Johann Michael Mueller, written Miller here in the US, has so much myth and mystery surrounding him. It has been difficult to sort out which is which and what is truth. In part, this is due to the fact that several books have been published with varying levels of accuracy, and once in print, each one is treated as gospel. It also has to do with the fact that Michael Miller was not exactly an uncommon name, and scrutiny has proven that there were often two or three in the same location. Lastly, he lived on several frontiers, left no will and like many Brethren, eschewed anything to do with government, including registering marriages and deeds. Yep, a genealogist’s nightmare.
In order to sort through all of the pieces, I made a timeline that encompasses all of the events and alleged events of Michael Miller’s life. I also included the people around him, like his wife’s family and anything else I could find that seemed relevant. For example, the Miller family is consistently found with the Cripe/Greib, Ullery/Ullrich, Stutzman and Berchtol/Bechtol families. Sometimes tracking those and other known Brethren families is the only way to track Michael.
Michael’s timeline reached 64 pages and it’s really not complete. However, at some point, one must put the stake in the ground and decide that it’s either now or never. And, it’s now. So here we go!
Johann Michael Mueller (the second,) the son of Johann Michael Mueller (the first) and Irene Charitas whose surname is unknown, was born October 5, 1692 in Steinwenden, Germany. In 1996, our cousin, the Reverend Richard Miller visited Steinwenden where he took the photo of the old house and door, above, surely a familiar sight to Johann Michael during his lifetime. Buildings that we consider quite old here are still in their prime in the old country. Richard was given several documents, including a copy of Johann Michael Mueller’s birth entry in the Reformed church book, second from bottom, below.
I had this original document retranslated recently by a professional German genealogist to be sure there wasn’t some wonderful tidbit that had been omitted. Johann Michael’s parents were Michael and Irene from Steinwend. The godparents were Johann Michael Schuhmacher, Balthasar Jolage, Christina, Hans Berchtold’s (?) wife from Schrodback or berg. The translator noted that she could not find a village by that name. As you can see, this translation was difficult at best. The word is likely Crottelback or Krottelback, where the Berchtol’s were known to live.
On January 4, 1714 in Krottelbach, Germany, Johann Michael Mueller (the second) married Susanna Agnes Berchtol, “a Swiss,” who was born May 3, 1688, the daughter of Hans Berchtol who died in 1711 and Anna Christina whose last name is unknown. Their first child was baptized in 1715 in the same church where they were married.
The Steinwenden Reformed records begin in 1684, but the Konken records begin in 1654, so perhaps more information awaits in those records, once they are translated and indexed in some location so that you can find entries without reading the entire church book – or better stated – paying someone else to read the entire church book.
Were these families already interrelated before they moved from Switzerland to Germany in the 1680s? The families were living in relatively close proximity by 1686 when Hans Bechtol witnessed the baptism of Johnann Michael Mueller’s child in Steinwenden. In 1711, Hans Berchtol’s death is recorded in Konken, but indicates that he lives in Krottelbach. Krottelbach, shown below, isn’t terribly distant from Konken and Steinwenden.
The next record we find for Michael indicates a much more substantial move, if this record is for our Michael Mueller.
Michael Muller born in Steinweiler, Oberamt Lautern became a citizen at Lambsheim on June 4, 1721, according to Heinrich Rembe, a well-known German genealogist.
If this is our Michael, then clearly Susanna would have been with him. They would have been married 7 years by this time and probably had about 3 children.
I do question if this Michael is ours, because Steinwenden, Konken and Krottelbach are in close proximity, but Lambsheim is not and is about 131 km from Krottelbach where they married a few years earlier.
In any event, by 1727, Johann Michael Miller and his wife and children were indeed moving again, boarding a ship in Rotterdam. They arrived in Philadelphia on the ship Adventure on October 2 where Michael, along with the rest of the men from the Palatine had to sign an oath of allegiance.
The beginnings of the Brethren faith as we know it today began with 8 people who formed prayer groups in 1708. Led by Alexander Mack, they adopted the doctrine that infant baptism does not save your soul, and that adults must be re-baptized when they are old enough to accept Christianity. This stood in opposition to the established religions of Catholic, Lutheran and Reformed, and caused the Brethren to become persecuted as their teachings became more in conflict with the established churches. Furthermore, they adopted the “peace at all costs” doctrine that prevented the men from fighting, even to protect themselves or their families.
Eventually they fled both Switzerland and Germany and joined the Mennonites in Holland, but the Mennonites wanted the Brethren to adopt their beliefs, and instead, the fledgling Brethren immigrated to America beginning in 1719 with more arriving in 1727. Having been exiled in Friesland for 9 years, 59 more families, 126 people total, arrived in 1729. After that, the sect died out in Europe.
It is unclear whether Johann Michael Miller was Brethren at this time, as his first child born in 1715 was baptized Reformed in Konken. However, he was indeed involved in some capacity, as he was among the Brethren immigrants who arrived in Philadelphia on October 2, 1727 on the ship Adventure from Rotterdam (shown above), last from Plymouth, England. Several books claim that Johann Michael Mueller was accompanied by Jacob Berchtol, his wife’s brother, Jacob Stutzman, his step-brother, and Hans Jacob Stutzman, his step-mother’s second husband. However, Ralph Beaver Strassburger, in 1892, transcribed the lists of Pennsylvania German Pioneers who arrived and took the oath of allegiance between 1727 and 1775. These books were later edited and republished by William John Hinke. Taking the oath of allegiance wasn’t an option. If you wanted to live in Pennsylvania and you were a German male 16 or over, you took the oath. Period.
I checked in Volume I of their book, Pennsylvania German Pioneers and on page 10, the only name given is Mich’ Miller.
Neither is there any Stutzman or similarly spelled surname listed in the index. However, Johann Jacob Stutzman surely did immigrate, because we do find him here. He could have immigrated before 1727 when the oaths were required.
However, referencing this same book on Ancestry.com shows us a different list.
As you can see, the list above does not include Johann Jacob Stutzman, but the list below, on the following page, does. What this does tell us is that there appear to be multiple Michael Mueller/Miller immigrants. But then, that’s consistent with finding multiple Michael Millers in Pennsylvania and Maryland.
This book has clearly been changed in its multiple printings. Furthermore, the original Volume II had original signatures, but the current Volume II has only the lists from 1785-1808. Today, a third volume exists titled “Pennsylvania German Pioneers, Facsimile Signatures, 1727-1775 that complements volumes I and II.
The older references still refer to page numbers in Volume II as holding the actual signatures, resulting in me ordering the wrong book and having a devil of a time trying to figure out what I really needed to order. Extremely frustrating, to say the least, not to mention wasted money as well. I could have bought a DNA test for what this actual scan of Michael’s signature cost me. However, this is the only copy of Michael’s signature known to exist, with one possible exception I have not been able to track down.
Michael’s name is first on the list, but there is also another Miller, two Ullerich or Ulrick’s and Johann Jacob Stutzman, near the bottom of the list. This list is noted as List 4B where the earlier list without Jacob Stutzman is noted as 4A. Why there were two lists for the same ship is unexplained. Michael’s signature is shown below.
Miller, of course, is a very common name, but Ullerich and Stutzman, much less so.
Some descendants report that Johann Michael Miller and his wife, Susanna Berchtol brought either 7 or 10 children with them. Again, there is no direct evidence of this. We know based on indirect birth years that they brought at least three, and there certainly could have been more, but it would be unusual for all of a couple’s children to survive infancy. I would like to see whatever documentation exists for these claims.
Jacob Stutzman turns out to be an important milestone when tracking Michael Miller. While there are multiple Michael Millers, Jacob Stutzman is rather a unique name. Jacob was younger than Michael by 14 years, being born in 1706. Jacob Stutzman was the son of Johann Michael Mueller’s step-mother and her second husband whom she married after the death of Johann Michael Mueller’s father. Despite their difference in age, these two men were obviously close.
Jacob Stutzman was a charter member of the Little Conewago Church along with Jacob Cripe and Stephen Ulrich. Michael Miller, as he was called in Pennsylvania, is not among the founding members listed, but his association with these families and the fact that he lived in the area is what has prompted speculation that Michael was indeed a member at Little Conewago.
Jacob Stutzman died in 1773, two years after Michael Miller’s death, and Jacob’s widow married Stephen Ulrich (the second.) Michael Miller’s grandson would marry Elizabeth Ulrich, daughter of Stephen Ulrich (the second) and his first wife, Elizabeth Cripe. These families formed a bond that lasts into the current generations.
Ironically, sailing on the same ship with Johann Michael Mueller was one Johannas Ulrich and a Christo Ulrick. The Ullrich/Ullery family was also Brethren and settled first in York Co, PA and then in Frederick Co., MD.
It’s unclear when Johann Michael Mueller and his wife “converted,” to the Brethren faith per se. The only thing we know for sure is that in 1715, their first child was baptized Reformed. The next we know, Johann Michael Mueller is found among the Brethren in Pennsylvania. In 1744 he is mentioned in letters written by Brethren leaders. It’s likely that he had at least developed some Anabaptist sympathies prior to arrival, given the families origins in Switzerland.
In the Pennsylvania Archives Second Series, Vol II reprinted under the directionof Charles Warren Stone and edited by John B. Linn and William H. Egle, MD, we find an undated record wherein “the persons hereafter named, called Quakers and other Protestants who conscientiously scruple to take an oath….took the affirmation and made and repeated the Declaration…..an act for naturalizing such foreign Protestants and others”….that includes the names of both Michael Miller and Philip Jacob Miller along with Jacob Stutzman and Stephen Ulrick as a bonus. Obviously a group of men from Frederick County went to Philadelphia together.
This would have been after 1747 when Philip Jacob would have turned 21. Obviously there were clearly Pietist by this time, either Brethren or Mennonite. Michael Miller’s wife’s family, the Berchtols were Mennonites in the US and Michael co-owned land with Samuel Bechtol in York County.
We may find a further hint as to how or why Michael Miller became Brethren in a letter written by Johann Philip Boehn, the founder of the Reformed faith in Pennsylvania. In a letter dated March 27, 1744 he says “since the founding of our churches here, there have been many people who though they were of Reformed antecedents, kept aloof, because there were no Reformed church services here, and they joined no religion or sect, because they were of the opinion that our cause could not be maintained in this country, principally because of our inability to support ministers. They are now, within the last few years, scattered here and there, mostly among Mennonites, Tumplers (Dunkers), 7th Day as well as 8th Day (German Baptists) and such like.”
As one minister phrased religion on the frontier, “They joined the church of opportunity.” Perhaps it wasn’t exactly what they wanted, but they preferred worshipping to not worshipping.
The Brethren at this time were an open, inviting faith, so it would not be unusual for non-Brethren families to convert.
York County, Pennsylvania
The family settled, at least temporarily, in Chester County, PA, possibly the portion that became Lancaster in 1729. Michael moved to near Hanover in York Co, PA in 1744, then to Frederick Co., MD about 1752. York County was taken from Lancaster in 1749, so in reality, Michael may not have moved as much as it appears. The borders may have, to some extent, moved over him, although the land he inhabited in York County was not settled in the early 1730s, so he would have clearly had to have moved to settle there. We can’t tell for sure where he moved from, or how far, because we don’t know where he lived in Chester County which was originally a very large founding county.
It would be in York County, PA that Johann Michael Mueller and Susanna Bechtol would raise their family, at least for a while. The battles of boundaries in that part of the country drove the entire group of Brethren south into Maryland. It appears that Susanna most likely died before the group moved to Maryland. Michael moved on alone and married a Brethren widow, Elizabeth Garber. But first, in York County, Michael would find himself smack dab in the middle of a war – something very uncomfortable for a Brethren.
The Pennsylvania-Maryland Border War
The earliest records of what is now Adams County, PA are found in what was then Chester Co., PA. which successively changed to Lancaster Co. (14 Oct. 1728), to York Co. (on 14 Oct.1748) and to Adams Co., PA in 1800.
And it wasn’t just counties that changed, but the state line itself was in dispute between Pennsylvania and Maryland, as was the actual land ownership – meaning that the Indians still felt they owned at least the frontier and borderlands, exactly where the Brethren families were living.
Ironically, the Brethren and Mennonite pietists who eschewed all forms of conflict wound up in the center of a heated battle.
Both Maryland and Pennsylvania claimed the land where Hanover in York County lay. Initially the Pennsylvania government complained when Marylanders settled this area, but since no one else except the Indians were complaining, nothing was done until 1728 when Pennsylvania ran the settlers off and burned their homes. By 1732, Pennsylvania, Maryland and Virginia were all three competing for settlers on the frontier to stabilize the region and provide a buffer between the settled portions and the “savages.”
In 1732, Pennsylvania began giving out “licenses” to settle west of the Susquehanna with the idea that the licenses could later be turned into warrants when the colony actually bought the land from the Indians. In essence, they were encouraging people to become squatters. No wonder the Indians were unhappy.
Between 1733 and 1736, 52 licenses were issued, mostly to German families. Presumably some went to the group who settled in the Conewego area in York County where the Ulrich and Cripe families were living at that time.
Maryland still claimed this land and by 1730, things were getting ugly. Maryland granted the same land, much of it to Thomas Cresap, a very early pioneer and Indian trader. Some paint him as an aggressive villain who terrorized the region, some as a hero who saved the day. One thing is for sure, he became the spokesperson for the German community, joined the Brethren Church, and ultimately bought the land Michael Miller would purchase from him called Miller’s Choice on Antietam Creek near Hagerstown, MD. This is probably a good indication about how Michael felt about Cresap.
However in the 1730s, local warfare ensued with both Maryland and Pennsylvania jailing people. At one point, Cresap got thrown off of his own ferry mid-river, but survived. In 1734, Cresap shot a Pennsylvania sheriff’s ranger who came to arrest him. Some settlers returned back east at this point, having had enough – but turning back never seemed to be an option for the Brethren who also wouldn’t fight. I struggle to understand these choices and their logic. Maybe it was a very simple faith in God.
As militias on both sides became involved, the frustrated Brethren and German settlers must have become quite desperate because in 1736 they sent a resolution to the Governors of both states pledging their loyalty. However, when the duplicate loyalty was discovered, Governor Oglethorpe of Maryland offered rewards for the apprehension and arrest of nearly 40 men. John Wright was apparently the ringleader, because the bounty on his head was 40 pounds. However, Michael Miller was included but his bounty, and that of most of the other men, was only 2 pounds. We don’t know if this was the Michael Miller of the Ulrich, Cripe group, but it could have been. Cripe and Ulrich were certainly there by 1738, but Michael may have still been living in Chester Co., PA. His tax records don’t begin in the York County area until 1744. However, he could have had an adult son, Michael (the third,) by this time.
Pennsylvania did purchase the land from the Indians in 1736, land warrants were issued in 1738 – but given the uncertainty about who owned what and which state the land would actually fall into, it was no wonder nothing much was done.
Eventually, we find our Brethren families in the records, but things really didn’t improve. In fact, this battle wasn’t settled for another 30 years with the running of the Mason-Dixon line, which, ironically cut right through Brethren land – even after they had finally had enough and left York County in Pennsylvania for Frederick County across the border in Maryland.
On February 16, 1742, Lancaster County, PA issued land warrants 7-U and 8-U for Stephen Ulrick, Junr. to take up lands west of the Susquehanna. He staked out adjoining tracts in what was then a dense wilderness on Little Conewago Creek on land adjoining that of his father. We know that Stephen lived there as early as 1738 when he is listed as a founder of Little Conewago Church. This land later became York County which later became Adams County.
These families had been embroiled in this entire mess the whole time.
The outlines of tracts A and B are based on an official survey, patent and deed records. Stephen’s land was described as adjoining his father’s tract.
Stephen Ulrich (the second) was a German Baptist minister, and believed to be the son of the immigrant Stephan Ulrich (the first.) About 1740, Stephen the second married Elizabeth Cripe.
It is believed that during the time Stephen Ulrich lived in what was Lancaster, then York County, he and his friend Jacob Stutzman organized the Conewago Congregation of the German Baptist in Conewago Twp. near Hanover PA, now in Adams County, probably on or near his land.
Stephen Ulrich sold the above-mentioned land to his friend Jacob Stutzman. This transaction is described in John Hale Stutzman’s book, “Jacob Stutzman, His Children and Grandchildren”. Unhappily for us, these two devout Dunkers, under the strictures of their church doctrine, avoided engagement with government authorities and did not record the deed of sale. Heaven perhaps for the Dunkers but Hell for the genealogist.
We only know about this sale because of the subsequent sale by Jacob Stutzman to George Wine.
Yes, Stephen Ulrich the first and Stephen Ulrich the second both had warrants for land near Digges Choice in Lancaster, then York, now Adams County. Hanover, York County, PA was at the center of Digges Choice, which was laid out about 1739 the first time. John Digges owned the land that eventually became Hanover, PA.
See Lancaster Co, PA Land Warrant #7, February 16, 1742 for 100 acres for Stephen Ulrick Junior; also Lancaster Warrant # 10, November 21, 1743, to Stephen Ulrich Senior, land adjacent to George Wagoner. There is also a Lancaster Co. Warrant to Ansted Ulrick on November 4, 1743 for 200 acres in Lebanon Twp, Lancaster County.
In 1743, another battle broke out and Stephen Ulrich was certainly in the middle of it, although his name is not specifically recorded. We know he was, though, because of John Digges and an unnamed Mathias Ulrich, possibly his brother.
In 1743, the Germans send one Martin Updegraf to Annapolis to check on John Digges grant. It was found that Digges had sold some land he didn’t own, so he got a new grant from Maryland which included farms of 14 Germans whose land had been granted under warrant from Pennsylvania. Both sides tried to intimidate the farmers. The Pennsylvania surveyor warned them against violating royal orders. Mathias Ulrich apparently told the sheriff “to go to the devil,” an action very out of character for a Brethren and remarkable enough that it was recorded. Eventually, the situation escalated further and Digges son was killed but Pennsylvania would not surrender the killers to Maryland to be tried. It was clearly one hot mess on the frontier, and petitions and requests for help went unheard and unanswered by those back east who cared little if a bunch of Germans killed each other.
The Brethren tried to stick it out for a few more years, but in 1745, Michael Miller began buying land in Frederick County, MD, near present day Hagerstown and not long thereafter, the entire group would sell out and remove themselves to what they hoped would be a more peaceful and secure, undisputed area.
The final straw, perhaps, came in 1748 when the sheriffs from both states insisted on collecting quit rent, which in this case, was in essence extortion money for being left alone. A 1748 deposition complaining to the governor said that “a great number of the Germans and some others were so much alarmed by the sheriffs’ proceedings that several of them have already left the province and others have declaired they would go.” The German families held land authorized by Pennsylvania, but they would leave and go to Maryland.
“Stephen Ullery” appears in the official records of York Co. in 1749 in the Little Conewago area. But in the early 1750’s after selling their land to Jacob Stutzman, Stephen and his wife migrated southwest to the Conococheaque Valley and by 1754 had acquired a large tract of land in the present Washington Co. Maryland, where they spent the rest of their lives.
However all was not tranquil on Conococheaque. Within three years of their assuming this new property, the French and Indians smashed General Braddock’s column a few miles to the west and set the frontier aflame. In 1756 Gov. Sharpe of Maryland wrote “The fine settlement of Conococheaque is quite deserted.”
I have to wonder. Did they long for the days back in Germany?
Lancaster and York County seemed perfect, but these families could not live with constant warfare. As much as they loved their new home, they began to cast their eyes elsewhere.
A typical farm in York County, below, looks much like Lancaster County. Soft, rolling, beautiful and fertile.
Today, many Amish and Mennonite families are found in this area, still using horse-drawn implements, much as their ancestors did.
To put things in perspective, the first road in Pennsylvania, from Philadelphia to Lancaster, was authorized in 1731 in answer to a petition from settlers, and it took ten years to complete. It’s very likely that Michael Miller traversed this road, or at least parts of it. In 1739, a second road, to Monocacy in what is now Frederick Co., Maryland was begun. It’s certain that Michael Miller would have used this road in 1745 and access to the frontier via the road may be part of the reason the Brethren wound up in Frederick County. In 1745, the road didn’t extend to what would one day be Hagerstown, so Michael Miller would have made his way by Indian trails to the remote homestead of John Hager, an Indian trader who patented 100 acres in 1729, and then Michael would have gone a bit further, perhaps with John as his guide, to find land.
John Hager’s home, built about 1740, is a museum in Hagerstown today. Michael Miller was assuredly in this homestead. It’s actually incredible that it still exists.
Frederick County, Maryland
It appears that the entire Brethren congregation from Hanover moved in 1752 to Frederick County, MD, en masse. Michael Miller had apparently been doing reconnaissance work, because he began buying land there in 1745. It was also in 1752 that he gave two of his sons a significant piece of land in Frederick County, and it was likely then that everyone moved, together. There would have been a convoy of Conestoga wagons, if the road was finished and wide enough for a wagon to pass, with livestock and people walking. Wagons of that timeframe did not have brakes and the wheels were chained going down slopes. Rivers and creeks had to be forded or ferries taken. These pioneers were pressing the frontier, forging a new way – not taking the road well-traveled.
The part of Frederick County, MD that became Washington County, near present day Hagerstown, is a beautiful land of rolling, fertile farmland, punctuated by curving roads and distant hills.
After the wanderings of this sect in Europe, this land must have seemed like Heaven. They Brethren believed they were in Maryland, safely away from the border warfare. This idyllic land is where Michael finally settled and amassed quite a bit of property.
Unfortunately, Johann Michael Mueller did not leave a will, and we have to deduce the names of his children from other transactions in his life. Specifically, he deeded land to 3 men believed to be his sons. There are at least 4 other Miller males in the right place at the right time to be his sons, plus several females as well who may be daughters. With the advent of DNA testing for genealogy, we may one day resolve the question of sons, but we may never know which women, if any, were his daughters.
The Maugans family lived nearby in the cabin (above) from the same time period. They would intermarry with the Millers in the following generations. The original Miller cabin was from the same place and time and was probably very similar. Both the Maugan’s cabin and John Hager’s cabin were built directly over springs, probably as a security precaution relative to fetching water and not having to leave the house if it was under attack.
Johann Michael Mueller suffered through the French and Indian war, likely vacating his land at least once if not twice. He died not long before the Revolutionary War began, which also introduced a dark period for the Brethren who were torn between their love for their new county and their religious beliefs.
Michael’s son, Philip Jacob Miller would eventually leave the beautiful valley in Frederick County and join the westward movement. Michael’s son Lodowick would join the flow of settlers into Appalachia and settle in Rockingham County, Virginia. Son Michael Jr., we lose entirely, and son John stayed in Maryland and died on his father’s original land. This is such a typical story of the American immigrant’s children. Some stayed, some left in different directions, and some are lost to time.
Let’s take a look at the timeline of events in Johann Michael Mueller’s life and see what tidbits we can recover. Before we start, there were several sources for this information and I have listed each one with the surname of the source. Other sources are noted individually.
Replogle – “Ancestors on the Frontier: Miller, Cripe, Ulrich, Replogle, Shively, Metzger” by Justin Replogle, self-published in 1998
Mason – “The Michael Miller and Susanna Bechtol Family Record” compiled in 1993 by Floyd R. and Catherine Mason, now deceased
Miller – “A History and Genealogy of David Y. Miller 1809-1898” by Gene Edwin Miller, self-published
Stutesman – “Jacob Stutzman (?-1775); His Children and Grandchildren” by John Hale Stutesman, Jr.
These 4 books plus two websites, Troy Goss’s Miller home page and Tom and Kathleen Miller’s pages are the primary resources for Johann Michael Mueller.
Suffice it to say that they don’t all agree – and in fact some contradict each other. So I’ve gone through each and compiled the information I found credible by evaluating the sources, where possible. Where doubt remains or work needs to be done, I have said so.
Michael arrived in Philadelphia in 1727 and the first actual record we find of him after that is in 1732 in Chester County, PA where he is paying taxes. Other Brethren are there as well.
Note that a second record shows another Michael Mueller arriving on a ship in 1732, and we really have nothing at all to determine whether our Michael was the Michael arriving in 1727 or 1732. Based on the information that his step-brother was along on the 1727 ship, the assumption has always been that the 1727 Michael is ours, but we don’t positively know. I compared the 1727 and 1732 signatures, and they are not the same, so it’s not a matter of Michael going back to Germany and returning in 1732. Regardless, Michael was here, in Chester County, by 1732. It’s unlikely that the Michael who arrived in Philadelphia on a ship on September 23, 1732 managed to travel to Chester County, settle and pay taxes before the end of the year. It looks like there were at least two Michael Mueller’s who immigrated. Given Jacob Stutzman’s presence and the 1732 tax list, I would say that our Michael is the 1727 immigrant.
However, the ambiguity between multiple Michael Millers in the colonies begins almost immediately.
In the 1730s, Maryland and Pennsylvania fight over the Hanover area of Lancaster County, current York County, with both volleying for position, the confrontation escalating and becoming increasingly violent. In 1736 the governor of Maryland offered a reward for the apprehension of about 40 people. On that list, with the reward at the low end at 2 pounds, was one Michael Miller. Other Brethren were in York County by 1734, but there is the matter of the tax records in Chester County, PA from 1732 to 1740 where Michael is listed. Michael could have been an absentee taxpayer in Chester Co., although it’s more likely that we have two Michael Millers involved. One of the Michael’s could be the son of the immigrant. It’s unlikely that a Brethren would be involved in a political dispute. They were more inclined to avoid trouble if possible, at all costs, than to participate.
Pennsylvania did not purchase the disputed land from the Indians until 1736 and did not issue any land grants until 1738. This dispute and boundary was not settled until the Mason-Dixon line of 1767.
1732-1740 – Michael Miller pays taxes in Coventry Township, Chester Co, PA. There were German Baptist Brethren (ChB) churches in Coventry Township, Chester Co., PA and in Manheim Twp., York Co, PA. Miller p 12
1737 – In Coventry Twp. in Chester Co, PA, Feb 15, 1737, warrant #50, vacated in 1748, Michael Miller obtains the warrant next to Thomas Miller and Thomas Perry for 200 acres. In 1748 the warrant was vacated in favor of Adam Harkman and John Wyatt. Miller P 23
1737 – Michael Miller on the Coventry Twp tax list, Chester Co PA. Miller p 13
1737 – Nicholas Carver (Garber) on the Coventry Twp tax list, Chester Co, Pa. Miller p 14
1737 – If the following is “our” Michael Miller, he was having this Chester Co. land surveyed in 1737 according to this 1758 document.
Land Transaction Caveats (1748-61): Chester County, PA
Feb 17, 1758
John Wells enters a caveat against Thomas Miller, or any person claiming under him, obtaining any survey or confirmation of land adjoining northward by land of said Miller, eastward by land of s’d Wells & southward by land of Christian Perry, in Coventry Township, Chester County, which Thomas Miller pretends to claim under an old warrant of 500 as. granted to him about the year 1717 which has been executed and the land regularly return’d into the Survey’r General’s Office, the above-mentioned land has been since surveyed to Mich’l Miller by warr’t of the 15th Feb’y, 1737, which is now vested in s’d J. Wells. Page 222.
It would be very interesting if Miller descendants of this Thomas Miller took the Y DNA test to see if Thomas Miller was related to Michael Miller. Based on these land transactions, these men seem to be somehow connected – although this may not be our Michael Miller. The name Thomas never appears in our Michael’s line.
1738 – Jacob Stutzman, Jacob Cripe and Stephen Ulrich listed as charter members of the Little Conewago Church in York Co, PA, indicating they were Brethren by this time. Replogle p 19 and 31
Some think that Michael Miller and some of his sons were members at Little Conewago and the Antietam congregations. Elder Nicholas Martin, the elder of the churches in the area where they lived, reports on the health of Michael Miller and Jacob Stutsman in his letters to Alexander Mack, Jr. We understand when Nicholas Martin was naturalized in 1762 that Michael Miller and Jacob Miller were witnesses. It was this Nicholas Martin who gave the year of death for Michael Miller as 1771. Mason p 10
If Michael Miller and Jacob Stutzman were not Brethren, Alexander Mack would not be discussing them in such familiar terms.
1739 – Michael Miller on the Coventry Twp. tax list, Chester Co, Pa. Miller p 14
1740 – Michael Miller on the Coventry Twp. tax list, Chester Co., Pa. There is no record of him on the tax lists there after 1740. It is believed that Michael Miller moved west from Chester Co, PA in the early 1740s.
1743 – Travel west would have been on a route called the Monocacy Road which was established in 1733. The road was the major route passing through Lancaster County, York County and crossing the Susquehanna River at Wright’s Ferry or Wrightsville, traveling along what is now US Hwy 30. After leaving Wright’s Ferry, it headed southwest through what is now York County, through Hanover and down into Maryland to the Hagerstown area. Miller P 14
Before the road, the other side of the Susquehanna River was only Indian trails. Replogle page 82
1744 – Nicholas Martin comments on Michael Miller’s health in a letter to Alexander Mack Jr. Replogle p 31
This probably establishes Michael Miller as a Brethren by this point in time.
1744 – On Feb 7th Michael Miller, Nicholas Garber and Samuel Bechtol, Hans Jacob and Elizabeth Bechtol, who also lived in Chester Co, PA purchased a tract of land consisting of 400 aces northeast of Hanover, PA in York Co. See circle #12 on the PA map, below, in the upper right hand corner. Today this land is near Bair’s Mennonite Church, perhaps lying south from the church. Mason p 14 and 20
This land, shown in circle 12, above, was near Little Conewago Chuch.
Floyd Mason included this legend to his maps with circles.
Gene Miller overlaid the York County land on an 1876 map.
Today, the York Road Cemetery also known as the Bair’s Meeting House Cemetery is located on the York County land owned by these three men. Bair’s Meeting House wasn’t established until in 1774, but burials could have been taking place on this land earlier. I have noted the location of the cemetery and meeting house on the map above with the red arrow.
Note that both the Bechtel and Miller names are found in this region on the 1876 Heidelberg Township map, more than 140 years later. However, the Miller surname is extremely common and there may be no connection with the earlier Michael Miller family.
Samuel Bechtol and Michael Miller obtained 150 acres, leaving 100 acres for Nicholas Garber. Michael sold his 150 acres to Samuel Bechtol in 1752 and we cannot identify what happened to the 100 acres of Nicholas Garber. It was after Nicholas Garbers’ death in 1748 that Michael Miller sold his land to Samuel Bechtol. Michael Miller married Nicholas Garber’s widow. We suspect that he also sold Nicholas Garber’s 100 acres of land to Samuel Bechtol. Samuel Bechtol was one of the administrators of the will of Nicholas Garber and Susanna Bechtol was (reportedly) Samuel’s aunt. Mason p 12, Replogle 91
Miller only shows three people bought the land, Michael Miller, Nicholas Carver and Samuel Backall, omitting Hans Jacob and Elizabeth Bechtol. Batchelors Choice consisted of 400 acres which had been owned by John Stinchcomb. The property was rectangular and was located about 2 miles east of Hanover and was bounded on the west by Gitts Run, on the south by portions of route 116 and on the north by the Pigeon Hills. The land was located on the outside of the east edge of Digges Tract. This could have been some of the disputed land in question.
Here’s is a satellite view of this same area today, with the red balloon marking Jacob’s Mills, shown on the map above.
It is believed that these three families were related in some way. Nicholas Garber/Carver has been theorized to be a son-in-law of Michael Miller. Others have suggested that some of Michael’s daughters married some of Nicholas’s sons. Obviously, both of these scenarios can’t be true, or Michael’s younger children would have been marrying the children of their older sibling.
Other settlers associated with these three families also lived in the area. Jacob Stutsman and Stephen Ulrich lived to the southwest of Hanover. Peter and John Welty, Michael Bigler, lived to the south of Hanover: Catharine the daughter of Michael Bigler became the second wife of the Dunker leader Daniel Leatherman. To the north of Hanover near East Berlin was the immigrant Jacob Cripe (1743), Hans Ulrich Wagner (1743) and George Adam Martin (1749). Miller p 14
This map shows the proximity of the Cripe family to the Miller, Bechtol and Garber families.
1745 – On May 14, 1745, Michael Miller buys a land warrant for either 150 or 200 acres (reported as both in two different sources) acres called Ash Swamp in Frederick Co MD for 200 pounds from John George Arnold. Replogle p 31, Miller page 20
It was then in Prince George County and now is Washington Co., PA. Liber BB 362-363. Miller P 20
This is the land that in 1752 Michael has resurveyed and deeds it to 3 his sons John, Philip Jacob and Lodowick. See circle 3, below, drawn by Floyd Mason, P 14 and 32.
The map below shows the migration pattern beginning in Chester County, PA, through York County, PA and then to Frederick Co., MD.
1748 – The land dispute in York County, PA got much worse. In a letter to the governor asking for assistance it says that “many of the Germans have gone already and the rest say they will.” Replogle 92
1748 – Frederick Co. Maryland comes into existence.
1748 – Nicholas Garber dies and his will is probated in Lancaster Co, PA, Book Y, Vol 2, p 123. This part of Lancaster becomes York the following year. By 1754 Michael Miller has married his widow. Mason P 12
1749 – Michael Miller buys 36 acres in Frederick Co, MD called “Miller’s Fancy.” Both pieces of his land are very close to present day Hagerstown, which wasn’t there at the time. Replogle p 31
Replogle suggests that perhaps Michael didn’t actually move, but stayed back in Hanover and eventually gave the land to his sons John and Philip Jacob.
Michael had Miller’s Fancy resurveyed. He lived there until his death in 1771. In 1765 it was deeded to John Riffe, husband of Michael’s step-daughter. See Circle 4 – Mason P 14
I’m not at all certain Mason’s circle 4 is in the correct location. I believe Miller’s Fancy is located south of Hagerstown on the convergence of Antietam and Little Antietam Creeks. Other researchers believe that Miller’s Fancy, Skipton on Craven and Well Taught are near Leitersburg, 5 or 6 miles due east of Maugansville. Following the deeds forward (or backward from current) in time would resolve this question.
1749 – Land surveyed in 1749 and granted in 1754 located between Skipton on Craven and Resurvey of Well Taught, containing 36 acres called Miller’s Fancy. Mason P 20
Skipton on Craven is 280 acres, purchased in June 1749 for 220 pounds. Wash Co., MD. Miller p 23
1749 – York Co, PA is formed from Lancaster. Hanover is located in York County. Part of the Hanover area was split off in 1800 to Adams Co. There are two Michael Millers and no Rochette family. Michael’s son, Philip Jacob Miller supposedly married a Magdalena Rochette about 1751, but you can’t marry someone if their family isn’t present in the community.
There are two Michael Miller wills in York County in both 1784 and in 1796, so this means that there were at least 3 Michael Millers in York County, if all three were there at the same time. Headache!!!
1749 – Most land at this time was not improved, but Stephen Ulrich’s may be the exception. The 235 acre piece he bought from Hans Waggoner in Frederick County may have been improved. The other 200 went to Walter Fonderbag. One of these men received “One dwelling house 20 feet by 16 made of hew’d logs and covered with lap shingles, a stone chimney, one dwelling house 27 feet by 22 of hwe’d logs and covered with lapp shingles, planked above and below, a stone chimney, a new barn of hew’d logs covered with lapp shingles, 49 feet by 27, 69 apple trees, 72 peach trees and 6 acres of cultivated land well fenced.” Replogle p 100 from the Stutesman book p 10-11
Replogle contrasts this land to Hager’s “2 sorry houses” and then mentions that by 1756, the Indians had probably burned these wooden structures.
True to form, in the faming community where I grew up, the barn was twice as big as the house.
1750 – Several Brethren families felt it necessary to move further west where it was safer, including the Shively, Ulrich and Cripe families. Replogle p 19
1750s – Around this time in the development of Maryland, tobacco had been the crop of importance followed by Indian corn. This usually was cultivated by the plantation’s negroes. However, in the newly developing western Maryland, the German settlers profited from the rich deep soil to raise large quantities of flax and other grains, disdaining the tobacco culture as well as slavery. The flax was hackled and the women would spin and weave it at home into very stout linen, making also threads of different colors that found a ready market. The seed was packed in the huge country wagons of the day and sent to Baltimore and Philadelphia.
Trade for the settlers of this day was in Baltimore. The western Maryland settlers produced goods that were needed in the eastern part of the province. The Germans learned to make linen goods, tow (rope), thread; they knitted long yarn stockings; they tanned their leather and made horse-collars and harness; they prepared honey, firkined butter, dried apples and applebutter. These were marketed in Baltimore which depended on the interior for their supplies. In return, the settler purchased materials essential to survival on the frontier, namely salt, lead and gunpowder.
The early settlers typically lived for a number of years in a “log cabin.” It had large garret roots (attic) and generally a deep cellar. The bedrooms were simply furnished. The painted bedsteads were supplied with straw beds and ‘feather decks” for covering. There were the barrels of sauerkraut and salt lead and apple butter in the cellar. Each farm usually had an abundant apple orchard and rows of cherry trees, and there were plenty of home-brewed drinks in the cellar besides cider. The frontier settlers had a diet that included pone and milk (cornbread usually made without milk or eggs), mush and milk, in wooden dishes, hominy and “cider-pap” (small hominy boiled in cider) with fat bacon fried, and “calcified” with molasses. Miller p 21
When I grew up, 200+ years later, many of those items were still being eaten by the descendants of these same German families, in particular, fried mush with molasses or maple syrup.
1751 – On October 26, 1751, Michael’s son Philip Jacob had taken over the warrant and enlarged the tract Ash Swamp to 290 acres. It was surveyed on April 25, 1752 and a patent issued on November 17, 1753. His brother John also farmed a portion of the property or about 140 acres.
This land is very near Maugansville. These resurveys were key to finding these properties today. Gene Miller went to a great deal of trouble to fit the pieces of the Miller and neighboring surveys together.
1751 – Michael’s son, Philip Jacob Miller marries Magdalena whose last name is said to be Rochette, but is unproven. The marriage year is based on the year of first child’s birth. If this is the case, then Philip may have married her in Hanover, York Co., PA, not Frederick Co., MD. This marriage could be why Michael gave Philip Jacob land when he did.
Replogle states from two sources that the early Brethren were very strict about not marrying outside of the faith. If this is true, then surely someplace there is a Rochette as a Brethren or Magdalena is not a Rochette. She is more likely from within the Brethren church. What I wouldn’t give for a membership list of Little Conewago Church in 1750.
1751 – Michael’s son, Lodowich Miller buys Tom’s Chance and sells it in 1755 to Peter Tysher, located today in what is Washington Co., MD, located adjacent to Ash Swamp, including the Salem Reformed Church on Salem Church road. Land books B p 429 and E p 945
1752 – Road from Wrightsville to Monocacy, near Frederick, MD today. Likely the road Michael Miller took when he moved from PA to MD. This road went right through Conewago country. In 1752, the entire Brethren community went down this road to Frederick Co., MD. Conestoga wagons were used on this road. The road from Frederick to Antietam Creek was very rudimentary, later becoming the National Road. Replogle 56-57
1752 – It is believed that Michael Miller moved to the Hagerstown area about 1752 because on March 7, 1752 he sold his portion of Batchelor’s Choice in York County, purchased in 1744, 150 acres, to Samuel Becktel for 220 pounds (York Co. Deed Bk C 445-446). Samuel Becktel probably continued to live on his farm until his death, sometime prior to March 31, 1767. Miller p 4, 20 and 23
In 1876, on the Heidelberg Township map, there are still two listings of S. Bechtel living on this land.
1752 – About this time Michael Miller moved to Frederick Co., living on Miller’s Fancy at the junction of Antietam Creek and Little Antietam Creek and lived there the rest of his life. His wife Susan Bechtol had recently died and he sold his Hanover land to his late wife’s relative John Bechtol. Replogle p 31
We have no evidence to suggest that when Susan actually died, other than it was prior to 1754 when Michael has remarried.
1752 – Michael Miller deeds Philip Jacob and John Miller half of Ash Swamp each. Philip Jacob lives there most of his life. Replogle p 33
This is believed to be the first record of Philip Jacob Miller – although there was an undated records that could have been earlier. By 1752 he would have been 26 years old.
Michael Miller bought the plantation Ash Swamp from John George Arnold in 1745, had it resurveyed to his 3 sons, John, Philip Jacob and Lodowich in 1752. They conveyed it to each other so that soon thereafter John owned the portion to the north and Philip Jacob the part to the south. Lodowich bought an adjoining farm to the southwest, “Tom’s Chance.” Miller P 15
1752 – Tired of the Maryland/Pennsylvania border feud that had lasted for 15 years, the entire Brethren community sold their land in Hanover Co., PA (today current Adams Co.) and moved to Frederick Co., MD. Where they established 4 new churches. Replogle 97
This area is still heavily Brethren and Mennonite today.
1753 – Michael Miller bought 409 acres. Replogle
1753 or 1754 – Johann Michael Miller marries Elizabeth Garber, the widow of his neighbor Nicholas Garber. Replogle p 31
1754 – We have no death date for Susanna Bechtol, the first wife of Michael Miller, but an administrative record in the orphan’s court of York Co., PA states that in 1754 Elizabeth Garber, the widow of Nicholas is now the wife of Michael Miller and that he is administrating the accounts for the will. (Book A – 1749-1762, page 47, York Co, Pa Dec. 10, 1754)
We believe Susanna died about 1752 at the time that Michael had land “Ash Swamp” in Maryland resurveyed for the 3 sons, John, Philip Jacob and Lodowich. This explains why there was no wife’s signature and perhaps why the land was divided at that time. Mason p 12
1755 – 676-677 – Michael Miller recorded a deed March 20, 1755 made March 17, 1755 between George Pow of Frederick Co. and Michael Miller for 36 pounds current money, confirms unto him, 2 tracts called part of the “Resurvey on Well Taught, in Frederick County; 1st parcel containing 292 acres and the other tract, containing 117 acres. Signed George Pow, before William Webb and Thomas Prather. Catherine wife of the said George Pow, released dower right.
Frederick County Maryland Land Records Liber B Abstracts 1748-1752 by Patricia Abelard Andersen, p 59.
1755 – Michael Miller obtains a grant for Miller’s Fancy in March, 36 ac. Washington Co. MD, Miller P 23
For the next ten years, Michael filed no deeds. It’s likely the area was abandoned for part of this time given the Indian uprisings.
1754 – All of the Indians disappear from Frederick County. French negotiators have been wooing them. This is the beginning of the French and Indian War.
1755 – General Braddock’s expedition leaves Cumberland County, MD on May 29th. Braddock met with George Washington and Benjamin Franklin in Frederick County, Maryland. Braddock had recently arrived from England and had just begun his march toward Fort Duquesne.
At the end of their conference, half of Braddock’s army moved west on the north side of the Potomac and somewhere crossed Antietam Creek. It’s not known just where, but it could not have been far from “Miller’s Fancy” and may been right across it. Replogle 32
Johann Michael Miller lived near the Upper Antietam bridge, which would have been a ford at that point.
Justin Replogle, on page 104 and 105 gives significant detail, but in summary, the troops pass, if you draw a straight line between Frederick and Conococheague, no more than a mile or so from Michael Miller’s farm. Miller’s Fancy is only about 2 miles north of the Potomac and the troops had to pass between the river and the farm. With 2000-3000 men or more, you know that the Miller family was not unaffected by this. Watching a British Army in red coats in June march through the woods and on Indian trails must have been quite a spectacle.
I wonder if Michael realized he was watching history unfold.
Braddock’s men may have camped in this area as well because they took a day to build a bridge over Antietam Creek. The photo below shows a portion of Braddock’s road still visible today near Fort Necessity. Braddock’s troops often opened or expanded the road as they went to a width that allowed wagons to pass.
Imagine seeing all of those red coats in the woods on or near your land, and wondering what the future would bring.
Michael had to wonder how this was any different than what happened in the 30 Years War in Europe that devastated the countryside. Did he ever question his decision to leave Germany?
Michael Miller wasn’t the only person to see the redcoats. Braddock’s troops also crossed the Potomac at Conochocheague, so Stephen Ulrich and Jacob Stutzman probably saw them as well. These men watched history unfold, having absolutely no idea of the dire consequences that would follow.
Braddock had been warned about the Indian’s ambush style of warfare Benjamin Franklin called “ambuscade,” but Braddock poopooed that information, stating that they would make no impression upon his finely trained troops. He was wrong, in fact, he was dead wrong.
Braddock was defeated, badly, as the Indians on further up the trail ambushed the brigade. Braddock himself was killed. Raids on settlements and settlers began immediately and within days reports say that upwards of 100 settlers had fled their homes, 50 had been killed or captured and 27 houses had been burned. On the Maryland-Pennsylvania border in the “two coves”, just west of Hagerstown, 47 people had been killed or captured. Now the entire western frontier lay unprotected. Replogle 105-106
Braddock’s disastrous defeat in November set off Indian attacks along the whole frontier and Stephen Ulrich almost certainly abandoned his farm and fled east, along with the entire community. He apparently came back. Replogle p 17
From 1755 to 1757, Alfred James writes, “Raid after raid from Fort Duquesne hit pioneer settlements along the Susquehanna and the Potomac.” It was unending and relentless. Another reports that “Frederick, Winchester and Carlisle became the new frontiers of the colony” and “Many even fled to Baltimore,” and “some to Virginia.” Arthur Quinn writes that families went as far east as Bethlehem “where there was no more room in the inns, or the shops or even the cellars.” Nead writes, “Terror and desolation reigned everywhere.” Repogle 106
Where was Johann Michael Miller and his family during this time? His children would likely all have been adults, with families of their own. Given Susanna Bechtol’s birth in 1688, their last child was probably born no later than 1733, so clearly an adult by 1754 or 1755. Susanna had died by this time, so Michael had his new wife and both sets of their children to worry about. Did they all escape or remove to locations further east? Together? Separately? In an orderly fashion? In a panic? What happened?
In April of 1756, Elisha Shaltor wrote, “I found the people in the greatest confusion, the troops abandoning the forts and the country people in the greatest consternation.”
The year 1756 seems to have been the worst for the Conococheague community.
On April 25, 1756, “Forty-one persons deserted their cabins and clearing near Conococheague and came to Baltimore. Their houses were destroyed and their cattle killed.” Two days earlier, Thomas Cresap, Jr. had been killed and fighting had occurred between Hanover and Bedford. No place was safe. Not where they moved from. Not where they moved to. Apparently no place except the eastern seaboard cities. Worse yet, in those cities, no one seemed to care.
Maryland and Pennsylvania legislatures were reluctant to do anything. The frontier was far from the cities and the Quakers hesitated to advocate violence.
Finally, in 1756, Maryland authorized a fort in the Conocheague area which would become Fort Frederick, about 15 miles away. That was far too little and way too late. If anything it incensed the Indians. The Indians easily captured this small isolated fort and killed all the settlers they encountered along the way, for good measure.
On October 25 Indians arrived with 20 scalps from the town of Conococheague. The list of the dead hints at the constant terror.
October 25 – John Loomis, wife and 3 small children
October 28 – Jacob Miller wife and 6 children
October 30 – George Falke, house, mill, barn, 20 cattle, 4 horses, wife, 9 children cut into pieces and fed to the pigs. A trader scalped, roasted alive, eaten.
The Conococheague residents tried to protect themselves at first, but then, they gave up and fled back east. The only Brethren name on the militia lists was George Butterbaugh, and Replogle suggests that he may not have been Brethren yet at that time. All of this was taking place in the area where the Ulrichs, Cripes and Millers lived.
Those who were willing to fight must have been terribly frustrated and felt endangered by the Brethren who were not. They were surely looked upon as a burden to the rest of the community. Did the Brethren truly watch their families slaughtered and do nothing? It’s difficult to believe that basic human instincts didn’t kick in.
Most settlers fled east from Monocacy. George Washington received a report in the summer of 1756 that “350 wagons had passed that place to avoid the enemy within the space of 3 days” and by August the report was that “The whole settlement of Conococheague in Maryland is fled, and there now remain only two families from thence to Fredericktown…..”
Surely that included Michael Miller and the rest of the Brethren families. The Indians were reported within 30 miles of Baltimore. Frederick is 47 miles from Baltimore.
Furthermore Washington said, “That the Maryland settlements are all abandoned…is a certain fact.”
Where did the Brethren families go? Who did they stay with? What did they do? And for how long?
In July 1756, the commander at Fort Duquesne said that he had “succeeded in ruining the three adjacent provinces, Pennsylvania, Maryland and Virginia, driving off the inhabitants and totally destroying the settlements over a tract of country over 30 leagues wide…the Indian villages are full of prisoners of every age and sex.”
In 1757, “the frontier settlements were abandoned over a wide area.”
And so life continued, land abandoned, the residents living who knows where, but assuredly with Brethren families or congregations back east, throughout 1756, 1757 and into 1758.
1758 – General Harris extends a road from Harrisburg, PA to Fort Duquesne on the Ohio River (Pittsburg.) Highway 30 follows this road most of the way today. Replogle 55
Forbes went from Cumberland to Bedford and had hundreds of men working on the road. By August 1758, 1400 men had extended the road to Bedford, just wide enough to get a wagon through. A contemporary writer said it took 8 days to travel from Bedford to Ligonier, a distance of about 45 miles. This tactic succeeded. General John Forbes took Fort Duquesne, now Pittsburg, the French abandoned it, and ended the French and Indian War on November 25, 1758. Indian attacks diminished and by 1762, the French had given up Canada. Replogle 107-108, 110
The area was never really in jeopardy of Indians regaining control, but it was in real jeopardy of French control. The French, like the English, were using the Indians by making promises. Were it not for Forbes, we might all be speaking French today.
When did the settlers return to this area? They likely had to rebuild from scratch. As difficult as this must have been, they obviously did and we have absolutely nothing in our family history reflecting this extremely difficult time. You would think there would be stories…something…but there is nothing.
We don’t know where our Brethren families lived during this time, what happened, who died, when they returned, how, or what they faced. Were their homes all burned? Was anything left? Did they start over again? What happened?
There is no hint. Brethren were never whiners. There are no tales of woe. The only hint is when transactions resume. For Michael Miller, that was in 1761 when he again began purchasing land, if that Michael was our Michael, or in 1762 when taxes were again being paid in Frederick County.
Michael, by this time, was an old man, 69 years old, and assuredly tired. In particular, tired of conflict and warfare. I’m sure he simply wanted to sit on the porch of his children’s home and look over a peaceful vista – one with no Indians, soldiers or war-like sheriffs.
One small item of significance – during the war, a small fort was built at Raystown, which would eventually become Bedford, a location that would, in 1770, become quite important to the Brethren. It was indeed the next frontier and two of Michael Miller’s grandsons through his son Philip Jacob would find themselves in Bedford County, PA.
1760 – One Michael Miller was Constable of Upper Antietam Hundred. This causes me to wonder how a Brethren can be a constable if they won’t take an oath.
The Brethren shunned anything legal. They did not marry by obtaining a license. I don’t think they would have registered their deeds if there was any way they could have avoided it. Many times, they simply didn’t.
For instance, on February 14, 1776, Alexander Mack Jr., the son of the founder of the Brethren faith writes in a letter that he is shunning his daughter, Sarah, because “she married outside of the brotherhood” and secondly “because the marriage was performed with a license and third because her husband had not quite completed his apprenticeship.” Shunning in the Brethren world was ostrification and the results of that could be far more severe then than now. Protection and assistance, for example, came from the group, generally a family group, that you were a member of. Sarah must have been one very brave young lady or blindly in love.
1761 – Michael Miller purchases Deceit in May, 108 ac for 50 lbs. Washington Co. MD Miller p 23
1761 – Michael Miller recorded a mortgage on May 6, 1761 made March 26, 1761 between Joseph Perry of Frederick Co. for 50 pcm (Pennyslvania Current Money) mortgaging a tract called “Deceit” on a branch of Antietam near the place that George Fairbush formerly lived on, containing 108 acres. Signed Jos Perry before Mos Chapline, Peter Bainbridge. Receipt ack, AF and duty pd. Frederick Co. Maryland Land Records, Liber F Abstracts, 1756-1761 p 124 by Patricia Abelard Anderson (Note – I did not extract all Miller records, just first names in which we are interested.)
Given that none of the other names are Brethren, I wonder if this is a different Michael Miller, perhaps the one that was a constable.
1762 – When Nicholas Martin was naturalized in Pennsylvania in 1762, Michael Miller and Jacob Miller were witnesses. It was this Nicholas Martin who gave the year of death for Michael Miller as 1771. Mason p 10 (Note that Michael’s signature would be on this document if the original still exists.)
This might suggest to us that Michael spent his time in exile in Pennsylvania and not in Maryland. Of course, he might simply have traveled to Maryland to testify for Nicholas Martin.
1762-1763 – In Frederick Co., MD, Michael Miller paid taxes on more than 700 acres, Michael Miller Jr. on 80 acres and Hans Michael Miller on more than 2000 acres. Replogle 117 quoting from Mason
To separate the three Michael Millers, Michael Miller Sr., Michael Miller Jr. and Hans Michael Miller, we use the information that is recorded in the Land Tax records at Annapolis MD in the archives. This is what was found:
Michael Miller Sr. 1762 and 1763
Skipton of Craven – 100 ac
Miller’s Fancy – 36 ac
Skipton of Craven – 180 ac
Resurvey of Well Taught – 409 ac
Michael Miller Jr. 1762 and 1763
Miller’s Chance – 50 ac – 1762 the same land
Blindman’s Choice – 50 ac – 1763 to 1772
(Most years Miller’s Choice was called Blindman’s Choice)
Hans Michael Miller – 1772
In addition to land in Antrim Twp, Franklin Co, Pa and New Creek, now Mineral Co, WV as given in his will, he paid taxes in 1772 in Frederick Co., MD on the following:
Resurvey of Nicholas Mistake – 1025 ac
Garden’s delight – 146 ac
Add Garden’s delight – 28 ac
Plunket’s Doubt – 133 ac
Maiden’s Walk – 35 ac
Tonas Lott – 16 ac
Small Hope – 20 ac
Small Hope – 43 ac
Rocky Creek – 150 ac
For anyone tracking Hans Michael Miller, Franklin County, PA and Mineral County, WV would be good places to start.
Gene Miller found that Hans Michael Miller was given 1000 pounds by his father Michael Miller Sr. (died 1771) to purchase Pleasant Gardens. What he purchased may have been an earlier name for what he called Gardens Delight and Add Gardens Delight. If it was this land, it was land that his 2 sons sold to Jacob Good and was located near the land, “Huckleberry Hall”, that Jacob Good bought from John Schnebly in 1787. It was located near Maugansville, MD. This land would go to the son-in-law and grandchildren of Elizabeth Garber, the step-mother of Hans Michael Miller, assuming he is the son of Michael Miller who died in 1771. Jacob Good had remarried. This is a connection between the 1st set of Michael Millers Sr.’s children and his step-children. Mason P 13
We did not follow the land records of Hans Michael Miller, but did follow the land records of Michael Miller Sr. (died 1771) and Jr., his presumed son.
We found that Michael Miller Sr. (the second, died 1771) paid taxes on his land and in his name for 1762 and 1763. He deeded all the land to his step-children in 1765. After that he continued to pay taxes on 36 acres of Miller’s Fancy and 8 acres of Resurvey on Well Taught. It’s this fact that causes researchers to believe this is where Michael actually lived.
1762 – John Hager began to lay out what would one day become Hagerstown, Maryland.
1763 – The surveyors started laying out the Mason-Dixon line and they got as far as Dunkard’s Creek where Indians stopped them. Replogle 114
A historical marker is located at Dunkard’s Creek in the Mason Dixon Historical Park where the creek crosses the Pennsylvania-West Virginia border about 150 miles west of Hagerstown.
1763 – In reference to Pontiac’s War (the Pontiac Conspiracy – which lasted until 1765) and the attacks on Fort Pitt, its inhabitants, and the destruction of Ligonier – David McClure says “the greater part of the Indian traders keep a squaw and some of them a white woman as a temporary wife. The people of Virginia…are different from those of the Presbyterians and the Germans. They are much addicted to drinking parties, gambling, horse racing and fighting.” These people were all residents of Fort Pitt, a total of 322 people. Most people fled east once again and the Indians attacked as far west as Carlisle.
The Maryland Gazette, written at Frederick on July 19, 1763 said, “The melancholy scene of poor distressed families driving downwards through this town with their effects…enemies…now daily seen in the woods….panic of the back inhabitants, whose terrors at this time exceed what followed on the defeat of General Braddock.” Ironically it also reported that the season had been remarkably fine and the harvest the best for many years. Once again, Frederick County put together two companies of militia and once again, no Brethren names appeared on the list. Replogle 113 – 114
By 1763, Michael Miller was an old man, almost 72 years of age. Again, relations with the Indians deteriorated and they attacked in waves. “The Cumberland Valley and frontier regions are deserted,” came the reports. “Bands of raiding Indians spread over western Maryland” Nead says and on August 13, 1763 George Washington writes that once again, “no families remain above the Conococheague road, and many are gone from below it. The harvests are, in a manner lost, and the distresses of the settlements are evident and manifold.” Replogle 113/114
Two Brethren, Nicholas Martin and Stephen Ulrich are found attending the Great Council of the Brethren in Conestoga in 1763. Would they have left their family in Frederick County among the massacres, or does this imply that the group had once again moved back east, and this where in the east they had moved?
Looking at the map, this seems to be an important clue. It would appear that they had been evacuating in reverse settlement order. Perhaps they first went to join the congregants of the church in Hanover, and finding that location unsafe, went on further back to their home church, Conewago, further east.
Conewago, in the book, “A History of the Church of the Brethren in Southern District Pennsylvania” is noted as being near current Ephrata, PA and also as being the current congregation of White Oak in Lancaster, County.
1765 – The 4 children of Nicholas and Elizabeth Garber were living in Frederick Co. MD before 1765. Nicholas’s will gives the names of two of them, Elizabeth and Samuel, and researchers have determined that the other two were Anna and Martin.
In 1765, Michael Miller is selling land, just like nothing happened, or perhaps the recent unrest is part of why he transferred the land when he did. In essence, he went on a huge deeding spree, deeding all of the land he owned, mostly to his step-children and their spouses.
1765 – Jacob Good recorded a deed on Oct. 28, 1765, made Oct. 25, 1765, between Michael Miller of Frederick Co. for 100 pounds current money, a parcel called Hamburgh, part of a Resurvey on Well Taught, metes and bounds given, containing 81 acres. Signed Michael Miller by mark M before Joseph Smith, James Smith, Elizabeth Miller wife of Michael released dower. P 140-142 Frederick Co. MD Land Records Liber K Abstracts, 1765-1768 abstracted by Patricia Abelard Andersen p 15-16
Please note that this means that Elizabeth Garber, Michael’s second wife is still alive in 1765. There is significant confusion about Michael Miller administering the estate of her former husband, Nicholas Garber, and some researchers have construed that administration in 1754 to be the estate of Elizabeth, which it clearly is not.
1765 – Michael Miller sold the 409 acres of Well Taught to Jacob Good and John Riffe. He paid taxes on 8 acres of this 409 acres along with the 36 acres called Miller’s Fancy which has what has led some researchers to surmise that is where Michael actually lived. Mason p 14
1765 – John Rife recorded a deed on Oct. 28, 1765, made Oct. 25, 1765 between Michael Miller of Frederick County for 200 pounds current money, a tract of land called Quarry, part of a resurvey on Well Taught patented to George Jacob Pow, metes & bounds given, 179 acres signed Michael Miller by mark M. Witnesses Joseph Smith, James Smith, receipt ack. Elizabeth Miller released Dower. P 166-167
1765 – Michael Miller sold in October 1765, 36 acres of Miller’s Fancy and 5 acres of Resurvey of Well Taught for 50 pounds. Wash Co., MD. Miller p 23.
This appears to be the 5 acres he paid tax on until he died, but he had already transferred the entire 36 acres to John Riffe, so this is somewhat confusing.
1765 – John Rife recorded a deed on Oct. 28, 1765, made Oct. 25, 1765 between Michael Miller for 50 pounds, a tract called Miller’s Fancy, metes and bounds given, 5 acres, signed Michael Miller by mark M. Witness Joseph Smith, James Smith. Receipt ack. Elizabeth wife of Michael released dower. P 175-176
1765 – Jacob Good recorded a deed on Oct. 28, 1765 made on Oct. 25, 1765 between Michael Miller of Frederick County for 300 pounds, a tract called Good’s Choice, part of Skipton and Craven, land whereon the said Jacob Good now lives, metes and bounds given, 163 acres, signed Michael Miller by mark M. Wit Joseph Smith and James Smith, receipt acknowledged and dower released by Elizabeth Miller wife of Michael Miller. P 177-178 Wash Co Md. Miller p 23
1765 – Jacob Good recorded a deed on Oct. 28, 1765 made on Oct. 25, 1765 between Michael Miller for 60 pounds tract called Luck, part of resurvey on Well Taught entered to George Pie. Metes and bounds given, 100 acres. Signed Michael Miller by mark M. Witnesses Joseph Smith, James Smith and Elizabeth Miller releases dower. P 179-180 Wash Co MD Miller p 23
1765 – John Rife recorded a deed on Oct. 28, 1765 made on Oct. 25, 1765 between Michael Miller for 200 pounds, a tract called Rife’s Lot, part of Skipton and Craven whereon John Rife now lives, metes and bounds given, 117 acres. Witnesses Joseph Smith, James Smith and Elizabeth Miller release dower. P 185-186
Jacob Good and John Riffe were Michael Miller’s step-daughter’s husbands. Mason P 14
1765 – Michael Miller sold Michael Tanner 50 acres of “Miller’s Choice”.
1765 – Michael Miller had “Range” surveyed – 50 acres – grant. We believe that this is the 50 acres on Piney Creek that he sold in 1765 to Michael and Eve Tanner who deeded it to a son-in-law, John Storm. See circle 9. Was Eve one of Michael Miller and Susanna Bechtol’s daughters that we have not discovered? Mason P 14
Frederick Co. MD Land Records Liber K Abstracts, 1765-1768 abstracted by Patricia Abelard Andersen, p 18-19
1768 – The defeat of Pontiac triggers mass migration westward over the mountains. Replogle 20
1768 – November – the British government bought large tracts of land from the Iroquois and Pennsylvania now owns all the land west of the Alleghenies to the Ohio River except for the northernmost part of the colony, opening the doors for a huge migration. However, the Delaware and Shawnee were left out and the raids continued. Replogle 115
1768-1769 – List of persons who stand charged with land on Frederick County rent rolls which are under such circumstances as renders it out of the power of George Scott Farmer to collect the rents and there claims allowance under his articles for the same from March 1768 to March 1769: (Note there are several pages of these, so much so that it looks like a tax list, not a roll of uncollectibles.)
No Cripe, Greib, Ullrich, Ullery or Stutzman
Jacob Miller Jr
Michael Miller heirs
Oliver Miller, Balt Co.
Oliver Miller, Balt Co additional
Inhabitants of Frederick Co. MD, Vol 1, 1750-1790 by Stefanie R. Shaffer, p 45
1770 – Michael Miller recorded on June 21, 1770 a deed made on the same date between he and Peter Apple/Apel for 50 pounds, a 20 acre tract of Small Hope. Signed in German script, Peter Apel before Charles Beatty, William Richey Receipt ack. Alienation fine paid. Please note that in 1772 Hans Michael Miller is paying tax on this land. P 154-155
Also note that in 1765 Johann Michael Miller was signing with an M, and this Michael Miller signs five years later in German script.
As best I can tell, the alienation fine was connected with selling the land privately away from the proprietor of Maryland. This is discussed on pages 33-35 of “The American Colonies in the Seventeenth Centuries, Volume 2” by Herbert Levi Osgood.
Frederick County Maryland Land Records Liber N Abstracts 1770-1772 Abstracted by Patricia Ableard Andersen p 24
1770 – Richard Richardson recorded June 25, 1770 made June 22 between Michael Miller for 40 pounds, sells 10 acres of tract called Small Hopes. Signed Michael Miller receipt acknowledged Pages 171-173
Frederick County Maryland Land Records Liber N Abstracts 1770-1772 Abstracted by Patricia Ableard Andersen, p 25
1771 – Michael Miller’s death is recorded by Nicholas Martin in a letter to Alexander Mack Jr. wherein he references the death of Michael Miller as a “year ago” which would be approximately May of 1771.
On May 24, 1772, when Nicholas Martin was presiding at Conecocheague, he wrote a lengthy letter to Alexander Mack, Jr., of which one paragraph reads:
“You will perhaps know that the dear Brother Michael Miller died a year ago. Brother Jacob Stutzman is again quite improved; he was very feeble this past winter.”
Michael Miller is references as “Brother” so there is absolutely no question that he died Brethren.
Elder Nicholas Martin was the ruling Church of the Brethren elder for this section of MD and PA and a friend of Alexander Mack Jr. Alexander Mack Sr. was the founder of the Brethren Church and his son the leader after his father’s death. In other letters he comments about the health of Michael Miller and Jacob Stutzman. When Nicholas was naturalized in 1762, Michael Miller Sr. and his son Philip Jacob Miller were witnesses for him. Nicholas’s farm called “Swamp of Experience” was adjoining Tom’s Chance and Ash Swamp. Mason P 19
These men were clearly very close neighbors and friends. Nicholas Martin probably preached the funeral of his friend Michael Miller, in German of course.
1771 – Justin Replogle believes that Michael is probably buried on Miller’s Fancy. Replogle p 32
Floyd Mason believes Michael is buried on Ash Swamp.
We believe that Michael Miller was buried on his plantation where he lived or in the family cemetery on John Miller’s section of Ash Swamp. We believe he remained Lutheran or Reformed. However he may have attended or joined the German Baptist Brethren. Some records say that they lived and were buried at Conococheaque, Washington Co., MD near Hagerstown, MD. Mason P 20
Gene Miller believes he is buried in the now-lost cemetery on John Miller’s part of Ash Swamp.
It is believed that Michael Miller is most likely buried in the private cemetery that was located on the John Miller portion of the Ash Swamp property. The 50 by 50 foot cemetery plot is apparently lost to history today as there is no record of it. Miller 31
I don’t have a clue where he is buried, but if I had to guess, and I do, I would suggest it is more likely to be on his son’s property than elsewhere simply because that land is more likely to ‘remain in the family’ where the land of step-children is already outside of the blood-line family. It’s also likely that a cemetery on John Miller’s land had already been established as the “Miller cemetery” for this family. It’s unlikely that there were no deaths between 1752 when Michael deeded this land to his sons and 1771 when Michael died.
1771 – Michael Miller dies and Ash Swamp is divided between Philip Jacob, John and Lodowich. 1000 pounds is given to Hans Michael to purchase Pleasant Gardens, Michael Jr. is given Blindman’s Choice. Miller p 24
Note: I don’t find a deed giving Blindman’s Choice to Michael Jr.
From 1769 thru 1772 the tax on Michael’s land was paid by the heirs as seen on this tax books. There are some records that show that the tax was owed for several years and we believe that they did not get around to paying the tax until after Michael’s death in 1771. Michael Miller Sr. (the second died in 1771) lived for years at the mouth of Little Antietam where it flows into the Antietam Creek. Mason p 13
We found that after the death of Michael Miller Sr. (the second), in 1771, both Michael Miller Jr. (the third) and Hans Michael Miller were paying the tax in 1772 and succeeding years. Philip Jacob Miller was paying taxes on “Ash Swamp,” 290 acres and Lodowich Miller was paying taxes on land that he had bought near Taneyown, Md. See Circle #7. Mason P 14
The names of Michael Miller Jr. (the third) and Hans Michael Miller are confusing. Given that Michael Miller Sr.’s (d 1771) actual name was Johann Michael Mueller (Miller), and Hans is short for Johann, you would think that Michael Miller Jr. would be Hans Michael Miller Jr. Both of these men cannot be sons of the Michael Miller who died in 1771. However, one could be a son and one his grandson. Further research into both Michael Miller Jr. (the third) and Hans Michael Miller would hopefully reveal additional information and in particular, about their age. We know, for example, that Johann Michael Miller (the second’s) first child, a son, Johann Peter, was born in 1715. If Johann Peter married when he was 20 and had a son when he was 21, whom he named after his father, that birth would have occurred about 1736. That child, Johann Michael Miller, would have come of age about 1757. Given that several grandchildren of Michael Miller could have been coming of age anytime after 1757, Hans Michael Miller could have belonged to any of the living or perhaps deceased male children of Johann Michael Miller the second who died in 1771.
I assembled the various land transactions of Michael Miller as shown below.
*Troy Goss refers to the John who was involved with the Ash Swamp land as John Peter. This is the only source I have seen referring to this John as John Peter Miller. It would be very unusual for Johann Peter to be called John instead of Peter, since Johann was the first given name of most German male children. The only person called Johann or John would be someone whose full name was Johannes Mueller.
In 1783, these men conveyed land back and forth. Troy shows deeds on Dec. 9, 1783 for 220 acres from Lodowich to Philip Jacob Miller for 5 shillings (Washington Co., Land records, Book C, pages 563-47). On December 26, 1783, Philip Jacob Miller conveys 144 acres to John Peter Miller for 5 shillings “and brotherly affection.” Book C, pages 260-262.
To finish the story of Michael’s land in Frederick County, when John died in 1794, Frederick County had become Washington County. The family sold all of Michael’s land that both John and Philip Jacob had inherited to one John Schnebley.
Philips Jacob’s land, sold on September 25, 1795, included Keller’s Discovery for 11 acres, Prickley Ash Bottom for 11 acres and his part of the Resurvey of Ash Swamp for 143.5 acres, for 2,175 pounds. Liber I, page 360.
John’s land included his 143.5 acres of the Resurvey of Ash Swamp for 2,044 pounds. Liber I FF page 584.
It’s interesting to note that Michael paid 243 pounds for this land in 1745 that sold for a total of 4219 pounds in 1795, about 50 years later, for a profit of 576%. He was indeed an astute investor.
Philip Jacob Miller left and went to Kentucky in about 1796, a couple of years after his brother John died. Philip had witnessed his brother John’s will. He likely sorely missed his brother who had been his neighbor and farming companion his entire life. While we don’t have a will in Maryland for Philip Jacob, we do have John’s will which gives us a peek into their life on Ash Swamp.
The land was referenced as both meadow and swamp. It seems there was about 100 acres of woodland and the rest was swamp, meadow and cultivated land. The woods are entirely gone today.
In John Miller’s estate inventory, we find
- A Bible – I have to wonder if this was his father’s Bible. If he was Johann Peter born in 1715, he was the eldest son, and this could well have been his father’s Bible if it survived all of the moves, warfare and indian raids. I wonder what happened to this Bible.
- Hand tools such as saws, hammers, trowels, branding irons, knives, pinchers, shovels, chains, broad axes, a grubbing hoe, a rifle, a scythe, an anvil and a corn hoe. Obviously, the rifle was for hunting, not defense.
- Farm implements such as a tar bucket, a bushel basket, a wagon whip, a dutch oven, old flour barrels, a chisel, a compass, a dung fork, an auger, a barking iron, a shot gun, a wool wheel, tanners knives, stelyards, a harrow, a hay fork, plows, draw knives, mall rings, wedges, a windmill and sausage horn.
- Produce such as flower, a barrel of vinegar, stacks of hay, wheat, oats, rye, corn, flax, potatoes. Some produce was still in the field such as 8 acres of barley and wheat that was seeded.
- Farm animals including geese, turkeys, ducks, horses, cows, calves, bulls, sheep and hogs along with cured pork.
- Household items such as chairs, a tub, a bedstead, a table, dressers, chests, a dough tray, lamps, baskets, a kettle, a stove, weaving loom and spooling wheel, wool cards, knives and forks, pewter spoons, a kitchen cabinet and shelves. It’s interesting that there is only one bedstead.
Philip Jacob’s farm would probably have been quite similar, as would Michael’s before them at his death in 1771, although Michael may have had significantly less because he had to start over so many times when war drove him out and the Indians likely burned his homes. I wonder how many homes he lost in that manner. I’m betting at least two.
Michael and his son’s lives were filled with uncertainty in a way we find difficult to relate to today.
“For the first fifty years the Brethren suffered many privations on account of the French war in 1755, the Revolution 20 years later, and subsequent Indian wars together with many inconveniences incident to a newly settled country, as our part of the state was at that time. The dread of the Indian’s tomahawk and scalping knife, was everywhere felt. In the morning before going to the fields to work, the farmer and his sons often bid good-bye to the balance of the family, fearing they might not return, or if permitted to do so, would find their loved ones murdered by the Indians.” (From The Brethren Almanac 1879.)
That simple paragraph probably pretty much sums up the daily life of Johann Michael Miller’s life. Always wary, always on the frontier, always in some amount of jeopardy. However, his faith sustained him and he managed to survive, as did many of his children, either because of or in spite of his Brethren faith and non-violent ways.
The Brethren Almanac goes on to report, “Under the guiding hand of their first resident Elder, Wm. Stover, the congregation worshipped in houses. Brother Jacob Miller was elected to the ministry, and in 1765 moved to Virginia.”
This is the genesis of the legend that Jacob Miller is the son of Michael Miller – a legend we will disprove.
Visiting Michael’s Land in Frederick (now Washington) County, MD
In October of 2015, I was able to visit Hagerstown, Maryland, located in Washington, County, the part formerly Frederick County. More specifically, I was able to locate Johann Michael Miller’s land, Ash Swamp, that he may have lived on and that he left to his sons, in particular, John and Philip Jacob, my ancestor.
Johann Michael Miller owned land just outside of and now partly within Maugansville, Maryland.
Gene Miller, in his book, assembled the surveys into a conglomerate. If Gene is right about where the cemetery was located, it may well be under the subdivision today, and if not, perhaps our ancestors are sleeping peacefully under some corn.
On this map, Michael’s land encompasses most of the land between Cearfoss Pike (58), Gardenville Road and Maugansville Road including Rush Run.
Here is the satellite view of that area.
The grey balloon is the old working farm that remains.
Arriving in the area from Cearfoss, approaching Michael’s farm, you notice the lovely clean farms. As I’ve been working my way north this week from Richmond, VA, I’ve noticed how much these farms resemble the Pennsylvania, Lancaster County, type of farms and buildings. That makes sense, since the people who settled here were a group of Germans that had previously lived in that area.
The land to the south of Cearfoss Pike was also Michaels. His son, Lodowick also bought a significant amount of land here.
There is a more contemporary home very near to the road. This structure is not old enough to have been here when Michael owned this land.
However, this farm that sits back could have been the original farm and house, or at least the location of the original buildings. This would have been John’s portion of the farm.
The house sits quite a ways back from the road, and I did not want to disturb the current day owners, so I took photos from a distance.
Based on the maps of this region from the 1850s through about 1900, this farm does not appear to have existed at that time, so it’s not the original farm house, as I had hoped.
Fortunately, Grace Academy purchased Michael’s land and built in the middle of the field, behind the homes on 58 and also behind the homes in the development off of Garden View and Maugansville Road.
The map above shows the original farm to the upper left, Grace Academy to the lower left, the property today owned by the car collector is to the far right and the arrow just slightly left of that is Ashton Hall. Johann Michael Mueller owned most of this land.
You can see the land overlayed on this scan from page 30 of the Miller book.
This 1859 Taggert plat map of Washington County shows homestead locations.
It appears that the old farmhouse on Cearfoss Pike is on the Daniel Zeter land but it’s not showing as a homestead. Daniel Zeter’s actual homestead is north of Michael Miller’s property, although it looks like there was a road leading to his house over Michael’s property. It could also have changed in the years since the 1770s or even the 1790s. It appears that the M. Horst and John Horst properties are the car collector perhaps and Ashton Hall.
The 1877 atlas, above clearly shows the Zeller residence. If that is where John’s farm was located, it’s likely under the subdivision today. Philip Jacob’s land is likely where the Horst farms were located.
The 1879 map is very similar.
The Ashton Hall history confirms we have the correct land with the following:
In 1838, the farm was sold to John Horst, of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, to settle the estate of John Schnebly. In 1865, Horst sold part of the farm to his son Samuel, …reserving that part of the dwelling house on the north side of the passage from the cellar to the garrett with privilege of using the entries and stairs for passing and repassing with free access to any of the springs and one third part of the garden… according to the deed. Samuel and his bride resided in the upstairs ballroom area, and an enclosed stairway was added just inside the kitchen door for access. In 1885, Lesher Horst, son of Samuel and Lydia Horst, built his own brick home on their portion of Ashton Hall. This property was later to become known as the Miller Asparagus Farm. Fanny Horst married Michael Martin and in 1899, the Martin family purchased the farm and continued their lineage at Ashton Hall. These were Mennonite families who continued to farm the land until 1989, 183 years. Orville Martin was the last steward of Schnebley’s fertile lands.
Ashton Hall has evolved into a community. John Schnebley’s estate has been subdivided with single-family dwellings converging over half the designated meadow, at this time. A church, a private school (kindergarten through twelfth grade), two smaller farms, and a soccer complex are on the perimeter acreage. In the midst of this, sits a quiet reminder of another way of life altogether.
The Grace Academy location, the private school mentioned above, provided wonderful access to photograph Michael’s land and the farm to the west. Most of this land was Michael’s. You can see what wonderful farming land it would have been, especially given the reminder of the mountains within sight to the west. These are the Blue Ridge and are maybe 8 or 10 miles distant.
My husband and I had a picnic lunch of bagels with cream cheese and left over pizza in the Grace Academy parking lot. It was fun to break bread on Michael’s land, some 244 years after he passed from this earth. He probably took food from his knapsack and did the same thing in 1745 when he scouted this land. I’m sure it looks dramatically different, 275 years later, but still, I returned and ate where Michael assuredly did as well. None of this land would have been cleared at that time, so Michael would not have been able to see the mountains in the distance. We’re looking at the results of Michael’s work and that of his sons John and Philip Jacob Miller.
Michael’s land to the left of the photo above.
Michael’s land to the right of the farm before the subdivision. The subdivision was his land too.
A closer look at the farm.
And the mountains. Did Michael ever dream of crossing these mountains? Or was Michael done with dreaming of new frontiers? His son, Philip Jacob not only dreamed of crossing these mountains, he did, at age 70 or so.
The farm from Garden View Road, from the back side, across the north part of Michael’s land. This sky is stunning.
Thankfully Michael had his land resurveyed, because this is the only record we actually have of who received the land and where it lay.
There are however, two other properties of significant interest. On the map, below the grey balloon marks the location of 13318 Maugansville Road.
Just below this location we find 13220 Maugansville Road, which is Ashton Hall. These two locations are quite historic.
Here is a closer view of the two together.
Michael’s son, Philip Jacob would have built a house on this land. These two properties are candidates for that home. Ashton Hall is actually on Rush Run, which would have been the water source for both. However, we know that the current building at this location was built in 1801 because the history of Ashton Hall has been researched. We don’t know if Ashton Hall was built on the location where Philip Jacob’s house had been.
In 1795, John Schnebly purchased 146 and 1/2 acres of land, parts of land grants Keller’s Discovery, Prickly Ash Bottom and Resurvey on Ash Swamp for the sum of …two thousand one hundred and seventy-five pounds five shillings current money. John Schnebly named his property Ashton Hall and, in 1801, built the stone house near Maugansville.
This does, however, confirm that part of this land was indeed Resurvey on Ash Swamp, Michael’s land.
This property, below, just north of Ashton Hall was visited in the 1970s by other Miller researchers when it was Miller Farm Market. The owners at that time believed that while the house was probably not old enough to be from that timeframe, some of the other buildings were.
There didn’t seem to be anyone home, so I pulled into the driveway, snapped a few quick shots and left.
An automobile collector lives here today. This could have been the location of the original Philip Jacob Miller homestead.
This begs the question of where Michael and his first wife, Susan Berchtol, are buried. The answer is that we don’t know.
Susan could have died near Hanover, PA before Michael migrated to Maryland, but it is uncertain.
However, it’s a safe bet is that Michael is buried either here or on his land on the Antietam, Miller’s Fancy. We know that someplace here on his own property is a 50 foot by 50 foot cemetery, found on John Miller’s portion, lost to time and probably being plowed or under houses. Michael’s son John owned this land when he died as well, so he is probably buried here too. If one of the houses in the subdivision is haunted, well, I guess we know why!
In the Mason book, Floyd mentions that they visited the Hagerstown area in 1990. He includes a photograph of a property he believes may be one of the old Miller locations. I originally thought it was the car collector’s property above, but after looking again, I don’t think it is.
I “drove” this area again using Google maps street view, and I saw nothing at all similar, so I’m presuming that this property is gone today, in October 2015, or it really is the same property I visited owned by the car collector. It has been 25 years since Floyd Mason took these photos, and it was an old property at that time. If it was as old as Mason thought, it would be very difficult to maintain. There are several new structures in the area and the couple that owns Ashton Halls has reported a lot of development.
The balance of Michael’s Resurvey of Ash Swamp is either a contemporary subdivision, or farmland surrounding Ashton Hall, which you can’t see from the road. Rush Creek crosses this property and by driving into the entrance of the soccer club, beside the Academy, you can see somewhat of the land east of the Academy, west of Maugansville Road and north of Cearfoss Pike. This is on the western part of Philip Jacob Miller’s portion of Ash Swamp.
The picture above is looking north. The one below looking east. Ashton Hall would be behind those trees about half a mile as the crow flies. The car collector’s property may be slightly visible in the distance just beyond the row of trees.
I find it very vexing, after all of the real estate transactions Michael Miller was involved with that we still don’t really know where he lived when he died. We know that he deeded all of his land before his death, so he was clearly living with one of his children (or step-children) or at least on land owned by them.
When visiting, I didn’t make the side trip to Antietam and Little Antietam Creek because with all of Michael Miller’s activities on or near Cearfoss Pike, I really didn’t think that he would be living south of Hagerstown. I was probably wrong, and of course, now I wish I had taken that side trip.
Michael did own that land and he could have been living on Miller’s Fancy. In the deed where he conveys the Skipton on Craven land to his step children’s spouses, Jacob Good and John Rife, the deeds say “the land where they now live” indicating that it’s where they live, not where Michael lives. But Michael continues to pay the taxes on part of the land he sold to his step-children’s spouses. He had to live someplace. Is that tax money his “rent” for the rest of his life?
Mason believes that Michael lived on 36 acres of Miller’s Fancy and 8 acres of Well Taught. That doesn’t seem like enough land to support a family, but then again, maybe Michael didn’t need to support a family anymore.
In general terms, the area where Michael Miller’s land lay on the Antietam Creeks was near Sharpsburg, Maryland.
One of the bloodiest battles of the Civil War was fought here. This iconic image of the Battle of Antietam where the Confederate and Union dead lie together in front of the Brethren Church has become symbolic of the war itself. This battle was found on the land of the descendants of Michael Miller.
The intersection of Antietam and Little Antietam Creek is on Keedysville Road.
A closer look at the intersection of Antietam and Little Antietam
This is the bridge over Little Antietam Creek.
Looking at Little Antietam from the bridge.
If the description of where Michael Miller lived is accurate, he lived on the curve where Antietam Creek intersects with Little Antietam, below.
This is the curve where Little Antietam intersects with Antietam. Antietam is on the left.
This barn is actually on the curve with the river slightly visible behind the barn. Was this where Michael’s barn stood? Was this Michael’s barn? It’s certainly in the right location.
This is the bridge over Antietam Creek.
Of course, Floyd Miller believes that Michael’s land was northeast of Hagerstown and Maugansville, as shown on his map with circle #4. Perhaps one day a future generation of Miller researchers will run the deeds backwards and forward in time and resolve this mystery once and for all. If we’re extremely lucky, an old cemetery will be discovered on one of these parcels.
Because Michael did not have a will, we only know of three or four children positively, and a possible fifth. The rest of the individuals attributed to Michael elsewhere are speculation. If someone does have other children and documentation for such, I would love to add that child. I have not included any speculative children below.
- Hans (probably Johann) Peter Mueller, baptized on January 19, 1715, at Konken, Germany. We don’t know if this child lived to adulthood. If so, he would probably have married when the family was living in Chester Co, PA. He may be John Miller below.
- Lodowich Miller born 1724 or earlier in Germany. Migrated with his parents and lived in or near Hanover, PA and Hagerstown, MD before marrying Barbara, surname unknown, and migrating to Rockingham Co., VA about 1782 where he likely died in 1792.
- Philip Jacob Miller born about 1726 in Germany. Migrated with his parents and lived near Hanover, York Co., PA. Inherited land from his father in present day Washington County, MD near Maugensville. Married Magdalena, probably in York County, who was reported to be a Rochette. He remained in Frederick County until 1796 when he, along with his children, migrated to Campbell County, KY where he died in 1799.
- John Miller inherits part of Ash Swamp from Michael in 1765 and lived there until he died in 1795, likely being buried on his own land on a 50 by 50 foot cemetery plot, now lost to time. He may be Hans Peter Mueller born in 1715.
- Hans Michael Miller is given money to purchase land.
- Michael Miller Junior is given land.
There exists some confusion between John Miller and Johann Peter Miller. In some cases, John, who inherited part of Ash Swamp is referenced as Johann Peter. If this is the case, then we know that Johann Peter did live and what happened to him. However, it also means that it reduces the number of children we know about.
Various researchers attribute Michael and Susanna with anyplace from 7 to 12 children. Given that they were married for 17 childbearing years, they would probably have had between 9 and 12 children. It’s unlikely that their children all lived.
It seems that any male with the surname Miller living in the region gets attached as a son. Miller is an extremely common occupation name in Germany. After all, every village had at least one miller, so there are lots of German Millers.
It’s certainly possible that the Jacob Miller and family who were massacred were Michael’s son and grandchildren, but we don’t know and we have no real evidence to suspect – other than the surname in the same place and time.
There is a Barbara who marries a Garber who is often credited with being Johann Michael Mueller’s daughter – and while she might be – there is no evidence that she is – not even land transactions. It would be interesting to see if any of Barbara’s descendants match any of Michael’s descendants utilizing autosomal DNA – assuming they share no other lines. Given the level of endogamy in the Brethren community, that’s a tough criteria to meet – assuming you do know the surnames of all of the females. Since the Brethren didn’t register their marriages in the counties where they lived, females surnames are particularly troublesome and elusive.
It’s almost assured that Johann Michael Miller and Susanna Agnes Bechtol had additional children. Whether those children lived to adulthood is uncertain. It’s even uncertain that Hans Michael Miller, above is Michael’s child, especially given the fact that we also have a Michael Miller Jr. involved. One of these men is probably a grandchild.
It’s ironic that we know more about Michael’s step-children through land transactions where he sells them land than we know about his own children, aside from Philip Jacob, Lodowich and John.
But there is one thing we do know, and it solves a very long and somewhat contentious mystery.
Jacob is Not Michael’s Child
Jacob Miller has been quite a conundrum. Jacob was born about 1735 in Pennsylvania, was a Brethren minister, lived in Frederick County and then moved to Virginia in about 1765. He eventually moved on to Kentucky. Eventually, Jacob is found in Montgomery County, Ohio, outside Dayton, when the county was first forming, again with our Miller family. In fact, Daniel, Michael Miller’s grandson through Philip Jacob Miller buys land from Jacob Miller when Daniel first arrives in Montgomery County. It has been assumed or postulated for a very long time that Jacob Miller is a son of Michael Miller, but he isn’t. Y DNA testing has shown that these Miller families do not share a common male ancestor.
One of the goals of establishing the Miller-Brethren project in 2009 was to sort through the various Miller individuals associated with the Brethren church as it expanded across America.
It took quite some time to establish the Y DNA signature of Johann Michael Miller. The first two men who believed they were descended from him did not match each other, so we needed to proceed with individuals with well documented genealogy. Fortunately, we managed to recruit several Miller men and today, we have a total of 6 Miller males who descend from Michael.
In the screen shot above, the Jacob Miller line is lavender. You can see that it differs significantly from the Johann Michael Miller line, in yellow, below. You can click to enlarge both graphics.
You may also have noticed that one the men who descends from the Elder Jacob Miller line thought that he descended from the Johann Michael Miller line. This certainly is not an uncommon occurrence and sorting through situations like this was indeed part of the project goals. It’s very difficult to tell the difference between people of the same name in the same county at the same time subscribing to the same religion. Thank goodness for the tool of Y DNA.
One of the surprising aspects of this project is that there were so many different Miller lines associated with the Brethren or found in the counties where the Brethren Millers were known to be living – including a second and third Johann Michael Miller. We have 15 groups in total, plus a few people who remain in the “non-Brethren” or ungrouped groups for various reasons.
We invite all male Millers who have Brethren heritage in their Miller line or who think they might descend from Johann Michael Mueller to test at Family Tree DNA. Please purchase the Y DNA 37 or 67 marker test and the Family Finder autosomal test as well, if the budget will allow both tests.
As more people test, hopefully Miller males who descend from “possible sons” of Johann Michael Miller, we should be able to either confirm more of his sons or put those rumors to rest once and for all.
I receive a small contribution when you click on some of the links to vendors in my articles. This does NOT increase the price you pay but helps me to keep the lights on and this informational blog free for everyone. Please click on the links in the articles or to the vendors below if you are purchasing products or DNA testing.
Thank you so much.
DNA Purchases and Free Transfers
- Family Tree DNA
- MyHeritage DNA only
- MyHeritage DNA plus Health
- MyHeritage FREE DNA file upload
- 23andMe Ancestry
- 23andMe Ancestry Plus Health
- Legacy Tree Genealogists for genealogy research
Best Christmas present ever.
What caught my eye this time was the Y-DNA table at the end, showing all the dissimilarities between the different Miller groups. But the numbers looked awfully familiar. I did a similar quick comparison using data from the French Heritage project, trying to figure out the degree of relatedness of my French ancestors that have R-M269 as an haplogroup. Granted, it covers 60% of the French and 50% of the Germans, but nonetheless I hoped the STR would potentially reveal trends. It includes the two Landry from our beloved Acadia. In spite of them coming from the same area, and probably having arrived on the same boat, the results precluded them from being father and son, or grandfather/grandson. What I thought interesting was how similar the rest of STRs are between totally unrelated individuals, including some of your germanic Millers.
Here is a link to a picture of my file:
My question is : it seems at the moment the only thing we can do is to say – same line or not.
Have there been studies to show the frequency of appearance of STR in different families or regions? Not knowing where the LeSage family (and thanking a 6th cousin from Illinois for having taken the test) came from, I was hoping for a clue…
The haplogroup studies are doing this kind of work. Right now the haplogroups are being broken into many different branches, and then the individual branches studied. The STR markers are still best for genealogy and looking for matches in a genealogically relevant timeframe, but SNPs look further back into time into our history before surnames.
Thank you for this concise answer. How does the Big Y test fit into the equation?
One of our Miller cousins has taken the Big Y. The Big Y is more of a discovery test and reaches back further in time.
Thank you for such a great analysis. Through a combination of Y and autosomal testing, it has been determined that my Miller line is from a different Johann Michael Miller. Some of my distant male cousins matched the one from Dorrenbach, Germany. But it is great to read about this Miller, and it brings back vivid memories of my visits to Antietam and Ephrata Cloisters.
Sharon Clontz Rowe
Can you rewrite this sentence?
acob Stutzman died in 1773, two years after Michael, and Jacob’s widow married Stephen Ulrich (the second.) Michael Miller’s granddaughter would marry Elizabeth Ulrich, daughter of Stephen Ulrich (the second) and Elizabeth Cripe.
I added a couple of words, but I’m not sure what is confusing about the sentence.
It sounds a little bit like Michael Miller’s granddaughter would marry Elizabeth Ulrich. Am I missing something here?
That’s exactly what happened. Daniel Miller, son of Philip Jacob Miller (son of Michael) and Magdalena, surname unknown, married Elizabeth Ulrich, daughter of Stephen Ulrich and Elizabeth Cripe/Greib. So you’re not missing anything at all.
Elizaberth marrying Elizabeth?
Daniel married Elizabeth. Should have said grandson, and does now:)
Merle Rummel, whom I think you know, alerted me to your new research concerning Michael Miller. Great piece of work.
I do have a question about Michael’s son Lodowich, hoping you have done work in that part of the line. As you probably know there were several Ludwig Miller’s in the general area of Pa and Md. border. I have been trying to sort out my Ludwig Miller from Lodowich and the two Ludwig Millers identified in York Co, Pa….one at Manheim and one at Germany Twp (he died there in 1783 with wife Anna Barbara Myer). I have seen a lot of posted information that seems to have these guys mixed up.
My Ludwig was born c1720 in Germany, came to US maybe early 1740’s, married Barbara Grable and lived in Coventry Twp of Chester Co., Pa. with his two cousins George Craft and Samuel Grable. They migrated to Pa/Md border area in 1750’s, living near Blue Ridge Summit in s/e corner of Franklin Co., Pa. and some right across the border in MD. In 1762, Ludwig was baptized Brethren and was naturalized with Daniel Leatherman as witness for both. The cousins went on to Fayette Co., Pa. in 1770’s. Ludwig died there in 1813 per his will.
Several factors have made me wonder if my Ludwig might be same person as Michael’s Lodowick. For example, both had a wife named Barbara, both had been in Coventry, and no record found for Lodowick’s death in Md. Also, George Arnold was close to Michael and his son Daniel interacted a good deal with Ludwig’s family. And most interestingly, Ludwig’s will prepared in 1808 shows David Stutzman, Jacob’s son, as a witness (Daniel was living in Luzerne Twp as was my Ludwig). Did David just happen to live in the area or were they connected in some way? Finally, deed transactions known to be Lodowick and those known to be Ludwig seem to mesh quite nicely i.e. they don’t overlap. Given all this, I was searching for DNA results to see if I could nail it down. Along comes your report with DNA for Michael’s family. If I am reading it right, the haplogroup for Michael is R-M 269. Four tests thru proven male descendants of my Ludwig show his to be R1a1a/R1a1 which seems to be at variance with that for Michael. This would suggest that my Ludwig was not part of Michael’s line. To be sure of this, would you help me understand a couple factors:
>Did the DNA tests include more than one of Michael’s sons? In other words, other than just thru Lodowick?
>My data points for Lodowick include the 1747 naturalization of Lodowick then some deeds up to the 1756 sale of Tom’s Chance with the next one being in 1782 where he sold the tract Germany to Daniel Ulery followed in 1783 with the deed covering the settling of his father’s estate. Question: do you have any data points for Lodowick between 1756 and 1782? Did I miss any deeds? Any tax lists? Other? Of course, I am looking for any overlap with my Ludwig.
>You have Lodowick going to Rockingham Co., VA where he died in 1792. That is first I have seen where he went to Va. Is there solid evidence to support this?
>Likewise, how solid are Lodowick’s children shown as being his? I have seem at least one listed as being his that appeared to belong to the Ludwig Miller of York Co.
I would really appreciate any help you can provide to put this to bed. If Lodowick is definitely not same as my Ludwig. so be it, I put that notion to bed and move on to other possibilities.
Art Miller, Louisville
Hi Art, I’m going to e-mail you, but I have not focused a lot of time on Lodowick because he wasn’t my ancestor and he moved away. I’m very glad you are focused on him.
Hi Art & Roberta – I know this is an old post but I have the same questions about Lodowick Miller. My clues suggest that he might be the same who died in Fayette, PA. Would love to touch base if you’re still out there.
Thank you for sharing your story about Johann Michael Miller. I was very intrigued by the information you shared about the Church of the Brethren and where some of the members of the church went after the troubles in York County, regarding the Pennsylvania/Maryland border. Would the sources you listed be useful for Bedford and Somerset Counties of Pennsylvania and Cumberland, Maryland? I have ancestors in these areas in the 1780’s that I suspect may belong to the Church of the Brethren.
(I’m having difficulties with my display and editing, or else I ran out of characters in my post above.)
The Brethren resources are likely the best. This information is widely scattered and this was probably the most difficult of my ancestors to research. The Brethren were so private which makes it even more difficult.
Are you familiar with http://www.plats.net? You can find the original surveys there back to the 1680s. There are confusing parts of the site — it takes 3 clicks to get to the “advanced” search box to search by names of persons and tracts, but under Frederick County are uploaded surveys for Patented Certificates for Well Taught and for Miller’s Fancy, in the 1750s.
For each County, first click on the first link listed under Beginner’s Guide (which is pretty useless). On the next page click on “Advanced Search.” This brings you finally to the search-box page where you can enter tract/persons names. The tract names pages and surnames have a lot of variations as well as outright mistakes.
Once you get search results (pay attention to the option to sort by earliest or latest), look for one with a number more-than-zero in the 3rd-to-last coumn, indicating there are images. Click on the link in the last right-hand column to get a list of pages you can look at. These are not grant documents (which have not been uploaded, and are usually listed without images on the County sub-site which they ended up in — but the survey documents are usually located in the county sub-site where the land existed when originally surveyed).
There is usually a narrative stating the origin / authorization for the Warrant for Survey, the surveyor’s text metes-and-bounds description, and a map. Sometimes there is also a table listing each of the line segments. Sometimes there are comments as to whether the land included buildings or other improvements. There is usually a cover sheet stating where the survey was recorded, when it was approved by the Proprietor or other authority, whether any alienation fines were paid and other useful details. Sometimes the documents include receipts if the warrant was sold (“assigned”) by the original issuee to the person(s) for whom the survey was being made. Occasionally there are also really useful other documents such as when the survey was made for heirs after the warrantee’s death. One of these situations really solved a problem with some distant cousins of mine.
I am pretty familiar with southern Washington County and eastern Frederick County. Some of my ancestors / relatives were there and might have known some of the Millers. One set lived in Frederick on Bennett’s Creek. Another cluster lived very close to the southern part of Antietam Creek, between the mouth to the Potomac and Keedysville, around 1750s to 1818. A related person operated the ferry between the mouth of Antietam and Virginia, across the Potomac to south of the silty island there; but he did not arrive until the 1780s and left about 1795 for Kentucky. The ferry landing on the VA side is often shown even on recent maps.
At least some of the Keedys were Brethren, their non-Anglicized surname sometimes given as Gueting. The Washington County Historical Society has some of their church records. I do not know the date-span. One of my non-Brethren relatives’ marriages before 1810 is listed there.
This was just an amazing saga. You deserve a rest after all the work it took to put this together.
That story is indeed a “Wow!”, Roberta. What a lot of thoughtful work went into that, including the Y chromosome analysis. My story this week was about my Hoover (Huber) family in Pennsylvania; although they were apparently Lutheran rather than Brethren, you have given me inspiration and some pointers to get on with my resolution to learn more about my “Pennsylvania Dutch” ancestors. Thank you for sharing your story.
Pingback: Phillip Jacob Kirsch (1806-1880), German Immigrant, 52 Ancestors #107 | DNAeXplained – Genetic Genealogy
Such an incredible piece of work! Most impressive. I am very interested as suspect our Miller lines intersect. Unsure where. My Brethren ancestors (Gooding) fought in the French and Indian Wars, for instance, and am unsure about my Hendricks ancestors. Very fascinating. TY. I seek additional info on participation in any Brethren DNA databases. TY.
The Miller-Brethren project at Family Tree DNA is for the Miller families who were known to be Brethren. Do you have any Miller males to Y DNA test? That would give us the answer.
Great Work! I am at a brick wall with Mark Miller, b 1819, in Chester, PA. Do you have any info that ties him into your work? His father was probably John Miller Dates, unk.
Harry – take the Y DNA test and we’ll know for sure. You’re a Miller and can do that. How lucky!
Pingback: The Rest of the Miller-Stutzman Story | DNAeXplained – Genetic Genealogy
I have 2 male cousins who would be Y descendants of Johan Michael Miller
Which of his sons do they descend from?
Pingback: Philip Jacob Miller (c1726-1799), Buried on a Missing Island?, 52 Ancestors #119 | DNAeXplained – Genetic Genealogy
Pingback: Daniel Miller (1755-1822), Musical Graves, 52 Ancestors #130 | DNAeXplained – Genetic Genealogy
Pingback: Stephen Ulrich (c1720–1783/1785), Twice Naturalized Brethren, 52 Ancestors #133 | DNAeXplained – Genetic Genealogy
Pingback: Another Daniel Miller – A Y DNA Tale – 52 Ancestors #135 | DNAeXplained – Genetic Genealogy
Pingback: Stephen Ulrich Sr., (born c1690), The Conewago Settlement and the Border War, 52 Ancestors #136 | DNAeXplained – Genetic Genealogy
Hello, ( I was only able to quickly scan all of this) but wondering if any possible connection to Millers in Washington County PA (year 1800)? My earliest land document (1801, lot 15, southeastern edge of North Beaver Twp ….. presently Lawrence County PA) has my Johannes Mueller “previously from Washington County PA”. 1800 Census (family breakdown) strongly suggests ” Cecil Township”. We have John’s later will of 1823 – kids were John, William, Michael (my ancestor who married Sarah Cassel (Kassol etc.), Jacob, Christiana (married John Deeds), Esther (Abraham Havice…. Harbisson etc.) and Margaret (Andrew Crees) …….. My Michael Miller line children mostly moved out to Ohio/Indiana border (1850’s and 1860’s). Anyone interested in my “Y” chromosome? ……. Email me directly at email@example.com …..Thanks
It would be very interesting to see if your Miller Y DNA matches those of the Johann Michael Miller line. There are several in the Miller-Brethren project.
I am searching for the parents of Mary Ann Miller married Jacob Riley 1757 Holy Trinity-Old Swede Church. Enjoyed your thorough work on your Michael.
Thank you so much for your work with the Michael Miller family. I am descended through his son Lodowich and am working on my Alley genealogy to publish in a year or so. One line of that is Miller.
I’d love to do more research on the land records but it appears that you and others have done a good job.
Robert E. Alley
I really think Lodowich and his records need more work. For example, there are indications of him owning land in various locations. Some people say he went south, and others say he didn’t. I think a thorough combing of the records in both Maryland and where the rest of his family migrated in the Shenandoah Valley would be warranted.
Very interesting read although I must admit I skipped over a few parts. I came across this after noticing that my Dad had entered said Michael Miller into our database as a possible ancestor. This would be a maternal line to me on my great grandfather’s side of the family. I mention this because he married a MILLER which is apparently a different line as we have never found a connection. I would also like to mention that I also relate to the Michael Tanner (Danner) mentioned in some of the land sales. He is an ancester on both my maternal and paternal sides.
I also wanted to point out one other thing. You mentioned Governor Oglethorp of Maryland. As far as I know his name was Samuel OGLE. I have never heard it as being OGLETHORP.
Regardless, I hope to go back and read in greater detail. Thank you for your hard work.
Norm Hare III
I may be descended from the Michael, Jr. you believe was lost entirely. A Michael Miller, Jr died in the Spring of 1777 in Surry County, NC. I went through my DNA cousins on Ancestry and one of the cousins claims descent from Lodowick. Would it be possible for me to send the results of my Ancestry DNA for testing to see if I connect to your family.
That’s really interesting. The best thing to do is to take the Family Finder test at Family Tree DNA, if you have not, because many of the Michael Miller descendants have tested there. Also, upload your kit to GedMatch. Several, but not all, have uploaded to there as well. If you tested at Ancestry before May 2016, it’s the same chip as Family Tree DNA and you can transfer your file for free and then just pay $19 to unlock all the features. That would include more distant matches. If you tested after that, the chip is different and to match as many people as possible you would need to take the Family Tree DNA Family Finder test instead of transferring. My Mom’s test is there as well, one generation closer to Michael than me.
Pingback: Concepts – Why Genetic Genealogy and Triangulation? | DNAeXplained – Genetic Genealogy
Hola armando mi arbol encontre que mi abuelo 10 son Michael Muller y susana a traves de una de sus hijas que se llamava Eva Rosina Muller nacida en 1724 en kreusendorf mi aplogrupo es M1a3a me gustaria saber si saben si Eva casada con Mateus wenzel es hija de ellos soy de argentina gracias Rita
I believe I am a descendant of Michael Miller Jr., who is supposed to be a son of Michael Miller and Susanna Berchtol. Frederick County, Maryland Land Record, Book WR-11, Pages 365, 366, and 367 shows a deed “This Indenture made the twenty-ninth day of October anno Domini seventeen hundred and ninety-two Between Tobias Hainley and Elizabeth his wife formerly Elizabeth Miller, Christian Miller, John Bower and Margaret, his wife formerly Margaret Miller, Michael Miller, and Henry Miller heirs at law to Michael Miller late of the County of Frederick and State of Maryland of the one part and Adam Miller of the said County of Frederick of the other part.” – It seems that Adam Miller, who I believe to be my 5th Great Grandfather, 1768-1833 (died Napier, Bedford, PA), had to pay his siblings for land belonging to their father, Michael Miller which he had not paid for in full. Subsequent deeds show Adam Miller and his wife Eve sold the land to a John Bower and moved to Bedford County in 1818.
If you have tested autosomally at Family Tree DNA, please join the Miller Brethren project so that we can see if you match any of the known descendants. I would LOVE to be able to prove this line to Michael. Let me know if you join the project because you’ll need to change the administrators access to Limited. Otherwise, I can’t see who you match.
Roberta, I have joined the Miller Brethren group on FTDNA and set your access to limited, as requested. Looking forward to reading more of your posts!
Thank you I’ll check shortly.
Roberta I have taken a DNA test and have Dunkard Brethren ancestry. Where is the site you have the line in…the one above?
The Brethren Miller project is at Family Tree DNA.
Thank you for sharing your research, which is very informative as well as impressive. A possible ancestor in my paternal line is listed in a 1764 (As I recall.) inventory of Conococheague Manor. The Inventory contains a number of surnames of early settlers in southwest Pennsylvania. Some owned land in both colonies. Other proven paternal ancestors are also found in Peters Township, Cumberland County, PA during the latter half of the 18th century, and a bit later in Washington County and Greene County, PA. The two young sons of Thomas Crago, who was murdered by Indians circa 1770 in present-day Greene County, PA, are said to have been sent back over the mountains to Conococheague. There has been much discussion by family researchers where the two sons were sent. Was it to the Conococheague Settlement area or nearby in PA? Or were the sons sent to the Conococheague area in Maryland? I am reluctant to make a decision at this time without better documentation. Land boundaries are artificial constructs, and borders do move about as the highly disputed boundary between colonies of Maryland and Pennsylvania. The Conococheauge region, including the Conococheague River, does extend south to the Potomac River, the southern Maryland boundary. Absent actual documentation or discoveries, your narrative provide a compelling case that based upon only known historic record, the two sons may have been sent into Maryland to be raised. As I mentioned earlier, in 1764, John Craigo was a tenant of Conococheague Manor, lhaving over hundred acres with a cabin and other structures, in Frederick County, Maryland.
Thank you again for providing your research information.
Pingback: Muller, Ringeisen and Stutzman Families of Schwarzenmatt, Switzerland – 52 Ancestors #221 | DNAeXplained – Genetic Genealogy
Pingback: The Muller House on Kreuzgasse; Humble Beginnings in Schwarzenmatt, Switzerland – 52 Ancestors #229 | DNAeXplained – Genetic Genealogy
There’s a strong possibility that I descend from this Michael miller line
Have you DNA tested? Many from his line have.
Thank you so much for your scholarship. I am attempting to work on my husband’s genealogy and his mother’s. My husband has taken a Y and Mtdna test. We know my Mother-in-law and husband are descendants of Peter Balthezar Suman, 1730-1781 who was a traitor in the Revolutionary War. His wife, Eleanor Beauford Miller (10 Feb1730 ?-1818) we believe is the daughter of a Michael Miller, but we are not sure which Michael Miller! We do know that Eleanor petitioned the court in Maryland for the return of Suman’s property after he was hung – there are documents, and she then was buried in the Ausherman School Cemetery in Burkittsville, MD on 11 September 1818. We would appreciate any comments you may have in if Eleanor was born Brethren or Reformed, and how I may find who her mother was, along with a possible record of her birth?
Does your husband descend from her through all females?
I am so sorry Imissed your reply. I got side-tracked with another family project! In any event, my husband descends from both – His maternal grandmother was Emily Suman (b. 1904 Ohio); her father Robert Suman (1871-1950 Ohio); Joshua Herring Suman Sr. (1832-1912); William Temple Suman (1797-1868 Maryland and Ohio); Peter Suman Jr. 1767-1844 and then Peter Balthazar Suman 1730-1781 who married Elinor Mueller/Miller. If you have any advice, I would appreciate it.
I’m not familiar with that name. Brethren never swore oaths, generally avoided the government meaning things like marriages, wills and deeds were seldom filed. No birth records, for sure, and that’s too early anyway. Generally you’d know because the family would likely have continued to be Brethren through the ages or are recorded as such in a local history.
Pingback: Katey Sagal – Who Do You Think You Are – “A PeaceMonger” | DNAeXplained – Genetic Genealogy
Pingback: Philip Jacob Miller (1723/1727-1799), The Reluctant Patriot, 52 Ancestors #202 | DNAeXplained – Genetic Genealogy
Hi Roberta: Great blog on the Brethren Michael Miller and family. It has been a frequent resource in my efforts to compile a history on the Millers, Schnebles, Frenches, etal. of Frederick-Washington Counties. As part of my research I like to compile plat map reconstructions, whenever possible, as that allows me to place my party’s land holdings into a more precise geographic setting. Toward that end, I have compiled several plat map reconstructions for these families’ lands in and around the Hagerstown-Leitersburg area. You may find my reconstruction of the Michael Miller tract of Ash Swamp and its surrounding neighbors of use and interest to your blog. I believe you will find that it more precisely locates Ash Swamp to the northwest of the site you have suggested in your blog. This placement is based primarily on the assumption that John Snavely built his home “Ashton Hall” somewhere within the bounds of Ash Swamp. Fact is, when Snavely bought the land from Philip Jacob Miller, it was actually composed of parts of three separate patents: Prickly Ash Bottom, The Head of Ash Swamp, and Ash Swamp. Since the Ash Swamp part was by far the largest of the three tracts acquired by John Snavely, it seems reasonable to think that he probably built Ashton Hall somewhere within the bounds of Ash Swamp, as opposed to being on either of the other two, smaller tracts.
Anyway, assuming that Ashton Hall was built near the center of the Ash Swamp tract, this would place Ash Swamp astraddle Jenifer Lane, centered near its intersection with Chads Terrace. I have selected this placement of Ash Swamp based on the fact that Ashton Hall is located in the southwest quadrant of the Jenifer Lane-Chads Terrace intersection. When the Dunn’s purchased the Ashton Hall property, it was surrounded substantially be vacant land, but now sits within a subdivision. In fact, its street address of Ashton Hall is 13426 Chads Terrace.
If you are interested in obtaining a copy of my plat map overlay, and rational basis for its history and siting on Jenifer Lane, I would be happy to share with you. If so, please contact me at firstname.lastname@example.org, so that I can send you these documents.
Keep up the great work, Robert Atteberry.
Robert, first, thank you for this invaluable work. Of course I’m interested:). Now I need to go to a computer and look at that address:)
I was so close when I was sitting in the parking lot of Grace Academy. I wonder if I can see the back of it in any of my photos.
Good Morning Roberta:
Since I have not received your e-mail contact re: my offer to share my research on the Ashton Hall property location, I have no other means of contacting you than through your blog page. Anyway, I will continue to slog along with my Miller-French-Schnebley families research. If you do not object, I will submit any future significant findings as comments on this blog page. To that end, I would like to share one further piece of information, which, if my interpretation is correct, would seem to have great import to yourself and other researchers on the life of Brethren Michael Miller. In your blog page and on many other similar publications, Michael is reported to have lived in Frederick County MD from about 1752 until his presumed death around 1777.
I would like to direct your attention to the deed conveyance from Lodowick Miller to his brother, Philip Jacob Miller, dated 9Dec1783, in which Lodowick conveyed all of his interest in that tract known as “Resurvey on Ash Swamp” containing 290 acres for the sum of 5 shillings. In that deed Lodowick states that he was conveying his interest in this tract based on his belief that he had already received his share of his father’s estate through other means. Most importantly, Lodowick stated the following:
“…said original tract [Ash Swamp] being resurveyed by and with my [Lodowick Miller’s] consent and free will as son and heir at law to my father, Michael Miller, deceased, and leaving no Will, I ordered and agreed that my brother, Philip Jacob Miller, should resurvey the said original tract called Ash Swamp, which was resurveyed on the 25th of April, 1752, and afterward patented unto him, my said brother, Philip Jacob Miller…”
It is my interpretation that at the time Philip Jacob Miller undertook the Resurvey on Ash Swamp in Apr1752, Michael Miller was already dead, and that he had died intestate. This belief is supported by the fact that no instrument of conveyance has been found conveying Ash Swamp to Philip Jacob Miller. In fact, no other instrument has been found showing the mechanism through which Lodowick and John Miller acquired any vested interest in Ash Swamp. Yet this conveyance, and the later conveyance from Philip Jacob Miller to his brother, John Miller, clearly suggest that all three brothers likely shared equally in Ash Swamp, as might be expected to inure through inheritance in the absence of a Will.
Absent any other means of conveyance from Michael Miller to Philip Jacob Miller (other than through inheritance and with the blessing and approval of the other heirs at law), it is difficult, if not impossible, to explain the legal means whereby Philip Jacob Miller would have held the legal position to file the Resurvey on Ash Swamp in 1752.
If my interpretation of this deed record is correct, then it must be assumed that Michael Miller had died sometime before Apr1752. That being the case, then we are left to ponder how it was that Michael Miller was able to convey his 150 acres of Bachelor’s Choice at Conewega in Mar1752. I cannot explain this, except to suggest that perhaps that that Michael Miller may have been the eldest son, in which case he may have been permitted by the court to dispose of part of his father’s estate (primo geniture).
Similarly, we are left to ponder the identity of the Michael Miller, who travelled in the company of Philip Jacob Miller, etal., to Philadelphia to become a naturalized citizen. Again, I would suggest that that Michael Miller may have been the eldest son of Brethren Michael Miller, and brother of Philip Jacob.
Along this same line of reasoning, it seems possible that the Michael Miller, who acquired several tracts of land along the Little Antietam and served at Constable in that area may also have been the eldest son of Brethren Michael Miller. And, finally, the Michael Miller, who is presumed to have died in Frederick County around 1777, may also have been the eldest son of Brethren Michael Miller. Such earlier death would explain his not having been identified as having a shared interest in Ash Swamp.
I would really value your reaction to the foregoing. Sincerely, Robert Atteberry.
I did email you weeks ago. I wonder about spam filters.
Good Morning Roberta:
Don’t know what became of my most recent post, so I will attempt to recreate it. Since I have not received a contact from you via e-mail, I am left with no other option than to communicate via this blog page. Since you have invested so much effort into creating your wonderful work on the Brethren, Michael Miller, I am sure you would like to have it as factual and informative as possible, Toward that end I would like to share with you one more piece of information that has come to my attention in the course of my research into the Miller-Schnebley-French families.
Your blog, and many other Miller resources report Michael Miller’s death date to have been around 1777. There is a clause in the deed record between Lodowick and Philip Jacob dated 9Dec1783, in which Lodowick relinquished his rights vested in the property known as Resurvey on Ash Swamp, which merits our particular attention. That clause is transcribed (by me) as follows:
“…said original tract [Ash Swamp] being resurveyed by and with my [Lodowick Miller’s] consent and free will as son and heir at law to my father, Michael Miller, deceased, and leaving no Will, I ordered and agreed that my brother, Philip Jacob Miller, should resurvey the said original tract called Ash Swamp, which was resurveyed on the 25th of April, 1752, and afterward patented unto him, my said brother, Philip Jacob Miller…” (Washington County Deed Book C, pp. 563-567)
This clause would seem to make it quite certain that Michael Miller was already deceased when Philip Jacob Miller filed for the resurvey on Ash Swamp in Dec1752. If my interpretation of this clause is correct, then there are numerous other “facts” regarding Michael Miller, which must be readdressed and corrected. For example, he could not have been the Michael Miller, who is on record travelling to Philadelphia with Philip Jacob Miller, etal., to receive the oath of allegiance to became a naturalized citizen. He could not have been the Michael Miller, who is on record having owned several tracts of land along Little Antietam Creek and having been elected a Constable for the Leitersburg area. He may not even have been the same person, who disposed of the 150 acre tract, part of Bachelor’s Choice near Hanover. If he was not those Michael Millers, then we should be more than a little curious to know who those Michael Millers were. It is my belief that those Michael Millers may have been another son of the Brethren Michael Miller.
My research will continue, and I will from time to time post any additional pieces of new information that may be uncovered regarding this family. I would really like to know your thoughts regarding the foregoing. Sincerely, Robert Atteberry.
Well, this is interesting. WordPress emails me comments. I saw this on my phone and replied to it, but for some reason, Outlook apparently decided that it was spam, or something, because it never downloaded to my computer nor is it in the junk mail folder.
So, let me say that I very much appreciate this. Do you have the original of the Lodowick deed in question on Dec 9, 1783? And if so, can you please share it? I am emailing you again. now.
As requested, I provided you with a copy of the deed more than two weeks ago in which Lodowick conveyed his interest in Resurvey on Ash Swamp to his brother, Philip Jacob. I have had no reply. It would be very helpful to my research, if you would provide feedback as to your interpretation of that document. If I am correct that that document provides proof that Brethren Michael Miller was dead at the time the deed was filed on 9Dec1783, then much of the history of Michael Miller’s family after that date needs to be reevaluated. Your opinion on this matter would be quite helpful to me and the many others who have an interest in this family. Sincerely, Robert Atteberry.
Robert, I am not receiving your emails. I am very interested. Not sure where you are sending it. Did you receive my email?
Please resend the document. I somehow missed it or inadvertently omitted it. Thanks. Robert Alley
Would anyone here happen to know if the Miller-Dunker Church at Antietam is related?
Pingback: When Did Michael Miller Really Die? The Answer May Lay in the Land – 52 Ancestors #312 | DNAeXplained – Genetic Genealogy
Greetings from the descendants of his son Ludowich Miller! After settling in Rockingham, many of his sons fought in the revolutionary war and then founded “Beaver Creek Church” on their land for the German Baptist Brethren to congregate. The church is still standing in now Woodbridge, Virgina. Elder Daniel Miller (1752-1819) is my 5th Great-Grandfather. Lots of reverends in our line with many of us living in Maryland and Virginia still.
Many of the Brethren families can be found in the Holman’s Creek book by Mr. Wine which covers this area and includes maps. Do you have that?