2025 Genetic Genealogy Retrospective: Wow – What a Year!

2025 has been quite a year in genetic genealogy. Genetic genealogy, per se, really isn’t a separate “thing” anymore. DNA testing is now an integral part of genealogy, with the potential to answer questions that nothing else can!

The 76 articles I wrote in 2025 fall into multiple categories and focus on different topics based on what was happening in the industry.

From my perspective, here are the most notable announcements and trends in genetic genealogy, and genealogy more broadly.

#1 for 2025 – Mitochondrial DNA: The Million Mito Project Released the New Mitotree, Updates, and mtDNA Discover

The biggest genealogy news items this year, both industry-wide and genealogy-changing are definitely the release of the new Mitotree, plus two tree updates. But that’s not all.

In addition, full sequence mitochondrial DNA testers received new Mitotree haplogroups, if appropriate, and everyone received a haplotype – a new feature. Along with Mitotree, FamilyTreeDNA introduced mtDNA Discover which provides 13 individual reports based on your haplogroup and matches.

It’s no wonder that mitochondrial DNA articles led the pack with the most views based on the eleven articles about that topic. If you haven’t yet tested your mitochondrial DNA at FamilyTreeDNA, there’s no better time! You never know what you’re going to discover and the more testers, the more matches for everyone.

You don’t know what you don’t know, and you’ll never know if you don’t test. Remember, mitochondrial DNA is for both males and females and tests your mother’s direct matrilineal line (mother to mother to mother, etc.) – reaching beyond known surnames.  Click here to order or upgrade.

#2 – MyHeritage Low Pass Whole Genome Sequence Test Charges into the Future

Another big hitter is the new MyHeritage low-pass whole genome test (WGS) test. It’s new and innovative, but we haven’t seen comparative results yet.

My results from the new low-pass whole genome test just came back, and I haven’t had the opportunity to review them yet, as compared to the earlier tests. That said, I do have roughly the same number of matches, but I need to determine if they are the same matches, and how well they track. I’ll be working on that review soon.

The new whole genome test may be more about future proofing and preparedness than additional current benefit – but we will see. I definately wanted to take the whole genome test so I can receive and benefit from whatever new is coming down the pike.

MyHeritage allows you to maintain multiple DNA tests on your account, so the new whole genome won’t “replace” your older or uploaded test. That way, you can easily compare the results of the whole genome against any DNA test that you curently have at MyHeritage.

Click here to order the new test.

#3 – 23andMe Experiences Problems

On a less positive note, but still quite newsworthy is the bankruptcy of 23andMe and subsequent repurchase of 23andMe by the original founder after setting up a new nonprofit. I have real mixed feelings about this topic. However, 23andMe was really never about genealogy, and now, matching segment information is no longer available. Those searching for unknown parents or family may want to test there if they are unsuccessful elsewhere.

Best Genealogy Tool

The FamilySearch full text search continues to have a HUGE impact for genealogists. This tool is not one-and-done, but provides increasing amounts of rich information as more records are added to the “fully scanned” collection. If you haven’t tried it, please do. It’s a game-changer and continues to improve.

A Cautionary Word About AI – Artificial Intelligence

AI is such a hot topic right now that I feel it needs to be included.

The FamilySearch full text search uses a form of AI. However, you’ll quickly notice that it can’t read everything, gets words and names wrong, and if you actually need to fully depend on it for accuracy, you cannot. (That said, it’s still an amazing tool, and I’m not picking on FamilySearch.)

Aside from FamilySearch, AI in its current form is both wonderful and terrible. I’ll be writing about AI in the new year, but for now, don’t ever rely on AI for anything that you can’t verity. It’s your assistant, not an expert, no matter how insistent it is. Never trust and always verify.

This is ESPECIALLY TRUE WHEN RELATED TO GENETICS and genetic related topics. I can’t even begin to tell you how very wrong it has been, and how much people fall in love with inaccurate results. No, just no – at least for now.

You need to know your AI tool, your skill set, your understanding of AI broadly, the tool’s limitations, and yours, and that’s all before verifying the actual AI results. If you want to educate yourself, and everyone should, treat yourself to anything, anyplace by either Mark Thompson or Steve Little, the dynamic AI duo. They offer YouTube videos and classes in a wide variety of places – but keep in mind that AI tools and technology literally change every few weeks.

AI is, indeed, a specialty all unto itself, much like genetic genealogy. And right now, it’s not soup yet, but it is cooking.

Tried and True Genetic Genealogy Staples – DNAPrint and Genetic Affairs

I haven’t written about either one this year, but I use both DNAPainter and Genetic Affairs regularly.

I consistently paint segments from matches at both MyHeritage, FamilyTreeDNA, and GEDmatch that are newly identified to an ancestor or ancestral couple at DNAPainter.

Unfortunately, neither Ancestry nor 23andMe provide matching cM location information for your matches (chromosome browser), but you may find some people who have tested at those companies at both FamilyTreeDNA and GEDmatch if they have uploaded to either of those vendors. Both vendors provide segment information and a Chromosome Browser, enabling you to paint that information to DNAPainter when you can identify your common ancestor.

MyHeritage also provides a Chromosome Browser, but unfortunately, no longer accepts uploads from any other vendor. You can paint segments from MyHeritage, but no longer upload DNA files to MyHeritage.

Thanks to DNAPainter, I have 90% of my segments identified to specific ancestors – which is actually rather remarkable given that my mother’s grandfather was a Dutch immigrant, and her great-grandparents on her other side were German immigrants, meaning we don’t have many matches on either of those lines.

Genetic Affairs continues to develop new, advanced clustering tools, one of which I’ll be reviewing soon.

Major Vendor Releases

Aside from what’s listed above, most of the major vendors released new features.

MyHeritage released a VERY COOL new tool called Cousin Finder that finds your relatives in the MyHeritage database, whether they match you on a DNA test, or not. They may not have even taken a DNA test. Cousin Finder identifies your common ancestor and shows your relationships. It’s a wonderful way to initiate communications, discuss your common ancestors, and ask about DNA testing.

Of my 378 Cousin Finder matches, only 23 (about 6%) are on my DNA match list, so that leaves 355 people to message, several of whom represent Y-DNA and mtDNA lines I don’t have. You can bet I’ll be offering testing scholarships.

Additionally, MyHeritage released a new ethnicity version.

FamilyTreeDNA, in addition to the new Mitotree, Discover, and associated features, released a new match matrix so you can see if and how selected matches are related to each other in a grid format. In other words, you can create your own cluster.

A new built-in “Share” feature blurs private information to make sharing easier both on the website and in Discover.

Discover improvements include thousands of new Y-DNA and mtDNA tree branches, plus thousands of new Ancient DNA samples. Discover is evergreen, so once you’ve taken that Big Y-700 test or the mitochondrial DNA test, your learning never stops as more content is added.

Tree integration with WikiTree is super-easy and means you don’t have to choose between trees. You can choose to retain your archived tree at FamilyTreeDNA, or move your tree to MyHeritage, PLUS link yourself to your family at WikiTree.

Ancestry released match clustering and a new beta pedigree view of ThruLines, but that’s back in the shop for more work. I’d expect to see it rereleased in 2026.

Conferences

RootsTech is the granddaddy of genealogy conferences, and it’s always fun to attend and write about the experience. Many vendors release new tools or products during the conference.

The ECGGC (East Coast Genetic Genealogy Conference), held in the fall, is the only conference that focuses entirely on genetic genealogy, new tools, how to use existing tools, and more. The 2025 conference was virtual and provided a great deal of focused content. Attendees particularly appreciate the deep dive in a particular topic presented in DNA Academy.

I’ll be at RootsTech in 2026, will write about that soon, and hope to see you there.

Concepts, Techniques and Plain Old Genealogy

In the past, my Concepts series and genealogy “how to” articles have been very popular, so, in 2025, I penned a half-dozen articles focusing on frequently asked questions about relationships and DNA.

For example, how does one go about finding DNA testing candidates? The number of options may surprise you and includes both Cousin Finder and Relatives at RootsTech.

By testing ONE PERSON for either Y-DNA or mitochondrial DNA that represents an ancestor, you actually receive information about that entire lineage of ancestors. So, on my Estes line, by locating an Estes male from my line to test, I received relevant information for every Estes male in my line, back to and beyond the progenitor.

Eventually, we hit a brick wall in every line, and those tools are the perfect way to break through those brick walls.

Other articles discuss things like how to use Discover’s Ancient Connections, and the difference between half and full relationships, both in your tree and genetically. Plus, what does a cousin “once removed” mean anyway? And why do I care?

Another question I receive is how far back, based on the shared amount of DNA, should I look in my matches’ trees for our common ancestor? In other words, how many generations back should I click? That article was fun and produced some unexpected results.

Memorial Articles

Because we are part of a community, I write memorial articles when one of our friends passes on. This year, sadly, Schelly Talalay Dardashti, well-known Jewish genealogist, and another very close friend joined the ancestors, so I’ve recognized the best in both of their lives which constitutes their legacy.

Be the Storyteller

Last, but not least, I wrote about my ancestors in the “52 Ancestors” series, which launched several years ago with Amy Johnson Crow’s challenge to write about one ancestor per week. She hosts this every year, and you can join (free) now.

I’m now on ancestor #467, so yes, it’s addictive, but it’s also AMAZING how many wonderful cousins I’ve met who have information that I did not. Not only that, but after publishing about an ancestor, I’ve discovered that I’m related to people I’ve known for years. We were SOOOooo excited!

I’ve been writing about the lives of my ancestors for several years now, and the articles include attempts to identify Y-DNA and mtDNA testers for each ancestor, where appropriate. There’s so much to learn that can’t be revealed any other way.

Plus, people seem to like the “mystery” and “short story” aspect, and I salt each story with the history of the region and relevant historical events of the timeframe. You might find your ancestors here too, or other helpful information.

Find a way to share about your ancestors!

Do You Have Suggestions for 2026 Topics?

Do you have suggestions or requests for article topics in 2026? If so, please comment on this article and let me know.

Check Out the 2025 List

Here’s the list of the 2025 articles. Did you miss something fun? Enjoy!

  Title Category Date Link
1 Welcome to 2025 – Opportunities and New Genetic Genealogy Articles Welcome, general 1-2-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/01/02/welcome-to-2025-opportunities-and-new-genetic-genealogy-articles/
2 Anne Doucet (1713-1791), Oceans, Rivers, and Perseverance – 52 Ancestors #438 52 Ancestors 1-4-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/01/04/anne-doucet-1713-1791-oceans-rivers-and-perseverance-52-ancestors-438/
3 Register for RootsTech 2025 Now RootsTech 1-16-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/01/16/register-for-rootstech-2025-now/
4 What IS the McNeil Family History, by George Franklin McNeil – 52 Ancestors #439 52 Ancestors 1-19-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/01/20/what-is-the-mcneil-family-history-by-george-franklin-mcneil-52-ancestors-439/
5 Jean Garceau dit Tranchemontagne (c1785-1711), Soldier from Saint Marseault – 52 Ancestors #440 52 Ancestors 1-29-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/01/29/jean-garceau-dit-tranchemontagne-c1785-1711-soldier-from-saint-marseault-52-ancestors-440/
6 Memories Resurface When the Old Family Home Gets a Facelift Genealogy 2-3-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/02/03/memories-resurface-when-the-old-family-home-gets-a-facelift/
7 MyHeritage Introduces Ethnicity v2.5 MyHeritage 2-6-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/02/06/myheritage-introduces-ethnicity-v2-5/
8 Relatives at RootsTech Reveals Cousins and Provides DNA Candidates RootsTech, techniques 2-8-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/02/08/relatives-at-rootstech-reveals-cousins-and-provides-dna-candidates/
9 FamilyTreeDNA’s New Matrix Shows How Your Matches Are Related to Each Other FamilyTreeDNA 2-12-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/02/12/familytreednas-new-matrix-shows-how-your-matches-are-related-to-each-other/
10 René Doucet (c1680-c1731), Lifetime of Incessant Upheaval – 52 Ancestors #441 52 Ancestors 2-15-2024 https://dna-explained.com/2025/02/16/rene-doucet-c1680-c1731-lifetime-of-incessant-upheaval-52-ancestors-441/
11 Lineages Versus Ancestors – How to Find and Leverage Yours Techniques 2-23-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/02/23/lineages-versus-ancestors-how-to-find-and-leverage-yours/
12 Mitotree is Born Mitochondrial DNA 2-25-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/02/25/mitotree-is-born/
13 RootsTech 2025 – The Year of Discover and the New Mitotree RootsTech, Mitochondrial DNA 3-14-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/03/15/rootstech-2025-the-year-of-discover-and-the-new-mitotree/
14 Pierre Doucet (c1621-1713), Walking History Book Lived to Nearly 100 – 52 Ancestors #442 3-16-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/03/16/pierre-doucet-c1621-1713-walking-history-book-lived-to-nearly-!100-52-ancestors-442/
15 Welcome to the New FamilyTreeDNA mtDNA Group Mitochondrial DNA 3-17-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/03/17/welcome-to-the-new-familytreedna-mtdna-group/
16 23andMe Files for Bankruptcy – What You Need to Know! 23andMe 3-24-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/03/25/23andme-files-for-bankruptcy-what-you-need-to-know/
17 New “Share” Features at FamilyTreeDNA Blur Match Information and Make Sharing Easy FamilyTreeDNA 4-1-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/04/01/new-share-features-at-familytreedna-blur-match-information-and-make-sharing-easy/
18 The Chauvet Cave: Trip Back in Time with Prehistoric European Humans – Are We Related? History, DNA 4-6-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/04/06/the-chauvet-cave-trip-back-in-time-with-prehistoric-european-humans-are-we-related/
19 DNA for Native American Genealogy Webinar & Companion Book Native American 4-8-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/04/08/dna-for-native-american-genealogy-webinar-companion-book/
20 Marie Levron (c1686-1727), Tragedy from Cradle to Grave – 52 Ancestors #443 52 Ancestors 4-14-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/04/14/marie-levron-c1686-1727-tragedy-from-cradle-to-grave-52-ancestors-443/
21 Mitochondrial DNA: What is a Haplotype Cluster and How Do I Find and Use Mine Mitochondrial DNA 4-14-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/04/14/mitochondrial-dna-what-is-a-haplotype-cluster-and-how-do-i-find-and-use-mine/
22 New Mitotree Haplogroups and How to Utilize Them for Genealogy Mitochondrial DNA 4-23-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/04/23/new-mitotree-haplogroups-and-how-to-utilize-them-for-genealogy/
23 Sir Francois Levron dit Nantois(c1651-1714), and Acadia’s Pirate – 52 Ancestors #444 52 Ancestors 4-26-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/04/27/sir-francois-levron-dit-nantois-c1651-1714-and-acadias-pirate-52-ancestors-444/
24 Catherine Savoie (c1661-c1722/25), Whispered Threads Weave a Tapestry of Life – 52 Ancestors #445 52 Ancestors 5-4-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/05/04/catherine-savoie-c1661-c1722-5-whispered-threads-weave-a-tapestry-of-life-52-ancestors-445/
25 Discover’s Ancient Connections – How Are You Related? Discover, Ancient DNA 5-8-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/05/08/discovers-ancient-connections-how-are-you-related/
26 Mother’s Day and Legacies 52 Ancestors, Genealogy 5-10-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/05/11/mothers-day-and-legacies/
27 The Mystery of the Blue Fugates and Smiths: A Study in Blue Genes and Pedigree Collapse Genetics, Genealogy 5-18-1015 https://dna-explained.com/2025/05/19/the-mystery-of-the-blue-fugates-and-smiths-a-study-in-blue-genes-and-pedigree-collapse/
28 Regeneron Wins Bid for Bankrupt 23andMe – Wedding Planned 23andMe 5-19-2023 https://dna-explained.com/2025/05/19/regeneron-wins-bid-for-bankrupt-23andme-wedding-planned/
29 Francois Savoie’s Homestead Rediscovered – 52 Ancestors #446 52 Ancestors 5-24-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/05/24/francois-savoies-homestead-rediscovered-52-ancestors-446/
30 Memorial Day – Some Gave All Memorial 5-25-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/05/25/memorial-day-some-gave-all/
31 Mitotree Webinar – What It Is, How We Did It, and What Mitotree Means to You Mitochondrial DNA 6-4-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/06/04/mitotree-webinar-what-it-is-how-we-did-it-and-what-mitotree-means-to-you/
32 Catherine LeJeune (c1633-1671/1686), Meet Your Grandchildren – 52 Ancestors #447 52 Ancestors 6-7-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/06/07/catherine-lejeune-c1633-1671-1686-meet-your-grandchildren-52-ancestors-447/
33 Mitotree Q&A for Everyone Mitochondrial DNA 6-11-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/06/11/mitotree-qa-for-everyone/
34 Father’s Day: Bravery and Love 52 Ancestors, Genealogy 6-14-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/06/14/fathers-day-bravery-and-love/
35 Francoise Bourgeois (c1659-1693/1697), High Drama in Beaubassin and Terror at Port Royal – 52 Ancestors #448 52 Ancestors 6-16-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/06/16/francoise-bourgeois-c1659-1693-97-high-drama-in-beaubassin-and-terror-at-port-royal-52-ancestors-448/
36 Requesting Suggestions for RootsTech 2026 Topics RootsTech 6-18-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/06/18/requesting-suggestions-for-rootstech-2026-topics/
37 FamilyTreeDNA and WikiTree Collaboration – In Two Easy Steps!! FamilyTreeDNA, WikiTree 6-25-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/06/25/familytreedna-and-wikitree-collaboration-in-two-easy-steps/
38 Jacques Bourgeois (c1620-c1700), Surgeon of Port Royal – 52 Ancestors #449 52 Ancestors 7-1-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/07/01/jacques-bourgeois-c1620-c1700-surgeon-of-port-royal-52-ancestors-449/
39 TTAM, a Nonprofit Formed by 23andMe’s Founder Now Plans to Buy 23andMe 23andMe 7-1-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/07/01/ttam-a-nonprofit-formed-by-23andmes-founder-now-plans-to-buy-23andme/
40 Jacques Bourgeois: Complex Acadian, Founder of Beaubassin – 52 Ancestors #450 52 Ancestors 7-6-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/07/06/jacques-bourgeois-complex-acadian-founder-of-beaubassin-52-ancestors-450/
41 How to Use Ancestry’s New Match Clusters and What They Mean Ancestry 7-10-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/07/10/how-to-use-ancestrys-new-match-clusters-and-what-they-mean/
42 Walk with Your Ancestors: Peace, Light and Healing in an Abandoned Medieval Village History 7-21-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/07/21/walk-with-your-ancestors-peace-light-and-healing-in-an-abandoned-medieval-village/
43 Jeanne Trahan (c1629-c1699), Life in Chinon, La Heve, Port Royal, and Beaubassin – 52 Ancestors #451 52 Ancestors 8-2-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/07/28/jeanne-trahan-c1629-c1699-life-in-chinon-la-heve-port-royal-and-beaubassin-52-ancestors-451/
44 Wherefore Art Thou, Oh Ancestor – New Generation Tree Chart Suggests Where to Look in Your Matches’ Trees Techniques, Genetics, Genealogy 8-2-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/08/02/wherefore-art-thou-oh-ancestor-new-generation-tree-chart-suggests-where-to-look-in-your-matches-trees/
45 Guillaume Trahan (c1601-1625), More Than Meets the Eye – 52 Ancestors #452 52 Ancestors 8-13-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/08/13/guillaume-trahan-c1601-c1684-more-than-meets-the-eye-52-ancestor-452/ 
46 The East Coast Genetic Genealogy Conference – ECGGC – Register Now for the Best of the Best ECGGC Conference 8-14-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/08/14/the-east-coast-genetic-genealogy-conference-ecggc-register-now-for-the-best-of-the-best/
47 Schelly Talalay Dardashti – May Her Memory Be a Blessing Memorial 8-17-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/08/17/schelly-talalay-dardashti-may-her-memory-be-a-blessing/
48 Francoise Corbineau (c1609-c1665), Bride in Chinon, Founder of Acadia – 52 Ancestors #453 52 Ancestors 8-25-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/08/23/francoise-corbineau-c1609-c1665-bride-in-chinon-founder-of-acadia-52-ancestors-453/
49 Nicolas Trahan (c1570->1632), Life in the Heart of French Wine Country – 52 Ancestors #454 52 Ancestors 8-31-2015 https://dna-explained.com/2025/08/31/nicolas-trahan-c1570-1632-life-in-the-heart-of-french-wine-country-52-ancestors-454/
50 Mitochondrial DNA A-Z: A Step-by-Step Guide to Matches, Mitotree, and mtDNA Discover Mitochondrial DNA, Discover, Genealogy, Techniques 10-2-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/09/02/mitochondrial-dna-a-z-a-step-by-step-guide-to-matches-mitotree-and-mtdna-discover/
51 Renée Desloges (c1570-1627/1632), Fragments of Life in Montreuil-Bellay – 52 Ancestors #454 (this is actually 455) 52 Ancestors 9-6-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/09/06/renee-desloges-c1570-1627-1632-fragments-of-life-in-montreuil-bellay-52-ancestors-454/
52 Best Mitochondrial DNA Presentation EVER – You’re Invited to DNA Academy!! Mitochondrial DNA 9-9-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/09/09/best-mitochondrial-dna-presentation-ever-youre-invited-to-dna-academy/
53 Unfillable Shoes Memorial – Douglas Rhodenbaugh 9-14-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/09/14/unfillable-shoes/
54 Concepts: What Does a Cousin “Once Removed” Mean? Concepts, Genealogy 9-24-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/09/24/concepts-what-does-a-cousin-once-removed-mean/
55 Daniel Vannoy (1752-after 1820), “Lived in the Boundary of the Cherokee Indians” – Say What??? 52 Ancestors 9-29-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/09/29/daniel-vannoy-1752-after-1820-lived-in-the-boundary-of-the-cherokee-indians-say-what/
56 Daniel Vannoy and the Strange Case of the Two Sarahs – 52 Ancestors #457 52 Ancestors 10-5-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/10/06/daniel-vannoy-and-the-strange-case-of-the-two-sarahs-52-ancestors-457/
57 Cousin Finder – MyHeritage’s Innovative New Tool Finds Your Relatives MyHeritage 10-9-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/10/09/cousin-finder-myheritages-innovative-new-tool-finds-your-relatives/
58 Sarah Hickerson Vannoy (c1761 – after 1826), Threw More than Shade – 52 Ancestors #458 52 Ancestors https://dna-explained.com/2025/10/13/sarah-hickerson-vannoy-c1761-after-1826-threw-more-than-shade-52-ancestors-458/
59 MyHeritage Introduces a Low-Pass Whole Genome Autosomal DNA Test & Why It Matters MyHeritage 10-14-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/10/14/myheritage-introduces-a-low-pass-whole-genome-autosomal-dna-test-why-it-matters/
60 Henriette Pelletret (c1640 – before 1694), Life Death in the Shadow of the Fort – 52 Ancestors #459 52 Ancestors 10-21-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/10/21/henriette-pelletret-c1640-before-1694-life-and-death-in-the-shadow-of-the-fort-52-ancestor-459/
61 Cheat Sheet: Mitochondrial Matches, Haplotype Clusters, and Haplogroups Mitochondrial DNA 10-22-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/10/22/cheat-sheet-mitochondrial-matches-haplotype-clusters-and-haplogroups/
62 Simon Pelletret (1610-1642/1645): A Walk Through Port Royal – 52 Ancestors #460 52 Ancestors 10-27-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/10/27/simon-pelletret-c1610-1642-1645-a-walk-through-port-royal-52-ancestors-460/
63 Perrine Bourg (c1626-1693/1698): Phoenix Rising from the Ashes – 52 Ancestors #461 52 Ancestors 11-2-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/11/02/perrine-bourg-c1626-1693-1698-phoenix-rising-from-the-ashes-52-ancestors-461/
64 Concepts: What is a Half Relationships, Life Half First Cousins, Anyway? Concepts, Genealogy 11-4-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/11/04/concepts-what-is-a-half-relationship-like-half-first-cousins-anyway/
65 Marie Broussard (1686-after 1752), Life Across the River from Port Royal – 52 Ancestors #462 52 Ancestors 11-10-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/11/10/marie-broussard-1686-after-1752-life-across-the-river-from-port-royal-52-ancestors-462/
66 Francois Broussard (1653-1716), Intractable Acadian – 52 Ancestors #463 52 Ancestors 11-22-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/11/22/francois-broussard-1653-1716-intractable-acadian-52-ancestors-463/
67 Mitotree Sprouts 12,773 New Branches and Includes Ancient DNA Mitochondrial DNA 11-24-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/11/24/mitotree-sprouts-12773-new-branches-and-includes-ancient-dna/
68 Catherine Richard (c1663 – after 1714), Mother of Beausoleil, Acadian Freedom Fighters – 52 Ancestors #464 52 Ancestors 11-29-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/11/29/catherine-richard-c1663-after-1714-mother-of-beausoleil-acadian-freedom-fighters-52-ancestors-464/
69 Ancestry’s ThruLines Has a New Pedigree View Ancestry 12-2-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/12/03/ancestrys-thrulines-has-a-new-pedigree-view/
70 Ancestry Reverts ThruLines to the Original View Ancestry 12-6-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/12/06/ancestry-reverts-thrulines-to-the-original-view/
71 Michel Richard (c1630-1686/1689), Carefree Acadian – 52 Ancestors #465 52 Ancestors 12-7-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/12/08/michel-richard-dit-sansoucy-c1630-1686-1689-carefree-acadian-52-ancestors-465/ 
72 Mitochondrial DNA: How Do I Know if I’m a Candidate to Receive a New Haplogroup? Mitochondrial DNA 12-9-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/12/09/mitochondrial-dna-how-do-i-know-if-im-a-candidate-to-receive-a-new-haplogroup/
73 Heavens Ablaze: the 1833 Leonid Meteor Storm and Your Ancestors History, Genealogy 12-15-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/12/15/heavens-ablaze-the-1833-leonid-meteor-storm-and-your-ancestors/
74 Madelaine Blanchard (c1643 – 1678/1683), Gone Too Soon – 52 Ancestors #466 52 Ancestors 12-20-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/12/20/madelaine-blanchard-c1643-1678-1683-gone-too-soon-52-ancestors-466/
75 Soar Inspiration 12-24-2025 https://dna-explained.com/2025/12/24/soar/

_____________________________________________________________

Share the Love!

You’re always welcome to forward articles or links to friends and share on social media.

Subscribe!

If you haven’t already subscribed, it’s free. You’ll receive an e-mail whenever I publish by clicking the “follow” button at the top of the main blog page, here.

Help Keep This Blog Free

I receive a small commission when you click a vendor link in my articles and purchase that item. This does NOT increase your price but helps me keep the lights on and this informational blog free for everyone. Please click on the affiliate links in the articles or to the vendors below if you are purchasing products or DNA testing.

Thank you so much.

DNA Purchases and Free Uploads

Genealogy Products and Services

My Books

Genealogy Books

Genealogy Research

Soar

Many people are struggling this year, often in ways that aren’t visible to anyone else. For countless reasons, the holidays can be especially difficult, especially in the face of loss, and when grief and long-held pain rise uninvited to the surface.

Keep in mind that most people will never let on. Often plastering on their happy face or retreating into silence – especially if something painful happens. Pain doesn’t just include things that occurred recently, but can be layered over time, like a cake or an onion. And sometimes all it takes is one harsh word, or too many memories, to pull you back to that awful place.

I hope you’re not among those battling sadness or despair this holiday season. But if you are, I’ve written this article of encouragement particularly for you. That said, it applies to everyone, because we’re all human and after all, this is the holidays! Trust me – this ends on a postive note. But first, I need to explain.

When I was young, my environment was bathed in “can’t”.

You’re too young…

You’re a female, so you can’t…

Ladies don’t…

We’re not going to waste a perfectly good advanced-placement (college prep) seat on a girl…

You’re too fat, skinny… (or fill in the blank)

You can’t…

We don’t hire…

So glad you’re a female, so we can pay you less… (Yes, this really happened more than once.)

You’re not <something> enough! (Says it all!)

The voices, if there were any, saying I was good enough, smart enough, talented enough, or even simply welcome, were drowned out by the others, and the toxic culture I was steeped in, where all of this was “normal.” If any encouraging voices were there, I couldn’t hear them in the cacophony of both direct and implied criticism.

Every single one landed like a blow, bruising my heart.

People either don’t understand, or don’t care that words can cut deeper than any knife ever could. Directly into your soul. Inflicting wounds that don’t heal and instead fester over time.

Words you hear again and again when the next person says something similar. No matter how many years later.

One Voice

But there was one voice. The man who fate sent to become the wind beneath my wings. The man who secured his forever legacy through his encouragement and kindness when no one else was there.

When he uttered those life-altering words to me, I was a young, single mother, having escaped a horrifically abusive marriage and was battling my way through college by working two jobs. I was both incredibly tired and unbelievably discouraged.

I repeatedly heard “can’t”, “shouldn’t”, and saw the disapproving glances everywhere. People were incredulous that I even considered the possibility that I could or should. What was wrong with me anyway?

They were all perfectly willing to explain what I “should” be doing, “shouldn’t” be doing, or best case, treating me like I was invisible. Silence still conveys a message, but it’s one notch better than continuing to be beaten with a hammer.

I heard a lot of “If you would just…” or “You should…”

Not one person encouraged me or asked if they could help.

Except him.

God bless that man for changing my life.

The Decision

I was visiting my folks one hot August day when I was trying to make what I knew would be a life-changing decision.

No female was ever encouraged to make something better of her life, let alone move away to do so. If you absolutely HAD TO go to college, you should be a teacher or nurse, a traditional female career. Certainly NOT an engineer, scientist, or something similar. Even applying for admission to those schools earned you a battle that required a warrior to win.

I worked very hard, maintaining stellar grades despite numerous challenges, and received an offer for a professional position as a systems engineer. My dream job. That was exactly what I had worked towards. The catch was that I’d have to move out of state.

Me, and my two young children.

Alone.

I was terrified. Not that there was much support where I lived, but my folks were there, and I knew my way around. The devil you know versus one far away. In a new place, I’d literally be starting over again.

In the echo chamber of my mind, all those negative words and criticisms that I had been peppered with all of my life were bouncing around.

“You’ll never make anything of yourself.” (Teacher)

“Girls don’t become scientists. <snicker> Pick something else.” (Different teacher)

“Why would you do that to your children?” (To give them a better life, so they don’t have to deal with this.)

“Why don’t you just settle down and get married?” (Hello, I did that once already.)

“Just do what your husband says.” (Neighbor, after the police were called when the former husband beat me.)

“Why can’t you just behave?” (Family member)

“Girls like you are the reason there’s unemployment. You’re taking all the jobs that belong to men.” (Quote from my brother’s mouth. I can’t even. And no, he was not kidding.)

My Dad

The most unlikely person you’d ever expect to be an advocate in these circumstances would be an old Hoosier farmer – but there he was.

Dad, seated with Spot, Mom in blue, with her Aunt Eloise Lore about 1980

My stepfather, Dean Long.

A man of very few words. The local prankster who graduated from high school, married, and stayed on the farm. He never set foot out of Indiana until he came to visit me, button-busting proud, a year or so later – in that distant state.

That fateful day is forever burned into my mind.

I was sitting on the blue and white metal lawn furniture in the yard outside the back door on the farm, “snapping beans.” The beans were in a towel in my lap. The bucket on one side was for the ends and strings that would be fed to the hogs, and the other bucket was for the beans that would be snapped into bite-sized pieces and cooked.

Mom was inside, probably cooking.

Dad had been at the barn, doing something.

My oldest child was playing on a tree swing nearby, and the youngest was inside napping.

It was beastly hot. No AC in that farmhouse.

I was rolling the various options around in my head, like a worry stone, wrapped in my fear, uncertainty, and insecurity. I kept hearing all of those things I had been told forever, over and over again. I was terrified.

What should I do?

What if I failed?

What if something bad happened to my children?

Of course, I had a logical “answer” for each of these things, and I fully realized that the only way “out” of systemic and generational poverty was through applied education.

However, logic and emotion are two entirely different animals, and I didn’t know how much was fear. Was I being foolish? Or wise? I had no idea.

This was truly the fork in the road, and I knew it.

Based on all of those voices, it seemed like heresy to even try, but then again, how could I NOT try?

I knew that my mother did not want me to move. No one wants their child to move away. She wanted me to be happy and safe, but there, where I could snap beans on Sunday afternoon and she could watch her grandchildren play outside the window, not someplace else.

But I wasn’t safe, by any definition of the word, and neither were my children.

An entire audience of people would love to see me fail and get my “comeuppance”, being one of those “liberated women,” and all.

If I didn’t take advantage of the opportunity, fighting so hard and against nearly insurmountable odds for my education would have been for naught. All those late nights. Multiple jobs. I wasn’t fighting only for myself, but for opportunities for my children in some place where opportunity existed – which was not where I lived. I didn’t want my daughter to endure what I had – and be expected to just shut up and take it.

Haven’t our ancestors been seeking better opportunities for generations?

I certainly wasn’t the only one, but I was very alone as I sat there, mulling the options and possibilities, both positive and negative.

I had talked to my parents about my looming decision and its ramifications, but I still had no idea what to do. I knew deciding either way would change my life – my children’s lives – and probably the lives of my parents too.

Dad was walking up from the barn towards the house. The small, uneven, sidewalk had a slight incline, so he moved slowly. He always wore overalls in the barn and took them off in the mudroom, between the back step and the kitchen. There was a sink there too for washing up.

Dad walked up beside me. I looked up and smiled at him, that smile that says, “I’m smiling externally, but I’m really very torn inside.”

My eyes were probably puffy. That decision-making process was agony.

Dad stopped and said:

Bobbi, don’t ever let anyone tell you that you can’t do something. You can do anything you set your mind to. You’re going to change the world.

I just looked at him, incredulous and truly speechless.

In an affectionate gesture, he thunked me gently on the shoulder with his thumb in passing, then just shuffled on into the house. The screen door clacking shut behind him.

Not another word was said.

He didn’t need to say any more.

He said it all.

Hot tears streamed down my cheeks, dripping onto the beans. I didn’t know why then, but I do now.

That may well have been the first time I had ever received direct, outright encouragement from anyone. Not only that, but he had complete faith in me. Far, far more faith than I had in myself.

My Dad saved me that day.

He is directly responsible for me taking that terrifying leap into the unknown future… a journey that, step by step, year by year, led me here.

He became the wind beneath my wings and sealed his legacy that day.

So, when you have the opportunity, choose words of kindness and encouragement.

Be that wind, lifting others up.

Soar

You don’t need permission to fly.

Ignore the naysayers.

Fill your life with those who are the wind beneath your wings.

Listen for that one uplifting voice in the darkness.

That clarion call.

Everyone has wings.

A majestic eagle,

A raven carrying light into the world,

A sparrow battered by the storm,

Or a graceful butterfly.

The wings are yours.

The sky belongs to no one.

It beckons you to take flight

Even when the wind is faint

And the night feels long.

Believe you can.

Because you can

Soar!

Madelaine Blanchard (c1643 – 1678/1683), Gone Too Soon – 52 Ancestors #466

Madelaine (also spelled Madeleine) Blanchard was born to Jean Blanchard and Radegonde Lambert about 1643, probably in Port Royal, Acadia.

Madelaine grew up right beside the fort, on the waterfront in Port Royal, at least for the first several years of her life. Her family’s home stood right about here, on the other side of the erosion-prevention boulders, back on higher ground out of the photo at right. Every Acadian had at least some access to the waterfront, and her family’s was here.

Madelaine would have scampered down to the river, perhaps searched for pretty rocks, taken off her shoes, and waded in the water.

How do we know where the Blanchard land was located?

Locating the Blanchard Land

When a new fort was being built in 1705, several lots were expropriated, including one owned by Jean Blanchard, which was located between Simon Pelletret and Guillaume Trahan, founding families of Acadia.

These families were among the earliest arrivals, establishing themselves in Port Royal when Charles d’Aulnay relocated the seat of Acadia from La Hève to Port Royal between 1636 and 1640. Their neighbor, Guillaume Trahan, arrived in Acadia in 1636, so it stands to reason that the men who received these fort-side premier real estate lots were the earliest arrivals and settlers in Port Royal.

Madelaine would have grown up playing along the Port Royal waterfront, as viewed here from across the river.

Born about 1643, Madeleine was an infant, or not yet born, during the Acadian Civil War from 1640-1645, but she would have been an eyewitness to the events of 1654.

The English Invasion

In July of 1654, when Madelaine was about 11, the English sailed up the river and anchored right in front of her home, in the part of the river shown above.

The Acadians had one day’s advance warning, because Emmanuel Le Borgne had been in the process of attacking the rival French fort of Saint John, across the bay, when the English arrived to do the same. French on French warfare was an ugly family feud, but the English attack was another matter altogether.

For better or worse, instead of staying to help defend Fort Saint John against the English, Le Borgne scooted back home to Port Royal.

After taking Fort Saint John, the English arrived in Port Royal to find French soldiers and Acadian men poised to ambush. The 130 men in Port Royal tried their best to fend off the British, but had absolutely no chance against more than 530 English soldiers. They quickly had to retreat into the fort, and the English laid Port Royal under siege.

We have no idea where the women and children were sheltering, although they may well have been inside the fort too, in the garrison. That’s the typical arrangement. There wasn’t much of anyplace else other than the woods and hills behind the town, or someplace upriver.

The English siege lasted approximately four weeks, from July 13th to August 8th, when Port Royal surrendered.

Given the circumstances, the capitulation terms were generous. The Acadians were to remain unharmed, could retain their property, including homes and livestock, and were permitted to continue worshiping as Catholics. The French soldiers and administrators would be sent back to France, and all property belonging to the French King would become the property of the English.

The English were now in command, but they had not planned ahead for how they would administer Port Royal. Major Robert Sedgwick had not originally planned to attack the French, but did so when the war with the Dutch was settled and New Netherlands became off limits. His warships were ready, and his men itching to go – so he headed for the French Acadian ports.

Sedgwick left a small contingent of Redcoat soldiers at the garrison in Port Royal, and an Acadian delegation in charge. Aside from the English coming and going from time to time, as far as a child like Madelaine was concerned, not much changed.

After the siege was over, Madelaine would have returned home from wherever she had taken shelter with her mother and siblings, but I’d wager that she was forever wary of English ships and English soldiers.

The English would rule Acadia for the next 16 years, but Madeleine was busy with other things.

Madeleine Marries

Madeleine was about 13 in 1656 when she married Michel Richard dit Sansoucy, who probably arrived as a soldier, either with Charles d’Aulnay before his 1650 death, or with Emmanuel Le Borgne, his successor, prior to the 1654 fall of Acadia.

While 13 sounds young today, it wasn’t uncommon for Acadian brides to marry early. There were probably few marriage candidates in Port Royal at the time, so one needed to strike while the iron was hot and a good candidate was available and interested.

Nicolas Denys, an English captive held at Port Royal, said that there were about 270 residents there, and that they were mostly families brought by de Razilly. That would include d’Aulnay who was Razilly’s right-hand-man in Acadia. D’Aulnay served as Governor after Razilly’s 1635 death, which is when he decided to move the seat of Acadia, along with the settlers, from rocky La Hève to fertile Port Royal.

A decade or so later, in 1653, Denys recorded that the Acadians had “multiplied much at Port Royal.” He also added that many had abandoned their houses in the town of Port Royal and settled along the river on farms, specifically around the BelleIsle Marsh. Maybe that’s where the women and children sheltered in 1654. Soldiers never braved the river’s boar tide and rocks beyond Hogg Island at Port Royal. Ocean-going ships could not navigate the river above Port Royal.

The small number of residents in 1654 likely amounted to approximately 30 families, or 60 parents, leaving about 210 children, or roughly 7 per family. Those children would range in age from newborn to approximately 20, implying that there were 10 people in each year age bracket from 0 to 20, with an average of 5 males and 5 females. Therefore, Madeleine either needed to marry a widower, or one of the older male candidates, who typically didn’t marry until they were 25ish.

Michel Richard would have had his choice of a widow or maybe a total of 10 females who were old enough to marry.

That’s not much selection.

We know very little about the earliest church in Port Royal, but the Acadian families knew each other quite well and would have either gathered together in the church, or in the priest’s home, to witness Madelaine and Michel’s marriage and celebrate the joining of their lives.

Weddings were probably social events as well.

1671 Census

In 1667, Acadia was returned to French control via treaty, although functionally that didn’t occur until 1670.

The first Acadian census was taken in 1671, where we obtain our first glimpse of Madelaine herself.

In her parents’ census entry, it’s noted that three of their children are married. Fortunately, French and Acadian women retained their birth surnames, so locating Madeleine in the census was easy.

Madeleine Blanchard, 28, is married to Michel Richard, a farmer, 41, and they have seven children. Rene is 14, so born about 1657, Pierre is 10, Catherine is 8, Martin is 6, Alexandre is 3, and Madeleine has just given birth to twin daughters, Anne and Magdeleine, who are five weeks old.

Madeleine and Michel have 15 cattle, 14 sheep, and farm 14 arpents of land.

It’s challenging to determine precisely where they are living because they are listed beside Abraham Dugas on one side, who we know is the armorer and lives beside the fort, and beside Charles Melanson on the other side, who lives across the river and is married to Abraham Dugas’s daughter. It’s likely that the census taker was canoeing back and forth across the river and not listing residents in house-to-house order.

What the Census Doesn’t Say

There’s a tale of heartbreak hidden in this census, told by blank spaces.

Madelaine would have given birth to another child who should have been 12 and one who should have been 4 – and that’s assuming that each of those children lived long enough to be weaned. Madelaine could have given birth to more children if the baby died shortly after birth, so she would have become pregnant quickly, leaving just a year between births.

There’s also room for a possible child who died in 1670.

By 1671, Madeleine had already buried at least two, if not three, children, the first one when she was only 16, the second at 24, the third one just the year before, when she was 27. I wonder if any of those births were twins, too. Twins are often born underweight.

Childbirth was dangerous for women and children alike, and only about half of the children born survived to marry.

The 1678 Census

The 1678 census is somewhat unusual for Michel Richard and Madeleine Blanchard. Based on the neighbors, they are almost assuredly living in the town of Port Royal.

  1. Their oldest daughter, Catherine Richard, has married Francois Broussard. The newlywed couple has five cattle, but no land, and are listed beside her parents, Michel Richard and Madeleine Blanchard. How do you graze five cows with no land?
  2. Michel Richard and Madeleine Blanchard are listed with no additional information – no children, no livestock, nothing. That’s very odd.
  3. Next, we find Germain Doucet and Marie Landry with a normal listing, including their children, livestock, and land.
  4. Then, the census shows Michel Richard without Madeleine’s name, but WITH four boys and five girls, plus 21 cattle on 10 arpents of land.
  5. Next is Michel Boudrot “at the brook”, who we know lives beside the fort and beside Abraham Dugas.

So, what exactly does this mean? No one else is listed twice, let alone once with and once without a spouse.

Madeleine Blanchard Dies

Based on the next census, taken in 1686, Michel Richard, now 56, has remarried to Jeanne Babin, who is 18. They have been married for at least three years because they have a child who is 2.

This tells us that Madelaine had died by 1683 when Michel remarried.

The strange 1678 census entry might indicate that Madelaine died sometime during the census. Or maybe not.

Michel Richard’s children in the 1686 census who would have been born to Madeleine Blanchard include: Martin, 19, Alexandre, 17, Marie, 12 (born 1674), Cecile, 10 (born 1676), and Marguerite, 7 (born 1679).

Madeleine’s youngest child, Marguerite, is shown as age 7 in 1686, so born in 1679, but in two later censuses, she is shown as born in 1677. This date, which is the most critical for determining Madelaine’s death year, is uncertain because it brackets 1678.

Can we determine anything more?

Unfortunately, the 1678 census only provides a count of children by sex. Let’s retrofit this information for Madelaine’s family.

We know that daughter, Catherine Richard, was married because she was living next door. This leaves a total of 5 girls in the household. Using the 1671 and 1678 censuses, we can account for all daughters, including the youngest, Marguerite. Therefore, we know Marguerite was NOT born in 1679, unless an unknown child was born in 1677 or 1678 and had died by 1686.

Madelaine’s children are as follows:

Child Birth – Death Marriage/Spouse # of Children
Rene Richard 1657 – before 1693 in Port Royal Married Magdelaine Landry about 1680 5 children
Unknown child 1659 – before 1671
Pierre Richard 1661 – after Jan. 1739 in Grand Pre Married Marguerite Landry about 1686 In Minas by 1693 – 10 children
Catherine Richard* 1663 – after 1714 in Port Royal Married Francois Broussard about 1678 11 children
Martin Richard 1665 – before Feb. 1748 in Beaubassin Married Marguerite Bourg about 1691 In Beaubassin by 1695 – 10 children
Unknown child 1667 – before 1671
Alexandre 1668 – October 1709 in Port Royal Married Isabelle Petitpas about 1690 9 children
Possible child 1670 – 1670
Twin, Anne Richard 1671 – 1745 in Grand Pre Married Germain Terriot about 1686 In Minas by 1693 – 11 children
Twin, Magdeleine Richard 1671 – after July 1729 in Grand Pre Married Charles Babin in 1686 In Grand Pre by 1688 – 12 children
Unknown child 1673
Marie-Joseph Richard 1674 – 1709 in Pisiquit Married Michel Vincent about 1689 In Pisiquit by 1690 – 8 children
Cecile Richard 1676 – after 1731 in Pisiquit Married Pierre Forest about 1692 in Pisiquit 9 children
Marguerite Richard 1678 – after June 1731 maybe in Minas Married Jean LeBlanc about 1698 In Grand Pre by 1699 – 10 children

*Catherine Richard’s first child born in 1678 or 1679 may have been born before Catherine’s mother, Madeleine, died. Sadly that child died soon after birth, as did Catherine’s second child born about 1680. Catherine’s first child that lived was born about 1681, although it’s very unlikely that her mother lived that long, given that Madelaine’s last known child that lived, Marguerite, had been born by the 1678 census.

In 1678, Madeleine Blanchard was 35 years old and had given birth recently, within the year, to Marguerite. She had nine children at home, and her oldest daughter had married and was living next door.

Madeleine may have died in 1678, or she may have died anytime between 1678 and 1683 when her husband remarried. Had she been alive during the intervening years, she would have been expected to have borne a child in both 1680 and 1682. For all we know, she did, and they died as well.

If Madeleine did not die in 1678, she would have buried her first grandchild, standing beside her distraught daughter, Catherine, who was only about 15. She may well have buried a second grandbaby too, a year or two later, if she lived long enough. Maybe Madeleine and Catherine bonded in an incredibly sad way – they may both have buried multiple children in a very short timeframe. First children for Catherine, the daughter, and last children for Madeleine, the mother.

One way or another, Catherine’s mother, Madelaine, was gone by 1683, joining several of her children and her first grandchildren, too.

Magdelaine’s Funeral

Michel and their children would have made their way to the church beside the fort, within sight of their home. The parish priest, probably Father Louis Petit, would have given Madeleine’s Requiem Mass, in Latin, of course, focusing on Christ’s resurrection and Madelaine’s soul. The service would have included scripture, hymns, communion, and prayers for the departed.

He would have offered the Holy Sacrifice of the Eucharist for the faithful, making Christ present with them on that day.

Then Madeleine’s sons would have lifted their mother’s coffin, lovingly carrying it into the churchyard, and lowering her mortal remains into the earth, where she rests today in an unmarked grave.

Tears watered the soil.

Catherine named her first surviving child, born about 1681, after her mother. If they were both exceedingly lucky, Magdelaine lived long enough to welcome that baby and enjoy her for at least a few months.

Catherine probably helped raise her remaining siblings left behind by their mother’s passing, especially given that her new stepmother was three years younger than Catherine, and Michel may not have remarried right away.

I feel like Madelaine’s life was somehow unfairly short-circuited. She endured a great deal of sorrow but was never able to enjoy grandchildren, which, in Acadia, were assuredly among the finer things in life.

Madelaine was simply gone much, much too soon, leaving a sorrowing family to carry on without her.

_____________________________________________________________

Share the Love!

You’re always welcome to forward articles or links to friends and share on social media.

Subscribe!

If you haven’t already subscribed, it’s free. You’ll receive an e-mail whenever I publish by clicking the “follow” button at the top of the main blog page, here.

Help Keep This Blog Free

I receive a small commission when you click a vendor link in my articles and purchase that item. This does NOT increase your price but helps me keep the lights on and this informational blog free for everyone. Please click on the affiliate links in the articles or to the vendors below if you are purchasing products or DNA testing.

Thank you so much.

DNA Purchases and Free Uploads

Genealogy Products and Services

My Books

Genealogy Books

Genealogy Research

Heavens Ablaze: The 1833 Leonid Meteor Storm and Your Ancestors

“The Falling Stars, Nov. 13, 1833.” Bible Readings for the Home Circle, p. 323. Review and Herald Publishing Association. 1914.

Every year during meteor showers, I think of my ancestors and wonder how they interpreted the 1833 Leonid meteor super-event and how it affected them. During the night of November 12th and the early morning of November 13th, 1833, the meteor shower turned into a storm, and was known as “the night of the falling stars,” and similar descriptions.

I began this article thinking about each of my ancestors who were alive then and, based on what I know about their lives, pondering what they might have thought and how they might have reacted. Where did they watch from? How much could they see? Did it affect their lives, and if so, how?

I had no idea I had 69 ancestors who were living in 1833, so I’ve narrowed the focuse of this article to the ancestors on my father’s side, in part because we actually have a local account.

The Night the Stars Fell

Beginning late on November 12, 1833, a Tuesday, and overnight, the heavens rained meteors at a rate of from 50,000 per hour to more than 240,000 per hour.

Most meteors are actually tiny fragments of rock the size of a pebble that burn up when entering the Earth’s atmosphere, emitting colors based on their chemical composition, sometimes resulting in vibrant streaks across the sky.

By Edmund Weiß – E. Weiß: “Bilderatlas der Sternenwelt”, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=562733

Fortunately, the 1833 storm is recorded in a number of drawings, paintings, newspaper articles, journals, and oral history.

Reports varied from around the world, but the event was described as a “rain of fire,” and a “tempest of falling stars.” With thousands every minute streaking across the night sky for hours on end, meteors were also described as “falling like snowflakes from the skies.”

The meteor shower began normally around midnight, but within a couple of hours, the sky was entirely filled with a display described in the New York Evening Post as “magnificent beyond conception.”

The Leonids are caused by the Earth passing through a cloud of space debris in the tail of Comet 55P/Temple-Tuttle, but people had no idea at the time. They thought the stars were literally falling out of the sky. Never before had there been a meteor shower of this magnitude, and it was frightening. Why was it happening?

Was it supernatural?

Was it God speaking?

Was it a prophecy?

Was it a warning?

Was it an answer?

Was the earth about to end?

Was Judgement Day here?

So many questions, with everyone left to decide the answers for themselves.

The most common reaction was fear and dread. Many people believed the end-times was approaching or had arrived, or the display was a sign of prophecy, as noted in this article by the Joseph Smith Foundation.

Some cultures measured time from that event of historic proportions.

For example, the Lakota marked time by the Leonids, but the 1833/1834 winter event was astounding, as detailed here. Battiste Good was the Lakota winter count-keeper, and recorded the meteor shower as the single event that would define that year in Lakota history.

The Library of Congress wrote an interesting blog article about the 1833 Leonid shower, or storm, that you can read, here.

Mary A. Hansard from Tazewell, Tennessee

Mary Hansard was born in 1825, died in 1899 in Claiborne County, Tennessee. She wrote a book, Old Time Tazewell, detailing local history. Cousin Travis Chumley extracted Mary’s entry about the Leonid meteor shower of 1833, and posted this excerpt in his historical Appalachian series.

In the year 1833 a most remarkable phenomenon occurred. I suppose that it is recorded in history. It was called the falling of the meteors. It happened in the night, and as I was only a small child, I was not an eyewitness to the awful scene. I heard my parents and others describe it next morning, as being the most awful sight that was ever looked upon with mortal eye. They said that the firmament on high was one solid glare of fire and light, and it looked as though every star in the sky was falling to the ground, and that they were certain the Day of Judgment was at hand. There were many wicked men on their knees that night praying to the Lord, and calling on others to pray for them, that had never been known to bow in prayer before. Such wild confusion had never been seen in Tazewell before. Next morning after all was over there seemed to be a solemn gloom resting on everyone’s countenance. It seemed that they were expecting more to occur. But everything moved on as usual. But I do not suppose that the scenes of that night were ever erased from the memory of those that were eye witnesses to the frightful event.

Where Were Our Ancestors?

I wondered where my ancestors lived in November of 1833. How old were they, and what did they think?

Were they frightened, as Mary Hansard reported, or perhaps enchanted?

My great-great-grandparents’ generation was living at the time, as were some of their parents, along with a few grandparents. In some cases, three generations were alive, and only three more would have brought the story to my father’s generation. How I wish they had kept a diary, but many couldn’t read or write. They probably told the story for a generation or two, until it was lost in time.

The Cumberland Gap Contingent

My father’s family was from the Cumberland Gap region, which includes families that lived in Claiborne County, Tennessee, Hancock County, Tennessee, which was formed from Claiborne in 1844, and Lee County, Virginia. Many lived in the Powell River Valley, shown above from the summit atop the Cumberland Gap.

  • John Y. Estes, Civil War Veteran, was born in 1818 in Halifax County, Virginia, to John R. Estes and Nancy Ann Moore, but had moved with his family to Claiborne County as a child. In 1833, he was 15 years old and living either in Estes Holler, near today’s Pleasant View Church, or across the Clinch River in Grainger County. There are no existing church records from nearby churches from this period, and there’s nothing to indicate that this family was particularly religious, so perhaps John was awakened and called outside by his parents to stare up at the sky in awe, side by side with his siblings.

  • John R. Estes, War of 1812 veteran, was born around 1787 in Halifax County, VA to George Estes and Mary Younger. He moved his family to the new frontier in Claiborne County, Tennessee about 1820. In 1826, he obtained land someplace close to the Indian Boundary line, but it’s unclear if he ever actually lived on that land. In 1833, a few years shy of 50 years old, he was probably living in Estes Holler, and would have witnessed the meteor shower in the skies between the mountain ridges, accompanies by his wife, Nancy Ann Moore, and their nine children. In Halifax County, John was probably a Methodist, since his father-in-law was a Methodist minister.

  • Nancy Ann Moore was born about 1785 in Virginia to the Reverend William Moore and Lucy, whose surname is unknown. Nancy Ann made the trek to Claiborne County with her husband and oldest five children around 1820. They settled someplace along Little Sycamore Road, probably in what would come to be known as Estes Holler, shown above. Did she gather her children close, fearing the worst? Her father was a Methodist minister, so she had assuredly grown up hearing the prophecies of Judgement Day.

Methodists, caught in the Second Great Awakening, interpreted the dramatic 1833 Leonid meteor shower as a powerful sign of Jesus’s Second Coming and the End Times, fulfilling Bible prophecies that stars would fall from heaven, sparking intense spiritual fervor, fear of judgment, and many conversions.

  • John Y. Estes’s wife, Martha “Ruthy” Dodson was born in 1820 in Alabama to Lazarus Dodson and Elizabeth Campbell. We believe that Ruthy’s mother died before 1830, when her father, Lazarus Dodson, brought his children back to Claiborne County, TN. In the 1830 census, Ruthy’s Campbell grandparents have four young children living with them. In 1833, Ruthy would have been 13 and would either have been terrified or fascinated by the night sky show. Did she equate the meteor shower with a message from her mother?

  • Lazarus Dodson (Jr.) was born around 1795 in Hawkins County, TN to Lazarus Dodson (Sr.) and Jane, whose surname is unknown. By 1833, he had returned from Alabama with his children after his wife, Elizabeth Campbell, died. By 1833, he would have been about 38 years old and was living just below Cumberland Gap on Gap Creek Road, now Tipprell Road. He was involved in the founding of Gap Creek Church, above. Interestingly, in 1833, he sold his land to David Cottrell and moved to Pulaski County, KY – although we don’t know when that move took place because those records are anything but clear. We will never know, of course, but I wonder what the meteor shower would have looked like from the Pinnacle of Cumberland Gap, directly above his land, some 2400 feet above sea level, and probably more than 1000 feet above his home. If I had been Lazarus, I would have ridden to the top to take a look for myself.

  • We know that Lazarus Dodson Jr’s father died in 1826, but his mother, Jane, whose surname is unknown, was born about 1760 and died sometime between 1830 and 1840, probably in McMinn County, TN. It’s unclear when Jane was living in Claiborne County, where she would have attended Gap Creek Church, just down the holler, or was living in McMinn County. In 1833, if she were living, she would have been in her 70s and most likely residing with one of her children. I wonder how she would have interpreted this heavenly spectacle from her view overlooking the road descending from Cumberland Gap. The Cottrell cemetrey above, now on LMU land, was once theirs. Were some people so fearful that they had heart attacks and died?

  • Elizabeth Campbell died before 1833, but her parents John Campbell and Jane “Jenny” Dobkins were still living. John Campbell was born about 1772 in Hawkins County, TN, moved to Claiborne County about 1802 and set up housekeeping on what is today Little Sycamore Road, right beside the Liberty Baptist Church. While Liberty had not yet been established at that time, there is a long-lost Baptist church back on Little Ridge, shown above, behind his house shown in the holler. Everyone in the neighborhood would have attended there. In 1833, John was about 50 and, like his neighbors, was a farmer. Was he wondering if the meteors were hitting the ground and damging his crops, or was he worrying about something different entirely?

  • Jane “Jenny” Dobkins was born around 1780 in Dunsmore County, VA to Jacob Dobkins and Dorcas Johnson. She married John Campbell around 1795 in Hawkins County, TN. As newlyweds, they moved to Claiborne County where, by 1833, at 53, she was raising her orphaned Dodson grandchildren in the log cabin portion of the home above, plus three of her own children who were still at home. What did Jenny tell her young grandchildren? Did she explain the phenomenon in terms of religion, or perhaps reassure them that their mother was looking over them?

  • Jacob Dobkins was a Revolutionary War Veteran who had been an Indian Scout on the frontier, barely escaping death. He was born about 1751 in Augusta County, VA, but was one of the first settlers in Claiborne County after the county was formed, obtaining prime farmland along the Powell River. In 1833, he would have been in his early 80s, maybe 82 or 83, and after what he had gone through in the war, I imagine nothing much phased him.

  • Dorcas Johnson was born around 1750, but much about her early life remains a mystery. She married Jacob Dobkins, setting out to homesteaded in the State of Franklin, then Jefferson County, TN, and then in a small log cabin, in Claiborne County around 1802. The cabin is shown above before it was dismantled. Dorcas was clearly one formidable woman. In March of 1833, at age 83ish, she was a sworn chain carrier for her grandson’s survey. After everything she had survived, she probably took a look at the meteors, thought, “Wow, those are cool,” peacefully enjoyed them for a while sitting on her porch in a rocking chair before going inside and back to bed. A few little meteors, or a lot, weren’t going to ruffle this woman’s feathers. Nosireee…

  • Joel Vannoy was born in 1813 in Claiborne County. He grew up in the portion that is now Hancock County, near the intersection of Little Sycamore and Mulberry Gap Roads, shown above. In 1833, Joel was 20 and still living at home, farming with his father, Elijah Vannoy on very steep, rocky terrain, on the side of Wallen Ridge. In his adult life, Joel struggled with mental health issues with symptoms that suggest paranoid schizophrenia. Given his challenges later in life, and that his diagnosis was “preachin’, swearin’ and threatenin’ to fight,” I can’t help but wonder how he interpreted the meteor sky show.

  • Elijah Vannoy was born about 1784 in Wilkes County, NC, married Lois McNiel, then moved across the mountains to Claiborne County, TN in about 1812. They settled on Mulberry Creek, with Elijah doing all of the normal pioneer things, like serving as a juror at court. However, beginning around 1820, Elijah began experiencing difficulties and lost his land entirely in 1834. So, in 1833, Elijah would have been struggling terribly and may have suffered from the same mental illness that his son would later exhibit. Elijah would have watched the meteors with Joel, and Lois if she was still living, along the rest of their nine children. He may well have believed the world was ending, because in a sense, his was. It’s beyond me how he managed to farm this incredibly steep land.

  • Phebe Crumley was born in 1818 in either Greene County or Claiborne County, TN to William Crumley the third and Lydia Brown. In 1833, she was 16 and living with her parents, either in Pulaski County, KY, or near Blackwater, on the Lee County/Claiborne County line. We have no records of the family’s involvement with a church, but many people joined churches in response to the meteors. Regardless, she would have told stories about that night into the late 1800s, before her death in 1900.

  • William Crumley the third, a War of 1812 veteran, was born in 1788 in Frederick County, VA, to William Crumley II and a woman whose name is unknown, but who had died by 1817 when his father remarried. William sold his land in Green County in 1822, was in Pulaski County, KY before 1830, and was living near Mulberry Gap Church, shown above, in Claiborne, now Hancock County, near or just over the Lee County, VA border, not long after.

  • William Crumley II was born about 1767 in Frederick County, VA, but had moved to the Territory South of the Ohio by about 1793, then to Greene County, TN by about 1795. He was probably raised as a Quaker, but as an adult, worshipped as a Methodist and helped establish Wesley’s Church in Greene County in 1797. His exact path to Lee County, Va, just across the border from Claiborne/Hancock County, TN is uncertain, mostly due to the fact that both he and his son had the same name. Regardless, it appears that in 1830, this William was living in Lee County, VA, near Blackwater, shown above. Would his religious leanings have influenced his interpretation of the meteor storm?

Some Quakers viewed the meteor shower as a Divine sign. Others encouraged scientific observation, and recognized it as a natural phenomenon, but still emphasized its spiritual meaning as an “inner light.”

  • Margaret Herrell was born about 1810 in Wilkes County, NC, to William Herrell and Mary McDowell. Her parents moved to the border region between Lee County, VA, and Claiborne County, TN on the Powell River by 1812. The Herrel land is shown above. In 1833, Margaret would have been 23 years old and had been married since about 1829. Her first child was born in early 1830, and her second known child arrived sometime in 1833. It’s quite interesting that on Sunday, December 1, 1833, Margaret was “received by experience,” into the Thompson Settlement Baptist Church. This means Margaret had undergone some sort of religious awakening, was baptized in the cold Powell river, and joined the church. Given that the sky rained stars just two and a half weeks earlier, I would be surprised if those two events weren’t connected. Margaret probably interpreted the meteor shower as a divine event, which convinced her to join the closest church, some 15 miles distant.

Baptists interpreted the brilliant meteor shower as awe-inspiring display by God that indicated fulfillment of the Biblical prophecy, specifically Matthew 24:29 and Revelation 6:13, signaling the imminent Second Coming of Christ and the End Times, which created a sense of urgency.

William Miller, who founded a sect called the Millerites, was a Baptist preacher who predicted that the end of the world would occur around 1843-1844. The “stars falling” became a key piece of evidence for his followers.

  • William Herrell, a War of 1812 veteran, was born around 1790 in Wilkes County, NC, and had moved his family to the northern-most portion of Claiborne County, TN before 1812. In 1833, William was about 43 years old and was living in a location on the Powell River known as Herrell’s Bend. One of the Herrell homes is shown above. William is quite the quandary, because while the meteor shower caused many people to reassess their lives, not so with William. In the 1830 census, William did not own any other humans, but William’s son, named Cannon, was born to an enslaved girl, Harriett, about November 1834, or perhaps somewhat earlier. William continued to have a “black wife” and a “white wife” for the rest of his life, living on opposite sides of his property and traveling back and forth between the two. Members of both families recount that he would live with one until she got mad at him, then go live with the other one until the same thing happened there too. However, there are no other known children borne by Harriett – so perhaps the meteor shower instilled at least a little fear of God in William. Or, maybe Harriett had children that died, or were sold.

  • Mary McDowell was born around 1785 in Wilkes County, NC, to Michael McDowell and Isabel, whose last name is not known. By 1833, Mary was living with her husband, William Herrell, five of her six known children ranging in age from 17 down to four, plus an enslaved girl, Harriett, also about 16 or 17, who gave birth to her husband’s child. There’s no possible way that either Mary or Harriett were happy with the situation, but neither of those women had any agency to do anything about it either. How did either, or both of them, interpret the meteor shower? Did that night sky display have anything to do with why William never fathered another child with Harriett, and perhaps why he built her a house? After Harriett’s death between 1840 and 1850, Mary raised Harriett’s son, Cannon, as her own, and as an adult, Cannon took care of Mary and his half-sister, who never married. The Herrell Cemetery, near their homes, with many unmarked graves, is shown above.

  • Michael McDowell was born about 1747, probably in Botetourt County, Virginia. After serving in the Revolutionary War, he settled in Wilkes County, NC, then, in 1809 or 1810, he forged on with the Herrell family to Claiborne County, TN. Michael settled on a peninsula of extremely rugged land in the Powell River aptly named Slanting Misery, shown above, looking towards the Claxton land across the Powell River. In 1832, when Michael applied for a Revolutionary War Pension, one of his witnesses was the Reverend James Gilbert of the Thompson Settlement Church, with whom Michael says he has a good relationship. By the time 1833 rolled around, Michael was 86 years old and still living on his relatively inaccessible, mountainous land. He was clearly thinking about the afterlife, though, because Michael deeded his land to two male McDowell men that year, “for love,” who are presumed to be sons or close family members. We don’t know whether the land transfer occurred before or after the meteor shower, because, of course, that deed book is missing. If Michael thought God was coming for him immediately upon seeing the stars falling, he was mistaken. He didn’t pass away until July of 1840 and may have been living with the Reverend Nathan S. McDowell at the time.

  • Isabel, spelled Isbell, whose surname we don’t know, was born around 1753, probably in Virginia. She and Michael McDowell settled for some time in Wilkes County, NC but Michael was a bit of a rabble-rouser, and by 1810 or so, they headed over the mountains to Claiborne County, TN. Isabel was about 60 by then, and in 1833, she would have been 80ish. In the 1830 census, a female, age 70-80 is living with Michael, and in 1840, it looks like Isabel is living with her daughter, Mary McDowell Herrell. Isabel’s children were all married by 1833 of course, except for her youngest daughter, Sally, born before 1790, who never married. No church records exist, but we do know that Nathan S. McDowell, her probable son or family member, was a minister in Claiborne County at the Big Springs Baptist Church, above, and was reported to have a “very crabbed disposition.” Closer to home, Isabel’s husband was close to the Reverend James Gilbert of the Thompson Settlement Church. I bet the discussions in November of 1833 were interesting in those mountains, especially if the interpretations of the two ministers didn’t quite align.

  • Samuel Claxton/Clarkson, a Civil War veteran, was born in 1827 in Claiborne County, TN, near the Harrells and McDowells, on Claxton Bend in the Powell River. In 1833, he would have been only 6 years old and may have stared at the Heavens in awe. He would have taken his cues in terms of “meaning” from his parents, Fairwick/Fairwix Claxton and Agnes Muncy, and the other adults around him. Samuel died a protracted, miserable death 43 years later as a result of his service in the war, and I hope that he was at least able to regale his children with stories about how the stars fell plum out of the sky one winter night a long time ago.

  • Fairwix Claxton was born around 1799 in Claxton Bend on the Powell River to James Lee Clarkson/Claxton and Sarah Cook. By 1833, he was married with five children. Fairwix and his siblings were trying to sort out his father’s land, above, on which his mother was still living. Estates can bring out the worst in people. Perhaps the meteor shower served as a stark reminder that Divinity is watching and was a wake-up call to whoever needed a rather remarkable reminder to be kind. Fairwick did not join a church until 1851.

  • Sarah Cook was born about 1775 in Russell County, VA where she met and married her husband, James Lee Clarkson/Claxton. They moved down the mountain range, settling along the Powell River, above, where she had eight children before James’s death in the War of 1812. Sarah never remarried and conducted business as any man of her time. By 1833, Sarah would have been about 58 years old, with two young adult children yet unmarried. She lived among and near the rest of her children and grandchildren on Claxton land. There is no evidence of a church affiliation. Sarah was very much a no-nonsense woman, so perhaps she thought that all of the superstition was bunk, and falling stars were simply that, stunningly beautiful, awe-inspiring, falling stars. The Claxton land looking across the Claxton Cemetery from the road, above.

  • Agnes Muncy was born in 1803, probably in Virginia to Samuel Muncy and Anne Nancy Workman. Agnes married Fairwick Claxton about 1819 or 1820 and they settled at Claxton Bend on the banks of the Powell River, near the Lee Co., VA, border with Claiborne County, TN. In her early life, Agnes probably attended the Thompson Settlement Church, as many of her neighbors and family members did. Something happened in September or October of 1833, perhaps a revival or “Camp Meeting”, although those were normally held in August, that caused a large number of people to join Thompson Settlement “by experience.” Perhaps, for these folks, the meteor shower was a “thank goodness” or maybe a confirmation of their choice. Later in life, Agnes was one of the founders of Rob Camp, a church located closer to where she lived.

  • Samuel Muncy was probably born around 1765, give or take a few years in either direction, in Montgomery County, VA. His twisty turny path would eventually take him to Lee County, and then by 1800 on the Powell River on the North side of Wallen’s Ridge, shown above. By 1833, Samuel, then 68 or 70, joined the Thompson Settlement Church on November 1st. This would have made more sense had it been December 1st. Obviously, Samuel had been thinking about the hereafter – and the meteor shower probably confirmed whatever spurred him to join the church.

  • Anne Nancy Workman was born between about 1761, probably in York Co., PA on Walker’s Creek. By 1788, she was marrying Samuel Muncy in Montgomery County, VA. Along with Samuel’s parents, the newlyweds hitched up the wagon, loaded with their possessions, and moved on down the Appalachian Range to Lee County, VA. We know the identity of three of Anne’s children, all of whom stayed in the Powell River/Wallen’s Ridge area of Lee County and Claiborne Co., TN. On September 1, 1833, Anne Workman was baptized in the Powell River, shown above, and joined Thompson Settlement “by experience,” a month before her husband joined, along with two of her three known children. A few weeks later, when the meteors appeared in the sky, they all probably heaved a sigh of relief because they knew that when the Rapture occurred, as the meteors were assuredly prophesying, they were saved.

  • Nicholas Speaks, a War of 1812 veteran, was born about 1782 in Charles County, MD. Ironically, he was born Catholic, although someplace along the way, he became a Methodist. He moved with his father to Rowan Co., NC, then Iredell County, where he was orphaned. Nicholas wound up in Washington County, VA where he met and married Sarah Faires. Two decades later, they made their way to Lee County, VA to establish a Methodist Church on Glade Branch, now Speaks Branch. By 1833, their older children had married, but other than their eldest, remained nearby. Their youngest child was seven. Given Nicholas’s unquestionable devotion, I would presume that he interpreted the meteor shower as a Biblical or Divine message and as the fulfillment of Biblical prophecy. Given his Catholic upbringing, I wonder if he automatically crossed himself occasionally, “just in case”, especially in times of intense emotion. Did he remember that ancient Catholic traditions link the August Perseids meteors, the Tears of St. Lawrence, to martyrdom? After the 1833 meteors made their appearance, Nicholas probably fervently prepared his parishioners in this beautiful little white church for the imminent arrival of Judgement Day. I would love to sit in those wooden pews to hear his message.

  • Sarah Faires was born about 1786 in Washington County, Virginia where she married Nicholas Speaks in 1804. In 1823, they packed a wagon and moved to the next frontier, where they built a one-room cabin, shown above in the 1970s before the wood was salvaged and incorporated into a newer cabin. By 1828, Nicholas had established what is now called the Speaks Chapel Methodist Church. When the meteor shower occurred in 1833, Nicholas had been preaching for at least five years, but probably closer to 13. Sarah may have felt that God was answering a prayer, but which prayer, for what, and in what way? Maybe she had prayed for her oldest son, Charles, to return home from Henry County, Indiana so he could be with the family when the end came – a prayer that was answered.

Henry County, Indiana

  • Elizabeth “Betty” Speaks, shown above with her husband, Samuel Claxton, was born in July of 1832, probably in Henry County, Indiana to Charles Speak/Speaks and Ann McKee. Elizabeth would only have been 16 months old when the meteor shower occurred, so probably slept through the entire thing.

  • Charles Speaks was born about 1804 in Washington County, VA to the Methodist minister, Nicholas Speak/Speaks and Sarah Faires. In 1823, when Charles was 19, his family made their way to Lee County, Virginia, and settled on Glade Branch where the family built what is today the Speak Chapel Methodist Church. Given that daughter, Elizabeth, is recorded as having been born in Indiana, and Charles is found in Henry County, Indiana in the 1830 census, it’s certainly possible that Charles and his family were not in Virginia in 1833. He had returned by 1839 when Nicholas Speak deeded the church’s land to the church’s trustees, and Charles is listed as one. Regardless of where Charles lived in 1833, given his religious convictions, the meteors probably moved him deeply. It may even have been what prompted Charles to pull up stakes and move his family back to Virginia where he spent the remainder of his days before joining other family members in the Speaks Cemetery, above.

  • Anne McKee was born about 1805 in Washington County, VA, to Andrew McKee and Elizabeth, whose surname is unknown, and was probably living in Henry County, in East-central Indiana, in 1833. Anne converted from Presbyterianism to Methodism when she married Charles Speak. At that time, the Presbyterians looked down on the Methodists for their “emotional exhorting,” which probably became even more pronounced in November of 1833. Anne had six children between the ages of 16 months and nine years. Her older children would have been quite curious about the stars falling from the sky, especially if they heard the accompanying cracks, pops, and whistles. Perhaps Anne explained that God was speaking to them.

The Virginia Contingent

  • George Estes, a three-time Revolutionary War veteran, was born in 1763 in Amelia County, VA, but had moved to Halifax County with his parents as a child. In 1833, he was 70 years old and must certainly have been in awe of the night sky. Never had he seen anything like this in his seven decades upon the earth. Several of George’s children lived on his or adjacent land, on what is now known as Estes Street in South Boston, Virginia, shown above, across from the Oak Ridge Cemetery which was originally part of his land. George’s daughter and her five children were probably living with him. Did they come and wake their grandfather, or did he learn about the celestial show the next morning and then watch on the following night to see if there was going to be a repeat performance?

  • Joseph Preston Bolton was born in 1816 in Giles County, VA to Henry Bolton and Nancy Mann. In 1833, he would have been 17, still living with his parents, and had not yet married. Joseph assuredly attended the local Baptist church that his father had helped found, and where his brother-in-law was the minister. What did Joseph think about the “falling stars”? Nestled between mountain ranges near Fincastle, VA, shown above, was he able to see the full display, or was some of it obscured by forest, mountains or clouds?

  • Henry Bolton was born in 1759 in London, England, became an indentured servant upon arrival in the colonies, and served in the Revolutionary War, reportedly caring for George Washington’s horse. By the 1830 census, he had moved from Botetourt County, VA a few miles away to Giles County, where he was living in 1833. We know Henry had a Bible, because he recorded genealogical events there. It was reported that Henry was a member and deacon of the Mill Creek Baptist Church, above, near Fincastle, VA, where his son-in-law was a minister. In 1833, Henry was 74 years old, but still had several children living at home. Did the entire family gather at the church during or after the meteor storm? Did they believe, as many did, that the End Times was approaching and the stars were omens?

  • Nancy Mann was born about 1780 and married the older Henry Bolton as his second wife in 1798 while living in Botetourt County. By 1833, they were living in Giles County on today’s heavily forested Stoney Creek Road. Nancy was 53, and her youngest of 14 children was 7 years old. Although meteors had been falling for time immemorial, nothing in recorded history, before or since, has rivaled the “night of the falling stars” that Nancy and her children would have witnessed.

  • Ann McKee’s mother, Elizabeth, whose surname we don’t know, was born about 1767, probably in Virginia. Based on the fact that Ann’s family was Presbyterian, her mother probably was as well. It would be very unusual for a mother to be a different religious denomination from the rest of her family. We know that Ann was living in 1830, but either deceased or living with one of her children by 1840. In 1833, she would have been about 60 and enjoying her grandchildren. Perhaps they all watched out the window of this old frontier “station” together and then later loved hearing their grandmother retell the story, over and over, of the night the stars fell from the sky.

Presbyterians, like other denominations, interpreted the incredibly rare and intense storm as the literal fulfillment of the Biblical prophecy of “stars falling from Heaven.” Many churches and groups of people held impromptu prayer meetings, believing they would not live to see morning.

In New Salem, Illinois, a devout Presbyterian deacon named Henry Onstot ran to alert his 24-year-old neighbor, pounded on his door, and urgently awakened him, declaring “Arise, Abraham – the day of judgment has come.”

Alarmed, Abraham lept out of bed and rushed to the window. Through the breath-taking meteor shower, he spotted the constellations, and realized that, indeed, the world was fine because the constellations were still in place.

Who was Abraham? Why, the future President, Abraham Lincoln, who concluded that the display was simply meteors. The spectacular event impressed Lincoln deeply though, because during the Civil War, he used the meteor shower as a metaphor for the Union itself, opining that beneath the chaos and falling fire of battle, the foundation remained solid and unchanged, and would endure.

_____________________________________________________________

Share the Love!

You’re always welcome to forward articles or links to friends and share on social media.

Subscribe!

If you haven’t already subscribed, it’s free. You’ll receive an e-mail whenever I publish by clicking the “follow” button at the top of the main blog page, here.

Help Keep This Blog Free

I receive a small commission when you click a vendor link in my articles and purchase that item. This does NOT increase your price but helps me keep the lights on and this informational blog free for everyone. Please click on the affiliate links in the articles or to the vendors below if you are purchasing products or DNA testing.

Thank you so much.

DNA Purchases and Free Uploads

Genealogy Products and Services

My Books

Genealogy Books

Genealogy Research

Mitochondrial DNA: How Do I Know if I’m a Candidate to Receive a New Haplogroup?

New haplogroups, which are phylogenetic tree branches, are formed with periodic updates to the Mitotree. In the November 2025 Mitotree release, 12,773 new branches were formed, and an amazing 67,000+ people received a new haplogroup. Haplogroups are relevant for both genealogy and more distant information about your direct matrilineal ancestor and their origins.

Are You a Candidate to Receive a New Haplogroup?

Lots of people have asked how one might know if they are a candidate to receive a new haplogroup, or tree branch, or why they didn’t, so let’s talk about the three ways your haplogroup could potentially change.

To follow along, if you have taken the full sequence mitochondrial DNA test, sign in to your FamilyTreeDNA account and click on Discover on the mtDNA Results and Tools page.

After clicking on Discover, you’ll see the mtDNA Discover sidebar menu on the left. Click on Scientific Details

You Have Private Variants

The first reason you might be a candidate to receive a new haplogroup is that you have private variants. Private variants are mutations that have not already been used to form a haplogroup, hence, they are still private to you.

To see if you have private variants, click on Scientific Details on the sidebar, then on the Variants Tab.

Click any image to enlarge

You’ll see a list of haplogroups under the Placement column header. Your assigned haplogroup is noted by the red square, J1c2f in this instance.

At the top is an “F” number, which is your Haplotype. Haplotype numbers are randomly assigned, and everyone with exactly the same mitochondrial sequence will have the same haplotype number.

You can see your haplogroup and haplotype matches on your match list. If you match both, both blue circles will be checked.

In this example, you can see that beside the haplotype number, which I’ve blurred, in the Name column, it says “No private variants.” This means that all of this person’s mutations have been used to assign them to haplogroup J1c2f and the haplogroups upstream of J1c2f.

This tester cannot match anyone any more closely than the exact same haplogroup, J1c2f, and the exact same Haplotype number, which means they match exactly and have no private variants. This means there’s no material available to form a new haplogroup.

I’ve written about mitochondrial haplogroups, haplotypes and haplotype clusters, in two articles.

Let’s look at an example of someone who does have Private Variants.

This tester, who is a member of haplogroup C4c1h has one private variant, T13879g. When another tester in haplogroup C3c1h also has this variant, or mutation, they are candidates to form a new branch in the next Mitotree release.

Keep in mind that not every private variant will become a haplogroup, based on several scientific factors.

So, while our haplogroup J1c2f tester is NOT a candidate to form a new haplogroup branch due to no private variants, our C4c1h person with one high-quality private variant is.

However, private variants are only one way in which a new haplogroup might form. There are others.

The Tree Splits Upstream

Sometimes the tree splits upstream.

Looking further upstream, or back in time from haplogroup J1c2f, we see that two of the foundation haplogroups that formed J1c2f are defined by more than one mutation.

Haplogroup J1 was formed using both C462T and G3010A, bracketed in red.

Haplogroup J was formed using seven different mutations, beginning with C295T and continuing to the bottom of the screen capture, bracketed in purple.

As more people test, eventually a new tester may have C462T, but NOT G3010A, AND their downstream mutations are different too. In other words, we’re not looking at a reversal for 3010, but at a completely different haplogroup with a split at C462T as its defining mutation.

In this case, the new branch would receive the new haplogroup name, and the existing branch would remain the same. But what if this scenario happened far up the tree and changed our understanding of this portion of the tree?

In that case it’s still very unlikely that your haplogroup would change, based on existing naming structures. FamilyTreeDNA makes every effort to NOT rename existing haplogroups when these types of branching situations occur.

The Branch is Renamed

Sometimes the existing tree structure is clarified, prompting branch renaming.

Let’s look at an earlier structure of this portion of haplogroup J1c2f.

In the earlier version of the Mitotree, shown above, you can see that two mutations define haplogroup J1c2, two mutations define J1c, and there’s a haplogroup called J1c’g that is constructed using a reversal at location 152.

In the November 2025 release of the Mitotree, this exact same portion of the tree looks different. The tester is still haplogroup J1c2f, but the upstream structure has changed.

  • J1c2 is now defined by only one mutation, A188G.
  • A new haplogroup has been formed: J1c2+16519. Notice the Weight column at far right. This mutation’s confidence weighting is very low, so this haplogroup is a good candidate for refinement in future trees.

Now look at J1c where we see the same thing occurring.

  • J1c is now comprised of just T14798C.
  • A new haplogroup, J1c+185 has formed. It has a weight of 17, still in the red zone, but more confident than J1c2+16519.

Looking further down the original placement table, we see J1c’g, which is a collapsed haplogroup based on a double reversal at C152T!!. It’s gone in the most current version of the tree. You can see that haplogroup J1c’g only had a weight of 1, so it was a good candidate to be refined, eliminated, or assigned elsewhere in the tree.

None of these changes affect haplogroup J1c2f itself, meaning the tester’s assigned haplogroup. Unless they actually look at their haplogroup mutations, they won’t see any difference. This person was and still is assigned to J1c2f.

However, if someone was assigned to J1 or J1c2 before, they might have a new haplogroup name. If they were assigned to J1c’g, they definitely have a new haplogroup name.

These scenarios are repeated throughout the tree, and may be exactly why you receive a new haplogroup, even without having any private variants.

Older Versus Newer

Haplogroups that form as a result of your private variants tend to be newer, or closer in time, but not always. You never know when just the right person will test to split an upstream branch!

Regardless, all new haplogroups help refine the tree, and all refinements are important. Branches that form in more recent generations are often the most useful for genealogy.

However, that’s not always the case. “Newer” versus “older” is sometimes relative (pardon the pun.) Let’s say that you are trying to figure out which of two sisters, or cousins, born in the 1600s, you descend from.

You may desperately need an “older” haplogroup that will divide the branches of the ancestral tree.

Or maybe you want to know whether your ancestor came from Scotland or Germany, so you may need an older haplogroup yet.

Want to know if they were Celtic or from a different culture? An older haplogroup fills in cultural and genealogical blanks that no other type of testing can reach. Haplogroups pierce the veil of time.

OK, So What Should I Check?

Even if you don’t receive a new haplogroup when a new Mitotree version is released, you’re certainly not out of luck.

Some of your matches may have received a new haplogroup, further refining the genetic tree, causing them to cluster together. This should correlate with the genealogical tree.

For example, I’m desperate to identify the wife of my ancestor, who has been known affectionately for years as H2a1. She is now haplogroup H2a1ay1, but I still don’t know her name.

The haplogroup formation date range extends back to around 1820, which is slightly late, but certainly not far off either. The dates for the genetic Time Tree, and the genealogical tree may not align exactly, but the date ranges generally do. Mutations don’t occur on an exact schedule.

However, matches for the tester who represents H2a1 (now H2a1ay1) have been nicely narrowed down to two other full sequence testers. Both have this exact same haplogroup, and one of them also has the exact same haplotype. The balance of her matches are now in a more distant haplogroup.

Now I can focus on the two matches with the same haplogroup.

Even though the trees of these three testers don’t seem to intersect, some genealogical sleuthing tells me a lot.

The ancestor of one of the haplogroup matches was born in 1741, a Quaker, in Chester, Pennsylvania, and died in 1818.

The ancestor of the haplogroup plus haplotype match lived in the same Virginia County as my ancestor, and they were both Quakers, whose families attended the same church.

So we have:

  • Haplogroup match – Born a Quaker in 1741 in Chester, PA.
  • Haplogroup AND haplotype match – Lived in Frederick Co., VA in the 1780s and attended same Quaker church as the tester’s ancestor

These new haplogroups, both of the tester’s haplogroup matches, and others whose new haplogroup shows they are more distant, are critical to refining my search.

I’m so close to identifying H2a1ay1 and her parents that I can smell it!

Any self-respecting genealogist would end this article right here and get busy!

I’m outta here!!!

Don’t stop with checking your own haplogroup. Review any changes to people on your match list and view the Match Time Tree, even if you didn’t receive a new haplogroup.

While receiving a new haplogroup is exciting, sometimes refinements among people around you can be equally, if not more, important and informative.

_____________________________________________________________

Share the Love!

You’re always welcome to forward articles or links to friends and share on social media.

Subscribe!

If you haven’t already subscribed (it’s free,) you can receive an e-mail whenever I publish by clicking the “follow” button on the main blog page, here.

Help Keep This Blog Free

I receive a small contribution when you click on some of the links to vendors in my articles. This does NOT increase your price but helps me keep the lights on and this informational blog free for everyone. Please click on the affiliate links in the articles or to the vendors below if you are purchasing products or DNA testing.

Thank you so much.

DNA Purchases and Free Uploads

Genealogy Products and Services

My Books

Genealogy Books

Genealogy Research

Michel Richard dit Sansoucy (c1630 – 1686/1689), Carefree Acadian – 52 Ancestors #465

Michel Richard was born about 1630, according to the Acadian census. We know he was born in France, because the first French settlers had not arrived in Acadia by 1630.

What we don’t know is where, or the identity of his parents.

Bona Arsenault, in his 1978 edition of HISTOIRE ET GENEALOGIE DES ACADIENS; 1625-1810, quoted on WikiTree and by Karen Theriot Reader, states that:

Michel Richard dit Sansoucy, born in 1639, originally from the Saintonge [an old province in the west part of France, now largely Charente-Inferieure. Its capital was Saintes]. Michel arrived in Acadia with the expedition of Emmanuel Le Borgne and de Guilbault in 1652 or 1651; he was with sieur de Saint-Mas, representative of Le Borgne. (Footnote cites Bona Arsenault’s own Histoire des Acadiens; and Louis Richard, in the Memoires de la Société Généalogique Canadienne-Francoise, vol. VI, no 1 (Jan 1954).)

Unfortunately, no sources were provided, and we know that the 1639 birth year is incorrect. No evidence has surfaced to confirm this location information, so for now, it remains unproven. As more parish records are transcribed and translated, Michel’s family information may come to light, although Richard is not an uncommon surname in France.

Sansoucy

Michel’s dit name or nickname is interesting. Sansoucy, means carefree, or without cares. It does not seem to be a place name, so it would either be a military nickname or indicative of Michel’s personality.

I like to think of him in this light!

A Brother by the Same Name

Michel probably had a younger brother, by the same name, who also settled in Port Royal, marrying Francoise Boudrot about 1663, and having two children with her before passing away, probably about 1667. Francoise remarried to Etienne Robichaud about 1668.

Francoise’s two children by Richard, Madeleine Richard Robichaud, born about 1664, and Charles Richard dit Cadet Robichaud, born about 1667, were known by the surname of their step-father, Etienne Robichaud. However, Charles used the dit name of “Cadet” signifying “the younger” and Y-DNA testing of several descendants has confirmed that indeed, he is genetically descended from the Richard line, not the Robichaud line.

These Big Y-700 tests from the French Heritage DNA Project show that the Richard and Robichaud men from these genealogy lines descend from the same genetic lineage. The common haplogroup, R-FT137222, formed about 1637, with a range that extends in both directions.

Cadet would indicate that both Richard brothers had the same name – a situation not unheard of and found in other Acadian families too, especially if they are half-siblings. We find this same situation occurring in “our” Michel Richard “dit Sansoucy” line, with two sons being named Alexandre. The older Alexander Richard was born about 1668 to Madeleine (Madelaine) Blanchard, and the younger Alexandre Richard was born about 1686 to second wife, Jeanne Babin.

I think the phrase, “It’s complicated,” could sum up the Richard family.

Port Royal

In the 1671 census, Michel is enumerated with Abraham Dugas on one side, and Charles Melanson on the other. Those two men lived directly across the river from each other.

Here, I’m standing on or near the Melanson land, looking across the Riviere du Port Royal at the Dugas land, at left, which is just west of the fort.

Michel Richard was listed as a 41-year-old laborer, or ploughman, wife Madeleine Blanchard, 28, along with seven children, Rene, 14, Pierre, 10, Catherine, 8, Martin, 6, Alexandre, 3, and twins, Anne and Magdeleine, 5 weeks. They have 15 cattle, 14 sheep, and are farming 14 arpents of land.

Twins, especially twins who both lived, are rare.

The census suggests Michel’s birth in 1630, Madeleine’s in 1643, and their marriage about 1656, so after the initial fall of Acadia in 1654.

Taken together, this tells us that Michel Richard was in Acadia prior to the fall and would have been a witness to and participant in those events.

The 1654 Fall of Acadia

In 1654, Michel would have been about 24 years old. He probably arrived in Acadia as a laborer, craftsman, or perhaps even a soldier. If he arrived with his parents or other family members, other than “Cadet” Richard, there was no trace of them by 1671.

Tensions had been escalating in the North Atlantic between the French, English, and Dutch colonies as extensions of their home countries.

In the summer of 1654, Oliver Cromwell in England was outfitting the English colonists in Boston with ships and soldiers to attack the Dutch in New Netherlands, today’s New York.

By the time they were prepared to attack, Major Robert Sedgwick was informed that the war had been settled, and peace was at hand. The trouble was that Sedgwick was prepared for battle, and had been authorized to take other territories belonging to the French after attacking New Netherlands, if time permitted. Given that he could no longer attack New Netherlands, that’s all the encouragement he needed.

He set out to capture all three Acadian forts: Saint John, Port Royal (now Annapolis Royal, NS), and Pentagouet (now Castine, Maine).

On July 14th, after Fort Saint John surrendered, Sedgwick crossed the Baie Française, now the Bay of Fundy, and attacked Port Royal, which was under the control of Emmanuel Le Borgne. Le Borgne had been at Saint John the day before attacking rival Charles La Tour when Sedgwick arrived there. Le Borgne quickly retreated to Port Royal, which gave him a day to prepare for Sedgwick’s arrival. It wasn’t much time, but better than nothing.

Le Borgne’s men lay in wait and ambushed Sedgwick, killing one and wounding six more. The more experienced professional English soldiers quickly returned fire, ambushed the ambushers, giving them no time to reload, and killed five men. We don’t know if those five men were French soldiers or Acadians.

The French soldiers and Acadians retreated into the fort, where the English laid siege to Port Royal. Knowing that the combined forces of about 200 men in Port Royal stood no chance against the 750 English and colonial soldiers, they surrendered on August 8th.

Le Borgne obtained generous surrender terms, meaning that the Acadians were to remain unharmed, keep their homes and belongings, be allowed to continue to worshiping as Catholics, and the French soldiers were to be transported back to France. Nevertheless, the English captured 113 men, more than 23 cannons, 500 weapons, and more than 50 barrels of gunpowder. In violation of the agreement, the Sedgwick had the Acadians’ livestock slaughtered.

It’s unclear whether all 113 captives were French soldiers, or a mixture of soldiers and Acadians. It’s unlikely that Michel was a French soldier, or he would have been sent back to France at this time, so he must have arrived in a different capacity.

Le Borgne’s own ship had been captured too, laden with a valuable cargo of alcohol. The surrender terms allowed him to keep the ship, AND his alcohol. He, as a French administrator, returned to France, but his sons were allowed to remain in Acadian, and he was allowed to keep his property. These suspiciously generous terms for Le Borgne personally fueled accusations of treason. The fact that Le Borgne had somehow escaped on July 13th from Saint John when the English were attacking, instead of fighting to defend Fort Saint John, furthered those accusations.

Regardless, Acadia was now under English control and would remain so until it was returned to the French in 1667 under the Treaty of Ryswick. In 1670, the transfer was completed, and was followed by the 1671 Acadian census, which provides us with a glimpse of what happened in Acadia between 1654 and 1670.

The next census in Acadia took place seven years later, in 1678.

The 1678 Census

The 1678 census was much less specific than the earlier one. We have the name of the head of household, the wife, the number of children by sex, and how much livestock they owned.

Michel Richard’s neighbors, in order, are shown as:

  • Jean Labat and Renee Gautrot – Labat was a military engineer who was sent to oversee the reconstruction of the fort. He lived in Port Royal, on the waterfront.
  • Rene Landry and Perrine Bourg
  • E(tienne) Pellerin and Jeanne Savoye – the Pellerin family lived in Port Royal and eventually owned Hogg Island.
  • Francois Brossard and Catherine Richard – Michel Richard’s newly married daughter.
  • Michel Richard and Madeleine Blanchard (their names only)
  • Germain Doucet and Marie Landry – lived in Port Royal
  • Michel Richard (no wife’s name, but the balance of his family and livestock are listed). Four boys, five girls, living on 10 arpents of land with 21 cattle.
  • Michael Boudrot at the brook – Michael Boudrot was the neighbor of Abraham Dugas.

This strongly suggests that the couple lived in Port Royal, and not yet upriver.

Additionally, there’s a very interesting note that indicates that Michel had three separate plots of land:

  • Sans Soucy, 29, 1 arpent of high land, bordering at one end of the river, part the other end on the North wood on one side Anthoine Hebert, Denis Godet.
  • 6 arpents at Port Royal, Lyon Rampat? Bordering on Germain then on the meadow and the petite Riviere then on Renee Landry
  • 3 arpents at gros Cap on Claude Terriot, Barnabe Martin at the road then at the river, 260 frontage

What types of information can we extract from this?

  • Michel’s age is not 29, which would place his birth in 1649, an impossibility given his first child’s birth in 1657. He would have been 48 or maybe 49, not 29. Perhaps this was misread or misrecorded.
  • Anthoine Hebert lives upriver beside Daniel LeBlanc at BelleIsle and so does the Godet (Gaudet) family, on the North side of the river.
  • Gros cap, “large cape,” may be the town of Port Royal itself, or the point of land where it sits, given that the Chemin du Cap is the road leading to the south out of Port Royal.
  • Renee Landry lives beside Jean Labat in Port Royal.
  • Germain Doucet lives on the other side of Michel Richard in the 1678 census in Port Royal.
  • We know, based on Nicole Barrieau’s thesis, that Michel Richard’s land was not among that expropriated in 1705 in Port Royal when the new fort was built, so his land was either further east along the waterfront, on the south side of the main road, along the Cape Path, or had already been settled in another way by 1705.

In 1671 and through 1678, based on the neighbors in the census, and the 1678 census notes, we can determine that Michel lived someplace along the waterfront in Port Royal for most of his life. This makes sense, given that we know that he was in Acadia before it fell in 1654.

Acadians in Gray, authored by Steven Cormier, states, in part, that:

First came Michel Richard dit Sansoucy, a young soldier born in the Saintonge region of France in c1630. He appeared at Port-Royal in the early 1650s in the entourage of Emmanuel Le Borgne. When his term of service ended, he remained in the colony, took up farming, obtained two grants of land from Le Borgne “at some ten to fifteen miles from the fort” on the upper Rivière au Dauphin, now the Annapolis River.

I very much wish Mr. Cormier had provided sources for this information.

Researcher Paul LeBlanc, prior to his death, believed that Michel’s dit name was derived from the location of Saintonge, although a male from Saintonge would be known as a “Saintongese.”

One of the pieces of land referenced by Cormier may be the land where Michel Richard’s son, the younger Alexandre Richard, eventually lived, near Bridgetown. Alexandre married Marie Levron about 1711, whose parents lived directly across the River from Port Royal.

Port Royal in 1686

What was Port Royal like in 1686?

We are fortunate that Labat drew a map in 1686 to encourage investment and settlement in Port Royal.

The church and cemetery are shown in this drawing.

The church is shown with the number #2, and above the church, the cemetery is annotated with #4.

The fort where Michel Richard would have served, assuming he did arrive as a soldier with Le Bourg, is shown in ruins, labeled #3, on the water, by the boats.

If Michel lived upriver in 1686, instead of in Port Royal, they lived in the BelleIsle area where 1500 arpents of prime marshland was awarded by a succession of stakeholders over the years.

Madeleine Blanchard Dies

Based on the 1686 census, Madeleine Blanchard died between 1678 and 1683 when Michel Richard remarried to Jeanne Babin. Jeanne was 15 at the time, so born about 1667, and Michel was 52.

In 1667, Michel had 10 living children, ranging in age from 20 down to 3. He needed a wife, even if his new wife was younger than his four eldest children.

In the 1686 census, we find Michel Richard, age 56, Jeanne Babin, 18, with children: Martin, 19, Alexandre, 17, Marie, 12, Cecile, 10, Marguerite, 7, and Michel, 2. Five other children are married. Marguerite was the last child born to Madeleine Blanchard, and Michel, age 2, is Michel’s first child with Jeanne Babin.

In addition to the blended family, they have two guns, 16 cattle, 30 sheep, and eight hogs on 12 arpents of land.

Based on the neighbors, it appears that Michel is probably living upriver by 1686, but that’s anything but certain. The census taker may not have been recording in the order that people lived. He may also have been paddling back and forth across the river.

The 1693 Census

By the 1693 census, Jeanne Babin has remarried to Laurent Doucet, and they have a three-year-old child, suggesting that they married about 1689.

We know that Michel Richard and Jeanne’s second child, Alexandre Richard, was born about 1686, which places Michel’s death sometime between 1686 and 1689.

Michel’s Funeral

Michel died before the Catholic church, which stood beside the fort in Port Royal, was burned in 1690 during another attack by the English.

His funeral would have been held in the church with the priest saying mass. His coffin would have been carried outside, where he was laid to rest in the cemetery in the churchyard, surrounded by his family and fellow Acadians.

Lost beneath the ramparts of the reconstructed fort today, when Michel was buried, a simple little church and adjacent cemetery behind the ramparts served the Acadian population and the French soldiers, all of whom were Catholic.

Michel was laid to rest within view of the garrison where he may have served, and assuredly defended in 1654. All that’s left of his grave today is mist and memories.

Belle-Ile-en-Mer

After the Expulsion of the Acadians in 1755, a decade later, in 1765, a group of 78 refugee Acadian families made their way to the French Island of Belle-Île-en-Mer where each family gave depositions about the origins of their ancestors.

The French were trying to determine how to help settle the refugees and whether they were actually French descendants. Clearly, they were. The French King settled the Acadian families in four regions on the island, providing them with housing and livestock.

The resulting depositions provide a plethora of information about the earliest Acadian ancestors. Of course, a few generations removed, not everything was perfectly accurate.

According to Stephen A. White, Genealogist,Centre d’études acadiennes January 17, 2005:

In four separate depositions, Michel Richard is mentioned by his Sansoucy dit name. He married Madeleine Blanchard at Port Royal, according to Pierre Doucet, the husband of Michel’s great-granddaughter Marie-Blanche Richard. (Doc. inéd., Vol. III, pp. 53-54).

Pierre mistakenly called his wife’s great-grandmother Anne, instead of Madeleine, but the 1671 census shows her true given name (see DGFA-1, pp. 1373-1374).

Three other depositions confirm the French origin of Michel Richard dit Sansoucy, although two of these attribute the given names of René to him and Marie to his wife, one from his great-grandson Pierre Richard (Doc. inéd., Vol. II, p. 191) and the other from Joseph LeBlanc dit Le Maigre, on behalf of his son Joseph, whose wife Angélique Daigre was another great-grandchild of the ancestor (ibid., p. 178).

The last deposition, from Pierre Trahan, whose father-in-law’s first wife was Michel Richard’s daughter, provides no given name for the ancestor and does not mention his spouse at all (ibid., Vol. III, p. 111).

Michel Richard’s Land in Acadia

Alexander Richard, the youngest son of Michel Richard, lived on land upriver, near present-day Bridgetown in 1710, according to the Labat map. This is probably the land granted to his father, Michel, assuming that Steven Cormier is right about Michel being granted land about 15 miles, or so, upriver. It fits that description exactly.

Michel Richard had two sons named Alexandre, the older one by Madeleine Blanchard, and the younger one by Jeanne Babin.

For a long time, I mistakenly assumed that the Alexandre Richard who lived on this land was Michel’s eldest son, Alexandre (c1668-1709), not his youngest, born about 1686. His eldest died in 1709, so it clearly cannot be him living on that land in 1710.

On this reconstructed Acadian map from MapAnnapolis, Alexandre Richard is shown living near present-day Bridgetown. The Gaudet, Petitpas, and Bastarche familes also owned land nearby, settling near Bridgetown and intermarrying.

There’s another possibility to be considered, too.

Based on the 1671 census location of Antoine Babin, this could have been his land before his grandson, the younger Alexandre Richard, farmed it. Antoine died about 1687, leaving 11 children. It’s a stretch to think that his middle daughter, Jeanne, inherited his land, then passed it to her son nearly a quarter century later.

The proximity of the Richard and Babin land to each other is probably more a function of the fact that Michel Richard and Antoine Babin were both granted land, probably by Le Borgne, anout the same time, and may have selected it together. After all, Michel Richard married Antoine’s daughter not long before both men died. Antoine and Michel were about the same age.

Alexandre Richard would have inherited the land from someone. His mother, Jeanne Babin, would have held it after Michel’s death. Her older son, Michel Richard Jr., settled in Beaubassin, so it makes perfect sense for this land to descend to Jeanne Babin, then on to Alexandre, her other son by Michel Richard Sr.. Michel Sr. and Jeanne Babin only had two children.

Perhaps Alexandre’s father, Michel Richard Sr., died before he was able to develop the land, but he was trying to leave something to one of his sons. Maybe specifically the youngest son, whom he knew he would never be able to raise. Michel was 56 when Alexandre was born. For all we know, Michel may have been ill and it’s possible that he died even before Alexandre’s birth.

Of course, the land needed to be dyked and drained for at least three years before it could be farmed, but that could wait until Alexandre was old enough.

I like to think of Michel walking here, selecting the land, imagining his grandchildren playing in the sunshine decades in the future.

This map may be slightly skewed. I used the 1710 original map and landmarks to attempt to locate Alexander’s property more precisely in preparation for a 2024 visit, so let’s see what we have.

Of course, it doesn’t help that some of the geography has been changed in the intervening three centuries. Roads have been laid, rivers have flooded, changing their courses, and, of course, those original maps weren’t 100% accurate.

It was easy to match up both the east bend in the river and the Bridgetown bend, although the Bridgetown bend has changed a bit. I should probably have turned one of these maps upsidedown.

Alexander Richard’s property was probably someplace near or between the two red stars.

Unfortunately, the view from the Harvest Highway and also from 201 is very obscured by trees.

Perhaps the best view of both sides is from the bridge itself.

This is looking south, but keeping in mind that the Acadians specialized in farming reclaimed marshland. The view looking north probably overlooks Alexandre’s fields.

Click to enlarge any image

You can see the river running beneath the bridge on the highway, where that first car is located, just before the sign. The fields between this bridge and the river would have been Alexandre’s.

Alexandre, and possibly Michel before him, would have worked these fields, as seen from the bridge over the Annapolis River.

The fields visible on both the left and right sides of the bridge, on the south side of the river, would probably have been his.

The location of the house and barn today, above the fields, is probably near the same place as it was then.

On the northeast side of the intersection of 101 and 201, there’s a small dirt road that serves one farm and also provides utility road access.

I drove up this road until I reached a fence with a warning sign, and the road began to deteriorate substantially.

This well-manicured field is still farmed.

I can see Alexandre tending the crops and farm animals, remembering his father fondly.

The father he never knew, who died when he was just a toddler.

The father who provided for him, even from the other side of death.

I returned to Highway 201, the road along the south side of the river, and turned towards the east bend.

Based on the river bends and the distance between easily identified landmarks, the Richard land may have been as far east as the red arrow.

These fields are hundreds of years old – drained by Alexander Richard and his neighbors and possibly begun by Michel.

Acadian men worked together on these tasks. Everyone helped everyone.

This model shows Acadian farmland. It takes at least three years after a salt marsh is dyked for the salt to wash out so it can be cultivated, and the dykes must be maintained to keep the fields salt-free.

Notice the stream, which is one of the cornerstone anchor landmarks I used to align this Google map with the 1710 map when searching for Alexandre’s land.

Michel Richard’s Legacy

I drove by, looking towards the river over the reclaimed marshland, thinking about Michel.

Did he ever dream that his descendant would return to find him, some three and a half centuries later? WikiTree, which doesn’t include all of his descendants, shows nearly 200,000. That’s ten times the size of the entire county where Annapolis Royal is located today, half the size of the Halifax, Nova Scotia, metropolitan region and one quarter of the population of all of Nova Scotia. That’s incredible for a humble Acadian farmer.

Everyone wants to leave a legacy. Sansoucy, carefree, is what pops into my mind when I soak in this sun-drenched summertime landscape, picturing Michel walking here.

Indeed, perhaps Michel Richard’s legacy of land enabled his son, Alexandre, to be Sansoucy too.

Perhaps a little of his Sansoucy has been passed down to all of us.

_____________________________________________________________

Share the Love!

You’re always welcome to forward articles or links to friends and share on social media.

Subscribe!

If you haven’t already subscribed (it’s free,) you can receive an e-mail whenever I publish by clicking the “follow” button on the main blog page, here.

Help Keep This Blog Free

I receive a small contribution when you click on some of the links to vendors in my articles. This does NOT increase your price but helps me keep the lights on and this informational blog free for everyone. Please click on the affiliate links in the articles or to the vendors below if you are purchasing products or DNA testing.

Thank you so much.

DNA Purchases and Free Uploads

Genealogy Products and Services

My Books

Genealogy Books

Genealogy Research

Ancestry Reverts ThruLines to the Original View

Just a quick note to let everyone know that Ancestry has reverted ThruLines back to the original, legacy version, and has obsoleted the new pedigree view. I wrote about the new version in the article Ancestry’s ThruLines Has a New Pedigree View just three days ago.

  • If you didn’t yet have the new version of ThruLines, you won’t receive it because it has now been obsoleted.
  • If you DID have the new version, everyone has now been reverted back to the original or legacy version, including the important “Evaluate” feature that was missing in the new version

It’s always a good thing when vendors listen to their customers.

That said, I hope Ancestry is working on a new and truly “improved” version that combines the best features of both views, including Evaluate, as suggested by many customers and blog readers, and provides customers with the option to default to either view.

_____________________________________________________________

Share the Love!

You’re always welcome to forward articles or links to friends and share on social media.

Subscribe!

If you haven’t already subscribed (it’s free,) you can receive an e-mail whenever I publish by clicking the “follow” button on the main blog page, here.

Help Keep This Blog Free

I receive a small contribution when you click on some of the links to vendors in my articles. This does NOT increase your price but helps me keep the lights on and this informational blog free for everyone. Please click on the affiliate links in the articles or to the vendors below if you are purchasing products or DNA testing.

Thank you so much.

DNA Purchases and Free Uploads

Genealogy Products and Services

My Books

Genealogy Books

Genealogy Research

Ancestry’s ThruLines Has a New Pedigree View

Update: Ancestry obsoleted this new feature on December 5, 2025.

Ancestry recently updated ThruLines and introduced a new pedigree view.

I’m not sure that everyone has the new view yet, so here’s what to expect.

If you do have the new feature, let’s take a look, because there’s new functionality you may not have discovered.

When I signed in and clicked on ThruLines on the DNA tab, the first thing I saw certainly looked different. Needless to say, I was surprised because I wasn’t expecting anything new.

Click on any image to enlarge

This doesn’t look anything like what we’re used to, but Ancestry provides navigation buttons.

One person mentioned that the new view was so small they couldn’t really see clearly, but by rolling your mouse button up or clicking on the little “+” button in the upper right-hand corner, it’s easy to enlarge.

That said, on this and especially on subsequent screens, I would very much like for there to be less white space at the top, or have a “full screen” option.

You can navigate up your tree by clicking on the little up arrows above the ancestors in the top row.

The Tile Display is Still There

But perhaps more importantly for people who prefer the previous display, it’s actually right there.

Click on the little tile button to switch from the pedigree to the traditional tile view.

It’s easy to toggle back and forth.

Take a look at the new ThruLines layout. If you don’t like it, select the tiled version

Why Do I Like the Pedigree View?

I like the pedigree view because it lets me easily see how people connect with each other. While I’m intimately familiar with the more recent generations, I don’t like the more distant ancestors all being smooshed together in the tile view.

In the pedigree view, I can see how many of my matches descend from each ancestor in the tree format.

Clicking on that number opens the dropdown showing the matches and how they descend from that ancestor.

In these expanded tree views, we really do need a full-screen option. It is challenging to see the entire sequence of descent.

My focus right now is on determining if anyone that I match carries the mitochondrial DNA of my paternal grandmother. On other ancestral lines, I have both the Y-DNA and mtDNA from generations back in time, but not my grandmother. I’m hoping to remedy that.

This layout makes it easy to see that there are many potential candidates for generations upstream. If I find the right person, descended from that ancestor through all females to the current generation, which can be male, I’ll be offering them a DNA testing scholarship for a mitochondrial DNA test at FamilyTreeDNA.

Suggestions for Improving the View

Perhaps Ancestry will provide the option of selecting a default view, so we can select our favorite – tile or pedigree – plus a full-screen option for pedigree view.

Another alternative would be for the pedigree view to be horizontal and extend left to right instead of top to bottom, the same as Ancestry’s traditional trees.

Truthfully, I really like the pedigree format and functionality of the new ThruLines pedigree view, but I greatly prefer the layout of this traditional tree. It’s much easier to see and is expandable without running off the top or bottom of the screen. Maybe Ancestry could combine the best features of both.

Update: A sharp-eyed reader caught that the “Evaluate” feature is now gone, which used to allow you to evaluate other people’s trees that suggested the ThruLines connection. This is really important, and I hope that Ancestry restores it. Genealogists must evaluate everything and weigh the evidence when determining if a connection is accurate.

_____________________________________________________________

Share the Love!

You’re always welcome to forward articles or links to friends and share on social media.

Subscribe!

If you haven’t already subscribed (it’s free,) you can receive an e-mail whenever I publish by clicking the “follow” button on the main blog page, here.

Help Keep This Blog Free

I receive a small contribution when you click on some of the links to vendors in my articles. This does NOT increase your price but helps me keep the lights on and this informational blog free for everyone. Please click on the affiliate links in the articles or to the vendors below if you are purchasing products or DNA testing.

Thank you so much.

DNA Purchases and Free Uploads

Genealogy Products and Services

My Books

Genealogy Books

Genealogy Research