deportation, which means the two families even stayed together as they were forced onto the ships. I envision them all holding hands.

Acording to the 1733/1753 map, the little Lore village had half a dozen homes clustered together, so one of them assuredly could have been Daniel Garceau’s.

Bucolic Years

I like to think of the years between Daniel’s marriage to Anne around 1730 and the deportation in 1755 as the bucolic years.

When life was still good and peaceful along the river, before everything blew up.

When the birds sang to welcome the springtime apple blossoms on the trees.

When the cows mooed to be milked, and butter was churned outside on porches.

When the fall apples were harvested to make applebutter or dried for the winter.

When as many babies were born as people died, and life had the cadence of continuity from one generation to the next.

When you worried about the weather and not if everyone was going to be killed.

When you prayed in your church, not in some godforsaken miserable place with nothing.

That hellscape was still a quarter century in the future when Daniel and Anne married.

I hope they truly enjoyed those 25 years or so, because the following chapter would be living hell.

Hell Arrives

Relations between the French and English had been deteriorating again. For decades, the Acadians had refused to sign a more restrictive oath to the English monarchy swearing complete allegiance, preferring to remain the “French neutrals.” They felt it was a matter of survival as they needed to coexist with the English, the French, and the Native people.

The English were becoming much less tolerant of the Acadians, who they considered French, and wanted to settle loyal English families in Acadia.

After all, those Acadians were so stubborn, troublesome and had attitudes. One might say they were ungovernable.

Finally, on July 28, 1755, orders were given by the British to round up and deport all French and Acadians in Nova Scotia – everyone who lived on those beautiful, productive farms that had, by now, been in Acadian families for generations.

On August 11th, the Grand Dérangement began at Fort Beauséjour, also known as Fort Cumberland, at Beaubassin.

Often, there and elsewhere, the Acadian men and boys over 10 were called to and then trapped in the church where the orders were read.

Then the women were ordered to gather their children and a few things they could carry, and board the ships. Essentially, the women and children were used as leverage to control the men.

Daniel Garceau’s younger brother, Joseph made his way to Beaubassin by 1741, so he, along with his wife and seven children, were deported from there. He wasn’t with Daniel along the Annapolis River.

At PRDH

Joseph is shown in New York in 1763 with a wife and four children. Six of his seven children are later accounted for via marriage or burial records in Quebec.

Daniel’s older brother, Pierre Garceau and his wife were deported from Port Royal with their three known children. Their oldest daughter, who had married Joseph Lord, also had two children. None of this family has been accounted for. An entire family, three generations, wiped from the face of the earth.

They may have been on the ship with Daniel, or perhaps not.

Daniel Garceau wound up in New York, but we have no idea if he was in contact with Joseph, or if he ever knew what happened to Pierre and his family.

Daniel, his wife, and ten of their children are later accounted for in Quebec.

Three of Daniel’s half-siblings are also accounted for in Quebec, one died before the deportation in Annapolis Royal, and two disappeared.

So much agony.

So much heartbreak.

The expulsion at Annapolis Royal began in the late summer or early fall, but did not go as planned.

By the time December arrived, the disheartened, hungry, and freezing cold Acadians knew there was no hope of evading their fate.

There were pockets of resistance, and some escaped, often into the woods, but Daniel and his family did not.

In total, someplace between 10,000 and 18,000 Acadians were displaced. After the first wave or two, the balance were hunted down. Families were scattered to the winds.

During the haphazard deportation process, families were often split up as they were herded like livestock onto waiting ships, with people finding themselves weeks later in the 13 colonies, the Caribbean, England, France, and eventually, Louisiana and Quebec. Many family members never made contact again or knew what happened to each other.

They sailed into the void.

Those who survived the actual deportation but died before they arrived in a location where church or parish records were kept are lost to us, especially if their descendants have not connected themselves to their ancestors either via records or DNA.

In October 1755, three ships were loaded from the Queen’s Wharf in Annapolis Royal  with unwilling passengers. They arrived in Massachusetts a few weeks later.

The balance of the Acadians would have spent weeks, if not months, agonizing, trying to figure out what to do.

Daniel Garceau’s wife’s uncle, Joseph Brousard, known as Beausoleil, was the legendary Acadian resistance fighter in Chignecto and Beaubassin, but that had little effect on the decision that had to be made by the Port Royal families. Ultimately, he too was captured, imprisoned, and deported, eventually leading a group to Haiti and, ultimately, to Louisiana in 1765. Beyoncé is one of his descendants.

The Port Royal families had contact with Beaubassin and may well have known what happened there in August and at Grand Pre.

Some Port Royal Acadians escaped to the south, to the Cape Sable peninsula, but they, too, were rounded up and shipped off to New York a few weeks later.

Some attempted to escape across the mountains to the north, but many froze and starved until the Mi’kmaq people found them in the spring and shepherded the survivors across the bay and on to New Brunswick.

As winter fell in Annapolis Royal, the remaining Acadian people were marched to the Fort and forced upon ships, directly across from the Levron home,. Perhaps they still hoped they would be able to return, to find their way home, or that they would be held as hostages, but eventually released or traded. It had happened in the past. It might just happen again.

They assuredly prayed relentlessly, but all to no avail.

Various newspapers tell the tale of two ships blown off course in a very late-season hurricane.

We know that in 1763, Daniel and his family were in New York where he petitioned, along with several other Acadian families, to be sent to France. That petition was denied, but the fact that they petitioned is gold to genealogists because it tells us where he was and how many children he had with him at that time. It also helps us reconstruct his trip.

Daniel and family most likely left Acadia on the ship, Experiment, that encountered a terrible storm and was blown to either Antique or St. Kitts in the Caribbean. Not that most people wouldn’t welcome some warmth in the winter, but about 20% of the Experiment’s passengers perished, and half of the people on her sister ship, the Edward, died.

This might explain what happened to Daniel’s brother, Pierre, who also lived in Port Royal, along with his entire family.

I told the story of this ill-fated journey and their unexpected detour through the eyes of Daniel’s 13-year-old daughter, Appoline Garceau.

Daniel’s other unmarried children were 22, 20, 16, 11, 9, 7, 4, and 3 when they were forced into the hold of that ship – terminating life as they knew it.

Daniel’s oldest daughter, Marguerite, had just married Charles Lore/Lord in January 1755. She was assuredly either pregnant, or had a newborn baby. However, there is no known child for her until 1766, so not only did that baby die, so did many more over the next 11 years. The

How soul-crushing. I can’t begin to imagine.

Nearly nine months later, in August, the beleaguered ship and hostage passengers finally docked in New York, probably at the port of New York in the harbour. Everyone knew the one in five people who died on the Experiment and were sent to a watery grave. One body every day or two was sent over the railing. They were assuredly neighbors and probably relatives. Many lost children.

And everyone knew the half of the passengers on the other ship, the Edward, that died too, although that ship landed in Connecticut, across the bay from New York. Their few possessions, blankets, cushions, and such, were burned on the beach in Connecticut to prevent the spread of whatever passengers were dying of. The New York passengers could have suffered the same fate, adding even more loss and grief to their horrific situation.

Reduced to paupers with nothing, many Acadians in New York became indentured servants. They had no choice if they wanted to eat.

How they must have hated the English.

Unfortunately, we have absolutely no concrete evidence where these families were living, or what happened to them and what they endured during the 11 or 12 years they are missing. Most New York families seem to be in the area that is now New York City, Long Island, or adjacent counties. The one thing we do know is that they were in close proximity to the Lore/Lord family, because daughter Appoline married Honore Lore someplace in New England in 1766.

Novelist Monique Michaud, when researching this family, says she found information that the Garceau family lived on Staten Island, which prompted her to visit Staten Island.

Additionally, by perusing the notarial records, she discovered that Daniel’s son, Jean-Baptiste Garceau, later identified his father, Daniel as a cooper. I later found that record in Jean-Baptiste’s marriage record too. I wonder if Daniel was a cooper back in Acadia, or if he learned that trade to earn a living in the shipyards of New York, or perhaps both.

I really encourage you to read Monique’s fine writing about the Garceau family, here.

The following map is from 1839, but it shows the locations of the shipyards along Staten Island’s north and northeast coastlines inside the shelter of the harbors.

I tend to think Monique is accurate, because Daniel was later identified as a cooper and Staten Island was known for its shipyards. Ships transported goods and water in barrels, which coopers constructed. The need was endless. His hands must have had layers of calluses built up over the years from the rough wood and tens of thousands of splinters.

I wonder if the Acadian men felt like failures, unable to protect their families from deportation. Unable to provide well for them during their exile. Maybe Daniel’s cooper trade made him more fortunate than most. Maybe that’s at least part of why none of his children died in exile.

Daniel was 48 years old when they were deported, and Anne was 42. They had brought 10 children into the world, and probably buried at least three in tiny graves that would have been abandoned at Port Royal – not by their choice.

Did they look back at the cemetery and the rubble of their homes as they sailed out of the harbour that frigid December morning?

The English burned everything so that the Acadians knew nothing remained to return to.

Their heartache was immeasurable.

Quebec

Daniel Garceau and Anne Doucet had 10 children born in Acadia. Eight were reported in 1763. Oldest daughter, Marguerite had married Charles Lord and is with him in New York. All ten of Daniel’s children are eventually accounted for in Quebec which is how we know they survived. That alone is something of a miracle.

Three of Daniel’s children married someplace in New England, two to sons of Jacques Lore, brothers of Daniel’s oldest daughter’s husband.

The balance of their children married not long after the family made it to Yamachiche in 1767. They must have left almost immediately after the Massachusetts governor reached an agreement with the Governor of Quebec allowing Acadians to settle there. Not just allowing them to move, but inviting them and offering FREE LAND!!

Free land to Acadians was like food to the starving.

During negotiations, the Massachusetts governor indicated that Massachusetts had “700 souls to send,” but I’d wager that as soon as Acadians in other colonies heard the news, they hurriedly made their way to Massachusetts. In early September 1766, between 800 and 1500 Acadians departed on ships supplied by Massachusetts, the first arriving on August 31, 1766.

Other Acadians probably made their way in any way possible. Some may have walked or taken carts.

We know that the Garceau family made it to Quebec by September 29, 1767, when Appoline’s marriage to Honore Lore was validated. Their first child was born in February 1768, so I’d wager they were married in New England between February and May 1767.

Finally, they felt safe, living back upon a river.

By this time, Daniel would have been 60 – not a young man by any stretch – and probably incredibly tired.

Physical labor would have been his only choice in New England. Either that or starve. The Acadians went from thriving farmers to paupers in the blink of an eye on that fateful day in the winter of 1755. Now, they had the opportunity to farm for themselves once again – and recover some shred of dignity. Quebec needed settlers. Acadians needed a home.

The Garceau family first arrived near Becancour and probably settled in the village of Saint Gregoire, which was at that time, Sainte Marguerite.

While the original church has been replaced, the old Acadian windmill remains. The above photo was taken from Rue Garceau which runs right behind the church.

Acadians were masters at water management, including mills.

Today, Rue Garceau reminds us of the original settlers. Many of Daniel’s descendants attended this church for decades and are buried here.

The original church would have stood here, near the windmill, and the original cemetery would have been located just outside the church. The original cemetery no longer exists. There’s a newer cemetery about half a mile or so down the road. I don’t know if the graves were moved.

Shortly, the family traveled down the river, about 10 miles, to Yamachiche.

The history of Yamachiche provides insight into how the Acadians came to settle here.

In July 1767, a schooner arrived at the mouth of the Yamachiche River carrying a large contingent of Acadians who were originally deported to Massachusetts. The Lesieur family, still the owner of the Grosbois-East seigneury, was ready to welcome them on a concession still to be cleared of trees.

Up to 42 Acadian families, or 192 individuals, settled on the Lesieur family’s concession. The French-Canadian villagers of St. Anne of Yamachiche parish, founded in 1722, gave them a warm welcome.

The parish priest, Jacques-Maxime Chef from the city of La Garenne, did hasten to validate the marriages and baptisms of all Acadians who could not officially take place in Massachusetts for lack of Catholic priests.

Historian Andre-Varl Vachon discovered the actual record of the ship that he believes delivered Daniel Garceau’s family. He used the 1763 census and the number of passengers, combined with Yamachiche records to reconstruct the families on that ship. He states that Daniel and family left New York on March 26th, 1767 and were one of the 22 families that arrived on the ship Diana at the port of Quebec on June 11, 1767.

OMG!!!

Ironic that the trip from New York to Quebec meant that they had to sail around and past Nova Scotia. Thankfully, not past Annapolis Royal, but there must have been a lot of tears shed, just the same. They knew there was nothing left for them there, and the English planters from New England had been in possession of their farms for a decade. No, there was no going back, and no one would have wanted to see what used to be their homes with English families living there. Now, they were the outsiders. Strangers in what had been their own land.

They were headed for a fresh start, to establish a new Acadia. They finally had hope.

Their prayers had been answered!

This is the scene that would have greeted them as they sailed up the St. Lawrence and saw the Port of Quebec in the distance.

The port of Quebec is Quebec City, perched high on a hill – certainly a welcome sight for French-speaking Acadians. Somehow vastly ironic that the English were in charge of Quebec too – the difference being that no one wanted to settle there, on uncleared land in the frigid, snowy north among French-speakers – except, of course, the displaced Acadians. They were thrilled!

The Acadians would have taken a few days to evaluate their options. Who was welcoming? Where were resources located? Was family already there someplace? Maybe family they hadn’t seen in years? And, about that land…

Quebec City is downriver about 90 miles from the Trois Rivieres, Yamachiche, Becancour area, so it makes perfect sense that they arrived at the Yamachiche River a month later.

The mouth of the Yamachiche River is swampy, an area that would have felt very familiar to homesick Acadians. The first settlement location was not in present-day Yamachiche, but where the upper red arrow is pointing, near today’s entrance loop to Highway 40. We know this because the old cemetery was located there and the early graves were moved to present-day Yamachiche in 1795.

Appoline Garceau’s first child was baptized in Yamachiche on February 28, 1768, and her brother, Jean Joseph Garceau died there on May 8, 1770, leaving his wife and eight children. The family had clearly put down roots in this community.

Daniel’s health may have been failing. In 1772, he turned 65, “retirement age” today.

On August 28, 1772, he died and was buried in the cemetery at Ste. Anne Church at Yamachiche, but that cemetery was not where it is located today.

On the 28th of August, 1772, I, the undersigned, have buried in the cemetery the body of Daniel Garneau, aged seventy years. The witnesses present were François Lavergne, Joseph Vivard, and several others who declared they could not sign.

Daniel’s original burial location was located here, about a mile from where his remains would have been moved 23 years later.

This original Yamachiche Cemetery held burials from 1654 to 1794. In 1795, all bodies were removed to the new Sainte-Anne Cemetery within the town.

The original church is long gone now, and in 1795, all of the burials in the cemetery adjacent to the church were moved inland to the present-day village. This location was quite close to the river, and I’m willing to bet that it flooded, prompting the move inland. The original cemetery was someplace in the meadow or woods, near the yellow marker above, or perhaps both. It may also have extended beneath what is today a modern road.

All burials, both pioneer and modern are reportedly located in the Ste. Anne Cemetery behind the church in town.

We don’t know where Daniel or the older burials were reburied in Sainte Anne, or if they were buried separately or together, but FindAGrave shows a few older burials near the monument beside the road in the rear.

Daniel’s remains rest someplace here, perhaps near the locations of those older graves.

His descendants placed a marker in 1995 honoring Daniel, Anne, and their family’s long journey, although Anne is not buried here.

Photo courtesy Giselle Cornier https://www.wikitree.com/photo/jpg/Doucet-37

The inscription is engraved in a black granite stone that pays tribute to the Garceau family. I used both Google translate and ChatGPT to translate.

Garceau
Yesterday to Tomorrow…
All United Together

After being driven
from our lands of Acadia in 1755
and exiled in a foreign country
under harsh conditions,
we are now free
and choose this land
as our new homeland.

Our descendants will take root here
and remember their origins.

Daniel Garceau and Anne Doucet

Unveiled: 1995-07-09

Erected by Garceau-Auger for the ADJGT

In addition to the inscription, there is an illustration that shows the journey of the Garceau family who voyaged from France to Acadia (present-day Nova Scotia), then from Acadia to Quebec.

Not to mention that unplanned detour to the Caribbean, thanks to a storm that might well have ended the lives of all on board, followed by a decade someplace in New York.

Where Did Daniel Live?

Daniel’s family may actually have lived halfway between Sainte Marguerite, now Saint-Gregoire, and Yamachiche.

The road, Rang des Garceau, marks the location where Daniel’s children and grandchildren lived, which certainly suggests Daniel settled there, too.

It looks like quite a distance today, by road, but then, it was just a couple miles to the river from Sainte Marguerite/Saint Gregoire, then maybe 7 miles by water to Rang des Garceau, then another 5 miles to the original church in Yamachiche.

Rang des Garceau, as it exists today, is just over two miles end to end, but of course, we don’t know how the modern roads have affected the east end where it intersects with the modern highways. We also don’t know if they moved once they got there after they were assigned land.

You can see that there’s still quite a bit of forest, and a few well-manicured fields.

Let’s take a drive, west to east. The older buildings are on the west end of the road.

This barn and two adjacent homes look to be quite old.

Notice the area in front of the barn. That could be an old homestead foundation.

Look at the exposed side of this house, which is adjacent to the barn. How interesting.

Just a short distance down the road, there’s an extremely old log home. I can’t help but wonder if Daniel lived here, although the traditional Acadian homes had a rather unique slanted roof to them. However, they may well have built what they could as soon as possible.

This is how I will forever think of Daniel in Quebec, a humble home surrounded by a garden. Maybe that’s “Anne” weeding.

This barn isn’t old enough to be Daniel’s, but if his children and grandchildren owned this land, it was assuredly theirs. This would have been a prime location for livestock because there’s a very small stream that runs to the right side of the barn, crossing under the road. The fields behind the buildings would have been cleared by the Garceau family.

The older homes are on the north side of the road. These fields on the south side are quite reminiscent of the reclaimed marshes of Acadia.

Daniel Garceau must have felt vindicated, at least somewhat. After all he and his family had been through, he could finally relax.

The Acadians weren’t just tolerated here, they were welcomed. They weren’t constantly in jeopardy. They no longer had to be afraid.

Finally, the Acadians had a new homeland.

Together.

Along the path that would one day be named Rang des Garceau.

Life’s normal rhythm resumed. Births, baptisms, marriages, deaths and burials.  Ceremonies and sacred rites performed by a priest, in French, in a Catholic church.

They could once again be buried in consecrated ground where their descendants, for generations, could come to visit their graves.

Once again, they had roots.

The Acadians were home.

_____________________________________________________________

Follow DNAexplain on Facebook, here.

Share the Love!

You’re always welcome to forward articles or links to friends and share on social media.

If you haven’t already subscribed (it’s free,) you can receive an e-mail whenever I publish by clicking the “follow” button on the main blog page, here.

You Can Help Keep This Blog Free

I receive a small contribution when you click on some of the links to vendors in my articles. This does NOT increase your price but helps me keep the lights on and this informational blog free for everyone. Please click on the links in the articles or to the vendors below if you are purchasing products or DNA testing.

Thank you so much.

DNA Purchases and Free Uploads

Genealogy Products and Services

My Books

Genealogy Books

Genealogy Research

Just Walking Each Other Home

I wasn’t going to write a Christmas or holiday article this year, but here we are. I couldn’t NOT write this, although, trust me, I tried.

This one is quite different, however. It’s about making a difference and, well…meet my new family.

The holidays are difficult for many people for a variety of reasons. Layers upon layers of loss and grief of all different descriptions.

Sometimes, as we lose people in our lives and there aren’t any in the “next generation” to fill new seats at the table. Then, there are none left.

Sometimes, we have recently lost a dear pet. Often, we’re closer to our pets than other humans, and their death is devastating. Our fur-family loves us unconditionally.

Sometimes, family is far away, or drifts away, or worse.

Sometimes, a run of bad luck, bad choices, or poor health leaves people in dire straights.

Sometimes, it’s the dark, cold, and grey of unrelenting winter – or maybe all of the above.

So, in a moment of insanity about 10 days ago, I decided to stop by a local Medicare/Medicaid facility to see if they had someone who needed something. Something as in something physical, such as clothes, or a visitor.

In particular, I had a hand-made cover to donate, with a few more in reserve.

I spoke with the aids a week ago Sunday, and they were talking about three people who didn’t have enough clothes. One woman only had one change. That’s all she owned.

I returned on Monday to speak with the administrator about how best to proceed.

This is a small facility with about 45 residents. It’s clean but rather threadbare. There’s no urine smell, which is always a good sign, and also no bleach smell or other “coverup” scents. The staff is very nice, welcoming, and caring.

The residents all appear to be clean and they don’t smell. It’s both an assisted living and memory care facility, but I’ve come to learn that even the people on the assisted living side are very close to needing the memory care side.

Why am I telling you this?

Because, as difficult as this is for me, there’s a huge blessing here for others. They really need us. Plus, it’s my holiday story for you.

Maybe I should subtitle this: The 10 Days of Holiday Insanity, because we’ve visited every day, and every day has held surprises of one sort or another.

I’ve disguised names. They have all given permission to take and publish their pictures, but all things considered, I’m not sure they have the agency to understand that, so all photos are disguised, too.

I discovered that they like to have their pictures taken with whatever they received and then be shown the photo. I always ask them to smile and tell them how wonderful they look – and they light right up. And everyone of them likes the photo when I show them. They also like to look at photos on my phone.

I’m borrowing liberally from my Facebook page where I’ve written about this adventure day by day. I’ll pause here to thank others. I never asked for donations of anything, but many of my friends reached out with offers and goods. Thank you to those who have helped and contributed in any way, including moral support. This hasn’t been exactly easy for me.

To be VERY clear, I’m NOT asking you for anything except to perhaps look around your community to see where you can make a difference.

Meet my three adopted family members this holiday season.

Steve

Steve has no family, at all. Translated, that means he has the barest necessities.

He’s a veteran, and after he got out of the service, he was a metal fabricator, a “tin man,” as he puts it.

He likes cars and trucks. But mostly, he likes snacks. Not healthy snacks like the facility provides, but the kind of bad-for-you snacks that all of us like.

He doesn’t feel well often, so we sometimes just have to leave his gift by the side of his bed in the gift bag and talk to him for a few minutes.

The other thing he likes to do is sit outside on the patio, so we got him a blue denim shirt, some sweatpants, a couple of t-shirts, and a patriotic throw for his bed.

Plus snacks, lots of snacks.

Ellen

Ellen is such a lovely lady. She knows that she’s forgetting things, and it worries her. She asked for puzzle books so that she can keep her mind sharp.

She doesn’t remember me from day to day unless I give her memory queues.

For example, one afternoon, she was sitting in the activity room, and outside, a fox wandered through the backyard. The building backs up against the woods.

Ellen was up and out the door like a shot. Past the patio like a sprinter. Immediately, the staff was off to retrieve her – but Ellen was thrilled to see that fox and quickly rounded the building.

Now, every day when I visit, I ask if she remembers the fox, and every day, you can see the light bulb come on, and she says she thought she was dreaming. She does sleep a lot. She’s always thrilled to know the fox was real.

Ellen has received several pieces of clothing, a throw for her bed for napping, which she does liberally, plus puzzle books.

Her favorite thing, though, is to visit and look at pictures on my phone. We look at dogs and cats and quilts and my daughter and whatever else she wants to look at. Sometimes, she tells me stories.

I just love Ellen. She’s a beautiful soul, concerned for all animals and people, and just lovely.

Bear

Bear, bless his heart.

Bear is someplace in his 80s, although he doesn’t remember how old he is. I can’t help but think about my ancestors who didn’t either.

Bear was a Navy Seal and then a farmer. He loves Harley Davidson motorcycles and thinks he still owns one or some. I don’t know that he ever did, but that doesn’t matter. He does in his mind and it makes him happy.

I’ve confirmed his military service, plus I’ve seen his literal physical scars.

His picture from when he graduated from boot camp is on his dresser. He served in Vietnam and was shot 6 times in his knees and once in the back.

You may recall that I lost my brother to the long-term effects of being shot down in Vietnam. I told him my brother served and was shot down. He asked if Dave lived. I teared up. He hugged me. We both cried. He told me that he was sorry.

I went to the local Harley dealer hoping to score some free Harley gear for Bear, but that didn’t work. A helpful employee showed me the closeout clothing rack, though, and gave me a 25% discount – plus, my friends began to donate.

We went back that same day with a Harley cap for Bear and the next day with a Harley t-shirt. He showed me his boot from when he was a little boy and told me that he was one of 10 children. How hard his mother had it raising them on the farm.

People love it when you ask them about their lives and show interest in their stories.

He’s incredibly proud of his military service.

The next day, I found him a flag and Constitution shirt. He had trouble reading it, so I read it aloud to him as he cried.

OMG!

I cried too.

We hugged each other.

God bless this man.

He does have moments of clarity. I saw him smile with a glint of recognition when he first saw me and cheerily said, “Hello.”

I’ve gone every day, but yesterday…well…Bear was having a rough day.

He told me his mother died, and they wouldn’t let him leave to go to her funeral.

He had her picture on his table and was truly distressed.

I gave him a hug and distracted him with his gifts.

We gave him a patriotic throw for his bed, which he loved, and two Harley wall decorations. His room is so very bare. He wanted to find his Harley hat, so we did and put it on him.

Then he told me about his mother again and that her funeral is today.

I have way too much experience with this from prior family members, so I told him the funeral is over now. I told him I thought he went on his Harley. I asked him if he didn’t remember the funeral, and he said he did. I could tell he felt better.

Whew!

Then he told me he was going to be in a parade. Told me he was getting ready to go out to eat before the parade.

I asked him where, and we had a nice conversation about who-knows-what.

Another resident came in and tried to flirt with him. That was so cute. She asked if I was his wife, and I had to explain to both of them that I’m married to someone else.

He said, “but you’re my family, right, because you come to see me.” I told him that I had adopted him and yes, I’m family.

My heart just aches.

Then he asked if I wanted to go for a ride on his Harley with him. I told him I had to go back to work, so we’d have to do that some other time, and he was fine with that. I told him I’d be back tomorrow, which made him happy.

I know he won’t remember 10 minutes later, but he’s happy right now and he’s happy for a little bit every day that I show up.

He wants to visit with Jim again. He told Jim earlier in the week that he has a good handshake. He’s so happy when anyone comes to visit. You can see all the residents look hopefully when someone walks by.

Bear asked if he could kiss my cheek goodbye. I gave him a hug, too, and a kiss on the cheek.

I was walking out the door to his room when he turned in his wheelchair, looked at me, smiled, and said, “Love you,” just like my brother Dave used to do. That was the last thing Dave ever said to me. I smiled and said, “Love you,” and quickly escaped down the hallway past the lady who is always screaming and the people who wander aimlessly all day, tears streaming down my face for their loneliness.

I am not good at this. I would much rather die than be abandoned and confused.

I hope someday someone is kind enough to tell me that I attended my mother’s funeral, and listen to my stories about a cowboy boot. Or maybe my stories will be about my ancestors.

The Shelter

I didn’t mean to go to the shelter. Truly, I didn’t.

On Friday, the administrator of the assisted living home where our three adopted people live declined 8 or 9 personal-size quilts or lap robes, whatever you would call them. She said they already have “so many blankets.” Needless to say, I was stunned. They were for the residents, not the “facility.” However, we had little choice except to take them back home.

Then, CASA wasn’t taking donations either. Seriously??? I began to question if people really do like the quilts I make them, or if they are just being nice. Now I see how quilts wind up at Goodwill.

A third place said they like soft, plushy blankets, not cotton. WHATEVER.

On the way home, I was really struggling with where to donate those small quilts where they would actually be appreciated. It was depressing. I already struggle with the holidays, and this didn’t help at all.

Then, two things happened. First, I got a notice on my phone that the local warming shelter would be open tonight for homeless people who sleep on the ground in various places. Just so you know, this includes children.

These people are in dire need. Some from their own poor choices, some from mental illness, some from whatever. It doesn’t matter. Many here got flooded out in two back-to-back hurricanes. One woman lives in her car. Once you’re in that situation, it’s extremely difficult to get out of it.

This clicked with what my friend had posted that morning about having lost her son several years ago today.

I immediately knew what we needed to do.

We went home and gathered more things. Warm felt booties and socks, plus another blanket. When the church that offers their building as the warming center opened for donations at 5:30, we were waiting.

They were grateful. So very grateful.

They said the people would love that their little quilt came in a gift bag. I wondered how long it had been since they had a gift, as such.

When we left, their clients were waiting patiently in line for a warm place, a hot meal, often the only hot meal since they were last there, and some shred of dignity. Many of the donations are things like underwear and socks. They can also safely shower there. There is no homeless shelter in this county.

The entire warming center is volunteer staffed and solely run on donations from the community, including food.

They said they accommodate from 20-35 people per night when it drops below 39 degrees, and so far this season, they have helped 88 people. Many people are repeat clients. Yes, they call them clients.

I couldn’t help but think how this was actually fulfilling Christ’s mission. How he said to care for the least of us. He didn’t say except for those most in need or the ones with very serious problems, or the ones that are inconvenient or can’t remember your name. If I recall, he said something about not being judgmental, too.

So, we remembered and honored my friend’s son today with our contributions. I knew that they would be going into the woods tomorrow when the shelter closed after breakfast, but they would at least be in the possession of someone who truly needs them.

Then Jim and I got Chinese on the way home, and my fortune was truly eerie.

This is your fortune, too, and really, the fortune for all of humanity.

So I ask you…

Look around.

Who needs their hand held, a hug, or some time?

Maybe a hot meal or some snacks.

A helping hand of some type.

Just someone to listen.

Who needs walking home?

Leave No Stone Unturned, No Ancestor Behind: 10 Easy Steps to Capture DNA Clues

There’s a lot, a whole lot that DNA testing can tell you. Not just your own tests, but the genetic information carried by your relatives that you do not.

Recently, I’ve been reviewing my brick walls, which led me to realize there are several ancestors who are missing their mitochondrial DNA and/or Y-DNA  results. I need these to learn more about my ancestors that can’t be revealed any other way – and to break down those pesky brick walls.

I’ve solved two mysteries recently, one thanks to a Big Y-700 test, and a second very unexpectedly thanks to mitochondrial DNA – both thanks to cousins who tested. These revelations were very encouraging, especially since there’s no way other than DNA for me to break through these brick walls. The mitochondrial test had been sitting there, waiting for what seemed like forever until just the right other person tested.

I am in the process of unlocking several brick-walled ancestors by providing testing scholarships to people who are appropriately descended from known ancestors in those lines.

Don’t leave information on the table. If I were to tell you there even MIGHT be a book available about your family, you’d overturn Heaven and Earth to find it – but you don’t need to do that. All you need to do is order DNA tests for cousins.

All cousins can provide useful autosomal DNA results, but you do need to find appropriate cousins for Y-DNA and mitochondrial DNA testing.

I’m sharing the steps for how I accomplish this! You’ll be amazed at what’s out there – and someone may already have tested!

Take Advantage of the Holidays

I’m sharing NOW because it’s the holidays and you’re likely to gather with people you don’t see any other time – and because the best sale of the year for both Y-DNA and mitochondrial DNA lasts from now through the end of the year.

These two factors combined mean strike while the iron is hot.

Prices for new tests and bundles are at an all-time low.

If you or your relatives have already taken a lower-level test, now is the time to upgrade to either the Big Y-700 or the mtFull Sequence test.

Step 1 – Test Yourself and Your Known Family

If you’re a male, order both the Big Y-700 test and mitochondrial DNA tests.

Be sure to click on “See More” for more useful tools.

When you receive your results, be sure to click on all of the tabs in your results, and do the same by clicking through to Discover from your account. Discover has 13 more goodies for you to help with your genealogy.

Both your personal page and Discover are essentially chapters of your own personal book about your DNA results. 25 very interesting chapters, to be precise, that are uniquely you.

I’ve written about understanding Y-DNA results here, and mitochondrial results here. My book, Complete Guide to FamilyTreeDNA, covers both along with Discover.

Discover provides robust information for Y-DNA haplogroups. If you’ve taken a Big Y-700 test, you’ll want to click through from your page to receive additional, personalized and more robust information than is available through the free public Discover tool. That said, the public version of Discover is an amazing tool for everyone.

After the new Mitotree is released for mitochondrial DNA, mitochondrial haplogroups will be available in Discover too.

I can’t even begin to stress how important these tools are – in particular the Time Tree, the Group Time Tree for members of group projects, and the Match Time Tree for your own matches.

Who Can Test For What?

Once you’ve tested yourself, you will want to take a look in your pedigree chart at branches further up your tree to see who can be tested to represent specific ancestors.

Let’s begin with my father’s side.

A mother contributes her mitochondrial DNA to all of her children, so your father carries the mitochondrial DNA of his mother.

If you’re a female, and your father is available to test, you’ll want to test BOTH his mitochondrial DNA and Y-DNA, because there’s no way for you to obtain that information from your own test. Females don’t have a Y chromosome, and men don’t pass on their mitochondrial DNA.

If you’re a male, you can test your own mitochondrial DNA and Y-DNA, but you’ll need to test your father’s mitochondrial DNA to obtain his mother’s. You might still want to test your father’s Y-DNA, however, because you may discover a personal family haplogroup. How cool is that??!! Your own tiny branch on the tree of mankind!

Your father’s mitochondrial DNA provides you with mitochondrial matches and haplogroup information for your paternal grandmother – in this case, Ollie Bolton.

If your father and his siblings can’t test, then all of the children of your paternal aunts carry your paternal grandmother’s mitochondrial DNA.

If they have no children or they can’t test, then the children of Ollie Bolton’s mother, Margaret Claxton/Clarkson all carry her mitochondrial DNA, and the children of Ollie’s sisters continue the line of descent through all daughters to the current generation.

The male children of Joseph “Dode” Bolton and Margaret Claxton carry his Y-DNA. Fortunately, that’s not one of our missing haplogroups.

Yes, you may have to climb up your tree and climb down various branches to find a testing candidate.

One of the reasons I’m using this example is because, while I have a high-level haplogroup for my grandmother, Ollie Bolton, we need a full sequence tester – and I’m offering a mitochondrial DNA testing scholarship for anyone descending from Margaret Claxton (or her direct female ancestors) through all females to the current generation, which can be male.

Ok, now let’s switch to the maternal side of your tree.

On the other side of your tree, your maternal grandfather or your mother’s brothers will provide the Y-DNA of your mother’s father’s line. Your mother’s uncles or their sons will provide your grandfather’s Y-DNA line, too. In this case, that’s John Whitney Ferverda, who carries the Y-DNA of his father, Hiram Bauke Ferverda/Ferwerda.

Your maternal grandfather or his siblings will provide the mitochondrial DNA of their mother, Evaline Louise Miller.

If they are deceased or can’t test, for mitochondrial DNA, look to the children of Evaline Miller’s daughters or their descendants through all females to the current generation, which can be male.

And yes, in case you’re wondering, I do need Evaline Miller’s mitochondrial line too and am offering a scholarship.

You might have noticed that I’ve been inching my way up my tree. All of my immediate relatives have passed over already, so I’m now looking for testers that I don’t know but who I’m related to.

If you’re seeing family members anytime soon, figure out if their Y-DNA, mitochondrial DNA, or autosomal DNA would be useful for your common genealogy. Take advantage of the opportunity.

Next, you’ll want to figure out which ancestors need haplogroups and locate appropriate cousins.

Step 2 – Identify Ancestors Who Need Haplogroups

Peruse your tree to determine which of your ancestors you need haplogroup information for. To make it easy, on my computer, but never in a public tree anyplace, I store the haplogroup of my ancestor as a “middle name” so I can easily see which ones I have and which ones I need. Sometimes, I have a high-level haplogroup and either need a new tester or someone to upgrade.

Sometimes, I have one tester from a line but need a second for confirmation.

In this example, I’m not missing confirmation on any Y-DNA haplogroups (although I am further upstream on different lines,) but I do need four different mitochondrial DNA lineages.

For easy reference, make a list of all of the lines you can’t confirm with two testers from different children of the same ancestor.

You just might get lucky and discover that someone has already tested!

Step 3 – Check FamilyTreeDNA Projects

Check FamilyTreeDNA Projects to see if someone has already tested to represent those ancestors on your list.

Click here for the Group Project Search. It’s located at the very bottom of the main FamilyTreeDNA page in the footer.

I’m going to use Estes as an example since I’m the volunteer administrator of that project and am very familiar with the lineages.

I’m searching for projects that include the surname Estes.

The projects displayed on the list are projects where the volunteer administrators listed Estes as a possible surname of interest. It doesn’t mean those projects will be of interest to everyone or every line with that surname, but evaluate each project listed.

You probably want the surname project, but if there’s not a surname project for your surname, try alternate spellings or consider checking other projects.

You can see at the bottom that 384 people of both sexes by the surname of Estes have tested at FamilyTreeDNA.

Now, let’s look at the Estes project. Note that not everyone with the Estes surname has joined the Estes project.

I’ve clicked on the “Estes” link which takes me to an additional information page where I can read a description and click to view the project.

For the Estes project, you do not have to join to view the results. Nor does your surname have to be Estes. All Estes descendants of any line are welcome. Everyone can benefit from the Advanced Matching within project feature to see who else you match within the project by selecting a wide range of individual and combined filters.

Click on the Project Website link shown in the search results.

If you’re searching for a male Estes ancestor, you’ll want to review the project’s Y-DNA Results and the Group Time Tree, for sure, and possibly the Map as well.

Let’s pretend I’m trying to determine if anyone has tested who descends from my ancestor, Abraham Estes, the founding Estes ancestor in Virginia who arrived in the mid-1600s.

In the Estes project, the volunteer administrator has divided the Estes male participants by sons of Abraham, the immigrant. Only three are shown here, but there are several.

Some of the participants have completed their Earliest Known Ancestor information, in the red box. Sometimes people don’t think to update these when they make breakthroughs.

If you descend from Abraham’s son, Sylvester, three men have taken the Big Y-700. That’s the test results you need.

If you descend from Abraham’s son, Abraham, no project participants have taken the Big-Y test to represent that line, although six people have tested, so that’s great news. Maybe you can offer an upgrade scholarship to one or some of those men.

In other words, to establish the haplogroup for that lineage, at least two men need to test or upgrade to the Big Y-700, preferably through two different sons of the common ancestor. A new, more defining haplogroup is often formed every two or three generations for Y-DNA.

Your genetic pedigree chart looks a lot like your genealogy pedigree chart.

Click any image to enlarge

The project Group Time Tree shows selected groups of men who have taken Big Y tests, along with their Earliest Known Ancestor, if they’ve provided the information. This is one of the reasons why the Big Y-700 is so critically important to genealogy. The time granularity is amazing and can answer the question of whether men by the same surname descend from the same common ancestor – and when.

If you’ve taken a Family Finder autosomal test at FamilyTreeDNA, or uploaded an autosomal file from another vendor, you may match one of these men or another male that descends from the Estes line if they, too, have taken an autosomal test.

This same process applies to mitochondrial DNA, but generally surname projects aren’t (as) relevant for mitochondrial DNA since the surname changes every generation. However, sometimes other projects, such as the Acadian AmerIndian Project are quite beneficial if you have Acadian ancestry, or a geographic or regional project like the French Heritage Project, or something like the American Indian Project.

Another great way to find testers is by utilizing your Family Finder test.

Step 4 – Family Finder at FamilyTreeDNA

The next step is to see if you match anyone with the surname you’re searching for by using your autosomal test results, so select your Family Finder Matches.

At FamilyTreeDNA you’ll want to search your matches by the surname you seek. This surname search lists any tester who has that surname, or anyone who has entered that surname in their surname list. Please note that this search does NOT read ancestors in your matches’ trees. You’ll still need to view trees.

Reviewing the 32 Estes Family Finder matches reveals several men, but one man with the Estes surname has already taken a Y-DNA 25-marker test, so he would be an excellent candidate to offer a Big Y-700 upgrade scholarship. If he’s not interested or doesn’t respond, there are several more men to contact.

Click on your match’s name to display the profile card, along with the Earliest Known Ancestors, both Y-DNA and mitochondrial DNA haplogroups if they have tested, and the assigned haplogroup based on their testing level.

Craft an email and offer a testing scholarship. This will help both of you. I’ll provide a sample email at the end of this article.

If you match a female with an Estes surname, her father, brother, uncle or cousin may either have already tested or be willing.

If you match someone who has a different surname, that means they have an Estes surname in their surname list and may know a potential tester. If your match has a tree, click to check.

I’ve found that matching through a company where you’ve both tested is the easiest way to encourage someone to take an additional test, but certainly, it’s not the only way.

Step 5 – WikiTree

WikiTree is a quick and easy way to see if anyone has taken Y-DNA or mitochondrial DNA test that should reflect a particular ancestor’s Y-DNA or mitochondrial DNA.

I just googled “Moses Estes 1711-1787 WikiTree” and clicked to view.

Each ancestor includes both Y-DNA and mitochondrial DNA information, in addition to people who descend from that ancestor through only autosomal lines.

In this case, two men have provided their Y-DNA results that pertain to Moses Estes. They have tested at different levels, which is why they have different haplogroups. That doesn’t mean either is “wrong,” one is just more refined than the other. You can correlate their kit number with the Estes surname project. People often don’t update their haplogroup information at WikiTree when it’s updated at FamilyTreeDNA.

Please note that if the genealogy is wrong, either at WikiTree or individually, the haplogroup may not reflect the appropriate lineage for the ancestor. Check to be sure that there’s no conflict showing between two testers for the same ancestor. For example, the same ancestor clearly can’t have two different base haplogroups, like E and R. The Discover Compare tool can help you evaluate if two haplogroups are in the same part of the Y-DNA tree.

When possible, it’s always best to test a close family member to represent your lineage even if someone else has already tested.

Scan down the list of autosomal testers for that ancestor to see if there’s someone with the Estes surname.

WikiTree provides additional tools to find descendants.

Sign in to WikiTree. You’ll see the ID of the profile you’re viewing – in this case – Estes-167. Click the down arrow and select “Descendants.”

This view shows all descendants through five generations, but you can click on DNA Descendants to see only Y-DNA descendants, X-DNA, or mitochondrial DNA descendants for female ancestors.

You may find people who are living and have added themselves who you can contact to offer a DNA testing scholarship.

Step 6 – MyHeritage

At MyHeritage, you can also search your DNA matches by surname.

Click on “Review DNA Match” to view more detail, including locations. Look to see if you have a Theory of Family Relativity Match which suggests how you may be related. That’s golden!

There’s no Y-DNA information at MyHeritage, BUT, you can search by surname and view DNA matches that either carry that surname or have that surname in their tree as an ancestor.

I have a total of 75 “Estes” matches, and other than the kits that I manage, searching through my matches shows:

  • Two Estes men connected to the same small tree, but that’s OK, I’m a genealogist!

  • One Estes male match with a Theory of Family Relativity. My lucky day!

You can contact your match easily through the MyHeritage messaging system and offer a DNA testing scholarship at FamilyTreeDNA. You may also want to share your email address.

MyHeritage customers may not be familiar with Y-DNA or mitochondrial DNA testing, so you might want to share this article about the 4 Kinds of DNA for Genealogy.

MyHeritage testers can also upload their DNA file to FamilyTreeDNA for free to receive autosomal matches plus a complimentary mid-range Y-DNA haplogroup. This free haplogroup is not even close to the detailed resolution of a Big Y-700 test, but it’s something, and it may well be an enticing first step for people who are only familiar with autosomal testing.

Step 7 – At Ancestry

At Ancestry, select DNA Matches and then search by surname.

You can search by the surname of the tester, which is very useful, or by people who have Estes in their trees.

I started with the surname Estes, because it’s the most straightforward and I may find a perfect male candidate for Y-DNA. If someone’s “screen name” doesn’t show as Estes, they won’t appear in the results of this search. In other words, if your Ancestry screen name is “robertaestes” you won’t show in this search, but “Roberta Estes” will.

For mitochondrial DNA, you would want to search for the surname in your matches’ trees. Unfortunately, you cannot search for the specific ancestor in someone’s tree, at least not directly.

Of my 19 Estes surname matches, ten are males, and of them:

  • Three have unlinked trees
  • Three have very small linked trees, but I can work on extending those if need be
  • Three have public linked trees AND a common ancestor, which means ThruLines

I can review which ancestor we share by clicking on my match’s name

The Estes side of this man’s tree has only one person and is marked “private,” but Ancestry has suggested common ancestors based on other people’s trees. (Yes, I know trees are dicey, but bear with me.)

It’s also worth mentioning that you can be related through multiple lines. I share surnames from Acadian lines with this man, but that really doesn’t matter here because I’m only using autosomal matching to find an Estes male.

Click on “View Relationship” to see our common Estes ancestor’s ThruLine.

The ThruLine shows how Ancestry thinks we’re related on the Estes line.

I can also click on “View ThruLines” to see all Thrulines for John R. Estes, which shows four additional males, some of which did NOT appear in the Estes surname search, and some of which don’t appear further up the tree. In other words, check all Estes ThruLine ancestor generations.

Don’t rely solely on Ancestry’s surname search.

Go directly to your ThruLines on the DNA menu.

Ancestry only reaches back seven generations, which for me is Moses Estes and Luremia Combs. Moses has 95 matches, but he has been given some incorrect children. Again, for this purpose, it doesn’t matter. Within all ThruLine matches, I found three Estes males who all descend through John R. Estes. Check every generation.

However, Luremia Combs shows promise for mitochondrial DNA descendants. Unfortunately, only two of her daughters are represented in ThruLines, and both of their descendants descend through Luremia’s grandsons. That’s too bad, because I need Luremia’s mitochondrial DNA line.

It’s easy to message your Ancestry matches. You may want to mention that they can upload their DNA file to FamilyTreeDNA for free where they will receive more matches and males will receive a complimentary mid-level Y-DNA haplogroup.

Please note that, in general, ThruLines need to be evaluated very carefully and are prone to errors, especially if you accept Ancestry’s suggestions of ancestors instead of carefully building out your own tree. Regardless, you can still find Estes cousin matches in your match list and by using ThruLines to find people that do not show up in an “Estes” match search.

Step 8 – At 23andMe

At 23andMe, you can search for anyone who either has the Estes surname or has included that surname in their “Family surnames” list. Keep in mind that your matches at 23andMe are restricted to either 1500 if you don’t have a subscripition, or about 4500 if you do have a subscription.

On my match list, I have two males with the Estes surname.

23andMe provides a mid-level Y-DNA haplogroup. You can’t use this to confirm the lineage when comparing with FamilyTreeDNA, especially given that 23andMe provides no genealogy or user-provided tree, but it is a clue.

Both Estes men at 23andMe have Y-DNA haplogroup R-CTS241. You could use this in some cases to potentially eliminate these matches at 23andMe. For example, if men in your lineage in the Estes project are in haplogroup R and your 23andMe matches are showing as haplogroup E, or any other base haplogroup, their common ancestor is tens of thousands of years ago.

Comparing the 23andMe haplogroup, which in this case is about 4500 years old, to contemporary testers who have taken the Big Y-700, which reaches within a few generations, isn’t terribly useful. These matches are extremely useful to identify individuals to reach out to for further information and potentially offer a Y-DNA testing scholarship at FamilyTreeDNA.

Remember, this also applies to females who have included Estes in their family surnames, given that they may have Estes male relatives.

By clicking to view your match, you can see if they have provided Family Background information, including a link to a family tree someplace.

Sometimes, there’s great information here, and other times, nothing.

You can’t verify this lineage without genealogy information.

I suggest leaving a genealogy-focused message, including where they can see your tree in addition to your Estes connection. Also include your e-mail.

You may want to say that if they descend appropriately, you have a Y-DNA or mitochondrial DNA testing scholarship, or you may want to wait to see how they descend. You can also ask if they have already taken a Y-DNA or mitochondrial DNA test at FamilyTreeDNA.

Step 9 – FamilySearch and Relatives at RootsTech

We’re getting ready for RootsTech 2025 which takes place in March. In the month or so before the last two RootsTechs, FamilySearch provided an absolutely wonderful tool called “Relatives at RootsTech.”

I’ve written about this several times, but essentially, you can see, by ancestor, other people who are registered both in-person and virtually for RootsTech, and how they descend.

Here’s an example.

In both years, I’ve found several people who descended from common ancestors AND were very willing to take the relevant DNA test. That’s a huge win-win for everyone.

The best part is that because these people have freshly registered for RootsTech, the reply rate is almost 100%.

I’ll write about this as soon as RootsTech makes it available this year. Fingers crossed that they do!

Step 10 – Social Media

Social media wouldn’t be my first choice to find DNA testers, but I have found perfectly willing cousins this way. You may be less successful on Facebook or other social media platforms, but if you’re striking out elsewhere, there’s absolutely no downside to trying.

You can enter a surname and search on Facebook, but I prefer to do a Google search like “Estes genealogy on Facebook” or even just “Estes genealogy,” which will produce far more widespread information, some of which may be irrelevant.

That Facebook Google search provided the names of two groups. People join groups because they have an interest, and I’ve had good luck in Facebook genealogy groups.

A Search of “Estes” on Facebook itself, then selecting “people” provided a list of Estes Facebook users.

I’ve had far better luck by joining a group that is focused on Estes genealogy, or even a county genealogy group that includes Estes families, than individuals. People who join any Estes group or project likely have an interest in that surname.

If you have a common surname, or there’s a park named after your surname, like Estes Park, you’ll probably want to focus by using Google searches for Estes genealogy.

The Descendants of Abraham Estes Facebook group has 222 members, of whom at least 31 are males with the Estes surname. Facebook just might be an underestimated resource.

If there isn’t a genealogy-focused group for your surname, you might want to consider starting one and encouraging people to join.

It can’t hurt, and it just might help. Before you start reaching out to random people on Facebook, please do a privacy checkup – I wrote about how, here.

Sale Prices

Remember, the sale prices at FamilyTreeDNA for new tests and upgrades last through year-end.

In my experience, it’s best to test as soon as someone agrees. You never know what will happen otherwise. I’ve had people pass away before they could swab. And yes, we’ve done funeral home swabs, too.

There’s no one-size-fits-all, but here’s a rough draft contact letter.

Potential Contact Letter

You’ll want to include several critical pieces of information.

Essentially:

  • Introduce yourself
  • Say their full name on their test AND the testing company in the title of an email. I manage many tests and if I receive an email that says, “Hi, can you tell me how we match” without telling me which person they match, I can’t even begin to answer.
  • Explain your genealogy connection
  • State your purpose in writing
  • Explain how a specific test will help them too
  • Offer to answer questions

Be sure to modify this letter to reflect your own voice and circumstances. You don’t want this to read like a form letter.

Dear cousin (insert their full name here,)

It was so nice to find our DNA match at <company name> (or we share a common ancestor, or appropriate circumstance.) (If you are managing someone else’s kit, say the name of who they match and explain that you manage their DNA kit.)

I descend from (ancestor plus birth and death date) who lived in Halifax County, Virginia and was married to (spouse.) You can view my tree at (insert link that does not require a subscription for viewing unless you match them on that platform. I use MyHeritage because everyone can view their trees)

I would very much like to confirm that our line descends from Abraham Estes (or relevant information meaning your reason for wanting them to test.)

Given that my surname is x (or I’m a female), we need to test the Y-DNA of a male who is descended from (ancestor) through all males to the current generation. (Or mitochondrial DNA descended through females to the current generation which can be male.)

FamilyTreeDNA provides this testing and shows who you match on that specific line using the Y chromosome (mitochondrial DNA).

This testing may connect us with earlier ancestors. Genetics can be used to determine when we share common Estes ancestors with others who test, where we come from overseas, and when. Even if we match ancient DNA samples that may tell us where our ancestors lived before surnames. In other words, where did we come from?

(Include a nice paragraph, but not a book about your ancestral lineage here.)

I have a DNA testing scholarship for someone from this line and you are the perfect candidate. I would like to take advantage of the current sales. If you’re interested, I only need two things from you.

First, permission so that I can order (or upgrade) and pay for the test, and second, an address where to send the test (unless it’s an upgrade). (If it’s an upgrade at FamilyTreeDNA, they can use a stored sample or will sent them a new kit if there’s not enough DNA.)

If you have any questions, please let me know. I’m very excited that we may be able to learn more about our heritage.

Please email me at xxx or call me at xxx if you have questions.

Your name

I know one person who offers to review results over Zoom. Someone else stresses that the tester’s email is attached to their test and they are always in control of their results. Another person asks them to join a project they manage to assure that they can follow their matches over time.

Customize this communication in your own voice and to fit the circumstances of each match.

It’s just me, but since I’m ordering while the tests are on sale, unless the person uploads their DNA file from another vendor, I add on a Family Finder test too and explain why. You never know if they will match you or another cousin, and they may have that match that eventually breaks down the next brick wall. Shared matches are powerful evidence and it’s a lot easier to add that test on now than try to contact them again later.

You Don’t Know What You Don’t Know

Which ancestors do you need Y-DNA or mitochondrial DNA results for? Methodically check each line.

There’s so much to learn. Don’t leave information on the table by virtue of omission.

Leave no stone unturned!

You don’t know what you don’t know.

Who’s waiting out there for you?

____________________________________________________________

Share the Love!

You’re always welcome to forward articles or links to friends and share on social media.

If you haven’t already subscribed (it’s free,) you can receive an e-mail whenever I publish by clicking the “follow” button on the main blog page, here.

You Can Help Keep This Blog Free

I receive a small contribution when you click on some of the links to vendors in my articles. This does NOT increase your price but helps me keep the lights on and this informational blog free for everyone. Please click on the links in the articles or to the vendors below if you are purchasing products or DNA testing.

Thank you so much.

DNA Purchases and Free Uploads

Genealogy Products and Services

My Books

Genealogy Books

Genealogy Research

Appoline Garceau (1742-1788), Walked the Wharf in 1755 – 52 Ancestors #435

Appoline was born to Daniel Garceau and Anne Doucet on Thursday, February 8th, 1742, and baptized the next day in the Catholic church in Annapolis Royal, Nova Scotia, or in one of the local “Mass Houses,” possibly St. Laurent at BelleIsle.

Her name has been interpreted as both Appoline, Appollonie, and other slight variations.

Jean Doucet was probably Appoline’s uncle.

We don’t really know where Appoline was raised along the river, other than three of four of her grandparents, Marie Leveron, Rene Doucet, and Marie Anne Broussard, lived along the north side between what is today the area just west of Granville Ferry and the far side of BelleIsle.

We don’t know where the fourth grandparent, Jeane dit Tranchemontagne Garceau, lived, but I suspect it was along this same stretch of river, probably not far from his wife, Marie Leveron, and her parents, who lived near Granville Ferry.

Appoline’s oldest sibling, Marguerite, married Charles Lore/Lord, the brother of Appoline’s eventual husband, Honore Lore/Lord – so it’s safe to say Appoline’s family probably lived along this part of the river too. Proximity is key when courting.

Appoline’s second oldest sibling also married one of the Lore boys, Jean-Baptiste, but that was in New England after the deportation – so this confirms that the families were deported together or at least had contact.

Newlyweds often lived with one family or the other, generally building another small house and sharing in the communal farm work. This field along the river once held the Lore homesteads. The remains of one are hidden in the grass to the right, where the grass looks bumpy, and the sunshine meets the shadows.

The old rock-lined well that provided life, now filled in, is also found here. Acadians always helped their neighbors, who were often also their relatives, in countless ways, so Appoline assuredly visited the Lore homestead, probably making apple butter or weaving cloth or engaging in hundreds of other activities.

The Lore family worked a significant amount of land, and on this 1733 map, a little village is shown with several homes.

What was life like in Acadia?

In 1744, when Appoline was just two, the French priest, Le Loutre, led a band of Indians in an attack on British-held Fort Anne in the town of Annapolis Royal, just a couple miles downriver.

The peninsula where the town was located is on the far left of the map, on the south side of the river.

Assuredly, Appoline’s family could hear the ruckus and could probably see at least part of the activity. It must have been terrifying for a young child.

Perhaps her parents took her and the rest of their children into hiding up in the uninhabited hills behind their home, or maybe further upriver.

Lieutenant Governor Mascarene had several buildings in the town ripped down so that they could not provide shelter for the attackers.

Neither of the three sides involved, the English, the Indians, nor the French, knew what to expect from the Acadians under the circumstances. However, the Acadians truly did not want to fight and remained neutral, a stance that had served them well for a long time. Remaining neutral and refusing to fight, regardless of how they felt, had at least kept them alive.

A 1745 report from Port Royal says the homes were “wretched wooden boxes, without conveniences, and without ornaments, and scarcely containing the most necessary furniture …”, and a visitor in the 1750s said, “the houses of the village (Annapolis Royal) … are mean, and in general built of wood.” By the 1750,s though, the houses in Annapolis Royal were English, not Acadian. Acadians had been forbidden from living along the waterfront there since 1724. Acadians preferred living upriver, where the land was more fertile anyway.

Father Le Loutre had been encouraging Acadians to leave for either Chignecto (Fort Lawrence), Isle Saint-Jean or Ile-Royal for several years because they were in French hands – not the despised English.

Many Acadians did not want to leave the fertile fields that represented generations of labor and investment in diking the tidal marshes along the Annapolis River. Diking was necessary to drain the saltwater and prevent it from returning in order to claim the land for farming.

This 1751 painting by Samuel Scott of a humble Acadian homestead is the first known depiction of an Acadian farm.

In the 1740s and early 1750s, the Acadians were aware of brewing unrest, especially in Les Mines, Beaubassin, and Grand Pre.

Of course, Appoline had no way of knowing that she wouldn’t live her entire life in the fertile Annapolis River Valley, just like generations before her had done.

Her life, and those of her parents and siblings, would come entirely undone a few years later, in 1755, when the English issued deportation orders for all Acadians.

During Appoline’s lifetime, an uneasy peace had held in Acadia. For their own protection, the French refused to take a loyalty oath to the English monarch and tried to remain neutral in the conflicts between the French and English. The English had controlled Acadia since 1710, and the Acadians certainly didn’t consider themselves English, but they really didn’t consider themselves French either. Of course, they clearly sided with the French, privately, given what the English had done to them and to their beloved Acadia.

They were Acadians, though, a new and different culture altogether, formed along this river. None of them had ever seen France and neither had their parents.

Of course, Appoline was likely further protected from discussions about politics, which were probably relegated to the men, or late-night discussions between couples after the children were fast asleep.

The routines of springtime planting and fall harvesting, punctuated by births, weddings, deaths, and, of course, church services, led from one day to the next. Winds of change turned the calendar pages.

1755

Appoline turned 13 on a freezing winter day in February of 1755.

During that summer, the Grande Derangement, or Great Expulsion, began in the northern regions of Acadia, along the Bay of Fundy.

Unease and fear among families was palpable and growing.

Acadian families along the Annapolis River all had relatives there, people who had left for a safer environment – but now look what was happening.

They must have been terrified as this tragedy unfolded, but also unable to do much of anything about their circumstances. Pockets of resistance did exist, but, ultimately, to little or no avail.

After all, the British soldiers were numerous, heavily armed, prepared with transport ships, and burned the Acadian homes after kidnapping the men to ensure compliance of the women and children.

After the horrific rounding up of most of the Acadians in Grand Pre and that region, the British arrived to evict the Acadians at Annapolis Royal, but the Acadians were anything but compliant. They had months for anger and indignation to seethe into fury, and it had.

The expulsion at Annapolis Royal didn’t go nearly as planned and took months, allowing time for some to escape.

Residents were rounded up, often without regard to families. People were herded onto ships like cattle with nothing more than what little they could carry. Sometimes, family members were separated in what turned out to be forever.

At Annapolis Royal, the ships laid anchor in the bay by the Queen’s Wharf, awaiting the captives who would soon be loaded, not as passengers, but as undignified “cargo” to be removed.

Leaves had turned their golden hues and cast themselves upon the ground. The first snow had fallen, and the winds blew bitterly cold.

The river was too shallow further upstream, so Acadians were escorted to the fort in Annapolis Royal, where they were forced to walk the wharf and then board the overcrowded ships. Those final footsteps in the snow would be the last time they touched Acadia.

That wharf still stands in silent testimony, today.

Sobs and screams were carried by the wind as smoke from their burning homes and farms wafted over the river.

Courtesy Charlie and Jennifer Thibodeau

A horrible situation was made worse by winter. On December 7th, 1755, Appoline’s feet walked this very wharf to board those ships under the guard of British soldiers, forcing the frightened Acadian families onward.

They settled in below deck, as best they could, and spent the cold night on the ship, rocking to and fro with the waves. I’d wager the men were discussing how to commandeer the ship, or at least try to.

Early in the morning, very early, hours before sunrise, the ship began to move.

The Acadians expected that they would all land someplace together – and that they would immediately set about making their way back home. The English tried to dissuade them of that idea by torching their farms and homes, flooding their fields by breaking the dikes, and killing their livestock in front of their very eyes. In other words, there was nothing awaiting them except ruin – and they knew it because they witnessed the destruction first-hand.

How horrific.

Still, I don’t think any of the Acadians had the concept of forever in mind. They had rebuilt before and were an incredibly resilient people.

Thirteen-year-old Appoline would have been frightened, or maybe terrified would be a more appropriate word. She probably clung tightly to her siblings’ hands so they would not become separated from their mother. Her oldest sister was married 11 months earlier and was probably pregnant or had a newborn baby. Her youngest brother was just three and would turn four just after the new year.

Unfortunately, no lists or rosters were kept, so we really don’t know who was on which ship. All we know, many times, is that there’s no death date in Annapolis Royal in the parish registers before deportation…and then…there’s nothing.

The ships were filled to capacity – then overfilled. Every Acadian that could be located was packed into every available inch. Some ships sank.

The ships that sailed from Annapolis Royal in October had an average of 167 people per transport, compared with 278 exiles on the December ships.

Departure

According to the journal of Captain John Knox, “Major Handfield, who was in charge of deporting those who were to be removed from Annapolis Valley, was ordered that the community was to be divided approximately as follows: 300 persons to Philadelphia, 200 persons to New York, 300 to Connecticut, 200 to Boston.”

And so it was.  Except there were far more than 1000 Acadians.

Several ships were involved, and not all records agree.

The first group sailed in October.

Capt. Shirley sailed the Mermaid, perhaps the first deportation ship to leave Annapolis Royal, out of the harbour on October 13th and was supposed to be piloting her to Connecticut. Instead, the Mermaid arrived in Massachusetts on November 17th. I don’t know if it ever made it to Connecticut.

The York sailed from Annapolis Royal on October 13, 1755, and made it to Boston on November 17. Perhaps these two ships stayed within sight of each other.

Capt. Salt (yes, that was really his name) sailed the Hornet from Annapolis Royal on October 28, 1755.  He, too, reached Boston on November 17 but continued on to Spithead, Maryland.

The expulsion proceeded slowly, giving some people a chance to leave and hide.

Finally, as winter descended upon the valley, on December 5th, 1755, the Acadians were rounded up and forced to board one of seven vessels waiting in the harbor.

As the ships were loaded, they moored by Goat Island in the river, sailing out together at 5 AM on December 8th “with a fair wind,” escorted by a man-o-war.

About three hundred Acadians are reported to have escaped deportation.

A ship named the Two Sisters was supposed to take 280 Acadians to Connecticut but was replaced by the Elizabeth, which left Annapolis Royal that miserable December day. Three Acadians died en route and the ship finally arrived at New London on January 21, 1756, with 277 unwilling passengers.

The Pembroke, bound for North Carolina, was another matter. 232 people, consisting of 32 families, took matters into their own hands and seized control of the vessel. Two months later, by February 8, 1756, the Acadians had sailed up the Saint John River as far as possible. They disembarked and burned the ship. A group of Maliseet met them and directed them upstream, where they joined an expanding Acadian community. The Garceau family was not aboard this ship.

The sloop Edward left Annapolis Royal with 278 Acadians. A terrible storm blew it off course, and she eventually docked in Antigua. En route or while there, 98 people died of smallpox. Eventually, the Edward made it to Connecticut, months later, arriving on May 22, 1756, with only 180 passengers on board. Another source reported that 260 Acadians arrived, and yet another stated that almost 100 had died of malaria as opposed to smallpox. When they arrived in Connecticut, what few belongings they had were burned so that the disease, whatever it was, wouldn’t spread.

Those Acadians had just survived more than five months of utter Hell.

The brig Experiment sailed the same day on what should have been a 28-day trip. Like the Edward, the Experiment encountered the storm and reportedly also ended up in Antigua. It apparently departed with 250 Acadians, but docked in New York on May 6, 1756 with only 200 Acadians. Some may have disembarked, and some may have died en route. They lost fewer than the Edward. “Only” 20% of the passengers perished. Of all the ships, the Experiment is the most likely candidate for our family.

Some Acadian families who lived further up the Annapolis River fled into the forest on North Mountain near Morden, Nova Scotia, about halfway between Annapolis Royal and the Minas Basin. More than 400 died, starved, and froze during the winter that followed until a Mi’kmaw band helped survivors escape in the spring across the Bay of Fundy to Refugee Cove at Cape Chignecto and from there on into the interior of New Brunswick. The Garceau family, thankfully, wasn’t among that group either, or I probably wouldn’t be here today.

About 50 or 60 Acadians who escaped the initial deportation are reported to have made their way to the Cape Sable region in southwestern Nova Scotia. From there, they participated in numerous raids on Lunenburg, Nova Scotia.

Other sources said that about half the Port Royal inhabitants headed for Cape Sable and that many were captured or migrated elsewhere. Half would seem to have been a very high number, considering that in a typical family, two people were parents, and maybe as many as 10 (or more) were children. Escaping with small children, especially on foot through dense woodlands, is exceedingly difficult and would be a very slow journey. Wagons or canoes could have been utilized – but would have been much more obvious. Not to mention treacherous in the winter weather and snow.

A schooner (probably the Mary) captained by Andrew Durning carried 94 Acadians from Cape Sable to New York, arriving on April 28, 1756. Given the New York destination, it’s possible that our family was on this ship, but less likely since the origin was Cape Sable.

The sloop Baltimore set sail from Annapolis Royal for South Carolina. It escorted three snows, two ships, and a brigantine that carried over 1600 Acadians. Some Acadians had already arrived there on earlier ships.

These unfortunate people drew the short straw and were treated horrifically. Some were restricted to the ships for weeks while officials tried to decide what to do with them.

On Nov. 27, 1755, the South Carolina Gazette notes that the local officials still had not decided what to do with the 600 “neutral French” that had arrived earlier in the fall from Chignecto.

“The General Assembly of this Province have been sitting since Thursday last; but, we don’t hear, that they have yet determined, how the 600 Neutral French lately arrived here shall be disposed of. On Saturday last came in, His Majesty’s Ship Syven, commanded by the Hon Charles Proby, Esq; and is already sitting out for a Cruze. We hear, she has some Neutral French on board.”

The health conditions were so poor that they eventually unloaded onto the beaches. About half the people died.

The South Carolina Gazette noted on May 7, 1756, that “upwards of 80 Acadians went from hence in Canows (canoes), for the Northward: The Country Scout-Boats accompany them as far as Winyab. Yesterday upwards of 50 more of those People went for Virginia, in the Sloop Jacob Capt. Noel.”

These poor people were desperate and were trying to row home.

There were also Acadians held in Nova Scotia at Fort Edward (200-300; the number fluctuated), Fort Cumberland, and Annapolis Royal (91 in 1763). Many of these headed to Louisiana a decade later, in 1765.

Given where Daniel Garceau was found, along with some family members in 1763, it’s most likely that they wound up on one of the two ships destined for New York, one from Annapolis Royal and one from Cape Sable.

New York

After the ship Experiment was loaded with her human cargo, she anchored in the bay at Goat Island, within sight of the Melanson settlement and the entrance to the Atlantic.

On December 8th, 1755, before dawn, she sailed out of the harbor and into the icy, treacherous Atlantic. The Experiment should have arrived in New York four weeks later. Some transports were taking six or seven weeks due to weather and overloading. We know the Atlantic was stormy because both the Experiment and the Edward encountered a severe storm that blew them off course, causing illness, shortage of rations, including water, and death.

Appoline “celebrated” her 14th birthday on February 9th, if the family even remembered or had a calendar, probably fearing for her life in the midst of a horrific storm. A few weeks later, she would land in a strange land, a mountainous tropical island. The Acadians were penniless refuges with no hope, except to live long enough for the ship to make it back to someplace in the colonies where they might escape.

Truth be told, the Acadians never stopped hoping to return to Acadia, and many tried. A few succeeded.

The Edward and the Experiment both ended up in Antigua. The Experiment had apparently departed Annapolis Royal with 250 Acadians and ended up docking in New York on May 6, 1756, with only 200 passengers. Some may have disembarked, and some may have died en route. They lost fewer than the Edward, where nearly half of the Acadian passengers perished. “Only” 20% of the passengers on the Experiment died. Of all the ships, this is the most likely candidate for our family, which means that Appoline got an unexpected and miserable trip to Antigua.

A different source provides slightly different information about the island.

In the New York Mercury newspaper on May 3, 1756, the headline read, “Extract of a Letter from Albany, Dated April 23, 1756,” and said, “Thursday last, a Brig with 200 Acadians arrived here from St. Kitts, being blown off our coast in the winter.”

St. Kitts is a neighboring island, about 50 miles west of Antigua, also torn between England and France.

By Martin Falbisoner – Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=47893166

Imagine the wonder of 14-year-old Appoline when she beheld the harbor, mountains, and palm trees, something she had never seen before.

By Fred Hsu on en.wikipedia – Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=47791771

It was also warm in the winter and there were beaches of sand. Where was the snow?

Acadian children wouldn’t have had any way of knowing that such a thing as the tropics existed, let alone be cast there…after being adrift…after being deported…after witnessing ship-board death.

Did the majority of the people die on board or here, on the island? Did they get to come ashore, or were they forced to remain on the beleaguered ship?

Did the Acadians pray and thank God for sparing them, or did they feel God had abandoned them? Certainly, everyone knew and was probably related to every person who died – 1 in 5 passengers.

The Experiment’s sister ship, the Edward wasn’t nearly as “fortunate.” She arrived in Connecticut more than 6 months after leaving Port Royal with roughly half of her passengers having perished.

I suspect that Daniel Garceau and his family were on the Experiment. The only other ship that discharged passengers in New York was an unnamed ship, probably the Mary, who sailed with 94 Acadians from Cape Sable.

New York

One way or another, Daniel Garceau, along with his wife and eight children wound up in New York, according to the 1763 “census” where Acadians requested transportation to France. That request was denied, but the request at least tells us where our family was living.

Piecing this family together from both directions, before deportation and after resettlement, we discover that Daniel Garceau and Anne Doucet had:

  • 11 children born in Acadia
  • 8 of whom are reported in 1763, which means at least two have married or died. Marguerite married Charles Lord in early 1755 and is with him in New York.
  • 10 children are later accounted for some 15+ years later in Quebec

At least Appoline wasn’t separated from her family. She was one of the “lucky” ones.

Daniel’s brother, Joseph Garceau, who had married Marie Philippe Lambert in Acadia was in New York as well, although he didn’t depart from Annapolis Royal.

Joseph made his way to Beaubassin by 1741, the year before Appoline was born, so he was not with Daniel living along the Annapolis River. Appoline had probably never met her uncle before their arrival in New York. Actually, we don’t know that Daniel and Joseph were actually in the same place in New York, so they might have never seen one another again, or not before their return to Quebec. Joseph Garceau’s death in 1789 was recorded across the river from St. Ours under the surname of Richard, that of his step-father.

In addition to Daniel Garceau, Charles Lord, wife, and a child were among the 1763 New York residents as well. Daniel’s oldest daughter, Marguerite, married Charles Lore/Lord in Acadia in January before they were deported. She would either have been pregnant, or perhaps cradled a newborn baby as she walked that wharf. Sadly, the fact that they only had one child in 1763 means that several children didn’t survive – including that child. They should have had at least five children, but only two, born later, are recorded later in Quebec.

There’s another possibility. Perhaps the Lord/Lore and Garceau families were separated. There’s a Charles Lord in Connecticut with 4 people, along with three additional Lord families. Jean Lord +7 people, Louis Lord +4 people, and Pierre Lord +3 people.

We know that somehow the Garceau and Lore/Lord families maintained contact, because the family members intermarried in New England.

Appoline Garceau married Honore Lore about 1767 in New England, but we don’t know where. He eventually served in Albany, New York, during the Revolutionary War, fighting for the citizens against the English. That comes as no surprise. Understandably, the Acadians hated the English.

Honore Lore is the son of Jacques Lore who was likely in this same location but is not listed in 1763, so may have already died. Appoline’s sister, Marie Joseph Garceau married Jean Baptiste Lore about 1765 or 1766, so the Daniel Garceau family had to live someplace close to the Jacques Lore/Lord family, or at least close enough to travel back and forth periodically.

Connecticut assigned Acadian families to 50 different host towns, each receiving an average of 50 refugees. This would have been four, five, or maybe six families.

New York Acadians lived in the New York City and Long Island region, along with both Orange and Suffolk. Many Acadians were treated as indentured servants, which meant they were trained and eventually could earn their freedom again.

No machine-readable author provided. Kmusser assumed (based on copyright claims).https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=1270050

New York and Connecticut share a north/south land border in addition to Long Island Sound, so clearly some communication was taking place between families, if not groups of families.

Onward to Quebec

The Massachusetts Legislature sent a delegation to Quebec in March 1766. The delegation obtained a permit from the English Governor Murray for the displaced Acadians to immigrate to Quebec Province, which they began to do immediately.

That must have been a time of great jubilation, because the Acadians wanted to gather together once again in a French-speaking Catholic region and create a new homeland.

Many families settled south of Montreal around LaPrairie and L’Acadie, as did Appoline and Honore eventually, but not initially. First, the family traveled to Becancour.

Why Becancour?

The Acadie website tells us:

The lord of Bécancour, Joseph-Michel Legardeur of Croisille and Montesson, invited the first Acadian families to take refuge on his seigneury. In the summer or fall of 1759, they settled at Lake Saint-Paul. At the same time, a second group of Acadian refugees, led by Michel Bergeron, settled on the site of the village of Sainte-Marguerite (now Saint-Grégoire) in the Godefroy seigneury, of which they were probably the first inhabitants. In the spring of the previous year, these Acadians had left their wood shack on the Saint-Jean River to undertake a long and challenging journey towards the St. Lawrence River. It was in September 1766, following the arrival of Acadians deported to Massachusetts, that many of them did settle in Sainte-Marguerite on the site of the present-day Acadian Boulevard.

Based on what we know about the Garceau and Lore/Lord families, Acadians from other colonies quickly heard about Quebec’s open arms, and they arrived, too.

The village of Becancour, which is actually an amalgamation of villages today, is across the St. Lawrence River from Trois-Rivieres, but the original Acadian settlement was in Saint Gregoire, then called Sainte-Marguerite, not in Becancour itself, which was upriver about six miles to the west.

It’s interesting that the St. Gregoire street names would bring Acadians comfort, such as Boulevard Port Royal, Rue Gaudet, Rue Girouard, and more – many more. The street names read like a veritable who’s who of Acadian families.

This St. Gregoire church was built about 1802, but the original church was probably located on this same site, or very close. The original cemetery is noted as being located here, and the later one is maybe half a mile down the road. The earliest church would have been adjacent to its cemetery.

The next sighting we have of Appoline is when she was 25 years old – on September 29, 1767, when her marriage to Honore Lor was validated by the priest in Becancour.

“In the year 1767, on the 29th of September, we, undersigned missionary priest of the Parish of the Nativite of Becancour, validated the marriage between Honore Lor and Appolline Garsau, both Acadians, who had been married by Francois Landry in Angleterre (translates to England)”.

We know that Appoline and her young husband stood in this church as they renewed their vows, accompanied by at least some of their family members.

A validation occurs when a couple is legally married, but not by a Catholic priest, so, as soon as possible, a priest validates the marriage.

Brother Bernard, now deceased, translated the marriage validation of Honorius Lord and Apolline Garceau in detail.

Validation at Becancour, Quebec, Parish of the Nativity, 1767, page 47.

“In the year 1767, on the 29th of September, we, undersigned missionary priest of the Parish of the Nativity of Becancour, validated the marriage between Honoré Lor and Apolline Garsau, both Acadians, who had been married by Francois Landry in England (New England was meant), no impediment having been discovered to said marriage, we gave them the nuptial benediction according to the form prescribed by our Mother the Holy Church, and this in presence of Fracous Lagrave and of Antoine Sabourin, who declared they know not how to sign this register, (Signed) F Louis Demers, Recollet Priest”

Given that the Father was a missionary priest, it’s possible that there wasn’t a physical church at that time, and they met in someone’s home.

This does tell us who married Appoline and Honore. Another Acadian, obviously, but someone I can’t find.

Locating Francois Landry might well tell us where they were married. The only Francois of the right age in the colonies is located in Oxford, Maryland, which is far from New York and even further from Connecticut.

Given that their first known child, Honore, was born in February, just five months after Appoline’s marriage was reconstituted, I would infer that they married in early 1767 or maybe late 1766.

Appoline’s middle name is given as Hippolyte in many places and as Pauline in PRDH, even when I’m not viewing in English. I’m not sure where this comes from, as I’ve checked all of her children’s baptisms, marriages and deaths and don’t find any name in any record other than simply Appoline or derived spellings.

The only exception is this book.

Her name is given as Marie Hypolite instead of Appoline. I think the author simply made a mistake that carried over into a Quebec genealogy book as well, or vice versa.

After their marriage was rehabilitated, their children were baptized in various churches, creating a path through their lives for us.

The history of Yamachiche provides insight into how the Acadians came to settle here.

In July 1767, a schooner arrived at the mouth of the Yamachiche River carrying a large contingent of Acadians who were originally deported to Massachusetts. The Lesieur family, still the owner of the Grosbois-East seigneury, was ready to welcome them on a concession still to be cleared of trees.

Up to 42 Acadian families, or 192 individuals, settled on the Lesieur family’s concession. The French-Canadian villagers of St. Anne of Yamachiche parish, founded in 1722, gave them a warm welcome.

The parish priest, Jacques-Maxime Chef from the city of La Garenne, did hasten to validate the marriages and baptisms of all Acadians who could not officially take place in Massachusetts for lack of Catholic priests.

Perhaps Acadian families made their way to Massachusetts as the first stop on their pathway to Quebec.

  • Appoline’s first child, Honore Lore was born and baptized in Yamachiche on February 28, 1768, about 10 miles from Becancour.

Appoline’s brother, Jean Joseph died here on May 8th, 1770, just 36 years old, followed by her father just two years later.

On August 28, 1772, Appoline’s father, Daniel Garceau, died and was buried in the cemetery at Ste. Anne Church at Yamachiche.

The original church is long gone, and in 1795, all of the burials in the cemetery adjacent to it were moved inland to the present-day village. This location was quite close to the river, and I’m willing to bet that it flooded, prompting the move inland. The original cemetery was somewhere in the meadow or woods, above, or perhaps both.

It’s very unlikely that Appoline was present when her father died and was buried. They had moved 37 miles on up the river some years before. Given that Appoline had an 11-month-old child, plus a two and four-year-old, I doubt that she stood at Daniel’s grave with her mother and siblings.

  • On December 30, 1769, Appoline’s second child, Marie Anne Lore, was baptized in the church at Saint-Denis-sur-Richelieu, about another 100 miles upriver. Marie Anne married Antoine Brousseau.

The next three children were born in 1771, 1773, and 1775 and baptized at St. Ours in the church of the Immaculate Conception, about 10 miles from St. Denis.

  • Francois Lore, born September 19, 1771, died December 13, 1824, in L’Acadie. He married Marie Anne Lafay in 1806.
  • Marie Claire Lore was born May 12, 1773, died on January 15, 1775, and was buried in the church cemetery. Appoline was eight months pregnant for Joseph when Marie Claire passed away.
  • Joseph Honore Lore was born March 5, 1775, and died sometime before 1787.

Appoline buried her daughter, just 20 months old, in the old St. Our Cemetery, which was closed a century later, in 1878.

That cemetery today may abut this newer cemetery, or perhaps it’s in the yard next to the church or across the street where the church’s school is located today.

No gravestones remain for this cemetery at FindaGrave, so I’m sure the cemetery has been destroyed and overbuilt. All perceptible traces are gone, but I’d wager that the locals know where it was located.

After spending several years at St. Ours, Honore and Appoline packed up and moved once again, sometime before the birth of their next child in October of 1777.

Two of Appoline’s children were baptized at Ste.-Marguerite-de-Blairfindie in L’Acadie, another 50 or 60 miles southwest.

Those children had been born in 1777 and 1779, but something strange was afoot because those children weren’t baptized until 1787. Furthermore, there’s no burial or marriage record for Joseph, who was born in 1775, so he died before the family reappeared in L’Acadie in 1787.

  • Charlotte Marguerite (also called Marie Charlotte) Lord was born October 14, 1777, and baptized on July 1, 1787, at Ste.-Marguerite-de-Blairfindie in L’Acadie, Quebec.
  • Jean-Baptiste Lore was born on February 1, 1779, and was baptized on July 1, 1787, in the same church in L’Acadie.

Those two baptisms in Ste. Marguerite on the same day were for children who had been born years earlier and had never been baptized in the Catholic church.

Why not?

What caused this family to move from Saint-Denis-sur-Richelieu to someplace that wasn’t Catholic, then back to the L’Acadie area surrounding Ste.-Marguerite-de-Blairfindie?

War Interferes

Another war – this time, the US Revolutionary War.

Say what?

They were living in Canada, not the colonies, so how did that war affect Appoline?

Her husband, Honore, served, as did two other Lore men: Charles, probably Honore’s brother who was married to Appoline’s sister, and Nathaniel Lord, whose identity we don’t know.

Apparently, the family returned to someplace in the colonies, probably near Fort Albany, where we know Honore served, sometime after March 5, 1775, when Joseph Honore Lore was baptized at St. Ours, and October 14, 1777, when Charlotte Marguerite was born but not baptized.

Honore returned over the border into the colonies to aid the battle against Britain. There must be a backstory, one that we’ll never know. We can piece a few bits together, thanks to history.

Contrary to what we think about where that war was fought, the British marched straight up the Richelieu River, directly through L’Acadie. So Honore’s service might have been one of self-defense and protecting not only his family, but the Acadian community as well.

Appoline had small children at home and gave birth to her two youngest children during this time, while troops were marching through the countryside. The horrors of 1755 probably intruded into her thoughts regularly – this time as the frightened mother, not the frightened child. She, like her mother, tried to protect her children.

They stayed wherever they were until June of 1787, about a decade. That’s a long time if their only motivation was the war and protecting L’Acadie.

We know when they returned, because they baptized their two children born while they were “away” immediately, on July 1, 1787. This probably unburdened Appoline’s soul, as she knew now that they would not languish in Purgatory, or worse, when they died.

There are those unspoken children, too – the ones not baptized and who, like their son, Joseph, would not have been buried in consecrated ground. There should have been babies born in 1781, 1783, 1785, and perhaps, 1787. Maybe that final child’s burial in a cemetery filled with people not of their faith is what pushed Honore and Appoline over the edge. Maybe that day, as they cried over yet another tiny coffin lowered into the ground, with no Priest, no Catholic service, and no family in attendance, they decided to return to Quebec to rejoin the Acadian community.

Or, maybe they moved back because Appoline was sick and needed family members nearby to help. Maybe she wanted to be buried in consecrated ground herself. Maybe she wanted her children to be raised both Acadian and Catholic. Maybe she hoped that the woman who would raise her children as a stepmother, whoever she might someday be, would have some family or cultural connection to her.

They probably chose L’Acadie because so many Acadian families had settled there, and they assuredly had surviving family living there. The horrors of deportation and what they did to survive cemented an indelible bond.

Appoline Passes Away

Appoline passed away just ten months and two days after she had her youngest two children baptized.

Appoline died young, at least by today’s standards, just 46. She assuredly didn’t die of “old age.” Given her age, I can’t help but wonder if her life was taken by a late-in-life surprise pregnancy that didn’t go well.

Brother Bernard translated the burial record for Apolline Garceau.

L’Acadie, 4 May 1788

The 4th of May 1788, by I, the undersigned priest, was buried in the cemetery of this parish the body of Apoline Garceau, wife of Honore Lord, deceased yesterday, fortified by the Sacraments, at the age of about 40 years. Present Flavian Dupuis, Antoine Boudreau, and several others.  (Signed)  Lancto

I couldn’t help but notice that the priest clearly didn’t know Appoline’s age, or perhaps didn’t care. Or maybe birthdays weren’t significant then. Appoline was actually 46 years, 2 months, and 22 days old.

Appoline died on a spring day. It’s likely that even though her family was grieving terribly, the earth was erupting once again with new life. Perhaps the daffodils were blooming, and the first dandelions of the springtime were popping up their heads.

Spring rains may have shed their tears, along with the family at her graveside – her children holding hands, all in a row.

Appoline does not have a gravestone in the cemetery beside Ste.-Marguerit-de-Blairfindie church, but I’d wager that her family lovingly planted flowers in her memory.

This church was built in 1800 and1801, but the original stood in this location, right beside the cemetery.

After Appoline’s funeral, her grave would have been marked with a white wooden cross. Her family would have glanced over and acknowledged her life every time they walked into church, or attended a funeral where Appoline gained another Acadian relative in the churchyard.

Eventually, three of Appoline’s children kept her company in the cemetery.

At Appoline’s death, she left a handful of young children:

  • Honore Lore was born August 14, 1768, in Yamachiche, so he was not quite 20 when Appoline died. He died in 1834 and is buried near his mother, as are eight of his children.
  • Marie Anne Lore was born on December 30, 1769, so she was 18. Five of her children are buried here.
  • Francois Lore was born on September 19, 1771, so he was 16. He died in 1824 and is buried near his mother as are at least three of his children.
  • Marie Claire Lore was born in September of 1772 but died on January 15th of 1775, so she was waiting for her mother on the other side. Appoline was heavily pregnant at Marie’s death.
  • Joseph Honore Lore was born on March 5, 1775, less than two months after Marie Claire was buried. We don’t have any more information about him, so he probably died while Appoline and Honore were living elsewhere, probably in the states. If he was alive, which was doubtful, he was 13 when his mother died.
  • Charlotte Marguerite (also Marie Charlotte) Lore was born on October 24, 1777, someplace, and was baptized on July 1, 1787. She was 10 when Appoline perished. Her first child is buried here near her mother.
  • Jean Baptiste Lore was born on February 1, 1779, and was baptized on July 1, 1787, making him 9 when he lost his mother. He died in 1828 and is buried near his mother, as are at least three of his children.

As best I can reconstruct their families, five of Appoline’s children grew to adulthood, married,, and gave her 51 grandchildren. Of course, they would only have known of Appoline’s stamina and survival in the face of incredible odds through stories told around the fireplace and at Christmas time—stories that, with retelling, probably grew into legends.

The comparatively tranquil years along the Annapolis River, Appoline’s bravery during the deportation, the horrific storm followed by beaches and palm trees, the dozen years in exile someplace in New York, her marriage in the colonies, their triumphant return to French Quebec in 1767, the Revolutionary War years that again transported her back to the colonies, then a final return to establish permanent roots in L’Acadie.

It’s so unfair that Appoline managed to survive all of that, only to rest in the cemetery instead of enjoying peace of a different kind, rocking grandchildren on the porch in the golden summer sunshine, regaling them stories about her long-ago life in beautiful Acadia, and maybe a few palm trees.

She would have said:

C’est vrai, c’est vrai, mes petits. J’ai ouvert les yeux et il y avait des palmiers qui poussaient sur les plages de sable!

Except – Appoline’s voice was silent!

What an amazing life and incredibly strong women Appoline must have been. It’s hard to believe she packed all that into just 46 years on this earth.

Acadian Memorial Unveiling – Honoring the Acadians

Finally, the memory and sacrifices of Appoline and the rest of our Acadian forebearers are being honored in Port Royal, now Annapolis Royal, where it all began.

On December 8, 2024, in the wind and snow, at Fort Anne in Annapolis Royal, adjacent to where the Catholic Church stood before it was burned, and where the remains of the Acadian cemetery blend into frozen blades of grass, the Acadians were honored.

A monument was placed to pay tribute to the approximately 1664 Acadians deported and exiled from this location. Exactly 269 years to the day after they were forced upon those waiting ships, unwillingly walking the Queen’s Wharf – much as the plank of destiny – in the snow one final time.

Courtesy Charlie and Jennifer Thibodeau

Those nameless 251 men, 263 women, 539 boys, and 611 girls suffered horrifically.

Their lives were ruined.

All of them.

Many died.

This was cultural genocide at its worst. Those who escaped, men, women, and children alike, were hunted, literally, with scalp bounties placed upon their heads.

These brave Acadians finally received recognition, even if not individually – at least as a family, a culture, a people.

And as our ancestors.

Nothing can ever right this wrong, but at least there’s a bit of satisfaction by the acknowledgment and perhaps a modicum of contrition, knowing that the truth has been recognized, even if justice remains forever out of reach.

Charlie and Jennifer Thibodeau of the BelleIsle Hall Acadian Cultural Centre provided wonderful photos and a video of the unveiling, here.

Jennifer said:

I kept thinking throughout the ceremony of what a terrible day it was for them and the journey they were beginning then. On Sunday, it was cold standing there and the rain. Snow mix was falling on us, and the wind blowing. I felt like crying when I thought of them and looking down at that wharf. I am glad we could attend such a special event to honor the Acadian ancestors.

It was an emotional day, for sure. Hard to explain how it makes you feel. Especially when you think of how many of them were children.

Charlie and Jennifer gave me permission to share their photography of this historical event at Fort Anne with you. Another attendee provided additional photos, here.

The heartache of our Acadian ancestors can still be felt permeating this land, 269 years and some ten generations later.

Courtesy Charlie and Jennifer Thibodeau

A small crowd gathered on this cold, blustery, grey, snowy day on the banks of the Annapolis River. In the misty distance, the Melanson Settlement across the river, and to the left, nearly obscured by fog, Goat Island, where the ships anchored after they were loaded with their human cargo, awaiting the signal to depart.

Did the Acadians, at least a few of them, stand at the railing and watch as the inky, darkened shore slipped past? Many of the men were experienced pilots and would have known when they exited the sheltered harbor into the angry Atlantic.

Courtesy Charlie and Jennifer Thibodeau

The monument, wrapped in the Acadian flag, waiting for the dignitaries, some of whom, including Jennifer and Charlie, are descendants.

Courtesy Charlie and Jennifer Thibodeau

The monument, unveiled, its writing fittingly obscured by snow, features a cross, so important to Acadians. In many ways, their religion is what they both lived and died for.

This monument stands ready to welcome descendants back home. The wharf which bore silent witness to the final footsteps of our ancestors in Acadia is seen at right, with the Acadian homesteads across the river in the distance.

They are still there. Still vigilant. Ever watching.

Thank you, Jennifer and Charlie, for continuing to remember and support our Acadian ancestors, their land, and their descendants who find their way back home!

_____________________________________________________________

Follow DNAexplain on Facebook, here.

Share the Love!

You’re always welcome to forward articles or links to friends and share on social media.

If you haven’t already subscribed (it’s free,) you can receive an e-mail whenever I publish by clicking the “follow” button on the main blog page, here.

You Can Help Keep This Blog Free

I receive a small contribution when you click on some of the links to vendors in my articles. This does NOT increase your price but helps me keep the lights on and this informational blog free for everyone. Please click on the links in the articles or to the vendors below if you are purchasing products or DNA testing.

Thank you so much.

DNA Purchases and Free Uploads

Genealogy Products and Services

My Books

Genealogy Books

Genealogy Research

Susannah Anderson (maybe), (born c 1713), wife of John Vannoy – 52 Ancestors #434

Susannah’s surname may not be Anderson. Her first name might not even be Susannah, but since we do have that name published in family history, Susannah is what I’m calling her unless we discover otherwise.

How I wish we had firm evidence about Susannah, the wife of John Vannoy. Something. Anything. But we don’t.

Of course, we know that she existed, by some name, because John Vannoy had children whose births were recorded in a Bible and he certainly didn’t bring them into this world by himself.

If Susannah’s birth surname might not have been Anderson, or its Dutch version, Andreissen, where did this information come from? In fact, where is her name recorded at all?

Great question.

Earlier Researchers

Thank goodness for earlier researchers. While they may not have gotten everything right, they did us a HUGE favor by recording what they were told, often reaching back two or three generations. This at least gives us something to work with. If the family members who recorded that history lived a century ago, that means their information may reach back two centuries, give or take. Some did us the additional favor of researching local records or writing about letters and documents that have since been lost to time.

James H. Hook, in a book written in 1957, referring to John Vannoy, tells us:

“He married, about 1740, Susannah, who, according to his grandson, Andrew Vannoy, son of Nathaniel, was Susannah Anderson, born in New Jersey. Confirmation of the New Jersey Origin of the Vannoys in North Carolina is given in the Cleveland Genealogy, Vol. III, p. 2086.”

Professional genealogist, Yvette Hoitink, in her summary about Susanah, writes:

The book is well documented and discusses the merits of the evidence, using qualifiers where appropriate. This shows that the compiler was a competent genealogist.

This publication shows that it was grandson Andrew Vannoy, son of Nathaniel who said his grandmother was Susannah Anderson, born in New Jersey. Note that this recorded tradition does not name her parents, and they are not recorded elsewhere in the book. It is likely that later researchers tried to fit her into the known Anderson family of New Jersey by making her a daughter of Cornelius or Andrew.

According to the publication, Andrew Vannoy, son of Nathaniel son of John, was born on 4 November 1783. This means he would not have personally known Susannah’s parents. However, he may have known Susannah herself, if she indeed died in 1816 as her Find-a-Grave memorial indicates.

His identification of her as an Anderson from New Jersey may have been an amalgamation of family stories. After all, he had a great-grandmother who was an Anderson from New Jersey. Without corroboration by independent evidence, this family tradition is not reliable.

The great-grandmother that Yvette is referencing is Rebekah (Rebecca) Anderson/Andriesen (1697-1727), who married John Vannoy’s father, Francis Vannoy (1688-1774), in 1718 in Hunterdon County, New Jersey.

James Hook also wrote about John Vannoy in an earlier 1954 book about the Lt. Samuel Smith family:

“His wife was Susannah, born Susannah Anderson, according to a letter written by her grandson, Andrew Vannoy, son of Nathaniel.” and ” It was Andrew Vannoy, a grandson of John who gave his grandmother Vannoy’s name as Susannah Anderson but did not give his great grandfather Vannoy’s first name.”

It also provides more information about the family Bible:

“The Bible of John and Susannah has been preserved. The family data in it begins with this entry: ‘John Vannoy, son of Jesse, was married to Susannah Vannoy. ‘Apparently, this was a later entry and should not be accepted.”

Jesse? Where the heck did Jesse come from? I’ve worked with the Vannoy records for more than 30 years now, and I’ve never once seen a Jesse this early or attributed as John’s father. I’ve never seen this information anyplace else either.

Also, about that Bible being preserved – I’d love to see it. Where is it? Does someone even have a photocopy? Checking my emails from 25 years ago, people were talking about it then, but in the abstract.

In his later 1957 publication, Hook attributed John as the son of Francis based on Francis’s will, as discussed in the John Vannoy article.

From the book, New Jersey, Abstracts of Wills 1670-1817

August 15, 1768 Francis Vannoy of Hopewell, Hunterdon Co., yeoman, will of.  Personal and real estate to be sold and money given to my 4 children, John Vannoy, Hannah Willson, Cornelius Vannoy and Andrew Vannoy. Eldest son John to have 5 pounds more than the rest.  Exec son Andrew and son-in-law Peter Willson.  Witnesses – Francis Wilson, James Willson, Andrew Wilson, Proved July 21, 1774

On the 1722 Hopewell Township, NJ, tax list, we know that Francis Vannoy was listed with 3 sons and 3 daughters, and that his probable brother, Andrew who is listed on the tax list as Abraham, has 1 son and no daughters.

We know that John Vannoy, and his wife, whoever she was, had left New Jersey and were in Rowan County, NC, in the Jersey Settlement, at least by the fall of 1752.

What Do We Actually Know About Susannah?

We are going to have to take Susannah’s first name on faith that her grandson knew and remembered her name accurately. I think that’s fully reasonable. The grandson, Andrew, was born in 1783. It’s very likely that both John Vannoy and Susannah were deceased by that time, but his father, Nathaniel, very clearly knew his mother’s name.

What do we actually know about Susannah?

The first thing we know, or can at least infer about Susannah is that she grew up in the Presbyterian church.

Let’s look at the pieces of evidence that we have collected.

Cornelius Andreissen and Annetje Opdyke, the grandparents of John Vannoy, Susannah’s future husband, had five of their children baptized in the Presbyterian Church in Churchville, Pennsylvania, on June 6, 1710.

By 1724, when Cornelius Andreissen died, they were living in Hopewell Township, New Jersey. In fact, Cornelius Anderson owned a mill in the southwestern corner of Hopewell Township.

In the book, A History of the Old Presbyterian Congregation of “The People of Maindenhead and Hopewell,” and More Especially of the First Presbyterian Church of Hopewell, we find not only the history of the founding of the church, but also of the settlement of this region, early taxpayers and residents. The land for the original church was purchased in 1697 in what is today the village of Pennington. The village, originally called Queenstown, in honor of Queen Anne, probably began to attract settlers in about 1708. Prior to that, it was wilderness.

The original name of the congregation was “The People of Maidenhead and Hopewell,” and 100 acres of land was conveyed for the purpose of “erecting a meeting-house and for burying-ground, and school-house.” Among others, the land was conveyed to Johannes Lawrenson, Thomas Smith, Jasper Smith, Joshua Andris, Enoch Andris, Cornelius Andris, and Lawrence Updike. Updike is Opdyke, Andris is Andriessen that became Anderson, and Lawrenson is Louwrensen.

John Vannoy’s father, Francis, married the daughter of Cornelius Anderson and his wife Annetje Opdyke, whose father was Johannes Louwrensen Opdyke. Cornelius Anderson’s other daughter married John Smith, so these families were connected as early as 1697 and likely earlier when they were living across the river in New York.

In the church booklet, we note one Frances “Fonnoy” (Vannoy) listed in 1722 with 10 cattle and horses and 150 acres of land. Of course, that was before the infamous 1731 Coxe Affair where the powerful Coxe family claimed that the land purchase had never been sold – attempting to coerce the settlers into paying for their land a second time in order not to lose it entirely.

John Vannoy was probably born in Maidenhead Township, near Hopewell, sometime around 1716, give or take a few years in either direction, not long after his family moved to the frontier.

Susannah, his eventual wife, was born between 1713 and 1720.  If she was an Anderson daughter, her father was most likely on the 1722 tax list, which includes:

  • Abraham Anderson with 1 son and 10 daughters
  • Benjamin Anderson with 2 sons and no daughters (probably eliminates him)
  • Cornelius Anderson with 3 sons and 4 daughters
  • Ellakim Anderson with 1 son and no daughters (probably eliminates him)
  • John Anderson with no sons and 4 daughters
  • Isaac Anderson with 1 son and 2 daughters

It’s worth noting that these names have been Anglicized, and I can’t fit everyone into a known family structure, although Ellakim is clearly the son of Cornelius based on later documents.

Even though the community would probably have been struggling to build a church and school, I hope that the children were being educated which was clearly the intend of the deed conveyance. I believe they were, in part, because John Vannoy or Susannah recorded their children’s names and birth dates in a Bible. You can’t do that if you can’t write.

We know that Susannah was living in the same location as John Vannoy in Hunterdon County, New Jersey, in about 1740 when they married. You have to live close enough to court. Their first child was born on April 12, 1741, just three weeks before her father-in-law pledged money for the Presbyterian parsonage. Baptism records that no longer exist would have reflected the baptisms of their children. It’s interesting that their only child known to have been baptized in North Carolina is Daniel Vannoy who was born on February 22, 1752 which tells us that he was not baptized earlier.

On May 1, 1741, Francis Vannoy is listed as a donor for the parsonage of the church, so we know beyond a doubt that his son John was Presbyterian, and based on the early Andreissen involvement, so were the Anderson and Opdyke families.

While this church isn’t original, it was reconstructed in its original location. The church today looks very much like it did in 1923, above.

According to the plaque on the front of the church, it was built in 1724, rebuilt in 1783 or 1785 (I can’t see the date clearly), enlarged and then rebuilt again in 1847, burned in 1874, and rebuilt a final time then. This also explains why none of the parish records exist.

In the churchyard, or burying-ground as was stated in the deed, several Vannoy burials can be found on FindaGrave. Assuredly, there are many more unmarked graves, very probably including Susannah’s children born about 1744 and 1748. Her children’s grandparents, probably all four of them, would rest here, too – as would Susannah and John’s siblings.

On the June 26, 1753 tax list, Francis Vannoy, with 3 sons and 3 daughters, and Andrew Vannoy with one son, both appear on the list, but John Vannoy does not. That makes perfect sense, because by the third week of September that year, John registered his stock mark in Anson County, North Carolina in the Jersey Settlement – so they had already left.

I had previously surmised that the Vannoys were probably Presbyterian, based on later interactions with Presbyterian circuit riding ministers in North Carolina. Presbyterian minister Hugh McAden stayed with the Vannoy family on September 5, 1755, after having ridden 45 miles that day. He clearly knew where they lived and how to find their cabin. He also stayed with the Anderson and Smith families during that same trip, both of whom were related to John Vannoy through his mother, and to Susannah as well if she was an Anderson.

Susannah would have been about seven months pregnant when the road-weary preacher came to visit. She was looking after a whole passel of young kids and cooking in an outdoor kitchen. She was probably hot, sweaty, and tired. I’m sure she was gracious, but the last thing she really wanted was an unexpected guest. Nevertheless, practicing frontier hospitality, she would have wiped her hands on her apron, handed him a bowl of whatever was in the pot, and made him welcome.

On the other hand, Reverend McAden surely brought news of her family and friends back in New Jersey. She, of course, hadn’t seen them in more than three years, so that probably overshadowed her fatigue. Regardless, he bunked with the family, as was the custom for frontier visitors.

Combined with the 1710 Andreissen Presbyterian baptisms, the early Hopewell Township Presbyterian records including the Vannoy, Andreissen and Opdyke families, and the continued thread into North Carolina, this confirms that Susannah was Presbyterian, at least initially.

The only other choice was Baptist. A Baptist Meeting House was built in Hopewell about 1715. Baptists would clearly influence Susannah’s life and that of her children, but that was years in the future. 

Children

The majority of the information we have about Susannah is through her children, thanks to those Bible records, plus additional research.

  • Rachel Vannoy was born on April 12, 1741, and was reported to have married Neil Patton, I was unable to confirm this, although, the Rev William Hamilton Eller (1842-1922) reported their marriage, here. However, she unquestionably married John Darnell sometime around or before 1771. They had four sons, including twins, before John reportedly died at the Battle of Hanging Rock in the Revolutionary War when the twins were but three months old. In January 1782, Rachel was ordered to deliver “what orphan children she had in possession” to the court, and in April, she was granted administration of John’s Estate. In 1785, with her brother, Andrew Vannoy, she posted a bond to administer another estate, and in October of 1787, apprenticeship records show that the twins, Benjamin and Joseph, born May 6, 1780, were apprenticed to Andrew Vannoy “to learn the occupation of farmer, read, write and cipher.” In 1787, she was shown on the state census with one male child under the age of 21, and in 1795, her land was mentioned in a neighboring deed.
  • Andrew Vannoy was born on August 12, 1742, and died on October 9, 1809, in Wilkes County. His marriage license was issued on October 18, 1779, with Susannah Shepherd, daughter of John and Sarah Shepard. They had ten children.
  • Appears to be a child missing who would have been born in late 1743 or early 1744.
  • Abraham Vannoy was born on January 15, 1745. We have no further information about Abraham, so it’s possible that he died relatively young.
  • Francis Vannoy was born on August 13, 1746, and died near Barbourville, Knox Co., KY, on July 26, 1822. The first record of Francis appeared in the court claims in 1765 in Rowan County, NC. By 1779, he was a juror in Wilkes County, where he received land grants for seven parcels of land between 1779 and 1799 for a total of 710 acres. He moved to Knox County around 1815 based on lawsuits in Wilkes County. Francis had as many as 19 children, not all proven, by at least two wives.
  • Appears to be a child missing who would have been born in 1748.
  • Nathaniel Vannoy was born on February 16, 1749. He died of measles at Greenville, SC, at age 87 at the house of his daughter, Mrs. Sallie Cleveland, on July 26, 1835. “He was a soldier of the Rev. War and served with Col. Benjamin Cleveland at King’s Mountain.” His obituary further stated that he was “half English and half French in stock,” neither of which was accurate, and that he was the first white man to be born in western NC, which is doubtful. His wife was Elizabeth Ray “of Ashe Co., NC,” and they had nine children. Nathaniel was also one of the early Baptist preachers in Wilkes County.
  • Hannah Vannoy, born March 26, 1751, may have married the Reverend Andrew Baker. There’s some question about whether Andrew Baker actually married Hannah, Susannah or any of the Vannoy daughters.
  • Daniel Vannoy was born on February 22, 1752, and married Sarah Hickerson on October 2, 1779. In August of 1774, he was baptized into the Dutchman’s Creek Church that had an arm at Mulberry Fields, and in September 1776, he purchased a scythe at the estate sale of James Burks in Surry County. He died sometime after January 1795 when he sold land and is not found in the 1800 census or later records. The family didn’t leave because his children remained in the area. His son, Joel Vannoy, married Elizabeth Saint Clear in March of 1817 in Wilkes County, and Little Hickerson signed their marriage license as bondsman. Little Hickerson was also known as Samuel Stewart, as discussed in this article, and was a nephew of Daniel’s wife, Sarah Hickerson.
  • Susannah Vannoy was born July 6, 1754, and may have married John Long, Sr., although I cannot confirm that.
  • Katherine Vannoy was born on December 26, 1755.

Baby Math

Given that Susannah’s first child was born on April 12, 1741, she became pregnant in mid-July 1740, suggesting that she was married a few months earlier, probably in early 1740. Of course, this presumes that Rachel was actually her first child.

Given that Susannah’s last child was born the day after Christmas in 1755, and it’s unlikely that she conceived another child after age 42, or so, that suggests she was born about 1713-ish.

This assumes that she lived long enough to have had another child in 1757.

  • So, if she was 42 when Katherine was born, Susannah would have been born around 1713.
  • If Susannah died before 1757, then she could have been born as late as 1723 or so, although 18 was a bit young on the frontier for a marriage.

We’re also presuming that Susannah was John’s only wife. Given that there was a Bible, I would presume that a second wife would have been noted if there was one. Also, a first wife would have been listed as the mother of the earlier children.

It really makes me uneasy that I’ve used the words presume or assume four times in this section alone, but all of this adds up to evidence.

And we’re not done yet.

Cousins

I retained Yvette Hoitink to sift through the various Dutch records both in the Netherlands and the US colonies to see if we could find any hint whatsoever as to the identity of Susannah’s parents.

We do have a significant hint in the fact that Andrew stated that John and Susannah were cousins.

What is a cousin?

The closest cousin one could have would be first cousins, people who shared grandparents.

If John and Susannah were first cousins, and Susannah’s birth surname was Anderson/Andreissen, that means they would have shared grandparents – Cornelius Anderson/Andriessen and Annetje Opdyke.

If they were second cousins, they would have shared great-grandparents, one generation further back in time.

I retained Yvette to thoroughly research all of the children of Cornelius and Annetje to see if there was any hint that Susannah might be related. Yvette did find a significant amount of information, but absolutely nothing connecting anyone with the name of Susannah, which is not a typical Dutch name.

Yvette then researched a generation further back, and in doing so, revealed the parents of Annetje – but nothing to connect Susannah.

It may be worth noting that after Cornelius Anderson died in 1724, his widow, the administrator of his estate, was referenced as “Annah,” which was clearly the name by which she was called. Her son, John Anderson and son-in-law, Francis Vannoy, were co-bondsmen. I only mention this because Annah and Susannah could sound similar, but checking the estates and known children and grandchildren of Annetje Opdyke does not show another Annetje, Annah, or Susannah. Of course, some children could have been omitted, and in at least one will, Andrew Anderson, no children were mentioned at all.

But what if Susannah’s last name wasn’t Anderson? People are more likely to know their grandmother’s first name than her birth surname. I’ve seen a grandmother’s birth surname recorded incorrectly on someone’s death certificate countless times. I’ve chased so many wild geese.  

Maybe Cousins on the Vannoy Side?

What if Susannah and John were cousins on the Vannoy side, and not the Anderson side?

John’s grandparents, John Vannoy (1644-1699) and Rachel, whose surname remains stubbornly elusive (zilch evidence for either Cromwell or Cornwall), had three boys and three girls.

  • Francis (1688-1774) – our John’s father who married Rebecca Anderson, so he’s accounted for.
  • John Vannoy – born about 1686 and alive in 1699 when his father wrote his will, but nothing more is known.
  • Abraham Vannoy – born about 1690, married Susanna Clayton, started having children about 1721, and died in 1774 in Kent County, Delaware.
  • Rachel – born about 1692 and appears to have married John Wells
  • Sarah – born about 1694
  • Catherine – born about 1696

Additional research may reveal more about Rachel’s daughters. I’d love to find someone confirmed to descend through all daughters from Rachel to take a mitochondrial DNA test so that we have something to work with. If that’s you, please reach out – I have a DNA testing scholarship with your name on it!

There’s no mention of a daughter, Susannah, anyplace, but at least we find the first name of Susannah in the family. John Vannoy’s uncle, Abraham, married Susannah Clayton. I was initially excited, but I quickly came to realize when researching this family further that for John Vannoy’s wife, Susannah to have been Abraham’s and Susannah’s daughter, she would have had to have been their firstborn, AND never been mentioned anyplace. It’s not impossible, but it is unlikely.

Furthermore, we have a different problem. Little Creek, Delaware, where Abraham lived and where Susannah Clayton’s parents lived, is about 125 miles from Hopewell, New Jersey, so the children of John’s son Francis and John’s son Abraham probably never met. Francis moved to Hopewell Township at least by 1722, and possibly as early as 1714, before his son John was born.

Conversely, maybe Susannah was a daughter of Francis’s brother, John, about whom we know nothing – including if he survived to adulthood. A John Vannoy is not found in the 1722 tax list, so John likely either died or moved elsewhere.

There are too many Johns in this family! It seems that every child in every generation married and had one. I swear, I need to assign numbers.

Frontiers and Children

Based on John Vannoy’s history, we know that Susannah lived through the Coxe Affair in New Jersey in 1731 as a child, where, if settlers had purchased land, they lost it. The only other alternative was to repurchase their own land, causing many people to leave and start over elsewhere and forcing others into bankruptcy.

When John and Susannah married, owning land probably seemed like nothing more than an unrealistic dream – but crooked politicians could wrest it away from you with the stroke of a pen and a few lies. By the time they had been married more than a decade, they still didn’t own land, and they apparently weren’t taking any chances.

John and Susannah loaded up and made the long journey from New Jersey to the Jersey Settlement in NC, some 600 mountainous miles that probably took two or three months if nothing went awry. Any wagon breaking in the train meant that everyone stopped to repair it, so the journey was likely arduous.

We know they were in Rowan County by the third Tuesday of September 1753 when John registered his stock mark at court.

This journey would have been made with children ages 12, 11, 8, 7, 4, two and a half, and 19 months.

Does this mean that Susannah’s next baby arrived at some unknown place along the road, and didn’t survive?

I fear that it does.

Babies were generally born about 18 months apart, but sometimes in as few as 12 months and as many as 24.

Did Susannah give birth to a baby in a makeshift bed in the back of a wagon, with absolutely no privacy, have to bury her infant someplace alongside the trail, then have to pull away and leave the tiny grave behind?

Oh, my aching mother’s heart. God bless them both.

Susannah’s next child wouldn’t be born until July of 1754, so she would have become pregnant in October 1753, just a month or so after John registered his stock mark.

This tells me that they lost a baby someplace on the way to North Carolina, or perhaps immediately after arriving.

Their last child was born the day after Christmas in 1755, so we know that Susannah was alive at this time.

Then…nothing…radio silence.

Additionally, we don’t know what happened to some of her children:

  • Abraham born in 1745
  • Hannah born in 1751
  • Susannah born in 1754
  • Katherine born in 1755

There’s no record in Nathaniel’s Bible, or from his son Andrew’s letter, or from Nathaniel’s son, Jesse’s Bible. Their births are recorded, but nothing further.

It’s very likely that Susannah buried these children too, including her own namesake child.

We know that five survived, and probably at least that many didn’t.

Susannah’s Death

Our only option for estimating when Susannah died is to bracket those dates with what we know about the history of her family.

We know she was alive the day after Christmas in 1755.

We know, based on multiple historical sources, that it’s very likely that Susannah and John Vannoy’s home was burned in 1771, forcing a hurried evacuation to then Surry, soon to become Wilkes County, probably settling on or near Mulberry Creek. If so, and if John’s Bible “was preserved,” as was reported, then we know either it didn’t burn in the fire, or he or Susannah meticulously wrote their children’s births in a replacement Bible at a later date.

We know that John and four sons were alive in 1772.

The Surry County tax list is missing for 1773, but in 1774, the four sons are present, but John is not.

By this time, the family is living in the part of Surry County that would become Wilkes County a few years later.

We have no idea if Susannah survived this long.

Her name is never mentioned in any legal or tax record anyplace, in any county. John does not have a will or estate record, at least not one that survived. If the family’s farm was burned in Rowan County in 1771 during the Regulator War, John and Susannah may have died with literally no possessions on the very edge of the frontier, having saved only their lives.

Susannah’s death date is not recorded in the family Bible, and neither is John’s, but then again, neither are the death dates or spouses of their children.

Not 1816

What I can tell you with near certainty is that our Susannah did NOT live until 1816, as is shown in many trees and on FindaGrave, where literally not one fact about her is accurate. She would have been approximately 100 years old, possibly more – a very remarkable accomplishment – so we can rest assured that if she was anyplace near 100, that legend would have survived. The Susannah Vannoy of 1816 is misidentified as our Susannah.

Susannah’s son, Andrew Vannoy married Susannah Shepherd in 1779 in Wilkes County. Andrew died in 1809. Susannah is enumerated on the 1810 census and is remembered in her father’s will that same year.

It’s very likely that this is the Susannah who died in 1816. I recall finding something in the court records at some time, but I can’t locate that record again. (This is why you should always write everything down, along with the source, when you find it.)

The identities of these two women, Susannah, the wife of John Vannoy, and Susannah Shepherd, the wife of Andrew Vannoy, have been conflated.

Not Baker

One last item about John’s wife, Susannah “Anderson”. Her middle name is often given as Baker, as in, Susannah Baker Anderson.

For the life of me, I couldn’t figure out when or where that started. It’s not stated in any of the early biographical books or articles about the family, or by Andrew Vannoy in his letter. This could have originated in an early speculative tree that has been copy/pasted hundreds or thousands of times, to the point where everyone assumed someone, someplace has the original information.

The Baker family does live nearby in Wilkes County and a Baker was a chain-carrier for one of Nathaniel Vannoy’s land grants. Andrew Baker witnessed several deeds for Nathaniel and vice versa. The Wilkes marriage records show that Martin Baker married “S… Vannoy” where the page is torn, on August 1, with the page torn again, and the bondsman was Nathaniel Vannoy.

Aha – I think we’ve solved two things. The first being where the name Susannah Baker Anderson came from – an amalgamation. Secondly, this is where the confusion about one of the daughters of John Vannoy marrying the Reverend Andrew Baker originated.

Andrew Baker was in Wilkes County by 1782 and claimed land on the New River, a neighbor of Nathaniel Vannoy. His son, Andrew, claimed his father’s 200 acres in 1779 next to land where “Susanna Baker now lives on.” She released her dower rights on a piece of property on Grassy Bottom Creek in Rowan County, North Carolina, in 1768 when she and Andrew sold it to James Sheppard. We know unquestionably that John Vannoy was still living in 1768, so this Susannah Baker is NOT Susannah, the wife or widow of John Vannoy.

Whew!!!

When I first started assembling information about this woman, now at least 20 years ago, our Susannah was listed as Susannah Baker Anderson. This phenomenon used to occur when there was uncertainty so someone connected both surnames, “just in case”, “because one of them has to be right.”

We were all novices at one time, so I recorded it the same way.

Today, with more information available, we can now determine why that assumption might be made, and also why it was wrong.

What About Mitochondrial DNA?

Thankfully, a descendant of Susannah Anderson has taken a mitochondrial DNA test at FamilyTreeDNA.

She has 1130 matches in total, of which 363 are exact full-sequence matches. Unfortunately, only about one-third of those matches, 130, have entered either their Earliest Known Ancestor (EKA) or the geographic location of that ancestor so that Susannah’s mitochondrial matches show on the tester’s matches map.

Of course, I first checked for matches in the same part of the world – looking specifically for the Netherlands. Red pins indicate exact matches, and the majority look to be in Scandinavia and Finland. But not all of them.

Expanding the map is somewhat helpful, but shows her exact matches widely scattered, which likely reflects the fact that haplogroup H1a is a relatively old haplogroup and had the opportunity to spread widely.

Taking a look at the US matches map doesn’t show any names that I recognize in the regions I had hoped. Of course, from these locations in the 1600s and early 1700s, her descendants are scattered everywhere now, and not everyone can trace their ancestors that far back in time. Or, they can, but didn’t list an EKA or location.

I was very much hoping for matches to another Andreissen woman, or another name I recognize from the congregation or tax list in New Jersey.

One of the challenges we have is that females’ surnames change every generation, and when people don’t include their EKA information, it means that genealogists have to click to view every person who has provided a tree.

Unfortunately, usually fewer than half of the matches have uploaded or connected to a tree, and without either an EKA, or a tree, or hopefully both, complete with a location, it’s VERY difficult to establish a genealogical connection.

Anyone who connects with people in Scandinavia is fortunate because, as a group, they are very involved with genetic genealogy and far more likely than average provide EKA, tree, and geographic location information. That can also make maps skew towards that region.

The great news is that the new Mitotree and MitoDiscover, to be released in early 2025, will provide Susannah with a more refined haplogroup or branch, a Time Tree, and a Match Time Tree showing her matches on that tree, WITH their EKA ancestors. (Yes, I’ve seen it – no I can’t share it yet.)

If you descend from any of the Hunterdon County families we’ve discussed through all females, or any other Hunterdon families for that matter, please test your mitochondrial DNA. With changing surnames in each generation, sometimes it’s all we have to make that elusive connection.

The best thing you can do to help yourself and your matches is to provide a tree, enter your EKA information (which is not extracted from your tree), and provide the best location possible for your most distant direct matrilineal ancestor. I wrote about how to do that, here.

Susannah’s Legacy

There are no deeds or other records that give us even the slightest hint about John Vannoy’s wife by any name, when she was born or died, so we’ll go with Susannah Anderson, which was recorded by her grandson.

We know that Susannah grew up in Hopewell Township, New Jersey, born just a few years after the first settlers began making inroads into the wilderness. The first church she attended would have been a log cabin and probably unheated.

As a teen, she flirted with the handsome John Vannoy, whose parents also attended the same church. In about 1740, they married, either in that same humble church, or perhaps one of their parents’ homes.

In 1741, their first baby arrived, founding the next generation.

A dozen years later, seeking to own land, John and Susannah set out for the next frontier with like-minded neighbors and family members – North Carolina.

Based on gaps between children, we know it’s very likely that Susannah buried at least two babies and likely three – one probably on that journey between New Jersey and Rowan County, North Carolina, in 1753.

The Vannoy Bible recorded the birth dates of the Vannoy children, but since there were no death dates, and no spouses listed for several children, it strongly suggests that Susannah may have buried someplace between two and four additional children before they reached adulthood.

If the family oral history and history of Rowan County are to be believed, and there’s no reason to doubt their accuracy, especially since one corroborates the other, Susannah’s home was burned in 1771 during or as a result of the Regulator War. It’s very likely that her husband and sons participated, and their home and farm were torched by Governor Tryon’s militia as an act of retribution for their uprising.

The Baptist Church in Rowan County backed the Regulators, while the Presbyterian ministers backed the governor and his troops.

The Vannoy family would have converted to being Baptists at this point, if they hadn’t already. Susannah was about 50 years old or maybe slightly older in 1771 when her home was torched, if she was still living by then.

We don’t know anything about Susannah for sure beyond the day after Christmas in 1755, when the birth of her youngest child, Catherine, was recorded in the family Bible. Given that there was a family Bible, this suggests strongly that John could write. It would have been unusual if Susannah had been taught to write – women learned “useful” tasks like cooking, cleaning, and household chores. Writing and cyphering were activities men needed to do.

That said, I really, really hope it was her handwriting in that Bible – although if it were, I suspect we’d have additional information.

If Susannah lived to 1771, she would have gathered what she could, as the family hastily departed to what was then Surry County, the portion that would have become Wilkes in 1778. None of her children had yet married by this time, unless Rachel had married Niel Patton, so they would all have lived at home as they attempted to escape the fire, save their livestock, each other, and any shreds of their lives.

I hate to think of the possibility that she perished in that fire. I would think if that had happened, it would have been added to the family story, given that the fact of the arson was passed down to her grandchildren.

As horrible as this scenario is in its own right, I’d much prefer to think that the soldiers at least gave the family the opportunity to leave before torching their homes. Yes, watching your home burn would be horrific, but the terror of being trapped and trying to find everyone and escape the flames is the stuff of nightmares.

If Susannah did not live to 1771, and died between 1755 and 1771, she would have been laid to rest in the churchyard beside the Jersey Baptist Church on Jersey Church Road in Rowan County, or perhaps in a private cemetery on the land where she and John lived on Lick Creek, at the mouth of the Yadkin River.

Susannah’s grave is unmarked, and she probably rests beside some of her children in the silent spaces between gravestones.

If Susannah did make it to Surry or Wilkes County in 1771, she is probably buried with John someplace near their log home that they carved out of the wilderness where they sought shelter after escaping Governor Tryon’s marauding troops. Resting in a quaint and now overgrown cemetery where prayers were offered as family members were buried in wooden caskets made from trees in their forest home, some 250 years ago.

Susannah faced at least two, if not three, increasingly difficult unbroken frontiers, gave birth to at least nine and probably 11 children, and buried at least three or four of them, if not more.

I still try to fathom what Susannah’s life must have been like and have come to the conclusion that she must have been incredibly brave and hearty – but then again, what else could she be? She had little choice but to greet whatever challenges life rolled her way – any one of which would do us in today.

But not Susannah.

She survived long enough to shepherd in the next generation and plant the seeds of the Vannoy family in Wilkes County, North Carolina. Some family members still reside there and have flourished, while others, like seeds scattered in the wind, have established the family elsewhere.

To Susanah, every challenge was just one more obstacle to overcome, which she did handily. She just kept putting one foot in front of the other, walking down life’s rocky road.

Hand in hand with her family.

And here we are today.

_____________________________________________________________

Follow DNAexplain on Facebook, here.

Share the Love!

You’re always welcome to forward articles or links to friends and share on social media.

If you haven’t already subscribed (it’s free,) you can receive an e-mail whenever I publish by clicking the “follow” button on the main blog page, here.

You Can Help Keep This Blog Free

I receive a small contribution when you click on some of the links to vendors in my articles. This does NOT increase your price but helps me keep the lights on and this informational blog free for everyone. Please click on the links in the articles or to the vendors below if you are purchasing products or DNA testing.

Thank you so much.

DNA Purchases and Free Uploads

Genealogy Products and Services

My Books

Genealogy Books

Genealogy Research

Dave Vance Joins FamilyTreeDNA as Senior VP and General Manager

Great news! Dave Vance has joined FamilyTreeDNA as the Senior VP and General Manager of the FamilyTreeDNA products.

I’ve known Dave for several years as a fellow genetic genealogist, as a fellow group project administrator, and as a fellow speaker at events.

Dave’s interest in genealogy began about the same time as his 30-year career with IBM – a choice that eventually led him to test through the Genographic Project back in 2005. IBM was one of the Genographic partners. That was a fortuitous, life-changing intersection of events for many, Dave included – opening the door to revelations genealogists could only dream about before.

Dave retired about 18 months ago and has since been quite busy focusing on his passion – genetic genealogy. He told me that there was one, and only one, position that even MIGHT have lured him out of retirement – and this was it. An opportunity to make a difference, maybe even a paradigm shift in the field he loves.

Dave certainly has all of his ducks in a row and knows exactly what he’s doing!

Dave’s book, The Genealogists Guide to Y-DNA Testing for Genetic Genealogy explains Y-DNA testing, soup to nuts. I guess it won’t come as a surprise, then, that David is the administrator of the Vance surname project at FamilyTreeDNA.

Dave has recently been the editor of the Journal of Genetic Genealogy for ISOGG, and published the book, The Genealogist’s Guide to Y-DNA Testing for Genetic Genealogy.

Most recently I saw Dave at the East Coast Genetic Genealogy Conference where he delivered the keynote, as well as other sessions and a joined a group of genetic genealogists for a panel discussion.

As if this isn’t enough, Dave has a YouTube Channel called “Dave Vance Genetic Genealogy Videos,” here.

Dave has also written a Y-DNA tool, SAPP, which several of his videos explain.

When does this man sleep?

For those of you who don’t know Dave, I’m sure you’ll be seeing and hearing from him soon – at RootsTech and at FamilyTreeDNA events.

I can think of few people in this industry with just the right mix of genealogist, tech geek, project management experience, and ambassador to fulfill this role and propel FamilyTreeDNA to the next level.

Actually, I can only think of one, and thankfully, he’s accepted the position, along with the inherent challenges. I’m confident that Dave knows what needs to happen and how to get it done.

Congratulations, Dave – and congratulations to our collective family of genetic genealogists, too, because we now have one of our own at the head of the table. Pedal to the metal! Let’s GO!!!

FamilyTreeDNA made a wonderful selection.

_____________________________________________________________

Follow DNAexplain on Facebook, here.

Share the Love!

You’re always welcome to forward articles or links to friends and share on social media.

If you haven’t already subscribed (it’s free,) you can receive an e-mail whenever I publish by clicking the “follow” button on the main blog page, here.

You Can Help Keep This Blog Free

I receive a small contribution when you click on some of the links to vendors in my articles. This does NOT increase your price but helps me keep the lights on and this informational blog free for everyone. Please click on the links in the articles or to the vendors below if you are purchasing products or DNA testing.

Thank you so much.

DNA Purchases and Free Uploads

Genealogy Products and Services

My Books

Genealogy Books

Genealogy Research