2016 Genetic Genealogy Retrospective

In past years, I’ve written a “best of” article about genetic genealogy happenings throughout the year. For several years, the genetic genealogy industry was relatively new, and there were lots of new tools being announced by the testing vendors and others as well.

This year is a bit different. I’ve noticed a leveling off – there have been very few announcements of new tools by vendors, with only a few exceptions.  I think genetic genealogy is maturing and has perhaps begun a new chapter.  Let’s take a look.

Vendors

Family Tree DNA

Family Tree DNA leads the pack this year with their new Phased Family Matches which utilizes close relatives, up to third cousins, to assign your matches to either maternal or paternal buckets, or both if the individual is related on both sides of your tree.

Both Buckets

They are the first and remain the only vendor to offer this kind of feature.

Phased FF2

Phased Family Matching is extremely useful in terms of identifying which side of your family tree your matches are from. This tool, in addition to Family Tree DNA’s nine other autosomal tools helps identify common ancestors by showing you who is related to whom.

Family Tree DNA has also added other features such as a revamped tree with the ability to connect DNA results to family members.  DNA results connected to the tree is the foundation for the new Phased Family Matching.

The new Ancient Origins feature, released in November, was developed collaboratively with Dr. Michael Hammer at the University of Arizona Hammer Lab.

Ancient European Origins is based on the full genome sequencing work now being performed in the academic realm on ancient remains. These European results fall into three primary groups of categories based on age and culture.  Customer’s DNA is compared to the ancient remains to determine how much of the customer’s European DNA came from which group.  This exciting new feature allows us to understand more about our ancestors, long before the advent of surnames and paper or parchment records. Ancient DNA is redefining what we know, or thought we knew, about population migration.

2016-ancient-origins

You can view Dr. Hammer’s presentation given at the Family Tree DNA Conference in conjunction with the announcement of the new Ancient Origins feature here.

Family Tree DNA maintains its leadership position among the three primary vendors relative to Y DNA testing, mtDNA testing and autosomal tools.

Ancestry

In May of 2016, Ancestry changed the chip utilized by their tests, removing about 300,000 of their previous 682,000 SNPs and replacing them with medically optimized SNPs. The rather immediate effect was that due to the chip incompatibility, Ancestry V2 test files created on the new chip cannot be uploaded to Family Tree DNA, but they can be uploaded to GedMatch.  Family Tree DNA is working on a resolution to this problem.

I tested on the new Ancestry V2 chip, and while there is a difference in how much matching DNA I share with my matches as compared to the V1 chip, it’s not as pronounced as I expected. There is no need for people who tested on the earlier chip to retest.

Unfortunately, Ancestry has remained steadfast in their refusal to implement a chromosome browser, instead focusing on sales by advertising the ethnicity “self-discovery” aspect of DNA testing.

Ancestry does have the largest autosomal data base but many people tested only for ethnicity, don’t have trees or have private trees.  In my case, about half of my matches fall into that category.

Ancestry maintains its leadership position relative to DNA tree matching, known as a Shared Ancestor Hint, identifying common ancestors in the trees of people whose DNA matches.

ancestry-common-ancestors

23andMe

23andMe struggled for most of the year to meet a November 2015 deadline, which is now more than a year past, to transition its customers to the 23andMe “New Experience” which includes a new customer interface. I was finally transitioned in September 2016, and the experience has been very frustrating and extremely disappointing, and that’s putting it mildly. Some customers, specifically international customers, are still not transitioned, nor is it clear if or when they will be.

I tested on the 23andMe older V3 chip as well as their newer V4 chip. After my transition to the New Experience, I compared the results of the two tests. The new security rules incorporated into the New Experience meant that I was only able to view about 25% of my matches (400 of 1651(V3) matches or 1700 (V4) matches). 23andMe has, in essence, relegated themselves into the non-player status for genetic genealogy, except perhaps for adoptees who need to swim in every pool – but only then as a last place candidate. And those adoptees had better pray that if they have a close match, that match falls into the 25% of their matches that are useful.

In December, 23andMe began providing segment information for ethnicity segments, except the parental phasing portion does not function accurately, calling into question the overall accuracy of the 23andme ethnicity information. Ironically, up until now, while 23andMe slipped in every other area, they had been viewed at the best, meaning most accurate, in terms of ethnicity estimates.

New Kids on the Block

MyHeritage

In May of 2016, MyHeritage began encouraging people who have tested at other vendors to upload their results. I was initially very hesitant, because aside from GedMatch that has a plethora of genetic genealogy tools, I have seen no benefit to the participant to upload their DNA anyplace, other than Family Tree DNA (available for V3 23andMe and V1 Ancestry only).

Any serious genealogist is going to test at least at Family Tree DNA and Ancestry, both, and upload to GedMatch. My Heritage was “just another upload site” with no tools, not even matching initially.

However, in September, MyHeritage implemented matching, although they have had a series of what I hope are “startup issues,” with numerous invalid matches, apparently resulting from their usage of imputation.

Imputation is when a vendor infers what they think your DNA will look like in regions where other vendors test, and your vendor doesn’t. The best example would be the 300,000 or so Ancestry locations that are unique to the Ancestry V2 chip. Imputation would result in a vendor “inferring” or imputing your results for these 300,000 locations based on…well, we don’t exactly know based on what. But we do know it cannot be accurate.  It’s not your DNA.

In the midst of this, in October, 23andMe announced on their forum that they had severed a previous business relationship with MyHeritage where 23andMe allowed customers to link to MyHeritage trees in lieu of having customer trees directly on the 23andMe site.  This approach had been problematic because customers are only allowed 250 individuals in their tree for free, and anything above that requires a MyHeritage subscription.  Currently 23andMe has no tree capability.

It appears that MyHeritage refined their DNA matching routines at least somewhat, because many of the bogus matches were gone in November when they announced that their beta was complete and that they were going to sell their own autosomal DNA tests. However, matching issues have not disappeared or been entirely resolved.

While Family Tree DNA’s lab will be processing the MyHeritage autosomal tests, the results will NOT be automatically placed in the Family Tree DNA data base.

MyHeritage will be doing their own matching within their own database. There are no comparison tools, tree matching or ethnicity estimates today, but My Heritage says they will develop a chromosome browser and ethnicity estimates. However, it is NOT clear whether these will be available for free to individuals who have transferred their results into MyHeritage or if they will only be available to people who tested through MyHeritage.

2016-myheritage-matches

For the record, I have 28 matches today at MyHeritage.

2016-myheritage-second-match

I found that my second closest match at MyHeritage is also at Ancestry.

2016-myheritage-at-ancestry

At MyHeritage, they report that I match this individual on a total of 64.1 cM, across 7 segments, with the largest segment being 14.9 cM.

Ancestry reports this same match at 8.3 cM total across 1 segment, which of course means that the longest segment is also 8.3 cM.

Ancestry estimates the relationship as 5th to 8th cousin, and MyHeritage estimates it as 2nd to 4th.

While I think Ancestry’s Timber strips out too much DNA, there is clearly a HUGE difference in the reported results and the majority of this issue likely lies with the MyHeritage DNA imputation and matching routines.

I uploaded my Family Tree DNA autosomal file to MyHeritage, so MyHeritage is imputing at least 300,000 SNPs for me – almost half of the SNPs needed to match to Ancestry files.  They are probably imputing that many for my match’s file too, so that we have an equal number of SNPs for comparison.  Combined, this would mean that my match and I are comparing 382,000 actual SNPs that we both tested, and roughly 600,000 SNPs that we did not test and were imputed.  No wonder the MyHeritage numbers are so “off.”

My Heritage has a long way to go before they are a real player in this arena. However, My Heritage has potential, as they have a large subscriber base in Europe, where we desperately need additional testers – so I’m hopeful that they can attract additional genealogists that are willing to test from areas that are under-represented to date.

My Heritage got off to a bit of a rocky start by requiring users to relinquish the rights to their DNA, but then changed their terms in May, according to Judy Russell’s blog.

All vendors can change their terms at any time, in a positive or negative direction, so I would strongly encourage all individuals considering utilizing any testing company or upload service to closely read all the legal language, including Terms and Conditions and any links found in the Terms and Conditions.

Please note that MyHeritage is a subscription genealogy site, similar to Ancestry.  MyHeritage also owns Geni.com.  One site, MyHeritage, allows individual trees and the other, Geni, embraces the “one world tree” model.  For a comparison of the two, check out Judy Russell’s articles, here and here.  Geni has also embraced DNA by allowing uploads from Family Tree DNA of Y, mitochondrial and autosomal, but the benefits and possible benefits are much less clear.

If the MyHeritage story sounds like a confusing soap opera, it is.  Let’s hope that 2017 brings both clarity and improvements.

Living DNA

Living DNA is a company out of the British Isles with a new test that purports to provide you with a breakdown of your ethnicity and the locations of your ancestral lines within 21 regions in the British Isles.  Truthfully, I’m very skeptical, but open minded.

They have had my kit for several weeks now, and testing has yet to begin.  I’ll write about the results when I receive them.  So far, I don’t know of anyone who has received results.

2016-living-dna

Genos

I debated whether or not I should include Genos, because they are not a test for genealogy and are medically focused. However, I am including them because they have launched a new model for genetic testing wherein your full exome is tested, you receive the results along with information on the SNPs where mutations are found. You can then choose to be involved with research programs in the future, if you wish, or not.

That’s a vastly different model that the current approach taken by 23andMe and Ancestry where you relinquish your rights to the sale of your DNA when you sign up to test.  I like this new approach with complete transparency, allowing the customer to decide the fate of their DNA. I wrote about the Genos test and the results, here.

Third Parties

Individuals sometimes create and introduce new tools to assist genealogists with genetic genealogy and analysis.

I have covered these extensively over the years.

GedMatch, WikiTree, DNAGedcom.com and Kitty Cooper’s tools remain my favorites.

I love Kitty’s Ancestor Chromosome Mapper which maps the segments identified with your ancestors on your chromosomes. I just love seeing which ancestors’ DNA I carry on which chromosomes.  Somehow, this makes me feel closer to them.  They’re not really gone, because they still exist in me and other descendants as well.

Roberta's ancestor map2

In order to use Kitty’s tool, you’ll have to have mapped at least some of your autosomal DNA to ancestors.

The Autosomal DNA Segment Analyzer written by Don Worth and available at DNAGedcom is still one of my favorite tools for quick, visual and easy to understand segment matching results.

ADSA Crumley cluster

GedMatch has offered a triangulation tool for some time now, but recently introduced a new Triangulation Groups tool.

2016-gedmatch-triangulation-groups

I have not utilized this tool extensively but it looks very interesting. Unfortunately, there is no explanation or help function available for what this tool is displaying or how to understand and interpret the results. Hopefully, that will be added soon, as I think it would be possible to misinterpret the output without educational material.

GedMatch also introduced their “Evil Twin” tool, which made me laugh when I saw the name.  Using parental phasing, you can phase your DNA to your parent or parents at GedMatch, creating kits that only have your mother’s half of your DNA, or your father’s half.  These phased kits allow you to see your matches that come from that parent, only.  However, the “Evil Twin” feature creates a kit made up of the DNA that you DIDN’T receive from that parent – so in essence it’s your other half, your evil twin – you know, that person who got blamed for everything you “didn’t do.”  In any case, this allows you to see the matches to the other half of your parent’s DNA that do not show up as your matches.

Truthfully, the Evil Twin tool is interesting, but since you have to have that parent’s DNA to phase against in the first place, it’s just as easy to look at your parent’s matches – at least for me.

Others offer unique tools that are a bit different.

DNAadoption.com offers tools, search and research techniques, especially for adoptees and those looking to identify a parent or grandparents, but perhaps even more important, they offer genetic genealogy classes including basic and introductory.

I send all adoptees in their direction, but I encourage everyone to utilize their classes.

WikiTree has continued to develop and enhance their DNA offerings.  While WikiTree is not a testing service nor do they offer autosomal data tools like Family Tree DNA and GedMatch, they do allow individuals to discover whether anyone in their ancestral line has tested their Y, mitochondrial or autosomal DNA.

Specifically, you can identify the haplogroup of any male or female ancestor if another individual from that direct lineage has tested and provided that information for that ancestor on WikiTree.  While I am generally not a fan of the “one world tree” types of implementations, I am a fan of WikiTree because of their far-sighted DNA comparisons, the fact that they actively engage their customers, they listen and they expend a significant amount of effort making sure they “get it right,” relative to DNA. Check out WikiTree’s article,  Putting DNA Results Into Action, for how to utilize their DNA Features.

2016-wikitree-peter-roberts

Thanks particularly to Chris Whitten at WikiTree and Peter Roberts for their tireless efforts.  WikiTree is the only vendor to offer the ability to discover the Y and mtDNA haplogroups of ancestors by searching trees.

All of the people creating the tools mentioned above, to the best of my knowledge, are primarily volunteers, although GedMatch does charge a small subscription service for their high end tools, including the triangulation and evil twin tools.  DNAGedcom does as well.  Wikitree generates some revenue for the site through ads on pages of non-members. DNAAdoption charges nominally for classes but they do have need-based scholarships. Kitty has a donation link on her website and all of these folks would gladly accept donations, I’m sure.  Websites and everything that goes along with them aren’t free.  Donations are a nice way to say thank you.

What Defined 2016

I have noticed two trends in the genetic genealogy industry in 2016, and they are intertwined – ethnicity and education.

First, there is an avalanche of new testers, many of whom are not genetic genealogists.

Why would one test if they weren’t a genetic genealogist?

The answer is simple…

Ethnicity.

Or more specifically, the targeted marketing of ethnicity.  Ethnicity testing looks like an easy, quick answer to a basic human question, and it sells kits.

Ethnicity

“Kim just wanted to know who she was.”

I have to tell you, these commercials absolutely make me CRINGE.

Yes, they do bring additional testers into the community, BUT carrying significantly misset expectations. If you’re wondering about WHY I would suggest that ethnicity results really cannot tell you “who you are,” check out this article about ethnicity estimates.

And yes, that’s what they are, estimates – very interesting estimates, but estimates just the same.  Estimates that provide important and valid hints and clues, but not definitive answers.

ESTIMATES.

Nothing more.

Estimates based on proprietary vendor algorithms that tend to be fairly accurate at the continental level, and not so much within continents – in particular, not terribly accurate within Europe. Not all of this can be laid a the vendor’s feet.  For example, DNA testing is illegal in France.  Not to mention, genetic genealogy and population genetics is still a new and emerging field.  We’re on the frontier, folks.

The ethnicity results one receives from the 3 major vendors (Ancestry, Family Tree DNA and 23andMe) and the various tools at GedMatch don’t and won’t agree – because they use different reference populations, different matching routines, etc.  Not to mention people and populations move around and have moved around.

The next thing that happens, after these people receive their results, is that we find them on the Facebook groups asking questions like, “Why doesn’t my full blooded Native American grandmother show up?” and “I just got my Ancestry results back. What do I do?”  They mean that question quite literally.

I’m not making fun of these people, or light of the situation. Their level of frustration and confusion is evident. I feel sorry for them…but the genetic genealogy community and the rest of us are left with applying ointment and Band-Aids.  Truthfully, we’re out-numbered.

Because of the expectations, people who test today don’t realize that genetic testing is a TOOL, it’s not an ANSWER. It’s only part of the story. Oh, and did I mention, ethnicity is only an ESTIMATE!!!

But an estimate isn’t what these folks are expecting. They are expecting “the answer,” their own personal answer, which is very, very unfortunate, because eventually they are either unhappy or blissfully unaware.

Many become unhappy because they perceive the results to be in error without understanding anything about the technology or what information can reasonably be delivered, or they swallow “the answer” lock stock and barrel, again, without understanding anything about the technology.

Ethnicity is fun, it isn’t “bad” but the results need to be evaluated in context with other information, such as Y and mitochondrial haplogroups, genealogical records and ethnicity results from the other major testing companies.

Fortunately, we can recruit some of the ethnicity testers to become genealogists, but that requires education and encouragement. Let’s hope that those DNA ethnicity results light the fires of curiosity and that we can fan those flames!

Education

The genetic genealogy community desperately needs educational resources, in part as a result of the avalanche of new testers – approximately 1 million a year, and that estimate may be low. Thankfully, we do have several education options – but we can always use more.  Unfortunately, the learning curve is rather steep.

My blog offers just shy of 800 articles, all key word searchable, but one has to first find the blog and want to search and learn, as opposed to being handed “the answer.”

Of course, the “Help” link is always a good place to start as are these articles, DNA Testing for Genealogy 101 and Autosomal DNA Testing 101.  These two articles should be “must reads” for everyone who has DNA tested, or wants to, for that matter.  Tips and Tricks for Contact Success is another article that is immensely helpful to people just beginning to reach out.

In order to address the need for basic understanding of autosomal DNA principles, tools and how to utilize them, I began the “Concepts” series in February 2016. To date I offer the following 15 articles about genetic genealogy concepts. To be clear, DNA testing is only the genetic part of genetic genealogy, the genealogical research part being the second half of the equation.

The Concepts Series

Concepts – How Your Autosomal DNA Identifies Your Ancestors

Concepts – Identical By Descent, State, Population and Chance

Concepts – CentiMorgans, SNPs and Pickin’ Crab

Concepts – Parental Phasing

Concepts – Y DNA Matching and Connecting With Your Paternal Ancestor

Concepts – Downloading Autosomal Data From Family Tree DNA

Concepts – Managing Autosomal DNA Matches – Step 1 – Assigning Parental Sides

Concepts – Genetic Distance

Concepts – Relationship Predictions

Concepts – Match Groups and Triangulation

Concepts – Sorting Spreadsheets for Autosomal DNA

Concepts – Managing Autosomal DNA Matches – Step 2 – Updating Matching Spreadsheets, Bucketed Family Finder Matches and Pileups

Concepts – Why DNA Testing the Oldest Family Members Is Critically Important

Concepts – Undocumented Adoptions Versus Untested Y Lines

My blog isn’t the only resource of course.

Kelly Wheaton provides 19 free lessons in her Beginners Guide to Genetic Genealogy.

Other blogs I highly recommend include:

Excellent books in print that should be in every genetic genealogist’s library:

And of course, the ISOGG Wiki.

Online Conference Resources

The good news and bad news is that I’m constantly seeing a genetic genealogy seminar, webinar or symposium hosted by a group someplace that is online, and often free. When I see names I recognize as being reputable, I am delighted that there is so much available to people who want to learn.

And for the record, I think that includes everyone. Even professional genetic genealogists watch these sessions, because you just never know what wonderful tidbit you’re going to pick up.  Learning, in this fast moving field, is an everyday event.

The bad news is that I can’t keep track of everything available, so I don’t mean to slight any resource.  Please feel free to post additional resources in the comments.

You would be hard pressed to find any genealogy conference, anyplace, today that didn’t include at least a few sessions about genetic genealogy. However, genetic genealogy has come of age and has its own dedicated conferences.

Dr. Maurice Gleeson, the gentleman who coordinates Genetic Genealogy Ireland films the sessions at the conference and then makes them available, for free, on YouTube. This link provides a list of the various sessions from 2016 and past years as well. Well worth your time!  A big thank you to Maurice!!!

The 19 video series from the I4GG Conference this fall is now available for $99. This series is an excellent opportunity for genetic genealogy education.

As always, I encourage project administrators to attend the Family Tree DNA International Conference on Genetic Genealogy. The sessions are not filmed, but the slides are made available after the conference, courtesy of the presenters and Family Tree DNA. You can view the presentations from 2015 and 2016 at this link.

Jennifer Zinck attended the conference and published her excellent notes here and here, if you want to read what she had to say about the sessions she attended. Thankfully, she can type much faster and more accurately than I can! Thank you so much Jennifer.

If you’d like to read about the unique lifetime achievement awards presented at the conference this year to Bennett Greenspan and Max Blankfeld, the founders of Family Tree DNA, click here. They were quite surprised!  This article also documents the history of genetic genealogy from the beginning – a walk down memory lane.

The 13th annual Family Tree DNA conference which will be held November 10-12, 2017 at the Hyatt Regency North Houston. Registration is always limited due to facility size, so mark your calendars now, watch for the announcement and be sure to register in time.

Summary

2016 has been an extremely busy year. I think my blog has had more views, more comments and by far, more questions, than ever before.

I’ve noticed that the membership in the ISOGG Facebook group, dedicated to genetic genealogy, has increased by about 50% in the past year, from roughly 8,000 members to just under 12,000. Other social media groups have been formed as well, some focused on specific aspects of genetic genealogy, such as specific surnames, adoption search, Native American or African American heritage and research.

The genetic aspect of genealogy has become “normal” today, with most genealogists not only accepting DNA testing, but embracing the various tools and what they can do for us in terms of understanding our ancestors, tracking them, and verifying that they are indeed who we think they are.

I may have to explain the three basic kinds of DNA testing and how they are used today, but no longer do I have to explain THAT DNA testing for genealogy exists and that it’s legitimate.

I hope that each of us can become an ambassador for genetic genealogy, encouraging others to test, with appropriate expectations, and helping to educate, enlighten and encourage. After all, the more people who test and are excited about the results, the better for everyone else.

Genetic genealogy is and can only be a collaborative team sport.

Here’s wishing you many new cousins and discoveries in 2017.

Happy New Year!!!

44 thoughts on “2016 Genetic Genealogy Retrospective

  1. Regarding phased parental matching

    My cousin Bennett has had his aT and Y DNA on FTDNA for some time. I recently reloaded a more updated Gedcom that includes many ancestors from his maternal side. Still only paternal matches are showing as identified.

    How does the DNA get connected to the tree? You used to be able to identify relationships by mutual confirmation but now you have to “link” them. The choices offed when you try to do that do not include first cousins which is what my relationship is to him so I am unsure if or how to make sure that FTDNA knows how to utilize the new tree information in combination with his DNA results. None of the new tree information is for anyone who has tested. Does that make it impossible to make any DNA connections?.

    • You don’t specify the relationship. You link the person who tested to their proper place in the tree. You may have to add them to their parents. Once you do, then FTDNA will find a person with that same name that is a DNA match to you and ask if it’s the right person. You say yes and they are connected in the proper place to be a first cousin.

    • The people who upload to DNALand have tested at one of the Big 3 and I have already tested at all 3, so there is no benefit. If you’re looking for matches, GedMatch is a better choice.

    • Genes for Good is not for genetic genealogy, so I have not evaluated them. I don’t know what you do or don’t receive. I would want to know if a pharmaceutical company is going to get rich off of my DNA and create drugs that I might not even be able to afford. I want to know what is happening to my DNA. I don’t know how Genes for Good handles this – but those the things I would look for. Do you have control? Do you have input? Do you get results? Are you relinquishing your rights to everything?

    • Like MyHeritage, DNA.Land use imputation. I found their “matches” beyond very close relatives to be highly dubious. They identified one person as a 5th cousin but did not match me to either of his parents’ results which he had also uploaded. When I questioned this with DNA.Land they told me it was normal and to be expected.

  2. Hi Roberta,

    I have also tested with Living DNA and am having to wait until February for results – almost three months since I provided swabs. I am happy to send you my opinion once they report to me.

    Happy new year.

    Paul Chennell.

    Sent from my iPhone

  3. A terrific summary of the providers and services. Apart from the excellent points you make, 23andMe also rule themselves out of the international market by using high cost courier services rather than regular post, effectively doubling the cost of testing with them.

  4. I ordered my Living DNA on 06/11/2016. Testing started 12/02/2016. Results projected for 02/20/2017. I am curious more anything else. I am just a DNA junkie!

      • I can understand your personal preferen but you indicate you don’t like My Heritage much and yet have an extensive review. Geneomate Pro has much to offer with a robust user interface and the ability to consolidate all DNA genealogy data in one place. It has many users in the genealogy community. I would be happy to share my experience and encourage you to try it again.

      • MyHeritage was new on the DNA scene this year and they are offering DNA testing. I have tried GenomeMate Pro twice. The uploads didn’t work correctly and I found it difficult and cumbersome to use. For heavens sake, it has a 200+ page users guide, to begin with. I know how to manage spreadsheets and have years of experience doing so. I’m glad it’s working for you, but GenomeMate Pro is not for me. I won’t write a negative recommendation for something I haven’t worked with, but I won’t write something positive when I haven’t had a positive experience either, and I see no benefit to spending the time and effort and investment in learning the application (i.e. beginning by reading the 200 page users guide) to try it a third time.

  5. Roberta, I must agree that the genetic testing ads we are all bombarded with are indeed cringeworthy, even though for practical purposes they do pull more people into the genetic pool. Also, regarding the genealogy ads, it’s like – press a key and download your ancestry! Just like that! And I’m afraid it really isn’t – and shouldn’t – be interpreted to be that easy. For those of us who slogged away at microfilm readers many years ago, when that was the only way to go (and which, in my opinion, was ultimately the most fun!), hitting a key and downloading your family tree would be rather lame. You need to put in the elbow grease to appreciate the results.

    One thing that disappoints me is the number of people in the past year who have signed up with FTDNA but who post absolutely no information regarding their ancestry. It really doesn’t take long to add that information, and it would make those entries so much more meaningful.

    One last note – keep blogging! Greatly appreciated by all of us readers! And a Happy New Year to you!

  6. Hi Roberta,

    Not sure if this is the right forum to ask, but have you every come across problems with Ancestry not indexing DNA matches correctly? I just came across a DNA cousin, who is a match on Ancestry but if I search on him in my list of matches or using common surnames, he doesn’t show up. If I search on his user profile, it shows we are a match.

  7. Hello-
    I have a 1C3R (who tested at FTDNA in 2007, at age 95, but has since passed away) and I linked him to my tree on there as a 1c3r and the administrator of his test confirmed it. We share twice as much DNA as we should (218 cM) and I still haven’t gotten any family phasing.

  8. Hi Roberta
    Just wanted to say a big THANK YOU for your most enjoyable blogs. Your evaluations are very helpful.
    I too have had to sit a few friends down and explain the reality versus the expectations of the new dna testing ads before they “waste their money”. And I’m not sure the increase to the database does us any good when these are probably the very ones that don’t have trees linked to their profiles and don’t reply when you contact them.
    I am currently reading Adam Rutherford’s, A Brief History of Everyone Who Ever Lived. Very informative about what our DNA can and can’t tell us, and entertaining to boot.
    Have a happy and prosperous 2017!

  9. Thank you for this annual update Roberta. I did want to point out that Maurice uploads the presentations from Who Do You Think You Are as well – which can cover the rest of the UK. In some ways DNA recruitment outside Ireland is more difficult, as the surviving records are that much better. Adam Rutherford is down to speak at WDYTYA 2017, as far as I know from Debbie – which will be very interesting and will help if he hangs around long enough to have a decent conversation. Autosomal DNA tests are big in America. More worked examples solving particular genealogical problems in the mainland of Britain will help. I have finally tested there, partly to help solve one particular genealogical problem, but partly to help educate my two grandsons on how DNA is inherited. I am sure it will be first when they walk their grandparents autosomal DNA profiles into the classroom.

  10. Happy New Year’s Roberta! Thanks for including me here. Everything you mention is great except I have one tiny point of disagreement…
    The purpose of uploading to DNA.land is to contribute your DNA to a very fine lab for scientific research and that makes it worthwhile to do. True there are few matches there but I like their presentation of ancestry composition and their compact chromosome display which includes “old” pieces. If you search for DNA.land on my blog I have several useful posts about them and yes I have met several of their people.

  11. Hi and happy new year

    In regards to Geni and their DNA matchings………I went from 230 matches prior to doing my BigY to now having over 6000 matches ……….clearly their world wide tree is flawed for DNA matching.

    Wegene is interesting , even if they use terms like, Sardinian for all Italians and hungarians to represent Germans as well etc …………….their other informational areas are good.
    One just needs to get the English version

    warm regards

  12. Thanks much for the news on LIving DNA. I reserve judgment as you do, Roberta, but was most interested to note they apparently have the results of the POBI Project (People of the British Isles). For a little more background your readers may want to look at the March 2015 POBI Newsletter: http://www.peopleofthebritishisles.org/nl6.pdf

    I confess I succumbed to the lure and sent in for a test even before I read your future review. My ethnicity results from Ancestry/FT/23 were all in rough alignment with my paper genealogy and helped solve a mystery. So, I’m hoping this new company will be an additional step forward, and also encourage the other big companies to keep competing.

  13. Is it possible to test both my aunt and uncle (brother and sister) autosomal DNA and them to have different matches. In other words I have tested my aunt but wondering if I should test her brother as well in case I might get new matches since they say siblings don’t inherit the exact same DNA from their parents, or would I be wasting my money testing her brother?

  14. Is there a reason why the phased matches show up one minute and gone the next? I remember you once had a link in an article with Campbell’s. Could you let me know which one it was. I found a Ydna match between my cousin and a William Campbell you manage- The ancestor is a George Campbell born 1771 at Clairborn, TN.

    TKU for all the great and informative information you share. Happy New Year and please don’t stop.

    • There are two male Campbell articles for John Campbell (brother to George) and Charles Campbell, father to both. Theo ne female is Elizabeth Campbell, daughter of John. If you type Campbell into the search box in the upper right corner of the blog, all of these articles will display and you can select the one you want.

      • I found the articles and had them saved for further use in a file I keep of all of your blogs here. Getting full for sure. I did as you had advised another to have a male Campbell tested. My cousin (our grandfathers were half brothers) gladly agreed. He is part of Kevin Campbell’s group of 30 and tested positive L-1335 and FGG10125. Since I manage the kit, I get the new Y matches and I saw William. Checking on mutations etc, is something I am trying to learn.

        Once again TKU very much.
        Donna Campbell Goodwin

  15. Hello,

    Thank for this helpful post! Family Tree DNA has some nice options. Are you able to offer perspective on how the “transfer” works?

    If an individual options to “Transfer” their DNA – are they “moving” their DNA from Ancestry to Family Tree DNA? Or is the Transfer simply having an additional “copy” of the same raw DNA sample at Ancestry and at Family Tree DNA?

    Thank you!

    Michelle

    • When a customer transfers their DNA, they are downloading a copy of their raw data file from one company and uploading that copy to the second company. The original copy stays at the original company, so it’s entirely unaffected.

  16. I recently tested at Family Tree DNA and got over 2,600 “cousin” matches. Over the last couple of months that number has grown to almost 2,800. I picked out a dozen at the “2nd-4th” cousin range, sent an email to them and provided a list of my family surnames back quite a few generations. So far I’ve heard from one who stated he had 3 or 4 of the same surnames and would take a look to see how we might be connected. The second response was from a person who said they did not see a SINGLE surname that matched any of theirs and they offered no interest in pursuing it further, except to suggest I test with Ancestry! Again, these people are identified as 2nd-4th cousins! Haven’t heard from the others but haven’t given up! Most people on my list don’t even have a modest family tree showing in the FamilyTreeDNA system so haven’t really gotten anywhere with that either! I’m a little disappointed but, at this point in my life and in my family research, I’m in a position to GIVE way more help than I get! I’m also awaiting test results for my two children and my brother. Thank you to FamilyTreeDNA for the “Christmas Sale”!

  17. Warn everyone  you know to avoid MyHeritage. They are a scam and rip off. They charged my credit card over $250 for autorenewal yesterday. When I tried to call them I was caller 25 and was on hold over 40 minutes. I asked for a refund and they told me they could give me 50% back and I told him I was going to the Better Business Bureau and post on all the social websites that they were a scam. He then said since it was just charged yesterday they could give me a full refund.  I tried to go in and change my credit card information but you need a special password “that was emailed to you when you first paid your bill” (over a year ago). I am going to get Discover to send me a new card and from now on I will have a prepaid / throwaway card to use.  When I started reading about MyHeritage I found numerous other people who have had the same problem.  Thanks, I needed to vent. Beth DeBusk

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s