Mitochondrial DNA: What is a Haplotype Cluster and How Do I Find and Use Mine?

A new feature called Haplotype Clusters was released with the new Mitotree and mtDNA Discover.

MtDNA Discover includes a dozen new reports for EVERY haplogroup. You can use the public version of Discover with any haplogroup.

However, there are additional included features for mtFull testers, and other information provided will be much more detailed and robust because the mtFull test is much more specific than any partial haplogroup.

If you have only taken the older partial-coverage HVR1 or HVR1/HVR2 tests at FamilyTreeDNA, you can sign in and upgrade, or if you have received a partial haplogroup from another source, you can take the mtFull test at FamilyTreeDNA.

OK, I’ve Taken the mtFull Test, So How Do I Access My Discover Reports?

Sign in to your FamilyTreeDNA account, then from your mtDNA dashboard, click through to Discover to access your Discover reports.

Discover reports are in addition to the tools in the mtDNA Results and Tools section of your dashboard on FamilyTreeDNA.

Definitions

Let’s start with some basic definitions.

  • Haplotype – Your individual DNA results at specific adjacent locations that are generally inherited together.

Other people may have the same haplotype as you. If they have mutations that you don’t have, or vice versa, then you have different haplotypes. People with the same haplotypes match exactly on whatever type of DNA is being discussed, such as Y-DNA or mitochondrial DNA, with no mutations or differences. Multiple people who match exactly are considered a Haplotype Cluster.

  • Haplogroup – A group of specific mutations that identify people who share a common genetic clan. Haplogroups, based on a series of mutations, can be traced forward and backward in time.

A haplogroup is a grouping of haplotypes with the same foundation mutations. You will share those mutations with other people in your haplogroup, but you may have other, different mutations that form your haplotype.

  • Other people will have the same haplogroup as you, because a group implies two or more.
  • You may or may not share a haplotype with other people. If you share the exact same haplotype with at least one other person, the two (or more) of you form a Haplotype Cluster

What is a Haplotype Cluster?

Haplotype Clusters are new and have been added to provide additional granularity to the new Mitotree, making results more genealogically useful.

In addition to your mitochondrial DNA haplogroup, you may also have a Haplotype Cluster if you took a full sequence mitochondrial DNA test, called the mtFull.

A mitochondrial DNA haplogroup, such as J1c2f for example, means that everyone within that haplogroup has the same foundation grouping of mutations. You may have additional mutations, or even some missing mutations, based on the older Phylotree Build 17, which was last updated in 2016.

Click to enlarge any image

To see your Extra and Missing Mutations in the Classic, or Phylotree build, on the FamilyTreeDNA mtDNA dashboard, click on “See More,” then on Mutations.

In the recently released Mitotree, which reconstructs the tree of humanity with more than 35,000 new branches, or haplogroups, many of those “extra” or “missing” mutations have been used in the definition of new haplogroups.

At FamilyTreeDNA, on your matches page, you’ll see your matches, like always. Matching has not changed.

You’ll notice that some are exact matches, and some may be “1 step” or more distant. That means they have one qualifying genetic mutation difference from you.

Some mutations have always been excluded from matching because they are unreliable. In my case, location 315.1C is one of those. You can read more about matching here. Matching has NOT been rerun with the release of the new Mitotree, but may be in the future.

The new Haplotype Clusters designate other people who you literally match exactly, with no differences – and no excluded marker locations.

So, let’s compare how I match people and what it means:

  • Haplogroup match – I match these people at the haplogroup level, which can reach back hundreds or even thousands of years ago. In addition, I may match them on both other relevant, reliable mutations, and/or unreliable mutations. On the current matching page, the mtDNA Haplogroup is the PhyloTree Build 17 haplogroup. Before Mitotree, matches to any other haplogroup were not displayed. Now, new haplogroups of my J1c2f matches, if they received a new haplogroup, are shown in the Mitotree Haplogroup column. My common ancestor with a match can have occurred anytime between when the haplogroup was formed and today.

Some people receive partial haplogroup level matches from other testing companies that also don’t include matching. A haplogroup match alone isn’t particularly useful except when it can eliminate a connection.

That’s why we need matching on the Matches page.

  • FamilyTreeDNA Matches Page Match – On the Matches page, I match these people at the haplogroup level as calculated based on Phylotree Build 17, as shown in the mtDNA Haplogroup Column at the Genetic Distance displayed. This means that I match them on the haplogroup markers PLUS possibly other markers.

My first match with Per, above, is listed as an exact match. Before Haplotype Clusters were introduced, I had no way of knowing if I matched him on all of my mutation locations, or just the ones that are NOT excluded from matching. But now I do.

My Haplotype Cluster number is F1752176. I know this because the little circle is checked and blue – meaning this person and I share both a haplogroup in the new Mitotree, and a Haplotype Cluster.

Ronald, above, is a match with a “1 step” Genetic Difference. I know for sure that I match him on the haplogroup markers. I also know that we don’t match on one non-excluded marker – but I have no idea which one. We may also match, or not, on some of the excluded markers. But we are not members of the same Haplotype Cluster. The blue circle is not checked.

You cannot be a member of more than one Haplotype Cluster, because everyone in a Haplotype Cluster must match exactly.

  • Haplotype Cluster – A Haplotype Cluster, if you have one, is a random F number assigned to people whose mitochondrial DNA matches exactly – and by exactly, I mean without excluding unstable or unreliable mutations.

You can see my Haplotype Cluster number, above, in the Mitotree Haplogroup column, in addition to my new Mitotree haplogroup – which is still J1c2f and did not change from the earlier version. In Mitotree, some people will receive new haplogroups, and some will not – based on your and other people’s mutations.

My match with Ronald is one step difference. Our haplogroup is the same, so that circle is checked, but Ronald belongs to a different Haplotype Cluster, so that circle is not checked, and he has a different F number. I can’t see his mutations that are different from mine, but I know he matches everyone else in his Haplotype Cluster exactly.

Let’s look at another example.

Click on any image to enlarge

Looking at my match list, I can see that beneath my matches’ haplogroup, which is the same as mine, F1752176 is checked and the checked circle is blue, which means that I share that Haplotype Cluster with those people. Everyone in that cluster has all of the same mutations in addition to the haplogroup-defining mutations, which is why both the haplogroup and haplotype circles are checked. I match both.

If I look at my Matches page, or the mtDNA Discover Time Tree, or Matches Time Tree, I can see that I have many exact haplotype matches, which means:

  • We all share haplogroup-defining mutations and
  • We match exactly on all other mutations as well

Before Haplotype Clusters were introduced, I had no way of knowing which of these people I matched exactly if no mutations were excluded.

To summarize, a Haplotype Cluster is a group of people who all match each other exactly within a haplogroup. People in Haplotype Clusters always match exactly, which INCLUDES mutations that are EXCLUDED from haplogroup formation and matching.

If you don’t match someone exactly, you’re not in the same Haplotype Cluster. You can either be in a different cluster, or no cluster at all if no one matches you exactly.

Everyone has a Haplotyupe Cluster number, but you will only be a member of a Haplotype Cluster if you have an exact match to at least one other person.

Don’t Ignore Other Clusters

The F number itself isn’t important. What is important is that Haplotype Clusters serve to focus your genealogy on that cluster first. However, understand that because the Haplotype Cluster does include unreliable or fast-mutating markers, it’s possible for you to share a more recent ancestor with people in a different cluster. It depends on the marker and the mutation, so don’t discount that possibility.

Who Can See Haplotype Cluster Mutations?

The only people who know the exact mutations of the people in a specific Haplotype Cluster are the members of that cluster – because they all match exactly.

If you scroll down your match list, you’ll notice that people, like Anastasia, who have a genetic distance of 1 step or greater have a different F Haplotype Cluster number, which is expected.

You may also notice that someone who is an “exact match” with you on the match list is assigned to a different Haplotype Cluster, such as Rose and Per. Rose is not in my Haplotype Cluster, but Per is, even though they are both “exact matches.”

Remember, “matching exactly” on the match list excludes unreliable mutation locations. Haplotype Clusters always match exactly and include all mutations. So, this tells me that I match Per on all mutation locations, regardless of their stability, and I match Rose on all stable locations, and we mismatch on at least one location that was excluded from matching.

However, the only people who know the exactly mutations of any other person are me and Per, because we both share a Haplotype Cluster. People in other clusters, or without a cluster, don’t know and can’t identify the mutations in clusters not their own.

  • The only thing I can tell about my match with Rose is that we don’t share one of the unreliable markers, because we are an “exact match” on the match list which excludes unstable markers. I have no idea whether I carry that unstable marker, or she does, or which marker it is.
  • The only thing I can tell about my match with Anastasia is that we don’t share at least one stable marker, because we are a “1-step” genetic distance, and we could also not share some of the unstable markers. I have no way of identifying those markers.
  • I know that I match Per exactly on all markers, including unstable or unreliable markers.

Included Versus Excluded Markers

Sometimes people who are listed as exact matches on your Matches page are assigned to different Haplotype Clusters. This is because mutations such as 309 and several others are included in Haplotype Clusters, but excluded from matching and haplogroup formation. The reason they are excluded is because they are sometimes unreliable – but they may be useful to your research. They aren’t always unreliable, but it varies on a case-by-case basis, including when the mutation occurred.

Location Haplogroup Formation Matching on Matches Page Haplotype Cluster
309 Excluded Excluded Included

Here’s an example using location 309. While some locations are excluded from matching, their inclusion in the formation of Haplotype Clusters may be very genealogically relevant to you – or perhaps not. That’s where genealogy research becomes important.

Haplotype Clusters give you the ability to focus your research on a specific group of people that you know do, in fact, match you exactly. Just keep in mind that some people in a different Haplotype Cluster, that don’t have a mutation at 309, for example, could have a closer common ancestor. That’s the nature of 309, 315 and other unstable SNPs, especially heteroplasmies, which tend to “come and go,” which I wrote about here. In other words, don’t ignore other Haplotype Clusters that appear on your match list – just begin with your own and evaluate using genealogy..

The Haplotype Cluster number itself isn’t important. What is important is that they serve to focus your genealogy efforts.

Where Else Can I Find My Haplotype Cluster

You can identify your Haplotype Cluster number by looking at your match list, as we have discussed, or by navigating to the Variants tab on the Scientific Details page.

On the variants tab, your haplogroup is marked with the solid red square, along with other information which I have truncated here.

Immediately above your haplogroup, you’ll see your Haplotype Cluster number, if you have one, along with any remaining private variants, aka mutations, that are haplogroup seeds and qualify to potentially become part of a haplogroup in the future.

In my case, this tells me that either all of my mutations are now included in a haplogroup definition, or they are excluded due to their instability or unreliability. Everyone else in this Haplotype Cluster is in exactly the same situation.

The only person who can see your Haplotype Cluster in Discover is you, if you are signed in to FamilyTreeDNA and you toggle “Show Private Variants” to “on.”

Haplotype Clusters as a Subset of Haplogroups

Haplogroups can and do have mutations “beneath” them, meaning haplogroup members may have different mutations or variants, in addition to the mutations used to form the haplogroup. Think of them as twigs or leaves on the tree.

Using the Classic Mitotree view in mtDNA Discover, you’ll notice that haplogroup J1c2f contains six Haplotype Clusters.

Please note that one of these clusters could be people who match the haplogroup definition exactly, and have no additional mutations of any type. They would form their own cluster.

Additionally, above the clusters, there are individual branches listed that don’t (yet) form clusters. You don’t know from looking at the individuals listed by country, such as Sweden, Germany, Norway, and so forth, if these people have only the exact mutations in haplogroup J1c2f, or if they have additional mutations that are unique and no one else has those exact mutations. What you do know is that so far, no one else matches them exactly, but as other people test, they may develop into a HaploType Cluster.

You may not match all of the people in your haplogroup on your matches page, because they may be over the match threshold and have too many mutations difference from you.

Some testers with unique, stable mutations may form new haplogroups as additional people test.

Using the Time Tree, you can see that there are currently 33 people who are in haplogroup J1c2f but do not match anyone else exactly.

The Discover Time Tree

Now that we’ve looked at examples individually, I took a screenshot of my entire haplogroup on the mtDNA Discover Time Tree to get the big picture.

The Time Tree offers a nice visual summary of all of J1c2f, including my full sequence matches, all in one place, along with Haplotype Clusters.

My haplogroup is shown in the black circle, and downstream haplogroups are shown in red circles.

You can see my Haplotype Cluster, which I can identify by the F#. You can see other Haplotype Clusters within my haplogroup, along with some individuals who don’t have any exact matches, who are shown alone on their line.

The Match Time Tree

When you click on Discover Haplogroup Reports from your dashboard, then on the Match Time Tree, you’ll see your matches’ names on your personal Time Tree, along with their self-reported earliest known matrilineal ancestors, in addition to their ancestor’s country of origin.

Here’s an example of a portion of my Match Time Tree with my matches’ names redacted.

With these new Discover and Mitotree tools, you know where to focus your research most closely. Which matches’ trees to view or build out to identify common ancestors, and who to prioritize for communications.

If you have a new haplogroup – that’s wonderful, but you don’t need one to make headway. The clue you need may well be found in your Haplotype Cluster.

There’s so much new information available for you. What can you discover?

_____________________________________________________________

Share the Love!

You’re always welcome to forward articles or links to friends and share on social media.

If you haven’t already subscribed (it’s free,) you can receive an e-mail whenever I publish by clicking the “follow” button on the main blog page, here.

You Can Help Keep This Blog Free

I receive a small contribution when you click on some of the links to vendors in my articles. This does NOT increase your price but helps me keep the lights on and this informational blog free for everyone. Please click on the links in the articles or to the vendors below if you are purchasing products or DNA testing.

Thank you so much.

DNA Purchases and Free Uploads

Genealogy Products and Services

My Books

Genealogy Books

Genealogy Research

Marie Levron (c1686-1727), Tragedy from Cradle to Grave – 52 Ancestors #443

Marie Levron was born about 1686 in or near Port Royal, Nova Scotia, to Francois “dit Nantois” Levron and Catherine Savoie. Levron is sometimes spelled Leveron, Leuron and other ways as well.

In 1686, we first find Marie Levron listed as age 1 in the census, along with her parents and three older siblings: Jacques age 9, Magdelaine, age 5, and Anne, age 2.

This probably means that Marie was actually born in 1686, given that her sibling is age 2, and children were generally born 18 months to two years apart. Later censuses also suggest that her birth was in 1686 as well.

In 1690, New England militia brutally attacked Port Royal, overtook the fort, plundered and burned the town, desecrated the church, and killed their livestock. Marie would have been too young to fully realize what was going on, but might have been terrorized by the attack itself. Assuredly, she would have been affected by the magnitude of the destruction. Given the level of trauma involved, this attack might have formed Marie’s earliest memories. Their home was probably burned, given their proximity to the fort.

Not only would her family have been immediately and directly affected, but this event was a turning point in English and Acadian relations. Any trust and goodwill between the two had been permanently destroyed.

In the 1693 census, Marie Levron was age 7 and was living at home with the same family members plus three new siblings: Elizabeth, age 3, Joseph, age 2, and Jean Baptiste, age 1. The gap between Marie and Elizabeth suggests she had an additional sibling born about 1688 who died between birth and the 1693 census.

This sibling may have died at birth when Marie was too young to realize what was taking place. Or, the child may have died just before the census when Marie was 7 and she had known them for years. It’s certainly possible that the child perished in the 1690 depredations when the English burned so many homes.

In 1698, Marie Leveron was age 12, living with her family, who had grown with the addition of two siblings – Jeanne, age 4, and Pierre, age 2. Her sister, Magdeleine, age 16, had recently married Clement Vincent and was living next door.

In 1700, Marie Leuron (Levron) was 14 and living with her family, but two of her siblings are missing. Jeanne and Pierre are not listed. Normally, this would mean that they had died, but that’s not true in this case.

Jeanne would have been 6 in 1700. She married in 1714, so she clearly had not died.

Pierre would have been 4. He is not found again until his death in 1725, when he died in the home of Pierre Godet as a domestic.

Where were these two children in 1700, and why was Pierre later working as a domestic?

Additionally, Marie’s sister, Magdeleine, also recorded as Madelaine, who was married in the 1698 census, is recorded as once again living with her parents. Her husband is not found. This leads me to question the accuracy of the census, because her husband, Clement Vincent, didn’t die, and they went on to have a dozen children. The eldest was born about 1701. Perhaps Magdeleine was visiting her parents when the census-taker recorded the family members.

In 1701, Marie Levrin, age 15, was listed as a servant in the home of Emanuel Hebert and his wife Andree Brun. Marie was younger than four of their five children at home, and one year older than their son, Alexandre, so she wasn’t living there to help with young children.

In 1698, Emanual Hebert was listed as the neighbor of Francois Levron, Clement Vincent and Rene Forest.

Servants were very unusual in Acadia, with only five listed individually. The total shows 17 servants in Port Royal, but we are left in the dark about the identity of the rest of those servants.

Marie’s parents and family are missing from the census.

It’s possible that they had departed for either Les Mines or Beaubassin and been missed in the census, or they were literally in transit. The family would have known the Emanual Hebert family well, so perhaps, for some unknown reason, Marie stayed behind, living with the Hebert’s as a servant.

If they went someplace, they were back by 1703.

In 1703, Marie was probably counted with her family in the census in Port Royal, although her parents had six daughters and four sons at the time, and the census only reflects four girls and two boys.

On November 20, 1703, Marie married Jean Garceau, a soldier at Fort Anne, and he was not listed in the census, so the census was likely taken before the wedding.

On the 20th of November in the year one thousand seven hundred and three, I, a parish priest performing the curial functions in this parish, after the publication of the three banns on three consecutive Sundays, without any impediment having been found, united in matrimony, by words in the presence of our Holy Mother Church, Jean Garsseault, called Tranchemontagne, soldier of this garrison in the company of Duvernay, son of Pierre Garsseaux and Jaquette Soulard of the parish of St. René in the diocese of Poitiers, and Marie Levron, daughter of François Levron and Catherine Savoye, of this parish. And they declared that they could not sign, but made their mark, along with those witnesses whose names I have signed below on the same day and year as above.

Marie was married by the Priest, Felix Pain, with the commander of Fort Anne serving as a witness.

The nuptials would have been performed either in the chapel at the Fort if it had been rebuilt by that time, in the rectory, or the commander’s residence in either the fort or on Hogg Island. The fort layout a few years later, in 1710, above, is from the Fort Anne Museum, at Fort Anne in Annapolis Royal.

As newlyweds, Jean and Marie would have wanted to establish a homestead, a place to live and raise their children for the rest of their lives. A little farm they could cultivate. They might well have built a small home on her father’s land.

Marie’s first baby, Pierre Garceau, was born on October 22, 1704, 11 months after they were married. His parents are listed as Jean Garssau dit Tranche Montagne and Marie Levron. Pierre Consolin, bombardier, and Anne Levron (mistranscribed as Curone), Marie’s older sister, were Godparents.

Since the 1690 attack, Fort Anne had fallen into disrepair to the point of being unable to defend itself, or anything else, for that matter. In 1702, a new, highly qualified engineer, Pierre-Paul de Labat had arrived, and by 1704, the dilapidated fort was under construction.

Concurrently, the English were chronically breathing down the neck of Acadia, so they desperately needed the protection of the new fort.

Financial and political issues with France delayed the rehabilitation of the fort which meant that Port Royal and the homesteads along the Riviere Dauphin, including where Marie and her small family lived, were exposed.

Both the soldiers and townspeople were struggling to complete the fort – but the soil and stone for the new earthworks and many ramparts all had to be hand-carried.

France, however, had essentially disappeared from the equation. No supplies arrived, and neither did money nor reinforcements.

(c) National Maritime Museum; Supplied by The Public Catalogue Foundation

Needing protection, Port Royal had little choice but to partner with privateers, a nicer name for pirates – well, at least the pirates that were on your side. Not only did they protect Port Royal, they sought and took English ships as prizes, and deposited captured English sailors at Port Royal where they could be used in future negotiations.

1707 – A Baby and a War

It’s puzzling that Marie Levron and Jean Garceau are not found in the 1707 census, but then again, neither are Marie’s parents. Jean was still a soldier, so they would have had to live near the fort.

Marie welcomed her second child, Daniel Garceau, on April 8, 1707. Interestingly, Monsieur de Subercase, Governor of the Province, and Dame Marie Mius, wife of Monsieur Duvivier, a French officer under Subercase, were Godparents. Jean Garceau was a soldier under Subercases’s command.

The two and a half year gap between Pierre and Daniel suggests that a child died in 1706, but there is no church record of such. Of course, the records may not be complete, or the child may have been born prematurely and never baptized.

A month after Daniel’s birth, the English launched an attack on Port Royal. Marie must have been utterly terrified.

To the best of our knowledge, Marie and Jean were living directly across the river from Port Royal.

All men were on a hair-trigger notice. Based on the reports provided by the English hostages, Port Royal was anticipating an attack. It was only a matter of when. Sure enough, in May of 1707, it arrived.

Messengers were sent to notify and gather the male residents living nearby in order to oppose the advance of the enemy on both sides of the river.

The British had landed near Goat Island, and more than 320 men were advancing through the woods on both banks. Port Royal was under attack.

The battle was brutal. Thankfully, Governor Subercase, who was quite competent, was in charge and led both the soldiers and Acadian men in battle.

The Acadian forces met the English face to face and engaged in hand-to-hand combat.

The English could not take the fort as they had anticipated, so they resorted to guerrilla warfare in the woods and along the river. They burned buildings and homes, laying waste to all of Port Royal.

Placard photos taken in the Museum at Fort Anne.

The English retreated, then returned again in August, but were once again repelled 11 days later.

However, the worst was yet to come – and everyone was on pins and needles.

The English Return

Subercase knew that time was limited, so he scrounged for as many additional hands as could be found to assist with the fort completion.

The privateers captured 35 more English ships and brought 470 additional English captives to Port Royal. The fort was not prepared for this many captives, and Spotted Fever, now called typhus, ravaged the hostages and the community. Typhus is caused by poor sanitation in extremely crowded conditions and is spread by fleas and body lice. More than 50 died.

Word came that a “great force” was being gathered at Boston. In preparation, Subercase added 150 Indians and 75 militia from Grand Pre. They expected an attack in 1708, and when that didn’t happen, in 1709.

The only thing that saved Port Royal in 1709 was that the English fleet had been redirected for service in the Spanish War. However, Port Royal didn’t know that.

Marie must have been a nervous wreck. She had two very small children. I think she lost a child in the spring of 1709, but we’ll never know.

1710 – Another Baby and the English Arrive

Around June 1709, Marie became pregnant for their third child.

Joseph Garceau, was born on March 20, 1710 and baptized three days later. Joseph Levron, his uncle, and Marie de Breuil stood as Godparents.

Fortunately, the fort had been mostly completed, and while Port Royal certainly could have used reinforcements from France, at least they weren’t entirely helpless now. The fort was ready – or at least as ready as it could be.

There were new barracks and a new powder magazine.

Additionally, trees and brush had been cleared from the waterfront so that the English couldn’t use it for cover.

When Marie’s baby was just six months old, and a month before her oldest child’s 6th birthday, the first few ships of the English fleet sailed up the river and into view. Not a few English ships like had happened in 1707, but the entire English fleet consisting of more than 35 ships and 3400 soldiers would arrive within a few days – almost three times the entire population of all of Acadia. Port Royal only had about 450 residents and of that, only 100 or so were men.

The English came prepared this time, with a full siege battle plan.

Complete with a labeled map.

To make matters worse for the Acadians, the abandonment of Port Royal and the rest of Acadia by France had created morale issues among the soldiers, which, in turn, led to a high desertion rate. Many of the deserters had joined the English forces and provided them with valuable intelligence.

No pay and reduced rations will do that to you. A few soldiers, like Jean, had married local women, but most had not and wanted nothing more than to escape – one way or another.

Marie’s husband, Jean, had to leave his wife and their children, wherever they lived, or wherever he secreted them to keep them safe. He donned his uniform as a soldier, facing incredible and unwinnable odds as the English attacked.

He had to know he was facing death. Marie knew that too, no matter what he said. I can only imagine their tearful goodbye as he departed their home to defend Port Royal from within Fort Anne in the face of legions of English soldiers. He must have felt like a sitting duck!

What is it like to stare death in the face?

What is it like to leave your wife and small children to their fate at the hands of enemy soldiers?

We don’t know exactly what happened. If Jean wasn’t in the fort as the English warships sailed up the river, he would have hurriedly taken his assigned defensive station within the fort before the gates were closed.

Maybe he hurried his wife and children into the fort with him.

Fortunately, the fort’s master engineer,  Pierre-Paul DeLabat drew a 1710 map.

He labeled the Nantois, or Levron, homestead, on the river across from Hogg Island.

This location of the Levron home might explain why Marie fell in love with a soldier who was stationed right across the river.

On the 1707/1708 map drawn by Delabat, the Nantois home is shown directly across the river from Hogg Island, just slightly upriver from the fort.

If Jean was in the fort, he didn’t have the opportunity to tell his wife goodbye. I don’t know exactly where Marie’s family was, although Labat was quite specific. The Levron family may have already moved elsewhere, anticipating the onslaught. That home had assuredly been burned out in 1707 and had to rebuild.

I hope Marie was able to make her way home to her parents who lived on the north side of the River, and perhaps to her mother’s parents several miles further east.

On September 24th, at about 2:15 in the afternoon, the first ships were sighted by sentries near Goat Island.

As more and more ships arrived from the west, a warning would have rapidly traveled along the river valley to alert the residents.

At least 35 ships anchored in front of the fort, blocking the harbour. A sea of sails swayed back and forth, striking terror in the Acadian residents and the few French soldiers, alike.

How could 300 men, which included a few visitors, possibly fend off 3400 English soldiers?

More and more ships sailed into the harbour – none of them French.

Acadia would not surrender without a fight.

By October 5th, all of the English fleet had arrived, but the Acadians had no way to know there weren’t more.

If Marie was at her parent’s home, the river in front of their homestead would have been full of English ships. Marie and others probably continued to anxiously watch the horizon to the west for yet more English warships to appear.

I’m sure they appeared endless.

Acadian women and children had been gathered in the fort and secreted in the dank, dark, subterranean “black hole” for safety.

We don’t know if Marie was among them.

Once the only door to the Black Hole is shut, there is no light and no circulation. I’d truly have to fear imminently for my life to willingly be locked in here.

Marie may have sheltered in the black hole.

Or perhaps she had made her way upstream and was hiding there with family members, or in the mountains that line the river valley on the north side of the River, behind the Levron homestead.

On October 6th, the English came ashore, landing troops both north and south of the Fort, and Port Royal.

The Acadians tried to fire upon the English ships, but their cannons couldn’t reach that distance across the river. The Acadians were both outnumbered and outgunned.

Aside from her own safety, Marie would have been worried sick about her husband. Was he safe? Was he injured? Was he dead? Where was he?

Could she see anything?

Fort Anne and Port Royal, including the area across the river, were completely surrounded. The Acadians resorted to guerrilla-style warfare, dressing not in military uniforms, but in skins and clothing like the Mi’kmaq, shooting at the English red-coats from the woods and what few structures remained.

The English burned everything they could. Homes, farms, fields, barn. Burned it all! Again!

After four days of resistance, Governor Subercase knew they were all about to be slaughtered. If you live, you can fight another day. From within the fort, which may have been where Marie was sheltering, Subercase sent a French officer with a white parley flag to the English camp.

Negotiations ensued for two days as the English continued to advance upon the fort. When they reached a distance of 300 feet, people within the fort could hear the voices of the English soldiers. Now within very close range, the English opened fire upon the fort and lobbed grenades inside the walls.

A hellish firestorm of a battle ensued. History speaks to the thunderous discharge of cannons and artillery raining down on the brave men holding the fort against insurmountable odds.

The women and families secreted in the pitch black Black Hole would have huddled together and prayed without cease. They would have felt every single explosion – not knowing if it was the literal end.

The English prisoners, also held in the fort, were probably equally as terrified, given that they might well be killed by either side – either intentionally or accidentally. They were probably praying too.

Then, silence.

Deafening silence.

The English fire ceased. The Acadians stood in the eerie silence, confused and wondering what was happening.

Had their prayers been answered?

Had, by some miracle, the French fleet arrived in the harbour?

Had they, by the Grace of God, been saved?

Time stood still as the Acadians waited. Anticipation had never seemed so long.

What were the people in the black hole thinking?

Were they anticipating the best, or the worst?

Maybe both?

Were they whispering, or silent?

What was happening?

And why?

By the end of the day on October 12th, negotiations were complete.

The Acadians would not be massacred. Their families would not be harmed.

The English prisoners would be released, and British boats were sent upriver to retrieve Acadian women and children who were hidden there – and to spread the word.

The entire episode lasted for 19 excruciatingly long days. On October 16th, the key to the fort was handed from the French officers to the English, and the French soldiers and Acadian men marched out of the fort through the gate with their dignity and little else.

Surrender terms included provisions to protect the Acadians. “Inhabitants within the gun range of the fort,” which was three miles, could remain in undisturbed possession of their land for up to two years if they wished, provided they were willing to swear an oath to the British Crown. Then they were required to leave.

Those at a greater distance than three miles were tolerated or allowed to remain on sufferance.

French soldiers were returned to France on British warships.

The local priest only recorded one death during the battle, a child who died on October 14th during the siege. I have a hard time believing only one person died. Two soldier-age men died not long thereafter, so they could have been injured during the battle.

Jean Garceau was a soldier. He had married an Acadian woman. Where was he?

Where Was Marie’s Husband?

When the fort fell, the priest, Father Durand, tried to reunite the Acadian settlers upriver, beyond the three-mile demarcation line. He attempted to protect the residents from the terms of capitulation that required that despised oath of allegiance to the English crown, an agreement that clearly would only have been made under duress.

The English were quite unhappy with Father Durand and considered him seditious. They took him prisoner in January of 1711 and sent him, as a captive, to Boston, with a few other unnamed Acadians.

Father Durand was ultimately released and returned to Acadia later in the year.

The last date before his capture that Father Durand performed any of his clerical duties was January 17, 1711. Father Durand once again appears in the parish registers on December 20th where he begins catching up on baptisms and other official duties that had been neglected in his absence, given that he was the only priest in Port Royal.

After recording more pressing items, Father Durand made a blanket entry for several people who had died while he was in Boston – including Jean Garceau, although he is erroneously recorded as Joseph. There was no Joseph Garceau, except for Jean and Marie’s young son, who we know did not die, and there was also no date on the group entry. What it does say is that these people died during Father Durand’s absence while he was in Boston.

Now, Marie, at age 24, was a widow with three small children. How was she going to survive?

Marie Remarries

The day after Christmas, December 26th, Father Durand married Marie Levron, widow of Jean Garceau, with Alexander Richard.

On the twenty-sixth day of December in the year 1711, I, the undersigned, acting in the role of parish priest, after three banns were published during parish masses, did join in marriage by mutual consent Alexandre Richard, son of the late Michel Richard and Jeanne Babin, and Marie Levron, daughter of François Levron and Catherine Savoye, widow of Jean Garceau, all of this parish. They declared that they did not know how to sign. In witness of which, I have signed on the above-mentioned day and year.

While that may not be her name and signature, it is Marie’s X, so she made that actual mark. The second mark is Alexandre’s.

The witnesses are Rene de Forest, and Rene Babinaut (sp?) along with Father Justinian Durand, officiating priest.

Rene may be an important clue, because he is a neighbor of Emanuel Hebert with whom Marie had lived as a servant. She would have known the family well. It’s also worth noting that Alexander Richard’s family lived in the area too.

Unfortunately, the Nova Scotia Archives doesn’t translate or index witnesses.

While we don’t know exactly when Jean died, Marie’s marriage just six days after the priest returned strongly suggests that Jean had been deceased for some time.

If Jean Garceau died shortly after Father Durand was captured in January of 1711, Marie would have been a widow for nearly a year.

When Marie remarried, she had three Garceau children. Pierre had just turned 7, Daniel, who was four-and-a- half, and Joseph, the baby, who was 21 months old. The baby would not have remembered Jean Garceau, and Daniel probably didn’t either.

Life With Alexander Richard

Marie’s second husband, Alexander Richard dit Boutin is somewhat confusing. His father had a son by the same name with both of his wives. While that sounds odd, especially if the first son lived, this is not the first time I’ve seen this phenomenon in Acadian families.

The Alexander Richard that Marie Levron married is the younger man, born around 1686 to Michel Richard and Jeanne Babin.

Alexander’s mother, a widow, had married Laurent Doucet, who lived at BelleIsle near the Savoie family.

The older Alexander Richard had died in 1709, so even without the detail in the parish record, we know unquestionably that Marie married the younger man.

Marie’s fourth child, and first child with Alexandre, Pierre Toussaint Richard, arrived on October 1, 1712, and was baptized the following day with Pierre Laure and Jeanne Doucet as Godparents.

Marie’s parents were getting older, and her father, Francois Levron, noted as ”about seventy years old,” was buried on June 23, 1714, according to the parish registers.

Marie, her mother, siblings and their families would have gathered that summer day to lay him to rest in the cemetery inside Fort Anne, probably where her husband, Jean Garceau rested as well. At peace, but with the protective barracks in the background.

The Acadian graves remain, but all are now unmarked. Whatever markers remained in 1755 were subsequently destroyed by the English.

Marie’s mother was noted in the 1714 census as “Widow Nantois, 2 sons and 1 daughter, living in the midst of the Girouard clan – so it’s entirely possible that they had moved upriver after they were burned out in 1707 and 1710. She actually had three unmarried sons, so one of them was missing from the census.

In the 1714 census, Alexander Richard is living with his wife and four sons beside Mathiew Doucet, very near the Julien Lore dit LaMontagne – not far east of Granville Ferry on the north side of the river – near the Leveron land. Of course, three of Alexander Richard’s four sons were his step-sons, but he raised the Garceau boys as his own. In fact, Marie’s youngest Garceau son, Joseph, often used the surname Richard, and sometimes Pierre used Alexandre’s dit name, Boutin.

Another two-and-a-half-year gap between children causes me to wonder if Marie lost a child in 1714.

Claude Richard was born on June 27, 1715, with Pierre Blanchard and Anne Robichaux, daughter of Alexandre Robichaux, as Godparents.

Three years between children nearly assures that a child was born and perished.

Marie Josephe Richard was born on June 17, 1718, and baptized the following day with Yves Maucaire and Marie LeBlanc as Godparents.

Marguerite Richard was born on May 1, 1720, and baptized two days later, with Alexandre Brossard and Marguerite Bourg, wife of Pierre Brossard, as Godparents.

Another three years between children. If Marie was actually losing every other child, she must have been filled with dread and anxiety with every pregnancy, especially every other pregnancy.

Isabelle Richard was born on May 14, 1723, and baptized two days later with René Doucet and Isabelle Levron as Godparents.

Isabelle Levron is Marie’s sister, who is also recorded in some records as Elizabeth.

On January 20, 1725, Marie’s 30-year-old brother, Pierre Levron died. Their father is noted as deceased, but their mother appears to still be living.

With nearly four years between Isabelle and Joseph, I’d wager at least one child was buried during this time. Sadly, without modern medical care, families anticipated losing half of their children. What a sad state of “normal.”

Marie’s youngest child, Joseph Richard was born on February 19, 1727, and baptized the following day with ”Pierre Garceau, son of the late Jean Garceau, and Marie Lor, daughter of the late Julien Lore,” standing as Godparents. Pierre was Joseph Richard’s half-brother.

If you’re scratching your head, thinking to yourself that Marie had a child named Joseph in 1710 with Jean Garceau, and now another Joseph in 1727 with Alexandre Richard – you’d be right. And yes, they were both alive in 1727.

Apparently Alexander having a same-name half-sibling didn’t deter him from doing the same with his own offspring.

Not Peaceful

Just for the record, in case we’re inclined to think that life was peaceful in Acadia after 1710 – it wasn’t.

Conflict with the English continued. First, the Acadians were required to leave in two years. Then, when they planned to depart, the English forbid it because they had come to realize that they had no prayer of feeding their own soldiers without the Acadians raising food for them.

Yet, the English continued to require a loyalty oath, and the Acadians just as adamantly continued to refuse for a variety of reasons. In 1720, some slight of hand resolved the oath issue for for the next 35 years. The Oath the Acadians signed was two pages – but only the first page was sent back to England. So, in essence, both parties got the conditions they required.

It wasn’t until 1720 that Acadians didn’t constantly live under threat of one kind or another. Until 1755, of course.

Marie’s Premature Death

Sadly, there is no happy ending to Marie’s story. No rocking great-grandchildren by the hearth or summers playing in the warm sunshine.

On August 1, 1727, Marie died just four and a half months after she gave birth to Joseph. The parish register tells us that Marie, the wife of Alexandre Richard, died on August 1st and was buried the following day. Her husband and Louis Tibault, her nephew, were witnesses.

Unfortunately, Marie’s parents were not listed, which would have given us a clue about whether her mother was still living. We know her father died in 1714.

The family was most probably associated with the St. Laurent Church at BelleIsle, because Marie’s sister, Madelaine/Magdelaine Levron was married there in 1722, and it was much closer than Port Royal.

Marie was either buried beside the church there, or in the cemetery at Port Royal.

On that hot summer day, Marie’s nine children would have said goodbye to their mother in the little chapel and buried her in the churchyard outside, now lost to time in the woods on the right side of the river.

When Marie died, none of her children had yet married, and many were young.

  • Pierre was 23
  • Daniel was 20
  • Joseph was 17
  • Pierre Toussaint was almost 15
  • Claude was almost 12, assuming he was alive
  • Marie Josephe had just turned 9
  • Marguerite was 7
  • Isabelle was 4
  • Joseph was only four and a half months old

What was baby Joseph to do without a mother? Someone had to feed him. Perhaps one of Marie’s sisters stepped in. Elizabeth/Isabelle had a baby in September of 1726, and Madeleine had a baby in October of 1726, which meant that both women would have been nursing babies when Joseph was in need. And, after all, they were her sisters and Joseph’s aunts.

Marie had probably already buried 4 or 5 children, mostly babies, along with her father and her first husband. Hopefully, she was buried near her children, all of whom passed too soon.

I can’t help but wonder if Marie’s death was an after-effect of or connected to Joseph’s birth.

Marie was only 40.

Who Raised Marie’s Children?

Who raised Marie’s children? Did her mother or perhaps a sister step in? If Marie knew how ill she was, or suspected that she was dying, that would have been the question foremost on her mind.

The purpose of Godparents is to raise the child in the event that the parents perish and cannot raise the child. In this case, only one parent died. Normally, what happens in cases like this is that the living parent quickly remarries to another individual who has lost their spouse. Clearly, in a small community, everyone already knew everyone else.

There’s absolutely no evidence that Alexandre ever remarried, and his occurred after the 1755 deportation – so he was single for a very long time.

Perhaps the marriages and other records of Marie’s children provide some clues.

  • Pierre Garceau, also sometimes known as Pierre Boutin, married Agnes Doucet in 1728 and lived in Port Royal. Alexander Richard did not sign for him. They had eight children. Pierre disappears from records after he witnesses his daughter’s marriage in Annapolis Royal in 1750. His wife, Agnes Doucet, died in Connecticut in 1789, so if Pierre lived long enough to be deported, that’s likely where he ended up. He would have been 51 years old in 1755.
  • Daniel Garceau married Anne Doucet about 1730 and lived near Annapolis Royal. No parish marriage record. They had 11 children. After the 1755 deportation, Daniel ended up in New York before making his way to Quebec.
  • Joseph Garceau married Marie Philippe Lambert about 1732 and lived in Beaubassin. No parish marriage record found. They had seven children. During the Grand Derangement, aka, forced expulsion of the Acadians, Joseph was reportedly separated from his family and deported to Georgia, while his wife, Marie Lambert, and children sought refuge at Isle St. Jean before making their way to Quebec where the family was reunited.
  • Pierre Touissant Richard married Marie Josephe Boudreau about 1732 and lived in Pisiguit. No marriage parish record found. They had six children. Pierre died at Port-la-Joye and was buried in 1751 on Isle St. John, today’s Prince Edward Island. His wife and children were deported to France in 1758 aboard the Duke William, landing in St. Malo, where one son died two days later, his wife died three days later and another son, 4 weeks later. Two additional children recovered, one living the rest of their life in France, and one eventually making it to Louisiana. One son’s wife and child made it to France, but his fate is unknown. The fate of the sixth child is unknown.
  • Claude Richard’s fate is unknown, but he could have died young – perhaps before Marie’s untimely passing.
  • Marie Josephe Richard married Paul Doiron in Annapolis Royal in 1738, with her father, Alexandre Richard, signing the parish register for her, so we know they were both still in or near Annapolis Royal in 1738. They had 11 children. Marie Josephe gave birth to a child in Pisiquit by 1747 and was on Ile St. Jean by 1752. By 1760, she was living in Saint-Etienne-de-Beaumont, just across the river from Quebec City in Canada, where she died in 1796. Five of her children succumbed to the smallpox epidemic that ravaged Quebec, and Quebec City in particular, in the winter of 1757-1758. Those children died on November 8, 1757, December 20th, January 7th , 8th and 14th, 1758, and were buried in the same cemetery as her sister, Marguerite’s children.
  • Marguerite Richard married in 1745 in Port Royal to Jean Breau “of the Canard River,” which empties into the Minas Basin across from Grand Pre. Alexandre Richard did sign as a witness. We don’t know exactly where Marguerite’s six children were born, but given that there are no Annapolis Royal baptism records for them, we have to assume it was near where her husband was farming. They were in Notre-Dame-de-Quebec by mid-1757, which means they were not deported from Annapolis Royal. Given their early settlement in Quebec, they would have been deported from further north in Nova Scotia, sought refuge in one of the encampments, and had possibly escaped their English guards at Mirimichi. Tragically, all but one of Marguerite’s family members succumbed to the smallpox epidemic of 1757-1758. Her husband, Jean Breau (Brault), died on July 4, 1757, the same day as Francoise, her six-month-old baby. Marguerite assuredly was horribly grief-stricken. She soon became ill herself, with a houseful of sick children. Marguerite died on December 7th, her 12-year-old son Jean died the following day, three-year-old Marie Josephe died on December 13th, four-year-old Francois died on December 18th, and 10-year-old Alexis died on January 12, 1758. They were buried in the cemetery at Notre-Dame-de-Quebec in Quebec City. Only one of Marguerite’s children, Elizabeth, survived to adulthood and died in 1792 at about age 41 in Quebec, after burying two husbands. What a horrific tragedy.
  • Isabelle Richard married Francois Raimon in 1753 in Port Royal. Alexandre Richard did not sign for her. We know nothing more about Isabelle other than she reportedly was listed on the 1760 Essex County, Massachusetts Acadian census, and was noted as having been deported to Connecticut in 1755. No children are listed. The next person on the census list is her father, Alexandre Richard dit Boutin.
  • Joseph Richard died in 1747 in Annapolis Royal. Alexandre was not a witness.

This tells us that Alexandre Richard did not move someplace else and remarry – and he stayed very involved with his children. He was obviously expelled with Isabelle and her husband and may have been living in the same household.

Marie’s husband, Alexandre Richard, three children and 18 grandchildren living in Annapolis Royal, formerly Port Royal until the English took it, were ensnared in the horrific expulsion of the Acadians. Additionally, four other children were forcibly expelled from elsewhere in Nova Scotia, and many died.

In 1755, by the time Marie’s husband and children who remained in Annapolis Royal were forced to march down the snow-covered Queen’s Wharf, board overcrowded death ships, leaving everything behind, Marie had been in her grave for 28 years.

If Marie’s final resting place was in the Garrison Graveyard, Alexandre and her children would have paused one last time to say goodbye, even if it was from the distance of the wharf.

We can only imagine the hell that followed.

On the 1760 list of Acadians in Essex County, Massachusetts, Alexandre Richard is listed, as is his daughter Isabelle Richard, who was married to Francois Raymond. Alexandre is listed as 70, infirm, and sent to Bradford.

So, it would appear that Alexandre Richard did not remarry, and one way or another, managed to find a way to raise his six children, and three step-children. Perhaps the older children raised the younger children, and everyone worked the farm together.

Alexandre was a good father to all 9 of Marie’s children, and apparently, loved Marie beyond the grave, given that he never remarried, remaining single for the next 33+ years.

Tragedy

Tragically, Marie’s life was cut short, as was that of many family members. Maybe it was a blessing that she did not have to endure 1755 and what followed, with her family separated in as many directions as there were living children.

Marie never got to attend her children’s weddings or cherish the smiles and giggles of grandchildren. She never received the honor of serving as a Godmother to her grandchildren, or seeing them baptized.

Marie buried her first husband, Jean Garceau, who may have died as a result of the 1710 fall of Acadia to the British.

Marie was fortunate enough to marry Alexandre Richard, who raised her three Garceau children in addition to their own. Marie’s youngest Garceau child was a baby and was close enough to Alexandre to take his surname as an adult. So did her eldest from time to time.

Some of Marie’s children remained in Port Royal after marriage, but several others struck out for points North where more land on the Bay of Fundy was available for salt-marsh reclamation and farming.

Child Acadia Location Deportation Location Children
Pierre Garceau 1704-after 1750 Port Royal Possibly Connecticut 8
Daniel Garceau 1707-1772 Port Royal New York 10
Joseph Garceau aka Richard 1710-1789 Beaubassin Georgia, then Quebec 7
Pierre Toussant Richard 1712-1751 Pisiquit, Prince Edward Island by 1751 He died in 1751 on Ile St. John. Wife and children deported to France 6
Claude Richard 1715 – ? Nothing known, probably died young.
Marie Joseph Richard 1718 – 1796 Pisiquit Quebec 11 – 5 succumbed to Smallpox in 1757-1758
Marguerite Richard 1720-1757 Canard River Quebec 6 – 5 plus both parents succumbed to Smallpox in 1757-1758
Isabelle Richard 1723 – after 1760 Port Royal Massachusetts None known
Joseph Richard 1727 – 1747 Port Royal Not deported Never married

Marie had at least 48 grandchildren, and probably several more. Records are spotty, and in the colonies, nonexistent.

Of those known grandchildren, 18 lived in Port Royal, so, had Marie lived, she would have known them and been able to see them regularly, probably on a daily basis. She would have been a seamless part of thier lives. I can see her playing hide-and-seek in the sunlight and shadows with them – except she never got to. Perhaps she visited them in other ways.

Marie’s mother, Catherine Savoie, born about 1659, may have outlived her daughter. Unfortunately, there is no existing death record for Catherine, so we don’t know when she died. Based on her son Pierre’s death record in 1725, where his father is noted as deceased, but Catherine is not, she may well have lived several years beyond Marie. She would have been about 68 when Marie died.

While Marie’s grandchildren didn’t have the opportunity to interact with her, they may have known and been close to Catherine – at least for a few years.

As difficult and tragic as Marie’s life was, she raised children who were survivors. Had it not been for those who persevered, with a dash of luck, of course, and probably several rounds of prayers, especially in the Black Hole – I would not be here today.

Our ancestors may have been scattered to the wind, but the Acadians were seeds and took root the world over. Today, WikiTree reports that Marie has (at least) 1984 descendants, and I’m sure there are more whose identities remain unknown.

_____________________________________________________________

Share the Love!

You’re always welcome to forward articles or links to friends and share on social media.

If you haven’t already subscribed (it’s free,) you can receive an e-mail whenever I publish by clicking the “follow” button on the main blog page, here.

You Can Help Keep This Blog Free

I receive a small contribution when you click on some of the links to vendors in my articles. This does NOT increase your price but helps me keep the lights on and this informational blog free for everyone. Please click on the links in the articles or to the vendors below if you are purchasing products or DNA testing.

Thank you so much.

DNA Purchases and Free Uploads

Genealogy Products and Services

My Books

Genealogy Books

Genealogy Research

DNA for Native American Genealogy Webinar & Companion Book

For those who couldn’t attend RootsTech 2025, you’re in luck, because my session, DNA for Native American Genealogy, was recorded as a webinar.

RootsTech tried something new this year, and some webinars were recorded live on the actual show floor. Seating for approximately 50 people was available, but unfortunately, these sessions weren’t included in the session schedule, so no one was aware that they could attend them live.

I’m very grateful to RootsTech for making the recording widely available – and for free.

The webinar includes 10 different techniques and tools available for testers to find and confirm (or sometimes refute) Native American ancestors.

I discuss ethnicity and why it may or may not be helpful, and how to morph your ethnicity results into a tool to identify which ancestors were Native. You may have Native ancestry, even if your ethnicity results don’t reveal that. Learn how to guage that possibility and what to do next.

Y-DNA and mitochondrial DNA, yours and other peoples, can confirm or refute Native heritage in each individual ancestral line.

After we discuss each of these techniques and how to use them, we talk about creating a DNA testing plan, and various ways to find autosomal, Y-DNA, and mitochondrial DNA test candidates – or identify people who have already tested.

You can watch this webinar for free on YouTube, here.

Companion Book

I’ve also written a companion book, DNA for Native American Genealogy, which is available here for buyers inside the US, and purchasers outside the US can order at Amazon, here.

Enjoy both the webinar and the book!

_____________________________________________________________

Share the Love!

You’re always welcome to forward articles or links to friends and share on social media.

If you haven’t already subscribed (it’s free,) you can receive an e-mail whenever I publish by clicking the “follow” button on the main blog page, here.

You Can Help Keep This Blog Free

I receive a small contribution when you click on some of the links to vendors in my articles. This does NOT increase your price but helps me keep the lights on and this informational blog free for everyone. Please click on the links in the articles or to the vendors below if you are purchasing products or DNA testing.

Thank you so much.

DNA Purchases and Free Uploads

Genealogy Products and Services

My Books

Genealogy Books

Genealogy Research

The Chauvet Cave: Trip Back in Time With Prehistoric European Humans – Are We Related?

One of the reasons I love both mitochondrial and Y-DNA testing is because it doesn’t mix with the DNA of the other parent like autosomal DNA does. This means that in additional to being useful genealogically, it provides a direct laser-line back in time – even thousands of years – to your earlier ancestors.

You’ll never know their names, of course, but you can track where they lived and where they migrated – through their mutations – breadcrumbs that function as signposts pointing the way to your ancestors. Using Discover, you can discover (pardon the pun):

  • Their migration path
  • When haplogroup defining mutations occurred
  • Other countries where ancestors of people with that haplogroup lived in a genealogical timeframe
  • Where that haplogroup is found further back in time through Ancient Connections

Your haplogroup and DNA matching is a gift from and a ticket to our ancestors that every genealogist should unwrap.

My mitochondrial DNA haplogroup is J1c2f, but the earliest tests that I took two decades ago when this industry was young positioned my haplogroup first as J, then as J1, then as J1c.

It wasn’t until a dozen years later than my full haplogroup, J1c2f was identified when the mitochondrial haplotree was initially published, then developed as more testers tested, both academically and personally at FamilyTreeDNA. Today, of course, we have the new Mitotree with even more refinement.

The earliest tests only covered the HVR1 or HVR1 plus HVR2 regions of mitochondrial DNA, while the current mtFull test covers all 16,569 locations.

Nevertheless, knowing that I was a member of haplogroup J told me something about my early ancestry, as well as provided matching to other testers. That “something” was information I could obtain no other way

In 2003, we knew that early humans had been in Europe by 50,000 years ago, Hunter-gatherers who spent their lives seeking shelter and food. We knew little else about their lives or cultures.

In 1994, stunning rock art had been discovered in Chauvet Cave in France. Thanks to a landslide blocking the entrance some 21,000 years ago, this cave and its art had been protected from humans, wildlife and the elements.

After its accidental discovery, the French government guarded and protected this astounding record of humanity with fervor, not repeating earlier mistakes in other locations, such as the Lascaux Cave, by allowing tourism which essentially destroyed those caves and their art.

By JYB Devot – Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=64503410

Chauvet cave is sealed behind a steel door with very limited access

Research at Chauvet remains closely controlled. Scientists have revealed that the stunning cave art created by early humans was older than initially thought, having been created beginning about 35,000 years ago and extending over thousands of years.

This charcoal drawing of an Irish elk was tested at location GifA 96063 (green dot) and was dated to 36,000 years ago (14C AMS). Furthermore, it’s drawn over what may be the earliest potential known depiction of an erupting volcano.

Just imagine what our predecessors must have thought when volcanos erupted.

Were the Chauvet artists Neanderthal or modern humans, or a mixture of both? We don’t know, but we do know that the earliest DNA recovered from Germany and Czechia, who surprisingly, were distantly related groups, dated from 42,000 and 49,000 years ago. They carried mitochondrial haplogroups N and R and those people were admixed and had Neanderthal ancestors. Then again, so do contemporary Europeans and their descendants.

Later papers expanded on haplogroup migration to and through Europe. We are still learning today – in many cases due to paleoanthropology or archaeogenetics by genetic anthropologists. Excavation and testing of ancient remains continues to reveal fragments and details of our human migration story.

However, back in 2003, when my first results arrived, all we knew was that haplogroup J was a European haplogroup, probably having initially formed in the Levant or Fertile Crescent – and making its way to Europe over thousands of years.

By Communication Grotte Chauvet 2 – Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=137822676

We also knew that Chauvet Cave was the earliest evidence of humankind in a specific European location – so it made sense to wonder if my ancestors were among the cave-painters.

I voraciously read everything I could find about Chauvet Cave, looking at each image and wondering if my ancestor, someplace between 1200 and 1700 generations ago, stood holding red ochre, painted those amazing spiritual images and signed their work with a handprint signature by spitting red pigment over their hand, leaving an outline on the rock wall. Was this a shamanistic ritual, connecting the shaman with the rocks with the animals they painted?

Did the practitioners perhaps hold handfuls of red ochre paint, then splat them against the wall, creating large red polka-dots that remain some 30,000 years later? Was this something fun, adding a little levity to cave painting, or maybe it depicted a wound?

Scientists tell us today that two individuals created those dots. A male that stood about 5’9” and either a female or younger male who pressed their ochre-reddened hands into the cave walls. Did they laugh as they were making art, or was this a spiritual ritual and deadly serious? Did they have a concept of “art” as we do today, or was this their form of religion? Were they praying for a good hunt, or perhaps begging for protection – or maybe both. Maybe looking to appease the Gods if the volcano was threatening to erupt.

Was a trip to the Chauvet Cave a vision quest? Perhaps a rite of passage? Were the animals either signatures of a sort, or visions?

What did they call this cave? Did it have a name? Did they have names?

I could close my eyes and see them. Were these artists specially trained in these techniques – the best of the best in their cultural group? Was it talent or training, or both? Rites of passage? There seems to be a pattern of quality among the paintings that suggest that cave painting wasn’t just left to anyone.

Was this skill or trade passed down through the generations? Was it a right of the leaders or powerful – or maybe followed specific lines? Perhaps direct maternal or direct paternal, or some other inheritance pattern?

Did the painters ritually prepare the wood, making it into charcoal used to draw the lions?

Lions? In Europe?

And rhinoceroses? In present-day France?

How things have changed!

Perhaps they used early handmade tools to engrave and scratch images into the walls for us to marvel at today. They used horsehair brushes with pigments found in their environment to paint and shape the images.

Were the horses domesticated in any way, or were they wild horses?

Did they hunt the animals portrayed – animals long extinct before modern history? Horses, aurochs, deer and mammoths? Was this their way of blessing the hunt, as such?

Many paintings depicted predatory animals such as lions, panthers, leopards, bears, buffaloes, hyenas and even rhinoceroses and are not found in any other European caves.

This hyena and leopard, which is much smaller, both have red ochre spots.

Was this art meant to absorb the power of these powerful awe-inspiring animals, or perhaps they were drawm for protection?

Or, was the act of drawing itself a rite of passage?

Why are no smaller animals portrayed? Was this a cave of special power, or powers?

The cave was inhabited during two historical periods, the first some 30,000-40,000 years ago, and the second roughly 25,000-27,000 years ago. The artwork is from the first habitation.

What happened to those people? Did they move on and cease to inhabit this region?

The remnants of hearths are found in the cave’s soft clay floor, along with a child’s footprints. So are pawprints of cave bears who hibernated there, along with their skulls and the skull of a horned ibex.

Pawprints from about 26,000 years ago are either those of a dog or wolf. Was there a difference then? Had wolves yet been domesticated into dogs as we know them?

Were the paintings meant to protect the painters and their clan? Were they shamanic portals to a spiritual world?

Did they pray to these animals as deities? Why are no humans depicted?

Who were these people?

By JYB Devot – Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=64503433

Why did they select the Chauvet Cave, high on this limestone wall, in a cliff over hung by the massive rock column known as the Pillar of Abraham, as opposed to another location? Is there a special significance? Is the location above the natural bridge relevant? Was it a meeting place or a journey destination? Did the landscape look, from a particular angle, like a prehistoric animal or deity? Some suggest the bridge bears some resemblance to a mammoth from the cave entrance.

There’s only one problem with that theory. The river elevation at that time was much higher than it is today, and the bridge wasn’t carved by the river when the caves were being painted. Many caves in the area are archaeologically significant – but nothing like the Chauvet Cave.

Why this cave?

And why did they choose the deepest recesses of the cave, nearly impossible to reach, in which to paint the best of their stunningly realistic artworks? Was the difficult journey to the cave part of the ritual itself? Did they work in a trance, perhaps? Trances and shamanic practitioners, functioning in the realm of the supernatural, are as old as humanity itself.

Did the artists join their ancestors there? Carbon dioxide levels in the cave reach levels considered unsafe in the winter months.

Were my ancestors among the hundreds of generations of those artists? Were they buried there? Did they become one with the art, the spirits, and ascend to the spirit world from Chauvet Cave?

Or, were some perhaps born in the safety of the deep recesses of the cave where the most spectacular art is found in the Gallery of Lions? Future shamans, perhaps, under the watchful eyes of the spirit animals and those shamans who had come and gone on before?

Could their power or presence be summoned?

So, so many questions.

Yes, I allowed myself to be drawn into the mesmerizing, elusive and unknowable history of Chauvet Cave.

There’s a very real possibility that my ancestors had been there.

Stood there.

Maybe participated in rituals there.

Placed red ochre on the walls.

This slide from a very early DNA presentation pretty much says it all.

I never forgot Chauvet Cave.

I also never thought I would accidentally visit.

Perhaps they summoned me.

But first, let’s go back to 1994 in the Ardèche Valley, high above the Ardèche Gorge and the natural bridge carved into the limestone by the Ardèche River millennia ago.

1994

It was a cold afternoon on a day that would live forever, shaping and changing our understanding of human prehistory. On December 18, 1994, three friends, amateur cavers, officially discovered the cave. Another person, Michel Rosa, nicknamed Baba, had discovered a hole the previous summer, which he deemed an airhole or vent into a cave, but was blocked by a stalactite that he could not get past. He was not among the group of three who would make their way into the cave that winter.

By Thilo Parg – Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=97312442

The entrance, marked above, was steep and difficult. The cave was long, and the depths, where the most remarkable art awaited, would not be reached for another several months.

Credit for discovery of the cave, and how much credit is deserved by whom is hotly disputed yet today.

Regardless, Eliette Brunel was the first to wedge her way into the hole, dropping into a world that time had frozen. After her eyes had adjusted and she looked past the crystalline deposits that had formed since the last humans visited more than 20,000 years earlier, she spotted fuzzy red lines on the wall, and exclaimed, “They have been here!”

The cave consists of six chambers, filled with prehistoric animals, plus two vulva-type figures, and perhaps one minotaur, depending on your interpretation.

These early artists achieved a realism not before known, nor discovered since, by incorporating the natural fissured and curves of the cave wall into the paintings, giving them motion, movement and life. That speaks of talent, not just copying and repeating a pattern.

Another of the three explorers, Jean-Marie Chauvet, for whom the cave was named the Chauvet-Pont d’Arc, remarked at the “remarkable realism” and “aesthetic mastery” of the early artists and their drawings.

The sophistication of these paintings exceeded that of any early works, and most later ones as well. In one word, they are unique, and we may never fully understand their genesis, purpose or impact.

Less than a decade later, when my haplogroup J DNA results arrived, the thrill of the Chauvet Cave discovery was still fresh – as was my palpable excitement about understanding the path of haplogroup J, then nicknamed Jasmine, as she trekked across Europe.

Was Jasmine in the Chauvet Cave? I don’t know.

Were my other ancestors in the Chauvet Cave? Probably, if the people of Chauvet survived? When Europe was first populated, animals and hazards far outnumbered small bands of people. A tiny village or family group of, say, maybe 20 people could easily be wiped out. Their genetic line forever extinguished.

Let’s hope that we continue to find ancient remains in Europe, and perhaps in the limestone caves along the Ardèche River. If people returned to this same location for around 20,000 years, one might surmise that the legend or custom of cave painting was passed from generation to generation, or maybe group to group. However, the truly masterful paintings seemed to only occur when the first group of people lived there.

Of course, they couldn’t return to this cave after the rockslide sealed the entrance. I can only imagine how the people, who may have been returning for time immemorial, 700-900 generations, felt to return and see their sacred cave permanently sealed.

Did they feel it was divine intervention? How did they interpret that? It seems like they would have done more than just shrug.

Did they have any concept of the number of future generations that might succeed them, as they had succeeded their ancestors for those 800 or so generations?

Probably not, but yet there I was, at Chauvet, in the summer of 2023, quite my accident.

The Surprise Visit

I journeyed to France in the summer of 2023 to travel to various ancestral locations via riverboat along the Rhone River, and to bask in the land of countless ancestors.

The tour operators offered day trips that guests could select from, and I chose one that included a walk in the beautiful village of Viviers, a visit to a lavender distillery, and the Ardèche Gorge. Truthfully, it was the lavender distillery, Maison de la Lavande, and the medieval village that hooked me. The Gorge was an added benefit.

Little did I realize…

We set out to visit the Massif Central and the Ardèche region. Ironically, I almost didn’t go, because I was concerned about the twisty curvy roads, and I didn’t want to feel ill. I sat near the front of the tour bus, just behind the driver, which afforded a wonderful view. Albeit, sometimes, a frightening view as the magnitude of the driving challenge was evident.

What I didn’t anticipate was a day trip that would include the Chauvet Cave.

The bus route through the Massif Central followed the Ardèche Gorge and winding Ardèche River, hundreds of feet below.

The river carves its way through the limestone cliffs, sculpting the land beneath and beside it’s wandering path.

It’s truly a long way down. Kayakers enjoy the slow-moving waters.

Kayak rentals abound along the lower reaches of the river.

The road runs high in the mountains, parallel to the river gorge, with overlooks at a few locations along the way. Few places have enough space for an extra lane, so overlooks are quite limited.

It was difficult for me to fend off motion sickness, but I managed, and it turned out to be well worth the effort.

It was an exceptionally hot day, so excuse my appearance.

If I look happy here, I didn’t yet know that the Chauvet Cave would present itself, literally, in front of me.

I hadn’t thought about the Chauvet Cave in some time and hadn’t put two and two together.

A few hours into our journey, we needed to stop for a bathroom break, to give the poor bus and driver a break, and to eat lunch.

When you are driving along the road beneath Chauvet Cave, at the base of the cliffs, you can’t see much of anything except foliage.

You can see the little walk in the field that begins a very steep hike and climb onto the cliffs. I took pictures here with absolutely no idea what I was photographing, although this one is from Google Maps later. What were the chances of taking a photo of that exact place and discovering it only later after the cave’s location had been pointed out to me?

The cave is unmarked, so you’d never know it was there if you didn’t know. We drove right past this incredible site, and no one was aware. It hadn’t clicked yet for me, either.

This unremarkable, humble little fence is the only clue. If you’re worried about me revealing the location, don’t be. The site is impenetrable.

You can see the loop, the location of the cave, the “person” on the road beside the stone building where we ate, and the camera icon is the natural bridge.

Our lunch stop, the stone building above, is essentially the only place in the area that has amenities with parking that could accommodate the bus. There were no other choices, but it was lovely and we didn’t care. I’ve marked the cave to the right, but we still had no idea.

When I say amenities, I mean remote French country, with a very cute, rather rustic but very clean building surrounded by flowers.

We piled out, stood in line for the restroom facilities which had been built onto a historic stone building without restroom facilities. There are very few new buildings in France. You can tell this is the only facility for many miles because this sign expressed exactly how we all felt.

We had a good laugh.

We were invited to find a seat at the few tables at what I think was actually a campground. There were maybe three tables inside and several more outside on the patio.

I’m an outside person, hot weather or not, so I found my way to the most distant table, beneath a tree, across from the vineyard, beside a flower box. Yes indeed, this is my idea of a wonderful, peaceful respite.

I could stay here forever.

This choice would turn out to be an incredible “happy accident.”

One of the two servers brought us a pitcher of ice water and glasses. And wine. Every meal has wine, but I’m not a wine connoisseur so my husband always gets mine too. I’m happy and he’s very happy:)

When traveling as a group, you often don’t get a lunch choice, or if you do, it’s either item 1 or item 2. I don’t recall what I selected. The menu was in French and I got the gist of it, but it really didn’t matter – I’m flexible and like to try new things. Often Jim and I order something different so we can both try two new things. We call it “adventure eating.”

Keep in mind that France is a much more laid back place than the US. Lunch may take an hour. Maybe two. Maybe all afternoon. It’s more about the event and the camaraderie and enjoying the food that getting full.

As we relaxed, waited for our lunch, enjoyed the wine, and chatted among ourselves, for some reason, it struck me that I thought I recalled that the Chauvet Cave was someplace in this region.

I had no cell reception, so I found our lovely French tour guide who was sitting inside with our bus driver, and asked.

I struggle with French, and she struggled with English, so I thought sure she had misunderstood my question when her answer was “Oui, Juste ici,” meaning “Yes, right here.”

No, I didn’t mean generally – I mean where, exactly? Will be pass anyplace close?

Yes, she replied, “it’s right here.”

Wait? What?

Me: Chauvet Cave?

Her: Oui, Grotte Chauvet?

Me: Where?

Her, pointing: “Juste là-bas.“ – Right over there.

Me: Vraiment? (Really?)

Her: “Oui, vraiment.”

My incredulity must have been written all over my face.

She came outside and sat down beside me. I showed her my phone with a picture of a map from earlier. She put the phone on the table and started pointing.

I was very confused.

She stood up and motioned for me to come with her.

We walked across the gravel road to the vineyard and she began to point.

“Right there,” she said, “on the cliff.”

“Where on the cliff?”

“Under the bushes?”

“Which bushes?”

I took this picture, and she pointed to the bushes beneath the rocky portion of the mountain, to the right of the large bushy glob, for lack of another word.

I was utterly and completely dumbstruck.

Speechless.

I stood mute in disbelief.

I finally found my words again and asked how she knew the exact location of the cave? She told me she lived in the little nearby village, and her friend actually discovered the cave. Everyone, she said, who lives there knows exactly where it is.

How is this even remotely possible?

July 8, 2023 – Facebook posting

OMG, I’ve died and gone to Heaven. I’m literally at the Chauvet Cave, the oldest evidence of human art in Europe. And it’s beyond stunning.

I’m pinching myself.

I had no idea we’d be here. This is not a bucket list item for most people, but it assuredly is for me. I’ve worked with and studied human migration for 25 years now, and this cave is sacred.

Very few people inhabited what would be Europe 35K years ago. Those that did painted this cave, recording animals we had no idea lived here. They were probably the ancestors, one way or the other, of most Europeans and their descendants today.

As luck would have it, a friend of our guide that lives in her tiny village discovered the cave, so she knew exactly where it is – and showed me.

Better yet, I’m having lunch looking directly at the cave. I feel like I’m living a dream. First this stunning location and then to discover I sat myself in front of the cave.

I truly could not believe the incredible odds that I would accidentally manage, by happenstance, to wind up having lunch is a remote region of mountainous France, literally looking at Chauvet Cave immediately in front of me.

And, by luck of the draw, have a women from this area who knew exactly where the cave is as my tour guide – for a tour that originated maybe three hours away on the Rhone River.

Tell me my ancestors weren’t calling to me.

I sat spellbound, eating the artistic, beautiful food, in the best seat in all of the Ardèche Department in France.

I cannot take my eyes off of the limestone cliff wall – connecting with those people who walked there, perhaps my most distant ancestors in Europe, across 40,000 years. I wonder how those humans originally found the cave. Were they seeking shelter?

We had some free time, and I left the group and walked alone in the vineyard that stands as a silent sentry today. Did the people who painted the cave also cultivate any agriculture, or was that still too early in human history.

I was spellbound to this place and that time. Utterly transfixed.

I saw a path, and I had to explore. Isn’t that the story of my life. Is that what they did, too?

I walked towards the cave, which seems to beckon me. Perhaps the cave that sheltered humanity, allowing us to survive.

I feel like I’ve been drawn home to the cradle of European humanity – the wellspring of our shared human story. Hooked like an unwitting fish in the water and reeled right in by some powerful ancestral force.

I don’t know how to describe this surreal moment other than perhaps some combination of an out-of-body experience and transcendent state of flow. Time paused, or perhaps collapsed in on itself. The boundaries between then and now, and them and me, dissolved. It felt both ancient and present – beyond time as we understand it – an umbilical cord somehow inexplicably tethering us.

Words are entirely inadequate.

In this picture, you can see the steep access path, beneath the rocky ledge, and other caves as well.

You’ll notice other limestone caves all along the cliffs throughout the region, but none of those caves even hold a candle to Chauvet – and none were treated in the same way. Why was Chauvet special?

Caves aren’t easy to access. Either they are high on the cliff walls, requiring either rappelling down or climbing up through narrow paths, then fissured rocks.

Here’s a nearby limestone cave. And no, I did not go splunking. Being with a tour group does not afford that amount of flexibility – especially since the cave wasn’t even on the agenda at all. Plus, by this time, I was alone, and you NEVER embark on a risky adventure alone. I’ve been there, done that, and broke my ankle in the process. Plus, there was more to see.

I turned around and hiked down to the river to see what awaited there.

This area is extremely popular with kayakers who walk their kayaks down this path and launch just before the beautiful natural arch bridge which you can see, at left, above.

By Jan Hager – Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=51738871

After reaching the water, I decided to hike on the path above and along the river, which afforded me a stunning view of the river, bridge and the mountains on both sides.

I suddenly realized that the river level 35,000 years ago was MUCH higher than it is today. It didn’t run beneath the arch, which hadn’t yet been hollowed out, but over the top, which meant the valley floor was also elevated.

OH!

The river is to my immediate right, and path in front of me continues straight to the mountains, or turns left to Chauvet. Isn’t that the perfect metaphor for life.

Standing at the intersection of the walk to the river, and the path alongside the river, you can see the bridge in the center, just to the right of the fence, the mountains on both sides, and Chauvet to the far left.

On this photo, I’ve marked both the top of the arch of the bridge, and the Chauvet cave, with red arrows. Based on the elevation, you can see that before the river carved the bridge, the landscape of the valley would not have been worn away, and human access to the cave would have been much different. In other words, the valley floor would have been much closer to the cave.

This makes so much sense.

As much as I wanted to stay, it was time for me to go.

I found it ironic that on the way back to join the group at the bus, I found this sign which, translated by ChatGPT, says:

The Invisible History of the Pont d’Arc

The arch of the Pont d’Arc is a unique natural monument in the world.
It has probably fascinated humanity for millennia.

Like a totem, it evokes a gateway between two worlds: the visible and the invisible, the familiar and the wild, mystery and knowledge.

Hidden within this setting is the decorated Chauvet-Pont d’Arc Cave,
classified as a UNESCO World Heritage Site.

It has revealed to our amazed eyes drawings over 36,000 years old.

But did you know that this site holds other hidden stories?

By exploring the Combe d’Arc, discover the invisible stories sheltered by this majestic landscape:

    • how water sculpted, drop by drop, this mineral arch
    • how, over the ages, humans found their place in this extraordinary location

Introspective Journey

While the rest of our tour group had lunch, sandwiched between two other stops, plus some time to walk along the river and view the natural bridge, I had taken an amazing journey back in time and visited ancient humanity. The people who painted those incredible images in the Chauvet Cave are probably the ancestors of every European, assuming even one of them survived to reproduce, or the ancestors of no one today, if their lines perished.

One way or another, humanity did survive, and standing on this sacred site allows us, today, to glimpse a time far in the past – just as our mitochondrial and Y-DNA do as well.

Our own ancestors speak to us from long ago, and the mutations we carry from them light the way back in time, through the Ardeche and the mountainous regions of France, expanding into the rest of Europe.

A priceless window in time.

Indeed, as Eliette exclaimed, “They have been here,” and perhaps they still are, in us.

Resources

If you’re interested, I found three YouTube videos that expand upon the Chauvet Cave.

My one regret is that I didn’t know about the Cavern du Pont-d’Arc, a vast to-scale reproduction of the Chauvet Cave. I would have found a way to visit, even if I had to hire a private driver for a day.

___________________________________________________________

Share the Love!

You’re always welcome to forward articles or links to friends and share on social media.

If you haven’t already subscribed (it’s free,) you can receive an e-mail whenever I publish by clicking the “follow” button on the main blog page, here.

You Can Help Keep This Blog Free

I receive a small contribution when you click on some of the links to vendors in my articles. This does NOT increase your price but helps me keep the lights on and this informational blog free for everyone. Please click on the links in the articles or to the vendors below if you are purchasing products or DNA testing.

Thank you so much.

DNA Purchases and Free Uploads

Genealogy Products and Services

My Books

Genealogy Books

Genealogy Research

New “Share” Features at FamilyTreeDNA Blur Match Information and Make Sharing Easy

Have you ever wished you didn’t have to blur or otherwise redact each name and other sensitive information in order to share your DNA match results? Or maybe you’d like to share fun Discover pages? Well, you got your wish!

FamilyTreeDNA has introduced a new “Share” feature in two locations. The first Share feature is available in your personal account after signing in, and two additional features can be found in Discover.

  1. “Share Mode” on your personal page obfuscates the names and photos of your matches.
  2. “Share Mode” in Discover obfuscates the names and photos of your matches on your Match Time Tree.
  3. “Share Page” in Discover shares publicly available pages to social media or provides a sharing link for you.

These are extremely easy to use and help immensely, allowing you to share screenshots on social media and with family without revealing the names of your matches.

I’ll show you, step-by-step, how to use all three.

“Share Mode” in Your Personal Account

When you want to enable Share Mode, you just toggle it on.

Sign in to your account at FamilyTreeDNA.

Select Account Settings beneath your name in the upper right-hand corner.

Under Privacy and Sharing, toggle Share Mode to “ON.” Default is “OFF.”

Sharing turns itself back off each time you sign out, so you’ll need to do this each time you sign on and want to share.

To see the results, let’s take a look at my match page. Sharing works the same way for Y-DNA matching, mitochondrial or Family Finder.

Not only does Share obfuscate your matches’ names, it also blurs their picture, and your information as well, at upper right.

This is wonderful for presenters!

Using “Share Mode” in Discover

On your dashboard, for either Y-DNA or mitochondrial DNA, select “Discover Haplogroup Reports” in the appropriate section.

Discover has two ways to share.

You can share your Match Time Tree, or other pages – using different tools.

Only one Discover page, the Match Time Tree, contains potentially sensitive match information. There’s a “Share Mode” for the Match Time Tree that blurs private information.

However, you may want to share your other Discover reports on social media. “Share Page” provides a quick and easy way to share any publicly available page.

Let’s look at both of those options.

Discover “Share Page”

Every page in Discover, except for the Match Time Tree and Globetrekker, has a “Share Page” icon at the top.

You can share any Discover page on social media (except as noted below), whether you’ve clicked through to Discover from your dashboard, or you’re using the public version of Discover.

In this case, I clicked on “Share Page” to share my Haplogroup Story page to Facebook. On your social media platform of choice, or by sharing the link, your friends can click through to see the page you’ve shared – minus your name and photo.

Please note that there are four Discover pages that either do not share or will display reduced information when using “Share Page,” as follows:

  • Globetrekker is an amazing animated video of your ancestors’ trek across the planet which is reserved for FamilyTreeDNA clients who purchase the Big-Y test or the mtFull, full sequence mitochondrial DNA test. Globetrekker does not use the “Share Page” feature, and is not yet released for mtDNA Discover.
  • Ancient Connections uses the “Share Page” feature, but only publicly displays a few ancient DNA haplogroup matches. Several more are reserved for testers who have taken either the Big-Y or mitochondrial DNA full sequence test, and click through from their dashboard. In a kit I just checked, two or three displayed when shared publicly, but the tester had more than 20 when clicking through his dashboard.
  • Notable Connections uses the “Share Page” feature and functions like Ancient Connections.
  • The Match Time Tree does not use the “Share Page” feature, which populates to social media, but there is a “Share Mode” option which blurs your matches’ sensitive information, similar to your personal page. After blurring, you can take screen shots to share.

Discover Share Mode for the Match Time Tree

The Match Time Tree on Discover is an extension of matching – meaning that your matches are placed on the Time Tree with names of tester-provided Earliest Known Ancestors (EKA) and their country of origin listed.

To view your Match Time Tree, click through to Discover from your FamilyTreeDNA dashboard, then select “Match Time Tree.”

You need to enable “Share Mode” within Discover, even if you had it enabled on your personal page. Toggle “Share Mode” to ON at the top of your Match Time Tree page.

Enabling “Share Mode” obfuscates the names and photos of people on your match list, who now appear on your Discover Time Tree in their proper place. You’re there too!

To share this page publicly, you’ll need to take a screenshot – so please don’t forget to enable “Share Mode” within Discover before doing this.

Benefits of Sharing

The best thing we can do for DNA testing, speaking broadly, is to encourage additional testers who are excited about what they can discover.

Sharing our pages and discoveries on social media is a great way to generate excitement.

Who do you know that might be excited to discover that they share an ancestor with Leo Tolstoy or maybe “Wild Bill” Hickock, even if it’s hundreds of years ago?

How about discovering that an Ancient Connection is a Viking man who was buried in Shestovista, Ukraine about a thousand years ago, and you two shared an ancestor about 1900 years ago? Might that provide a clue about your genealogy? What was the life of your ancestor like?

Or, maybe your friends and relatives would be excited to view the path their ancestors took, marching across the map, until their ancestor arrives on the globe where their haplogroup is most recently anchored?

Trying to get Uncle John or Aunt Mary to test? What kind of information would they think is cool?

A scientist I know especially loves the Ancient Connections that extend far beyond the reach of surnames.

One of my ancestral lines has an ancient DNA match just 9 kilometers from the town where they are rumored to have originated in France. Along the ancient Roman road. How else would I have EVER made this discovery?

The more people that test, the larger the matching pool – and the better for all genealogists.

Thank you to FamilyTreeDNA for introducing “Share Mode,” which makes sharing matches with other researchers effortless, and for “Share Page” within Discover, which makes sharing publicly a breeze!

Who can you share and collaborate with?

______________________________________________________________

Sign Up Now – It’s Free!

If you appreciate this article, subscribe to DNAeXplain for free, to automatically receive new articles by e-mail each week.

Here’s the link. Just look for the black “follow” button on the right-hand side on your computer screen below the black title bar, enter your e-mail address, and you’re good to go!

In case you were wondering, I never have nor ever will share or use your e-mail outside of the intended purpose.

_____________________________________________________________

Share the Love!

You’re always welcome to forward articles or links to friends and share on social media.

If you haven’t already subscribed (it’s free,) you can receive an e-mail whenever I publish by clicking the “follow” button on the main blog page, here.

You Can Help Keep This Blog Free

I receive a small contribution when you click on some of the links to vendors in my articles. This does NOT increase your price but helps me keep the lights on and this informational blog free for everyone. Please click on the links in the articles or to the vendors below if you are purchasing products or DNA testing.

Thank you so much.

DNA Purchases and Free Uploads

Genealogy Products and Services

My Books

Genealogy Books

Genealogy Research

23andMe Files for Bankruptcy – What You Need to Know!

I dreaded this day, but 23andMe has filed for bankruptcy protection from their creditors. 23andMe announced this turn of events publicly with an open letter to their customers, here, and the attorney general for the State of California, where 23andMe is located, has issued an urgent consumer alert, here, suggesting that customers may want to consider deleting their data at 23andMe.

Let me be very clear – this is ONLY related to 23andMe and no other DNA testing company.

What is Going On?

With 23andMe filing for bankruptcy, the assets of 23andMe now fall under the supervision of the bankruptcy court. The court’s job is to oversee the planning of a “fresh start” by liquidating assets and/or creating repayment plans for fair and orderly debt payment to 23andMe’s creditors.

From the 23andMe blog article:

Filing for Chapter 11 protection under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code is a reorganization process that allows for a company to restructure its finances and operations, including though (sic) a sale of certain or all of its assets, while continuing to operate its business.

I wrote about the problems at 23andMe last September in the article, “23andMe Trouble – Step-by-Step Instructions to Preserve Your Data and Matches.”

I strongly recommend that you read that article, because it includes additional information that I’m not repeating here, such as how to preserve your data and how to download your DNA files. It also includes other resources and articles that detail the history of what has occurred.

When I wrote that article, I calculated the $ burn rate based on financial information provided by 23andMe. I’m not a financial analyst, so I didn’t share that calculation, but unless something changed dramatically, they would be out of money about now. And indeed, they are.

Some people interpreted 23andMe’s presence at RootsTech, combined with their promises about features they are planning to resuscitate, as a good sign, but I suspected it was a last gasp and an attempt to generate immediate revenue via sales. New features or even old features redesigned and re-released require developers and staff. A company on the threshold of bankruptcy would be running very lean.

There’s nothing wrong with attempting to generate revenue, of course, and I’m glad they are/were trying to stay in business, but it appears it may have been too little, too late.

Having said that, the bankruptcy court may restructure their debt without selling (all of) their assets. We simply don’t know.

Therein lies the problem. We simply don’t know.

What Does This Mean to Genealogists?

23andMe’s focus has never been about genealogy, but on health, medical research, and big pharma. That means they never developed the tools that genealogists requested, as genealogy did not align with their corporate goals. At one point, 23andMe partnered with MyHeritage for trees, but when that relationship was discontinued, 23andMe never offered trees – a foundation of genealogy.

23andMe welcomed genealogists to test, of course, hoping that a substantial number of their 16 million customers would opt-in to sharing their DNA for research.

Many genealogists, me included, made important discoveries at 23andMe – particularly people who were looking for close relationships, given that 23andMe was the first company to offer autosomal testing in 2007. Often people who tested at 23andMe, specifically for medical or health results, are not found in genealogy databases, making 23andMe a unique and important resource for adoptees and people searching for unknown close relatives.

Unfortunately, after their data breach in the fall of 2023, many of the features enjoyed by and critical to genealogists were removed and never returned.

DNA is a Non-Repeat Business

One of the challenges facing 23andMe is that without other features and benefits, such as trees or records data, or at least multiple types of DNA testing with features genealogists want, DNA testing is a one-and-done proposition. That’s why companies update their ethnicity and come up with cool new genealogy features – to keep you coming back.

23andMe introduced some features behind a subscription wall, which generated ongoing revenue, but most of those are health-focused. For a genealogist, they hold little allure, and given that you can’t just subscribe, but are required to retest – well – for me, it just wasn’t going to happen.

The bottom line is that 23andMe’s current financial situation, especially since the expensive $30 million data breach settlement, is untenable. Hence, the bankruptcy.

Your DNA is an Asset

I don’t know what’s going to happen, but your DNA file, the fact that you opted-in for research (if you did), and you as a customer are all considered part of their corporate assets which are now available for sale, under bankruptcy protection. In other words, another company, with court approval, could purchase their database or some portion thereof.

23andMe is officially for sale, in whole or in part.

From the 23andMe blog article:

  • 23andMe has made the decision to facilitate a sale of its business by initiating voluntary Chapter 11 proceedings. 23andMe intends to continue operating its business in the ordinary course throughout the process.
  • If approved by the Bankruptcy Court, the Company will actively solicit qualified bids to acquire all or parts of 23andMe.

It’s also important to note that they are not just turning the lights off. From their blog:

  • All orders and subscriptions will continue as normal, and any recent purchases or genetic testing kits sent in for processing will be handled without disruption.

Review Your Account

Regardless of what you decide to do, now would be a good time to review your 23andMe account to be sure you understand:

  • If your DNA is stored for future use. If so, you can request to have your biological sample destroyed, regardless of whether you maintain your account at 23andMe or not.
  • If you have opted-in to allow 23andMe and/or third-party researchers to use your genetic data and stored sample. If so, you can opt-out, even if you decide to keep your test active at 23andMe.

You can also delete your results and close your account, but if you make that decision, please do so AFTER downloading anything you want, including your DNA file, which you can safely upload, for free, to:

You’ll find instructions here.

I’m not saying that the sky is falling, but I am suggesting that you take few minutes and evaluate your relationship with 23andMe, why you tested, your goals, and any current or potential benefits you may receive from your DNA being at 23andMe.

You’ll need to weigh your personal goals against the unknown, meaning who may purchase the 23andMe assets and your comfort level.

Step by Step Instructions

Let me begin this section by saying that the 23andMe website has been either exceedingly busy/slow or unavailable today, for obvious reasons.

Many people are probably signing in that haven’t done so in a long time. So, if you can’t get in right away, please don’t panic. Just try again later.

Please note that one of the steps to delete your information is by verifying your birthday and year, so if you have not added that information, do so before you attempt to delete your kit.

You can do this in Step 1.

Step 1 – Check Your Birth Date

Select Settings at upper right when you sign on.

Scroll down to Date of Birth and then click on View/Edit.

While you are there, review the rest of your settings to be sure they are what you want.

Step 2 – Check Your Sample Storage (Biobanking)

Under settings, scroll down to Preferences.

If you’ve given 23andMe permission to store your sample, that authorizes them to run additional tests if you also authorize genetic research.

Your current selection is displayed. To edit your choice, click on edit and make your changes. You can read more about biobanking at 23andMe here.

If you previously elected to store your DNA sample, you can change that preference and any remaining DNA sample will be destroyed.

Making this decision does NOT close your account and does not affect your ability to use your account. That is a completely separate action.

Step 3 – Check Your Status for Participating in Genetic Research

To check your consent settings for research, under Settings, scroll down to “Research and Product Consents.”

Review your answers and click Edit to make changes.

If you previously elected to participate in research, you can change that preference at any time without affecting your ability to use your account. Changing this preference at 23andMe does NOT close your account, which is a completely separate action.

Step 4 – Download Your Data

Regardless of whether you delete your data or not, this is a good time to download your data. Under Settings, scroll all the way to the bottom to the section titled 23andMe Data.

Click on View to read more or to either download your data or delete your data/account.

Please do NOT delete your account until you read Step 5, below.

23andMe generates several types of data that you may wish to download.

Step 5 – Deleting Your Data (if that’s your decision)

I’m not saying you should delete your data. In fact, I’m not making a recommendation either way. That decision is entirely up to you.

Here are some additional factors to consider.

  • Any data download or deletion requests will be verified by sending an email to your email address on file, so if your email isn’t current, you won’t be able to do either of those activities. You can update your email, which is found under Account Information, under Settings, but your new email must be verified and that is a 2FA (two-factor authentication) process.
  • If you manage other people’s profiles under your account, and you delete your account, their profiles are deleted too. If you want to save their profile, you can create a new account and transfer a profile to that account.
  • You can also delete a single profile from your account without affecting the rest of the profiles in your account, but if you delete your entire account, ALL profiles IN your account are deleted as well.

Here’s what 23andMe says about an account closure request:

If you participated in 23andMe Research, your Personal Information will no longer be used in any future research projects. If you asked us to store your genetic samples, they will be discarded. We will retain limited information about you, including records of this deletion request, and other information as required by law and otherwise described in our Privacy Statement.

If you have questions about your privacy, contact privacy@23andme.com, and if you have issues with account settings or data deletion, contact  customercare@23andme.com, or use their chat feature.

To be clear, data deletion and account closure is one action, occur together, and are permanent and irrevocable. If you change your mind, you can always choose to retest later, which you would have to do anyway if you ever wanted to subscribe to their updated features.

The Big Question

Now, everyone is going to be asking themselves if they want to update their permissions or delete their account – or maybe some people aren’t concerned at all.

I want to reiterate that this situation solely involves the uncertainty surrounding the status of 23andMe and its asset distribution during bankruptcy.

No other DNA testing company is affected.

I know you’re all wondering what I’m going to do.

Truthfully, I haven’t entirely decided, but at least one of my consideration is probably different from yours.

Were it not for my blog and my desire to provide you with the best up-to-date quality information, both here and in presentations, I would have deleted my data from 23andMe some time ago.

I have already revoked all research consents and have never stored my DNA at 23andMe because they never had multiple DNA products, so there was never any possibility of upgrading. In other words, my DNA storage would have been for their benefit, not for mine.

Here’s what the 23andMe website says under “Delete Data”:

What happens to my data if the company is sold or otherwise changes ownership?

If the company does change ownership in the future, your data will remain protected under the current 23andMe Privacy Policy unless and until you are presented with materially new terms, with appropriate advanced notice to review those material changes as required by law.

I don’t know how much comfort this brings you. It appears we would receive notice.

We’ve all thought of the negative scenarios, but there’s another side to this coin too.

As you ponder the situation, remember that the primary candidates to purchase 23andMe, or the database, would be other DNA testing companies. I have my fingers crossed, personally, because I’d love to preserve these matches AND obtain better tools. That could be a win-win for everyone.

And if 23andMe does not survive as a company, and another genealogy DNA company doesn’t purchase the database, you can always delete your data and close your account when we have a better handle on the outcome.

So, for now, I’m waiting but I’m also monitoring the situation VERY closely! You can read more about the court proceedings and bankruptcy restructuring as it progresses, here.

So, what’s your decision? Stay, go, or wait?

If you go, I hope you at least make lemonade out of this situation by uploading to both FamilyTreeDNA and MyHeritage if you haven’t already done so or haven’t yet tested there directly.

_____________________________________________________________

Share the Love!

You’re always welcome to forward articles or links to friends and share on social media.

If you haven’t already subscribed (it’s free,) you can receive an e-mail whenever I publish by clicking the “follow” button on the main blog page, here.

You Can Help Keep This Blog Free

I receive a small contribution when you click on some of the links to vendors in my articles. This does NOT increase your price but helps me keep the lights on and this informational blog free for everyone. Please click on the links in the articles or to the vendors below if you are purchasing products or DNA testing.

Thank you so much.

DNA Purchases and Free Uploads

Genealogy Products and Services

My Books

Genealogy Books

Genealogy Research

Welcome to the New FamilyTreeDNA® mtDNA Group

If you are a member of the Mitochondrial DNA for Genealogy Facebook group that I started when we launched the Million Mito Project, you may have noticed something new.

Not only does the group have a new name, FamilyTreeDNA® mtDNA Group, and an updated map, but it’s also now the official FamilyTreeDNA mitochondrial DNA group. A company-sponsored group provides one official, moderated, social media platform for mitochondrial DNA discussions and ongoing education.

I’m very pleased to “bequeath” this group to FamilyTreeDNA. It’s the perfect time, too, with the Mitotree release and full sequence testers receiving new haplogroups, along with the mtDNA Discover reports. Have you checked your new haplogroup – and mtDNA Discover?

I’m still an administrator, but I have been joined by several talented people from FamilyTreeDNA, including Million Mito Team members. We’ve assembled the best group possible to educate and answer questions.

You probably know that FamilyTreeDNA has an official Big-Y DNA group as well, here, where people can engage in conversation and education about Big-Y testing and results and how to use them for genealogy. This is the companion mitochondrial DNA group.

This FamilyTreeDNA® mtDNA Group is a private group, but anyone is welcome to join – whether you’ve already tested or are just thinking about it. It’s the “go to” place to learn about mitochondrial DNA.

Everyone can test their own mitochondrial DNA, so take a test, come on over, and join the fun, here.

See you soon!

_____________________________________________________________

You Can Help Keep This Blog Free

I receive a small contribution when you click on some of the links to vendors in my articles. This does NOT increase your price but helps me keep the lights on and this informational blog free for everyone. Please click on the links in the articles or to the vendors below if you are purchasing products or DNA testing.

Thank you so much.

DNA Purchases and Free Uploads

Genealogy Products and Services

My Books

Genealogy Books

Genealogy Research

Pierre Doucet (c1621-1713), Walking History Book Lived to Nearly 100 – 52 Ancestors #442

Pierre Doucet was born around 1621, someplace in France, to unknown parents. It was believed for a very long time that his father was Germain Doucet dit Laverdure, which is why Pierre is often listed with that dit name. However, Germain is not his father.

There is evidence in the form of dispensations for consanguinity in subsequent generations that Pierre’s mother may have been a Bourg. I question this, though, because Pierre married Henriette Pelletret about 1660, daughter of Simon Pelletret and Perrine Bourg, whose parents are unknown. Acadians had only been in Acadia for one generation. If Pierre’s mother was a Bourg and closely related to his wife’s mother, their marriage could not have occurred. Of course, there could have been two completely different Bourg families in Acadia, but given how small the population was, and that Charles d’Aulnay had recruited many, if not most, of the families from his mother’s signeury in France, the chances are slim. The ongoing discussion can be viewed on Germain Doucet’s WikiTree page, here, and Pierre Doucet’s page, here.

The 1649 will of Charles de Menou d’Aulnay, Governor of Acadia and one of the original founders of the colony, was discovered a few years ago and indicates that Germain Doucet was caring for his nieces and nephews.

D’Aulnay specifically left Germain 200 livres in recognition of his many years of “loyalty and affection.” Doucet and his wife also received a promise of free food and 50 écus of rent per year for the rest of their lives. Additionally, d’Aulnay left Germain additional funds for the help Germain had given his “nephews and nieces”, which can only mean PierreMarguerite, and their unknown sister, Inconnue Doucet.

Therefore, Pierre Doucet was the nephew of Germain Doucet, and Pierre’s father was Germain’s unidentified brother. We don’t know if Pierre’s father (and mother) died after arriving someplace in Acadian as early settlers, or if they died in France and their uncle brought the children along to raise. It appears that Germain had no children of his own, although, based on Y-DNA results, he may have adopted a Native American child who was his namesake.

There is speculation about where in France Pierre was born, but no one has produced any evidence or sources. If we knew where Germain was born, or married, that would assuredly help, but we don’t know that either

It’s possible, in fact probable, that Pierre Doucet’s unidentified parents arrived in Acadie at the same time as his uncle, Germain Doucet dit Laverdure, as early as 1632 with the “300 elite men” brought by Razilly. Families began arriving in 1636. Regardless, Germain was there by 1641 when he is listed as the “Captain at Arms” living among the families residing in Pentagouët, Acadie.

Fort Pentagouet in present-day Castne, Maine, along the Penobscot River, was built in 1625 and served as the first capitol of the French colony of Acadia, serving as both a military outpost and trading center. 

An archaeological dig in the 1980s revealed the fort’s remains in the yard of the Our Lady of Holy Hope Catholic Church, marked by a cross today.

You can see the outline of part of the fort, above.

We know that Germain Doucet was there in 1640, when Pierre would have been about 20, just a few years after families had begun to settle both here and at La Have.

If Pierre was at this remote outpost with his uncle, and perhaps his parents, he came as a child or teen. Just think what a great adventure this would have been for a young boy.

If they arrived in 1636, the family would have spent time at Le Have (LaHave) where the Fort Point Museum is located today..

His parents could have died and been buried in the cemetery at Fort Ste Marie de Grace at Le Have near Razilly, Fort Pentagouet, or Port Royal before 1649. Based on d’Aulnay’s will, it sounds as if Germain has been helping his nieces and nephews for some time.

It’s fairly clear that Pierre arrived with his parents, because his siblings were in Acadia too. Pierre’s sister, Marguerite, born about 1625, married Abraham Dugas about 1645, another very early settler who lived beside the fort in Port Royal. Another sister, whose name is unknown, married Pierre Lejeune about 1654. She was probably born about 1634.

Acadia was still tiny in 1654 – the Port Royal area only had about 270 people, and most of those lived at Port Royal, with a few across the river. Families didn’t move “upriver” until after 1654, hoping for more safety. 

Pierre apparently knew d’Aulnay, and fairly well. In 1687, several Acadian men signed an attestation regarding the work of d’Aulnay, and Pierre was among the signers, which also suggests he was in Acadia for several years before d’Aulnay’s death in 1650.

Steven Cronier in Acadians in Grey tells us that Germain was a minor nobleman and “captain at arms,” born in the mid-1590s and came to Acadia with Isaac de Razilly and d’Aulnay in 1632. He was master at arms at Pentagouët in 1640 and testified in an inquiry against former governor Charles La Tour that year.

D’Aulnay moved the seat of Acadia from Le Have to Port Royal sometime between 1635 and 1640.

The men would have worked together to dyke the marshes. It took three years for the salt to be washed clean so the fields could be farmed, but when farming commenced, the land produced fantastic yields. Port Royal was a good choice for multiple reasons. It addition to fertile land, it was also protected somewhat from the sea and was less likely to be embroiled in constant warfare like Fort Pentagouet – or at least it would appear that way.

Germain Doucet and d’Aulnay were apparently quite close as Germain was appointed guardian of d’Aulnay’s children after his death in 1650.

Germain was commanding Fort Anne in Port Royal in 1654 when the English seized Port-Royal, defeating the French.

If Germain was raising his nieces and nephews, including Pierre, this suggests that they would have been living with Germain, probably in the fort in the commander’s quarters.

In 1654, when Port Royal was lost, per the capitulation agreement, Germain would have been required to return to France. If Pierre, who was still unmarried at that time unless there was an earlier marriage we know nothing about, had been Germain’s son, it’s very likely he would have been forced to leave too.

While Pierre and his sisters would have bid a tearful goodbye to their uncle, all three remained in Acadia. Germain returned to France and we know nothing further about him.

By this time, Pierre would have been in his mid-30s. He assuredly fought side by side with his uncle in 1654 to defend Acadia against the English, but to no avail. French settlement ceased immediately, and the Acadians began refusing to sign a loyalty oath to the English King – much to the chagrin of the English. The loyalty oath, its language, how it was written, and what it meant was a constant source of turmoil for decades.

Pierre married much younger Henriette Pelletret about 1660. She was 19 and he was about 39.

They began their family in 1661 and over the next 24 years, had 10 living children and probably four who perished.

In 1670, the French regained control of Acadia through the Treaty of Breda. The following year, the first census was taken, tallying a total of 392 people. There were more than twice as many cattle and sheep than humans.

Although France was now officially in control, France pretty much ignored and neglected Acadia, fostering a culture of stubborn independence among the Acadians.

The Census

We would be entirely lost without the Acadian censuses, especially given that no church records in Port Royal exist before 1702.

The 1671 Census:

Pierre Doucet, bricklayer 50 (so born about 1621), wife Henriette Peltret 31; Children: Anne 10, Toussaint 8, Jean 6, Pierre 4, and 1 daughter 3 months; cattle 7, sheep 6 and 4 arpents of land.

Thanks to this census, we know that Pierre was a brick or stone mason.

The houses in Acadia were almost always wood, but they all had stone fireplaces and  bake ovens outside.

This is a reconstructed Acadian home in the historical gardens in Annapolis Royal, formerly Port Royal.

Baking was done outside, but cooking in a pot or kettle was done inside in the fireplace.

Through the house and out the “back door” here, you’re viewing the Allain River and on the other side, Abraham Dugas’s land.

Homes were generally one room and relatively small, overlooking the marshlands and fields. The roof was thatch, which made them particularly vulnerable to fire, and a second story provided sleeping quarters in the rafters for children.

Sometime in the 1670s, Father Pettit established a school at Port Royal, but it was probably only for boys. The Sisters may have opened one for girls in 1687.

The 1678 Census:

Pierre Doucet and Henriett Pelletret, 1.5 arpents of land, 10 cattle, 1 gun, 5 sons, 17, 12, 14, 6, and 3, 2 daughters, 10 and 3.

The census enumerator was going back and forth across the river because Pierre is enumerated “beside” Abraham Dugast and Marguerite Doucet, Pierre’s sister, who lived by the fort, and “beside” Antoine Bourg who lived adjacent to Pierre’s property on the north side of the river.

In 1682, Acadians began to settle along the Bay of Fundy in the Minas Basin and at Beaubassin, but Pierre chose to remain at Port Royal. Probably, in part due to the fact that he had posession of good land that was well drained and producing what they needed. Plus, at about 61, he was no spring chicken. The next generation, younger couples, were in need of land..

In 1684, yet another new Governor arrived who described the Acadians as having a simple, pastoral existence stating that they lived better than Canadians … for they never lacked bread or meat. But they weren’t as industrious, and never put away harvests in case of a bad year. The dowries were usually less than 20-25 francs in goods, a cow in calf, a ewe and a sow. Well-off families sometimes included a feather bed.

The 1686 Census:

Pierre Doucet 55 (should be 65), Henriette Peltret 40; children: Toussaint 23, Jean 20, Pierre 18, Magdelaine 16, Louis 12, Jeanne 10, Pierre 8, Marguerite 6, Mathieu 1; 2 guns, 5 arpents land, 8 cattle, 12 sheep, 6 hogs.

The family was doing well.

We are fortunate to have a 1686 map and I was able to place the Doucet property from 1707 and later maps.

This map also shows the Catholic church that they attended and the neatly fenced cemetery. The legend indicates that the fort is in ruins. “Un fort ruine.”

In 1688 the governor noted that both labor and manure (for fertilizer) were in short supply, as were untapped tidelands that could be dyked and drained – noting that as the reason why 25-30 mostly younger people had moved to Minas in the past six years.

Whoever thought of manure being in short supply.

Here’s a contemporary view. It’s necessary to understand the lay of the land. The land farmed by Pierre, and later his son Rene, lay acros the river directly from the fort.

The 1690 Attack

1690 was a terrible year. Acadia, and more specifically, Port Royal was caught up in the tide of escalating warfare between France and England.

The Acadian governor, Meneval, only had 100 soldiers in the garrison at Fort Anne.

Phipps, the English commander from New England sailed up the river, arriving with 7 ships and 700 men. He had more soldiers than the entire population of Acadia.

The Acadians’ goose was cooked. The Doucet land laid directly across the river Dauphin, and Pierre’s sister was married to Abraham Dugas, whose land lay directly beside the fort.

The English struck, burned 28 homes, probably every home in Port Royal and across the river within sight, plundered anything of value, including from the church that they torched.

They didn’t bother with the upriver farms and for some reason, and they didn’t burn the mills either. Phipps captured Meneval, the Acadian governor, and several French soldiers taking them back to Boston with him. Before departing, he put a council of Acadians in place to conduct business, forcing the Acadians to sign an oath of allegiance.

After Phipps departed, English pirates arrived and burned more, murdering people and killing livestock just for sport.

Indeed, if it weren’t for bad luck, the Acadians would have had no luck at all.

Pierre Doucet, by then 69 or 70, signed the loyalty oath with a mark which tells us he was illiterate. Of course, in that time and place, the priests read the Bible and interpreted its meaning for you. There was little need to read.

The 1693 Census

In 1693, another census was taken which lists Pierre Doucet, widower, 56; Rene 13; Mathieu 8; 10 cattle; 12 sheep; 10 hogs; 8 arpents of land; 1 gun.

Pierre’s age is incorrect. He would have been 72, an odd mistake to make. Sadly, even though Henriette was 20 years younger than Pierre, she predeceased him. Just goes to show that you never know.

Henriette was 40 in 1686. She could have died in childbirth between then and 1693, or she could have been killed in the 1690 depredations, given that they lived within sight of the fort and would surely have been targeted. Of course, she could also have died of something else, but one thing is certain – it wasn’t old age.

Pierre Doucet’s son, Pierre, born about 1667 is also missing after 1686 and before 1693. He would not have signed the 1690 Oath of Allegiance because he was not a head of household, unless he had married. He was living with his parents yet in 1686 where he is listed as age 18. No more records are found for this Pierre, nor is he ever listed as a head of household. He likely died sometime after 1686, but before 1693 when he would have again been listed in a census. It could well have been in 1690.

Pierre Jr. and his mother are both probably buried in the cemetery at Fort Anne. Pierre Sr. would have stood at their gravesides as the Priest spoke, probably wishing it had been him instead.

The 1698 Census

Pierre Doucet, widower, 80; Louis 24, Rene 18; Mathieu 10; Margueritte 12; 12 cattle, 8 sheep, 5 hogs, 16 arpents of land, 40 fruit trees, 1 gun.

The fruit trees are interesting. Acadians are known for their apple trees which still stand as silent reminders along the back roads where their fencelines were and near the marshes where their homesteads used to be.

Anyplace Acadians lived, you’ll find apple trees – many of them very old now.

The 1700 Census

Pierre Doucet, widower, 63; Rene 20; Mathieu 15; 8 cattle, 10 sheep, 8 arpents, 1 gun.

Pierre’s age is vastly incorrect. He would have been 79 or 80.

By now, there were 2000 people in Acadia, but they had scattered between multiple locations. The capitol of Acadia had been in Beaubassin for awhile, but was moved back to Port Royal

The 1701 Census

Pierre Doucet, widower, 80; Rene 21; Mathieu 15;  2 gun; 9 cattle, 6 sheep, 2 hogs; 6 arpents of land.

Clearly, a man of 80 was not doing the heavy part of farming, so sons Rene and Mathieu would have taken over most of the chores.

The Acadians realized they really needed to shore up the fort, but only limited supplies were arriving from France, so they began the backbreaking work by hand, carrying each rock and every barrel of dirt by wheelbarrel or cart.

The 1703 Census

Pierrer Doucet, widow[er] 1 female, 1 arms bearer.

Clearly, Pierre was still considered an arms bearer, capable of defending Acadia.

Rene had married in 1702 but was in all probability farming his father’s land. Mathieu did not marry until 1712, so I have no idea where he was, and Marguerite had married about 1700. Perhaps the female listed should have been a male.

In June 1704, Port Royal came under attack again. The fort was not ready to fully defend Port Royal. Churches were looted again. Dikes were dug down and the fields flooded, meaning no crops could be grown and harvested for another three years.

Based on drawings, it appears that the English ships remained closer to the far side of the river in order to stay out of cannon range. That means they were closer to Pierre’s home.

In 1705, 550 English men arrived in two gunboats, 14 transports, 36 whaleboats and a shallop, killing people and capturing prisoners along the way as they made their way up the Bay of Fundy. Imagine the dread watching all of those vessels sailing up the river towards your home.

New Governor Realizes the Acadians Are in Big Trouble

A new governor, Daniel d’Auger de Subercase arrived in April of 1706 and quickly realized he had years of both mismanagement and neglect to overcome.

The fort was dilapidated and even the old powder magazine was leaky and wet. You can’t fire cannons without dry powder. The fort was in terrible condition and morale was at an all-time low. The Acadians at Port Royal were sitting ducks, but Subercase heroically attempted to rectify the situation as best he could – going so far as to sell his clothes to do so.

The attacks continued. In March of 1707, the governor only had 160 soldiers to defend not only the fort, but the town as well. Of those, many soldiers were inexperienced and had no desire to fight. Essentially, they had been recruited from the “quays of Paris” and likely had no choice in the matter. Many defected to the other side.

Now, all Acadian men who could carry a gun were soldiers defending their homes, families and homeland.

Governor Subercase managed to hold the fort, somehow, against more than 1000 men from New England, but the sheer imbalance foreshadowed the future.

Having no other choice, the governor recruited pirates who were more than happy to assist the Acadians by taking English ships as “prizes.” While France ignored Subercases’s please for help, the Acadians lived off the booty of the corsairs for the next three years.

This did help, but it also enraged New England whose ships were being lost and who could no longer easily access the fishing grounds on the Grand Banks.

On this 1707 map, you can see Pierre’s home (red arrow) almost directly across the river from the fort.

Today, the same location, marked with the red arrow.

From the fort, we can view the opposite shoreline where Pierre Doucet raised his family.

Standing in Fort Anne, Pierre could see his home across the river.

Moving more to the right and viewing Pierre’s land across the wharf where his descendants would be forced to walk and board the ships that would rip them from Acadia in 1755.

A 1733 map shows the location of homesteads.

Two homes are shown on this map where Pierre Doucet had lived. Earlier, they would have been inhabited by Pierre and his son, Rene’s family. By 1733, one would have been Pierre’s son, Rene’s home and probably Rene’s daughter Anne Doucet and her husband, Daniel Garceau.

MapAnnapolis identified the current location of Pierre’s home.

A closer view, along with a “rough patch,” similar to those in other locations that conceal the foundations of original buildings.

No one was safe in 1707. Pierre was an old man with one gun fighting against hundreds of young healthy English soldiers with a lot of firepower.

By this time, many of Pierre’s children had departed for the northern parts of Acadia. He probably wished he had too.

  • Marie Doucet was in Grand Pre with Husband Jean Hebert, but would die in 1710 at 49.
  • Toussant Doucet married Marie Caissie about 1690 in Beaubassin.
  • Jean Doucet married Francoise Blanchard about 1692 in Cobequid.
  • Pierre Doucet disappeared from the records between 1686 and 1693 and probably died.
  • Magdeleine Doucet married Rene Bernard about 1689 and was living in Beaubassin by 1690.
  • Louis Doucet married Marguerite Girouard about 1702 in Beaubassin.
  • Louise Doucet married Pierre Chenet about 1691 and remained near Port Royal.
  • Rene Doucet married Marie Broussard about 1702 and farmed his father’s land.
  • Marguerite Doucet married Alexandre Comeau about 1700 and remained near Port Royal.
  • Mathieu Doucet married Anne Lord in 1712 and remained near Port Royal.

In 1707, only Mathieu was left at home, and Rene was literally farming his father’s land. Louise and Marguerite had remained near Port Royal. Unfortunately the Doucet land and homstead was very vulnerable – probably more vulnerable on that side of the river than the houses near the fort because it was essentially undefended.

1710

The worst was yet to come in 1710 as Pierre reached his 9th decade of life.

To begin with, the harvest failed. Then an epidemic drove the corsairs away. While France was ignoring and neglecting her colony, the English were strenghtening theirs.

The English dispatched five ships with more than 3400 troops to Acadia. Subercase had only 300 soldiers, plus Acadian men. According to the 1707 census, there were around 100 male heads of household, plus 72 boys age 14 or over. The entire fighting force was less than 500 men and older boys.

There were more soldiers on those ships than the entire population of all of Acadia, including the northern settlements. The ships sailed up the Riviere Dauphin, right up to Fort Anne – in front of the Doucet home.

The English documented their plan of attack for posterity.

This map shows the fort and the location of the various homesteads and settlements.

Using the English map combined with various Acadian maps identifying the Doucet homestead and that of their neighbors, it looks for all the world like the British came ashore on Pierre Doucet’s land. Pierre’s home is shown with the red outline and the red arrow points to the location that the English labeled, “where our whole body of men landed.” Of course they landed across the river from the fort. Cannon shot could’t reach that far.

What did Pierre do? Did an 89-year-old man go to the fort and either fight or help the soldiers in some way? Did he watch his home burn, again, from the fort? Alternatively, was he put in charge of keeping Rene’s wife and young children hidden and safe someplace?

If I had to bet, I’d wager that if Pierre was physically able, at all, he was right there in the fort with the other Acadian men. Or, was he one of the guerilla fighters in the woods? He doesn’t seem like a shrinking violet to me. Did they have to hogtie him to keep him out of the way?

While the earlier siege had failed – this one would not. They would win by sheer numbers and treachery. Of course, they burned everything – again!.

Miraculously, the overwhelmed Acadian men held the fort for 19 days, but on October 12th, understanding the gravity of their situation, they surrendered. It was surrender or be massacred, along with their families.

Pierre’s sons, Rene and Mathieu were assuredly fighting, as were Pierre’s sons-in-law. Pierre, depending on his health and stamina may have played a role as well – or maybe he simply prayed becasue he could do nothing else.

The Acadian men were permitted to leave the fort with all the honors of war, “their arms and baggage, drums beating and flags flying.”

The exit gate archway still remains, today, and if you stand quietly, you can hear them across the years.

Subercase, begrudgingly, but honorably handed the key to the fort to his English adversary, Francis Nicholson, quipping that he hoped to pay him a visit in the spring, and with that, the English took posession of Fort Anne, Port Royal, and in 1713, all of Acadia.

The surrender agreement stated that the French soldiers would be transported back to France, and they were probably glad to go. The Acadians were in such bad shape that the French couldn’t even provide provisions for the soldiers, so the English had to provision the soldiers for their return trip to France.

Additionally, the English required an oath of allegiance, stating that the residents who took the oath and were “within cannon shot,” which was about 3 miles, could remain for 2 years, but then had to remove their moveable items, meaning furniture and livestock, to somplace else in the French territory. In 1710, the rest of Acadia, like Beaubassin, was still French, as was mainland Canada. Apparently a list given to Nicholson listed 481 people who had taken the oath, although based on the 1707 census at Port Royal, there were less than 200 males that would have been of age, and only about 100 heads of household.

So, now 90-year-old Pierre Doucet had a new problem. Should he stay or go? Was resistance futile? The priests were gathering people beyond the 3 mile perimeter and encouraging resistance, but that did little for the families like Pierre’s, across the river from the fort. Worse yet, his home assuredly was burned for probably at least the third time.

Did he even have anything left to move? Did he want to move?

Unfortunately, there is no census before 1714, and even that one doesn’t tell us anything about livestock or arpents of land – so we are left in the dark about their condition in 1710 and for several years after. It’s difficult to feed your family if your farmland has been ruined by seawater.

We do know that disease ravaged the 450 English soldiers that were left to occupy Fort Anne and between that and desertion, a year later, only about 100 remained.

The Acadians were appealing to the Governor of Canada, asking for his assistance to leave. Another faction was plotting to overthrown the English in Port Royal, resulting in a confrontation upriver in June of 1711 called the Massacre of Bloody Creek in which about 32 English soldiers were killed by “Indians,” although I very strongly suspect Acadians men were involved as well.

Following that successful ambush, a group of about 600 men blockaded Fort Anne. Although they outnumbered the soldiers substantially, and the garrison was small, the Acadians had no artillery, and the fort was accessible from the back side by water.

Ironically, as the Acadians prepared to leave the area, the English began putting up roadblock after roadblock. They had discovered how useful the Acadians were, and they couldn’t feed themselves without the Acadians’ produce. Oh, the irony.

So now the Acadians were willing to go but couldn’t. There was no shortage of confusion, and I’m sure, a multitude of differing opinions. A few younger families did leave, but the majority of Acadians in the Annapolis River Valley had well-established farms and really had no desire to start over by clearing land and creating fields out of marshland. Worse yet, land they were offered elsewhere was rocky and stony and they had no idea how to farm that type of land. They claimed they would starve and wished to stay in Acadia near Port Royal, even if it was under the thumb of the English.

On April 13, 1713, “All of Nova Scotia or Acadia comprised in its ancient limits, as also the city of Port Royal” was ceded to England in the Treaty of Utrecht.

Pierre’s Death

I think of all this upheaval and wonder if Pierre was able to correspond with his children who had relocated along the Bay of Fundy in the late 1600s. Did he know his grandchildren at all? Did he ever visit? Did he, too, consider transplanting himself to the Minas Basin?

Perhaps all this was just too much for Pierre.

In the 1701 census, Pierre was already the oldest person in Acadia by a full decade—a living relic of an earlier generation. By 1713, he was no longer just an anomaly; he was a venerated legend, the exception to every rule, the last thread connecting the present to a distant past. He had endured wars, famine, and disease, outlasting friends, family, and entire communities. While others had fallen to time and tragedy, Pierre remained—a wizened, revered elder whose very survival defied the odds, a testament to resilience in a land where few lived long enough to see old age.

I wonder if he was lonely as he aged and had no contemporaries.

I’m unclear whether Pierre died on June 1, 1713 and was buried the following day, or if he died on June 2nd.

According to the parish register, penned by priest, Justin Durand, Pierre was “nearly 100 years old.”

The Registers of St. Jean-Baptiste, Annapolis Royal, 1702-1755 are held in a collection titled “An Acadian Parish Remembered” by the Nova Scotia Archives. They don’t translate verbatin, but provide the relevant data, as follows:

I asked ChatGPT to translate this, but it introduced language that was not there. A big thank you to Karen Theriot Reader for reading and translating the original document correctly. I have removed the erroneous translation and substitutied hers. Thank you so much Karen!

Pierre
Doucet
[in another
hand]
100 ans!!

Ce deuxieme de Juin de L année Mil Sept cent Treize
Moy Soussigné faisant les fontions curiales a port royal
de L Acadie ay Inhumé Solennellement le corps de
pierre Doucet habitant de port Royal aagé de
pres de cent ans En foy de quoy jai Signé le jour et
an que dessus F. Justinien Durand Recollet Missionnaire

—————————————————————
Pierre
Doucet

This second day of June of the year one thousand seven hundred thirteen,
I the undersigned, doing the curical functions at Port Royal
of Acadia, have solemnly buried the body of
Pierre Doucet, resident of Port Royal, aged
of nearly one hundred years. In witness of which I have signed on the day and
year as above. Fr. Justinien Durand, Missionary Friar
—————————————————————
You may notice that only the burial date of June 2, 1713, is given. However, Stephen A. White’s Dictionnaire généalogique des familles acadiennes has Pierre listed as dying on 1 Jun 1713, buried on 2 Jun 1713 (p. 528).

Pierre was the last man alive who personally witnessed the founding of Acadia. The first seat at La Have, probably the Fort at Pentagouet in Maine, settling and clearing the land across from the fort at Port Royal, building Fort Anne, again and again, losing Port Royal in 1654 and regaining it again in 1670, the brutal attack of 1690 followed by murderous pirates, the incessant demands for loyalty oaths and many attacks by the English accompanied by burned homes and barns and ruined fields, rebuilding his home repeatedly, trying to rebuild the fort by hand without supplies in the early 1700s, and the final blow in 1710 where the Acadians lost Port Royal for the final time.

Amongst all of this, Pierre buried his wife and probably at least six children. I wonder if he even knew that his daughter died in Grand Pre on November 3rd, 1710, less than a month after Port Royal fell. Was there any way to receive notice, especially given the warfare? 1710 was a terrible year, no matter how you slice it.

Pierre was a walking history book. Given that he lived to “nearly 100,” he clearly figured out how to co-exist and get along with the English. I surely wish he had been able to write, and had scribed a journal for us. Just think how invaluable that would be today, not only for family history and genealogy, but for world history as well..

Pierre would have been laid to rest in the Garrison Cemetery, in what had been the churchyard in Port Royal before the English destroyed everything – buried near his wife and at least one child, his namesake, who had waited a very long time for him to arrive.

Their graves are unmarked, destroyed by the English when the Acadians were all rounded up and deported in 1755.

Yet, they are not gone.

They live on.

Rest in Peace, Pierre. You surely deserve it!

_____________________________________________________________

Share the Love!

You’re always welcome to forward articles or links to friends and share on social media.

If you haven’t already subscribed (it’s free,) you can receive an e-mail whenever I publish by clicking the “follow” button on the main blog page, here.

You Can Help Keep This Blog Free

I receive a small contribution when you click on some of the links to vendors in my articles. This does NOT increase your price but helps me keep the lights on and this informational blog free for everyone. Please click on the links in the articles or to the vendors below if you are purchasing products or DNA testing.

Thank you so much.

DNA Purchases and Free Uploads

Genealogy Products and Services

My Books

Genealogy Books

Genealogy Research

RootsTech 2025 – The Year of Discover and the New Mitotree

Last week, RootsTech was a whirlwind and full of discoveries – which, ironically, was the 2025 theme.

I always take you along with me and share the RootsTech experience, start to finish, so here’s my 2025 “feet on the ground” report.

I might, just might, have overcommitted myself. I taught the half-day DNA Academy,  three more sessions, plus several other commitments such as book signings, get-togethers, and interviews.

One class, “DNA for Native American Genealogy,” was a live webinar from the floor of the expo hall. You can watch that here for free, if you’re interested.

Unfortunately, none of my other sessions were recorded, but I’ll see what other alternative options may be available to bring those to you.

Additionally, I did two book signings at the GenealogyBank booth, along with two other authors, Drew Smith and Sunny Morton. I’m sorry, I don’t have any pictures. I should have asked someone to take some.

There were long lines and books sold out. Still, you can order either of my books, The Complete Guide to FamilyTreeDNA – Y-DNA, Mitochondrial, Autosomal and X-DNA or DNA for Native American Genealogy, at Genealogical.com. Thank you to GenealogyBank for being so welcoming.

The book signing was particularly fun because people shared their success stories or their hopes of what they want to achieve. I met a couple of new cousins too! Even people waiting in line were helping each other with information about research resources.

I had created my “RootsTech plan” for sessions I wanted to attend, but I was only able to actually attend one of those. Several were happening at the same time as mine, or directly before or after. As a presenter, you arrive early to get set up and make sure everything is working correctly.

Then, after your session, attendees have questions and are interested in your topic, which is a good thing. So essentially, you can’t attend sessions either before or after your session either.

Before I share photos, I’d like to share something else.

It’s About the People

I have never attended RootsTech for the classes, although there are wonderful offerings – and I have enjoyed them immensely.

Having said that, for me, the best part of RootsTech is the people. People I know and love but never get to see – many of whom I met in-person at RootsTech initially. I get to meet my blog followers. I meet with or reconnect with friends and cousins from around the world. I am privileged to talk with people about their challenges and their victories – when they’ve broken through a brick wall using DNA that they could never have otherwise achieved. People collaborating and helping each other. It’s all beautiful.

The reason I started blogging in the first place, and the reason all 1750 articles are free, is because I wanted to help people do just that – confirm ancestors, find ancestors, and connect with their fsmily.

My cousins that I’ve met through genealogy are some of my closest friends and closest family members. Outliving everyone is a mixed blessing but it makes me extremely grateful for my various cousins since all of my siblings and close family, with the exception of the next generation, have transitioned to the land of the ancestors.

So, yea, for me, RootsTech is about connecting and reconnecting with the people.

That’s also why I never get anything done because I’m always talking with someone.

Additionally, this particular RootsTech was a celebration.

Mitotree Release

Just a few days before RootsTech, the Million Mito Team at FamilyTreeDNA released the brand new Mitotree, 5 years in the making, reconstructing the tree of humankind to reflect our combined heritage more accurately.

At RootsTech 2020, I was honored to announce the Million Mito Project, and the new Mitotree initiative was born.

At some point, I will write about the deep, personal significance of the Mitotree for me,  but for now, suffice it to say that there is something profoundly moving about rewriting the tree of humankind and in doing so, giving a voice to our ancestors from long ago. Yes, I know many of them are thousands or even tens of thousands of years old, but had they not survived, we would not be here today. Now we can identify who they are and that they lived.

Million Mito Team, left to right, Goran Runfeldt, Dr. Paul Maier, me, Dr. Miguel Vilar, Bennett Greenspan, John Detsikas

Our amazing Dream Team has given life to our ancestors and said their names once again, even if their name is a mitochondrial DNA haplogroup. Four team members, Goran, Paul, me and Bennett were at RootsTech. Where else can you actually approach and speak with the actual scientists?

When I say RootsTech is about the people, I know that I am related to every single individual at RootsTech, it’s just a matter of how far back in time. So are you.

Just think about the significance of that for a minute.

Every. Single. Person.

The other end of the mitochondrial DNA spectrum is genealogy, of course, and the new Mitotree with it’s haplotype clusters brings mitochondrial DNA results into the genealogical timeframe. In future articles, I’ll be writing about each one of the new tools, what they mean, and how to use them.

Dr. Paul Maier, lead scientist doing most of the hard science behind Mitotree, had the much-deserved honor of introducing the Mitotree to genealogists at RootsTech.

I’m not sure the audience understood they were witnessing history unfold, but they clearly were. We needed a drum roll and some balloons!

This wasn’t like most vendor announcements of a new product or feature – this was a major scientific achievement that led to genealogical benefits.

In celebration, I asked my friend to make double helix zipper pulls so that I could give them to colleagues, friends and cousins that I ran into at RootsTech. It’s my way of celebrating and sharing the joy!

Five years is a very long time to work on a project. The Mitotree is a massive accomplishment. Every customer at FamilyTreeDNA who has taken the full sequence test received their new haplogroup either the week before or during RootsTech, AND, the second updated version of the tree was released too.

While this is truly wonderful, the true highlight is the testimonials – seeing how Mitotree is actually helping people break through their brick walls.

Here’s just one.

Breathless Testimonial

I’m going to try to convey this exactly as it happened.

A lady that I don’t know literally runs up to me in the hallway. This isn’t unusual. She was so excited that what she said was one long breathless sentence, which I’m going to try to reconstruct here, although I’m adding a bit of punctuation. I also can’t remember how many “greats” were attached to the “grandmother,” but you’ll get the idea.

Roberta, Roberta, I’m so excited – I just wanted to let you know – I found my ancestor using mitochondrial DNA. I got my new haplogroup and I had like 47 matches before but now they are clustered together so I could focus…and there were three matches in my cluster…and one of them had an EKA but the other didn’t…so I built out the EKA matches’ tree and guess what??? They were from the same place and then I found that her great-great-grandmother’s sister is my great-great-grandmother but she had her surname so now I have more generations too. OMG I ‘m so excited I could never have broken through this wall without mtDNA because I had no surname. This is THE MOST CONSEQUENTIAL DNA TEST I’VE EVER TAKEN, and I’ve taken them all. Thank you, thank you!

And with that she quickly hugged me and ran off to something she was obviously late for.

I never got to say one word, which was fine, but I stood there with tears in my eyes, thinking to myself, “This – this is what it’s all about.”

It doesn’t get better than this!

I want to hear your stories too. I just scaled my fourth brick wall last night using the new Mitotree and mtDNA Discover features.

RootsTech Week

RootsTech week started early for me – as in leaving the house at 3 AM Sunday. I fly on Sunday because the flights are cheaper and because the pre-conference meetings and events begin on Monday.

We took off into the dawn, jetting our way westward through the azure blue sky.

I have never gotten over the majesty and beauty of the Rocky Mountains.

And then, of course, the Great Salt Lake, for which Salt Lake City is named.

Looking at the Salt Palace across the street from the Marriott hotel. The silver building is the new Hyatt which is attached to the conference center behind the windmills which extends another very long block to the right, out of view. The mountain range is visible in the distance, and the beautiful sunset.

Speaking of the Marriott hotel, several people have asked if it was any better this year, and if I got trapped in the fire exit again, like last year.

No, I didn’t get stuck because I didn’t tempt fate again. It looked just the same though, so I’m presuming nothing has changed. Furthermore, there was no heat in my room, so they gave me a space heater and a pass to the concierge level – which they did not do last year.

That was kind of them, but food ran out, and there was only one poor server in the restaurant. I’m not even going to mention the nauseating thing that happened with my food. Let’s just say I’m not picky, but I will NEVER eat there again, and that makes it particularly difficult because there’s very little close by, especially when you’re exhausted.

I’m hoping that RootsTech will negotiate someplace different for speakers in the future. I’ve stayed in a lot of Marriotts and most of them are just fine. I have never had issues like this with any of them, let alone repeat issues year after year.

The good news is that we’re not there for the hotel, and the fun began on Monday.

Monday

My interviews began on Monday morning with “Mondays with Myrt” at the FamilySearch Library, which you can view here beginning about 16 minutes.

Mondays with Myrt is a RootsTech tradition and Myrt incorporates people present in person and tuning in virtually as well. Left to right, Kirsty Gray from England, John Tracy Cunningham, me and Myrt. Kirsty had a huge breakthrough that she shared with us just a few minutes after it happened.

I met John at the ECGGS Conference last October. He’s one of the few people I know whose 8 great-grandparents were born in the same county. I’m so jealous. Mine were either born in or first generation immigrants from four countries.

Sometimes the broadcast waiting area is just as much fun as the actual broadcast – in part because it’s the first day of RootsTech week and everyone is so excited to see their friends that they haven’t seen in forever. Call is a reunion!

Do Kirsty Gray and I look like we’re about to get into mischief?

Behind me is the first group of folks to be interviewed.

Pat Richley-Erickson, aka Myrt, Cheryl Hudson Passey, Laura Wilkinson Hedgecock, and Jenny Horner Hawran.

This is the livestream room at the FamilySearch Library. The waiting area for the next group is to the right, and the three presently being interviewed are sitting on the left beside Myrt.

For those who know Gordon, aka Mr. Myrt, he’s coordinating interviewees outside the livestream room. His job is herding cats and he’s the nicest cat-herder you’ll ever meet!

Pre-RootsTech Library Research

I love the FamilySearch Library. It feels like coming home to me.

So many passionate genealogists at every level – learning and searching. Lots of volunteer helpers available, too.

Normally, I create a research plan for the library, but I had been so utterly slammed between preparing my several RootsTech sessions and the Mitotree release that I hadn’t really been able to prepare anything.

I did, however, have a group of ancestors in mind that settled in the Oley Valley in Pennsylvania, so I decided to focus on the Berks County books.

I won’t bore you with the details, but among other things, I found confirmation that the Hoch surname is also the same as High and Hoy, which explains some very confusing Y-DNA results. So even though I didn’t get much productive time there, I did find something very useful in the land records.

I also ran into cousins and friends, of course, which is why I didn’t get more actual research done.

I knew Judy Nimer Muhn, at left, was going to be at RootsTech as a speaker, and I knew we connected through Acadian lines, but we never took the time to really piece together that puzzle.

My cousins, Mark and Manny were also coming for RootsTech, and to visit the library, for the first time. Mark, Manny and I visited Nova Scotia together in the summer of 2024, chasing our ancestors.

You know, fate is a funny thing.

We all descend from Acadian, Francois Savoie who was born about 1621 in France, but settled in Acadia, today’s Nova Scotia. Mark, Manny and I knew that we are cousins through Francois, but Judy and I did not. Mark, Manny and I ran into a local historian, Charlie Thibodeau, the Acadian Peasant, last year, outside of Port Royal. It just so happened that he was taking another couple to see the remains of the Savoie homestead deep in the salt marshes at BelleIsle.

We asked if we could join them, and Charlie was kind enough to include us. It was a long, brutally hot, tick-infested hike through the swamp, but oh so worth it!

We also found the well, located between three homesteads.

The year before, Judy had been in the same place in Nova Scotia, found the same man, Charlie, at the BelleIsle Hall Acadian Cultural Centre, and he had taken her to the remains of the same homestead.

And here we all four are in Utah.

What are the chances?

Needless to say, we had a LOT to talk about, and still do. Unfortunately, I wasn’t able to get to Judy’s talk, but Mark and Manny attended.

I ran into Katy Rowe-Schurwanz, the FamilyTreeDNA Product Manager at the library too, and look what she’s wearing – a mitochondrial DNA scarf. How cool is that!

The rest of Tuesday and most of Wednesday morning were spent trying to update my several presentations to reflect newly released information by various vendors and practicing the timing of the presentations. I had another interview, and more people were arriving.

I found time to visit Eva’s Bakery about 3 blocks from the Salt Palace. If you’re ever in Salt Lake City, Eva’s is a must! Lunch is wonderful, and so are their French pastries.

Wednesday is “tech prep” day at RootsTech, along with speaker instructions and then the Speaker Dinner.

Steve Rockwood, President and CEO of FamilySearch always delivers an inspirational message and this year did not disappoint.

If you’ve wondered about RootsTech conference stats, they provided this information. I can’t even imagine trying to coordinate all of this – and that’s not including the vendors, expo hall, technology in the presentation rooms, food, security and so much more.

Last year, in 2024, the final attendance numbers were more than 16,000 people in person and 4 million virtual attendees. I noticed a few days ago that there were more than half a million people participating in Relatives at RootsTech, which is still live until April 12th.

On Wednesday evening, after the Speaker’s Dinner, vendors in the Expo Hall were putting the final touches on their booths and preparing for the thousands of excited genealogists who would descend Thursday morning.

Discover

This year’s RootsTech theme was “discover” and attendees were greeted with this display just inside the door.

Attendees listed their discoveries on Post-its and could either post them on the board or plastic boxes, or on the green tree.

I placed my discovery from the day before at the library on the Rootstech tree.

Some people place their wishes here, kind of like a technology wishing well.

I couldn’t help but think of the new Mitotree, now forever green and growing, so I posted a second discovery, “Mitotree.”

Thursday – Opening Day

For those who don’t know, the Salt Palace Convention Center is two lengthy blocks long, a block wide, and two or three stories high, depending on whether you are in the front or rear portion. In other words, it’s massive and you need a map!

The huge Expo Hall with vendors is located in the center on the first floor and vendors have aisle addresses. The show floor is always very busy, and this year was no exception. One of the things I love is that spontaneous conversations just spring up between people who often find commonalities – common ancestors, common locations, and more. People compliment each other and join others at tables. It’s like a big family gathering of sorts.

I always try to walk the entire Expo Hall, because I really enjoy seeing the vendors and their wares, but this year, I never actually had enough time to traverse all the aisles. I took several pictures as I was passing through and running into people, but not nearly enough. I know I missed a lot, but there just wasn’t enough time and I arrived at RootsTech already tired.

However, the energy of RootsTech is like no place else and just infects you.

It’s like you can’t drink from the genealogy firehose fast enough!

Let’s Take a Walk

Ok, come along on a walk with me.

Left to right, Lianne Kruger, a speaker, and Courtney, in the FamilyTreeDNA booth. I believe they said they are cousins.

Daniel Horowitz, genealogist extraordinaire, in the MyHeritage booth. More about MyHeritage’s announcements shortly.

Geoff Rasmussen in the Legacy Family Tree Webinars booth. For those who don’t know, there’s lots of good material at Legacy, and the freshly recorded webinars are always free for a week.

Several vendors offer booth talks, including MyHeritage. I love their photo tools and use their site in some capacity almost daily.

One of the RootsTech traditions is ribbons. Collect one, collect ‘em all. Liv’s ribbons almost reach the floor. I think she wins!

Selfies are also a RootsTech tradition. Me, here with Jonny Perl of DNAPainter fame. I owe Jonny an apology as he asked me if I had a minute, and I had to say no because I was on the way to one of my own classes. I never got back to his booth to view his new features. Sorry Jonny – don’t take it personally!

Jonny released a new Ancestral tree version titled Places, so take a look here at his blog. I need to go look at my ancestors Places.

You’ll find this new feature under Ancestral Trees, Places. These are my most recent 8 generations. Just think of all those brave souls who climbed on a ship and sailed for the unknown. Check this feature out and have fun.

In a booth talk, Dave Vance, Executive Vice-President and General Manager at FamilyTreeDNA is speaking about the three types of DNA, which are, of course, Y-DNA, mitochondrial and autosomal DNA – all useful for genealogy in different ways.

Dave is explaining how in-common-with matches, also known as shared matches, operate with the chromosome browser. You can use the chromosome browser, shared matches, the new Matrix Tool, and download your match segment information at FamilyTreeDNA, a combination of features not available at any other vendor.

WikiTree, a free a moderated one-world-tree is one of my favorite genealogy tools. One of their best features is that you find your ancestor, and in addition to lots of sources, their Y-DNA, mitochondrial DNA, and those who are related autosomally are listed. Here’s my grandfather, for example.

Several DNA connections are listed. The further back in my tree, the more DNA connections are found, becuase those ancestors have more descendants.

WikiTree volunteers were wandering around taking pictures of “WikiTreers” holding fun signs.

Paul Woodbury, a long time researcher with Legacy Tree Genealogists, who specializes in DNA. I don’t take private clients anymore, and regularly refer people to Legacy Tree.

Me with Janine Cloud taking our annual RootsTech selfie. Janine, the Group Projects Manager at FamilyTreeDNA and I co-administer one of those projects and accidentally discovered a few years ago that we are cousins too. How fun is this!!!

I wanted this shirt, but by the time I got back to the booth, it was too late. I’m going to order it online from Carlisle Creations, in case you want one too. This is so me.

Land records are critically important to genealogists. Rebecca Whitman’s class was about plotting land plats. What she’s holding is a surveyor’s chain. You’ve read about chain carriers? This is what they carried to measure land boundaries – literally metes and bounds. Some of my best discoveries have been thanks to land records.

The only session I actually got to attend was Gilad Japhet’s “What’s New and Exciting at MyHeritage.” For those who don’t know, Gilad is the founder and CEO of MyHeritage and it’s always great to hear about the new features straight from the top executive who is, himself, a seasoned genealogist. That’s why he started MyHeritage in the first place – 22 years ago in his living room.

Gilad had several wonderful announcements, but the one I’m most excited about is their new Cousin Finder. Cousin Finder finds and reveals cousins who are DNA candidates if they have not yet taken a DNA test.

I’ll be writing more about the MyHeritage announcements soon, but you can read their blog about Cousin Finder now, here, and their Roundup here about the rest of their announcements!

My Last Class – Reveal Your Maternal Ancestors & Their Stories

My last class at the end of the final day of RootsTech was “Reveal Your Maternal Ancestors & Their Stories – Solving Mitochondrial DNA Puzzles.”

Had I tried to coordinate this presentation with International Women’s Day, I could never have done it, but fate winked and here I was.

I’m often asked what it’s like from the presenters’ perspective. This is one of the smaller ballrooms. My earlier sessions were in larger rooms, maybe 3 times this size. I took this picture about 15 minutes before the session started as people were beginning to drift in.

The amazing RootsTech techs had me wired up to microphones and had verified that the audio and video equipment was working correctly, so now it was just waiting.

My cousin, John Payne, who co-administers the Speaks surname project with me, came by and took this great picture of the two of us. We’ve made huge inroads connecting the various Speake(s) lines in America, plus finally proving our home village in England, thanks to the Big Y-700 test, followed by church records. All is takes, sometimes, is that one critical match.

As I sat there, waiting to begin the mitochondrial DNA session, I couldn’t help but reflect upon all of the women who came before me and how fortunate I was to have been in the right place at the right time to be a member of the Million Mito team.

These are my direct matrilineal ancestors who give me, and my daughter, pictured at left, their mitochondrial DNA. I felt them with me as I sat there, waiting.

The woman at furthest right, Barbara Drechsel (1848-1930), immigrated to Indiana from Germany as a child with her parents in the 1850s. Before her came thousands of generations of women with no photos, of course, and no names before Barbara Freiberger, another eight generations earlier, born about 1621 in Germany.

Before that, which was before church and other records, prior to the 30 Years War, this lineage came from Scandinavia where some of my exact matches are still found today.

Before beginning, I said a positive affirmation and thanked my ancestors – so very honored to introduce them. I know they were proud of me, a member of the team that opened the door to the distant past. I wouldn’t be here if not for every one of their lives.

In this session, I would discuss, for the first time ever, the new Mitotree and my/our connection to all of humanity some 7000 generations ago, more or less.

The mutations we carry over those generations form an unbroken chain of breadcrumbs, connecting us to mitochondrial Eve who lived about 145,000 years ago. We revealed that breakthrough finding in the Haplogroup L7 paper, published in 2022.

I’m still in absolute awe that we have been able to both reach that far back in time AND, at the same time, make the newest haplogroups and haplotype clusters genealogically relevant. I will write more about that soon, but for now, I wrote about the Mitotree release here and you can find articles by Katy Rowe-Schurwanz here and here.

I’m very excited about my new mitochondrial DNA results for my ancestral lines that I track and have already made headway on several.

I’m not the only one.

Not only was I excited about my results, many other people have had breakthroughs too, including Mark Thompson, one of our genealogy AI experts who also spoke at RootsTech. I particularly love his AI generated image.

If you haven’t yet, check your mitochondrial DNA results.

It’s a Wrap

Another year done, another RootsTech under our belts. Hopefully everyone is over the “conference crud” by now and are busily applying their newfound knowledge.

You can view either live-cast sessions or RootsTech webinars, here.

I saw a meme posted sometime during the conference that coined the term “exhausterwhelmulated,” a combination of exhausted, overwhelmed and overstimulated at the same time.

I added exhilarated and elated to the mix and asked ChatGPT to draw me a picture of someone at a genealogy conference feeling those simultaneous emotions.

ChatGPT titled this request “Genealogy Conference Overload,” which made me laugh.

The first two attempts looked like the person had a headache, which I fully understood, so I asked ChatGPT to make the person look happy to be there.

This person, carrying a coffee like I often do, looks like they have just discovered the great irony that they have chased the wrong ancestor for some 20 years – with “laugh or I’ll cry” mania being their overwhelm “go to” in that minute.

This one made me laugh too!

Yes, indeed, I think every single one of us, especially at RootsTech, has experienced this exact adrenaline-fueled emotion.

We leave with a VERY long to-do list, exhausted but full of anticipation and buoyed by excitement. Filled with so much gratitude for our cousins and fellow genealogists, the speakers, vendors, DNA to solve thorny problems, new tools and records, FamilySearch who sponsors RootsTech itself and their amazing employees, plus the legions of the volunteers who make it all work.

Thank you! Thank you! Thank you!

_____________________________________________________________

Share the Love!

You’re always welcome to forward articles or links to friends and share on social media.

If you haven’t already subscribed (it’s free,) you can receive an e-mail whenever I publish by clicking the “follow” button on the main blog page, here.

You Can Help Keep This Blog Free

I receive a small contribution when you click on some of the links to vendors in my articles. This does NOT increase your price but helps me keep the lights on and this informational blog free for everyone. Please click on the links in the articles or to the vendors below if you are purchasing products or DNA testing.

Thank you so much.

DNA Purchases and Free Uploads

Genealogy Products and Services

My Books

Genealogy Books

Genealogy Research

Mitotree is Born

Mitotree is born and I can hardly contain my excitement.

The Million Mito R&D team members, along with many others at FamilyTreeDNA, are proud to introduce the new Mitotree and mtDNA Discover, which were brought to life thanks to one pivotal entrepreneurial figure, Bennett Greenspan, whose support and vision set the ball in motion and made Mitotree possible.

Left to right, the Million Mito science team is:

  • Goran Runfeldt, Head of R&D at FamilyTreeDNA
  • Dr. Paul Maier, Senior Population Geneticist at FamilyTreeDNA
  • Roberta Estes, DNAexplain, scientist, blogger, author, genetic genealogist, and Genographic Affiliate Researcher
  • Dr. Miguel Vilar, Genetic Anthropologist, Lead Scientist with the Genographic Project, and Professor at the University of Maryland
  • Bennett Greenspan, President Emeritus of FamilyTreeDNA, and avid genealogist
  • John Detsikas, Front End Developer who is responsible for the user interface for both Y-DNA Discover and now mtDNA Discover

The Million Mito Project Inception

The Million Mito Project was launched at RootsTech 2020 and encouraged people to test their mitochondrial DNA, both for their genealogy and to help build the database. More than a million samples were candidates, but only high-quality, full sequence results were used. In the process of building the tree, additional samples were incorporated from other public sources for tree construction.

Drum Roll – The Mitotree

A beta version of the Mitotree is being released today, and boy, is this a big deal.

Before we discuss the rest of what’s coming, I need to mention that the Mitotree is now evergreen, meaning that the tree will be updated periodically, as will mtDNA Discover. This lifetime value is included with the cost of your test, so there’s nothing more to purchase.

Haplogroups will change from time to time, as the tree does, so don’t fall in love with yours, and definitely, no tattoos😊

I’m going to be speaking in terms of “we,” meaning the Million Mito team who built the Mitotree and mtDNA Discover, plus an amazing team of FamilyTreeDNA folks who were absolutely essential in getting this out the door and to you.

The Mitotree is new from the ground up, and yes, haplogroup naming consistency with PhyloTree has been maintained where possible.

One of the unanticipated challenges we encountered was that the 2016 PhyloTree had to be recreated, essentially reverse engineered, to determine the rules they used regarding mutations for haplogroup creation. In other words, which mutations were valid and reliable, which weren’t, determining their relative importance, and so forth.

After the existing 2016 tree was recreated, the next hurdle to overcome was that none of the existing phylogenetic software used in academia would scale from 24,000 samples and 5500 subclades to more than a quarter million samples and 40,000 haplogroups, so that software had to be designed and written by R&D team members.

More information about this process will be forthcoming shortly, and a paper will be published with our methodology, but for right now, let’s look at the user experience and what’s being released now.

Here’s what’s coming today and over the next few days.

The beta Mitotree includes:

  • Over 40,000 branches
  • Over 250,000 mtFull Sequences from FTDNA
  • Over 10,000 third-party full sequences from GenBank, 1000 Genomes, etc.
  • Over 1000 Ancient Connections
  • Over 100 Notable Connections

More is on the way.

The new Mitotree is the tree provided in several formats within mtDNA Discover. You can view the public version of the tree, here, or sign on to your FamilyTreeDNA account and click through from your dashboard to see more.

Today’s Releases

The Mitotree doesn’t exist in a vacuum, so several updates and new features will be rolling out today.

  • mtDNA Discover, which includes the new Mitotree
  • New customer haplogroups for those who have taken mtFull sequence tests
  • New mtDNA matches page

New Haplogroups

New haplogroups have been calculated for FamilyTreeDNA customers who have taken the full sequence test. Those who have taken only the HVR1 or HVR1/HVR2 tests are encouraged to upgrade to the full sequence test.

Not everyone will receive a new Mitotree haplogroup that is different from their classic haplogroup, but most people will. Your original haplogroup is displayed with the classic tag, and the new Mitotree haplogroup with the beta tag.

If your classic and Mitotree haplogroups are the same, it means that either you have no more private variants (mutations) available to form a new haplogroup, or no one else from your lineage has tested yet.

New mtDNA Matches Page

If you click on your mtDNA matches, you’ll notice that the page has been redesigned to look and function like the other FamilyTreeDNA match pages.

If you click to view your matches, you’ll be able to view both the “old” classic haplogroup, and your matches’ new Mitotree haplogroup, plus a new haplotype if they have one. We will talk about haplotypes in a minute.

The people you match are the same as before, but matches may be recalculated in the future.

If you click through to the new mtDNA Discover from your dashboard, you’ll be able to view the public portion of mtDNA Discover, plus the additional customized information provided to FamilyTreeDNA mtFull sequence customers.

mtDNA Discover

If you have taken a full sequence test, sign on to your account to view your new haplogroup, then click on the new mtDNA Discover icon on your dashboard.

If you haven’t taken the mtFull sequence test, but the partial HVR1 or HVR2 versions, you can still view mtDNA Discover on your dashboard, but without the mtFull customization.

Customization that occurs exclusively for FamilyTreeDNA mtFull sequence customers includes:

  • Most detailed placement of your branch on Mitotree
  • Haplotype clusters
  • Additional Ancient Connections
  • Additional Notable Connections
  • The Match Time Tree
  • Globetrekker (coming soon)
  • The Group Time Tree (coming soon)

mtDNA Discover is similar to Y-DNA Discover.

You’ll be able to view a dozen new reports about your haplogroup in addition to the tools provided on your dashboard.

The new Mitotree can be viewed in several formats, each with its unique benefit.

  1. Time Tree – a genetic tree that shows when each haplogroup was formed, plus a country flag for where present-day testers report as the location of their earliest known ancestor (EKA)
  2. Classic Tree – a more traditional view of a phylogenetic tree, including the number of testers on each branch, the variants, or mutations that define the haplogroup, the era and approximate date of formation, and other details about the tree topology
  3. Scientific Details Variants Tab – shows the variants that differ in each haplogroup as you reach back in time
  4. Ancestral Path for the selected haplogroup – outlines your path back to early humans, including Denisovans.
  5. Match Time Tree for you and your matches (must be signed in to your account and click on mtDNA Discover icon)
  6. Group Time Tree (coming soon) for those who have joined projects

Match Time Tree

The Match Time Tree is extremely useful because it overlays your matches, plus their earliest known ancestors (EKA), on a genetic Time Tree, by haplogroup and haplotype, so you can see how you may be related, and when.

You can also see your matches that have now fallen into neighboring haplogroups, which suggests that they probably aren’t as genealogically close as people in your haplogroup. However, that’s not always the case, because mutations can occur at any time.

Haplotype Clusters

A haplotype cluster is a new concept introduced specifically for genealogists with the new Mitotree. Haplotypes are identified by numbered “F” groups. Three are shown, below.

There may be groups of people within a haplogroup that have exactly the same mutations, or genetic signature, and no additional mutations. Still, they may not form a new haplogroup. There could be several reasons for not forming a new haplogroup, including known SNP locations where mutations occur that are known to be unstable, such as location  315, which tends to accumulate random insertions and is ignored because of its known instability.

When multiple people share an exactly identical signature, meaning all of the same mutations, they are shown within a haplotype “F” cluster to provide additional specificity to the tree.

The haplotype has been designed to provide additional granularity to the tree and genealogically relevant information. The haplotype “Fxxxxxx” numbers are randomly generated and have no special meaning.

A word of caution here. While the haplotype sequences are identical, it is still possible that another tester from outside the cluster could be a closer relative. For example, they could have accumulated a fast mutating SNP in the last few generations, which would give them a different signature.

Someone who is actually genealogically close to you may be in a different haplotype, or no haplotype at all because no one matches them exactly. For example, if your aunt or sister has a heteroplasmy, they are a close relative and will be in your haplogroup, but won’t be in your haplotype cluster because of the heteroplasmy. So don’t ignore matches who aren’t in your haplotype.

In the above example, under haplogroup V71b, there is one group of three people of unknown origin, meaning they didn’t enter any location for their earliest known ancestor, plus haplotype F9712482 – all of whom are identical matches to each other, but don’t form a new haplogroup.

Beneath V71b is haplogroup V71b1 with nine people, plus two haplotype clusters. F1965416 consists of two people, and F8189900 consists of 16 people.

You can also see haplotype clusters bracketed on any of the Time Trees in mtDNA Discover as well.

More to Come

There’s more information to come in the next few days and weeks, and at RootsTech. I’ll be writing articles when I get back.

For now, take a look to see if you have a new haplogroup. The new haplogroup rollout is being staggered, and you should receive an email when yours has been posted. But there’s no need to wait. Go ahead, sign in and check now, check out mtDNA Discover, and have fun.

Guaranteed, you’ll learn something new, and you may discover the key to a new ancestor!

Resources

Here are additional resources about the new Mitotree, mtDNA Discover, and the associated updates:

_____________________________________________________________

Share the Love!

You’re always welcome to forward articles or links to friends and share on social media.

If you haven’t already subscribed (it’s free,) you can receive an e-mail whenever I publish by clicking the “follow” button on the main blog page, here.

You Can Help Keep This Blog Free

I receive a small contribution when you click on some of the links to vendors in my articles. This does NOT increase your price but helps me keep the lights on and this informational blog free for everyone. Please click on the links in the articles or to the vendors below if you are purchasing products or DNA testing.

Thank you so much.

DNA Purchases and Free Uploads

Genealogy Products and Services

My Books

Genealogy Books

Genealogy Research